Abortion-related bills filed in the 114th General Assembly
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Since the 114th General Assembly has gaveled in and completed their special session on education, immigration and disaster relief funding, Tennessee lawmakers will soon shift their focus to other issues they would like to address through legislation.
One topic that will be address this year is abortion. Currently, lawmakers have filed around half a dozen bills related to abortion.
Here are some of the abortion-related bills lawmakers hope to see passed this session.
The first abortion-related bill filed by lawmakers was filed by Democrats. Nashville Rep. Harold Love and Memphis Sen. Raumesh Akbari filed this bill, which carves out exemptions for what constitutes an abortion in Tennessee.
Specifically, the bill clarifies the use of contraceptives is not included in the legal definition of 'abortion' in the state, including 'any device, medication, biological product, or procedure that is general intended for us in the prevention of pregnancy' as well as the disposal of embryos resulting from fertility treatments.
When Tennessee's trigger law banning abortion went into effect in 2022 after the fall of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court, there was confusion around whether or not those receiving IVF treatments would be breaking the law if not all of the embryos created were carried to term. This bill would make clear those receiving IVF would not be running afoul of the abortion ban.
This bill, filed by Brentwood Republican Rep. Gino Bulso and Hohenwald Republican Sen. Joey Hensley, would prohibit someone from mailing or delivering an 'abortion-inducing drug' into the state.
Gun legislation filed in the Tennessee General Assembly
An 'abortion-inducing' drug is defined in the bill as any medication that is intended to be used to terminate the life of an 'unborn child,' including mifepristone, misoprostol, and mifeprex (RU-846). It would not include misoprostol intended to treat stomach ulcers.
If someone violates this statute by mailing the drugs to Tennessee and they are used successfully, whoever mailed them would be liable for $5 million in damages if someone brings legal action within five years.
On the other side of the coin, Rep. Aftyn Behn (D-Nashville) and Sen. London Lamar (D-Memphis) filed the 'Reproductive Freedom Act.' The bill, as filed, declares every person has a 'fundamental right' to their own reproductive care, including having an abortion or using contraceptives and states a fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus does not have 'independent or derivative rights' under state law.
The bill also deletes provisions of current law restricting access to abortions, such as through 'ambulatory surgical treatment center' requirements, requirements for final disposal of fetal remains, a mandate to erect a monument to unborn children with state funds, reporting requirements for those who perform and receive abortions, a requirement to show a pro-life video titled 'Meet Baby Olivia' and more.
⏩
This bill takes a less extreme stance than the 'Reproductive Freedom Act.' Filed by Chattanooga Democrat Rep. Yusuf Hakeem, this bill clarifies that a 'criminal abortion' in Tennessee does not include abortions received after a woman has been the victim of rape or incest.
Tennessee's current abortion ban contains no such exemptions.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
18 minutes ago
Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials
KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha
(NewsNation) — The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected legal precedent that people in a majority group have a higher standard for proving discrimination. Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha agrees with the high court decision. 'Discrimination doesn't say, 'Oh, you have to be black,' or, 'You have to be a woman,' or, 'You have to be gay.' … Discrimination means you're treating me different,' he says on 'CUOMO.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear case threatening ballots mailed by Election Day, but received later
Jun. 2—The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear a case against mail-in ballots in Illinois that may affect Washington. The case was brought by U.S. Rep. Mike Bost, R-Illinois, who sued the Illinois State Board of Elections in 2022. According to the New York Times, Bost and two federal electors argued that the state's law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted 14 days after an election violates statutes that created an Election Day. Spokane County Auditor Vicky Dalton said Washington state could be affected by the ruling in this case as ballots that are postmarked by Election Day or before are accepted 10, 14 and sometimes 21 days after Election Day, depending on the election. "It would disenfranchise voters," Dalton said. "It may have a pretty significant impact on our operations." Both federal courts that previously heard Bost's case, a federal district court in Illinois and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, dismissed it, agreeing that it lacked standing as Bost couldn't prove that the state laws directly injured him. Dalton said if the Supreme Court case agrees with Bost, the change could affect voter turnout. Oregon also has a universal vote-by-mail system, but requires mailed ballots be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day. In the 2024 general election, Washington had a voter turnout of around 79%. In Oregon's general election of the same year, about 75% of voters cast ballots. According to a 2024 study from the University of Chicago, universal vote-by-mail programs tend to increase voter turnout by around 2 to 4 percentage points. Dalton said that accepting the postmarked ballots later is helpful for both the voter and the election office as it gives them more time to process each ballot. "Lots of people wait until the last minute because we're humans and humans procrastinate to a great extent," Dalton said. Despite the increase in voter turnout, late mail-in ballots are often challenged in the aftermath of President Donald Trump's loss in the 2020 election where he called the later-arriving votes fraudulent. The Spokane County Republican Party last year adopted a platform calling for an end to mail-in voting as well as a return to hand-counting all ballots. State Reps. Mike Volz and Jenny Graham were among Republican legislators who backed a bill this year to bring back in-person voting and eliminate mail-in voting for non-absentee voters. The bill didn't receive a hearing. The Supreme Court case is on the docket for the next term beginning in October. If any changes happen in the months following, Dalton said the county's first steps would be to await orders from the Secretary of State Steve Hobbs.
