logo
Despite fatal attack, wildlife advocates outraged over Florida bear hunt revival

Despite fatal attack, wildlife advocates outraged over Florida bear hunt revival

Yahoo19-05-2025

Florida is on the cusp of having an annual and regulated bear hunt that environmentalists and wildlife advocates likened to "barbarism" and say is informed by "outdated data."
At a December Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) meeting after receiving an update on the commission's bear management plan, board chair Rodney Barreto told staff to develop a bear hunting option for commissioners to consider.
Five months later, the option is ready for a public hearing. And it comes not long after the first fatal Florida bear attack ever recorded.
The FWC said it was developed with input from four virtual public meetings. Once it was published, a public comment period for the proposal was open for three days – May 14-16.
The 31 pages of rules include a 23-day bear season this December and, starting in 2026, annual bear hunting between the first of October and the end of December.
Commissioners will consider the rules at their May 21-22 quarterly meeting in Ocala, with a final vote expected in August.
Morgan Richardson, the FWC's director of hunting and game management said the rules create 'a conservative, well-regulated hunt' to manage the bear population.
But opponents like James C. Scott of Speak Up for Wildlife said they 'are riddled with contradictions and sloppy math."
Scott has more than a half-dozen objections to the proposal including the FWC reliance on data that is at least a decade old to decide whether the bear population is healthy enough to sustain a hunt.
'It is outdated data. This proposal was advanced and inspired by the appointees on the commission, not the scientists, not the agency staff,' Scott said.
The FWC's Bear Management Coordinator Mike Orlando said the agency is relying on figures from 2015, which he characterizes as 'conservative.' 'We don't detect any decreasing (numbers statewide),' Orlando told the Naples Daily News.
The Florida black bear, a distinct subspecies of the American black bear, was listed as a threatened species as recently as 2012; the population had dwindled to about 500 in the mid-1970s and has rebounded to an estimated 4,000 today.
Florida ended an annual bear hunt in 1994.
A week-long hunt was attempted in 2015 but was closed after two days when hunters had killed 300 of the 320 bears allotted for harvest.
The proposal that will be considered in Ocala divides the state into seven "Bear Management Units" and declares any area with more than 200 bears a "Bear Harvest Zone" – there is no cap on how many bears can be taken from one BMU.
Hunting permits would be issued through a random drawing and cost $100 for a Florida resident and $300 for anyone else; 187 permits would be issued this year.
A permit holder can bring along one guest hunter. If hunting with dogs, a permit holder may bring along nine guests. A permit allows its holder or party to kill one bear. And the number of bears taken (or the number of permits issued) each year would be up to the FWC's executive director.
The rules allow hunters to lure bears with food and kill them while they eat, to use packs of dogs to run them to exhaustion, and to skip check-in stations after a bear has been taken.
'This isn't wildlife management. It's not modern wildlife management. It's barbarism codified. There's no need for this and these rules are not in line with the black bear management plan adopted in 2019,' Scott said.
Amendment 2 approved by voters last November makes hunting the preferred means of managing wildlife populations.
The discussion in Ocala about bear hunting comes after the first death from a Florida bear attack that is known. An 89-year-old man was killed in Collier County earlier in May.
While generally shy and tend to avoid people, bears are food-driven and the bear in the Collier incident appears to have been frequently attracted by garbage in the neighborhood. FWC lists securing garbage as the biggest bear deterrent.
The Collier bear was found by wildlife officers and euthanized. Human bear encounters have increased in recent years as residential subdivisions are built in what once was undeveloped land.
Nuisance bear calls increased from 2,000 in 2016 to more than 6,000 in 2024, according to the FWC.
'As the bear population grows and development occurs, we are probably going to see more bears move into developed areas. So that's one reason we want to try to manage bear population growth,' Richardson explained at the start of the first virtual meeting for the new bear hunting rules.
A substantial majority of Floridians, however, are opposed to a bear hunting season.
An April Naples Daily News poll, taken before the Collier bear attack, showed 92% opposing the hunt with 8% in favor.
A Remington Research survey commissioned by Humane World for Animals found 89% opposed to hunting bears with dogs.
Given those numbers, groups like Bear Warriors United, Bear Defenders, Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation are urging their members to show up at the FWC quarterly meeting in Ocala to ask commissioners to postponed consideration of a bear hunt until the population numbers are updated.
'This proposal is widely unpopular, riddled with contradictions, and not in alignment with FWC policy - we shouldn't even be discussing this until we have updated accurate population data,' Scott said.
Commissioners will discuss the proposal, then a vote to adopt the rules is expected at their August meeting, with the location to be determined.
James Call is a member of the USA TODAY NETWORK-Florida Capital Bureau. He can be reached at jcall@tallahassee.com and is on X as @CallTallahassee.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Bear hunt returns? Florida faces uproar over new rules

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

EDMONTON - Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally said Friday that the move signals a 'renewed commitment to open and fair trade' with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. Alberta's liquor stores are privately owned but must order stock through the provincial government. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Other premiers also announced bans on U.S. liquor along with other proposed penalties. Nally said in a statement that the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines 'sets the stage for more constructive negotiations' ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The agreement, known as CUSMA, was negotiated during the first Trump administration and is up for a mandatory review in 2026. 'Prime Minister Mark Carney has made a clear effort to reset the relationship with the U.S. administration, and Alberta's government supports this approach,' Nally said. 'We are focused on highlighting Alberta's role as a responsible and collaborative trading partner and will continue working alongside other provinces to advocate for a tariff-free relationship.' The minister said Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. In April, the province paused its policy around procurement from U.S. companies in what Nally called 'the spirit of diplomacy.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know

In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs

EDMONTON — Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally says the move signals a "renewed commitment to open and fair trade" with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Nally says the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines "sets the stage for more constructive negotiations" ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The minister says Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. Nally said in April that the province was pausing its policy around procurement from U.S. companies "in the spirit of diplomacy." He said since the province's retaliatory measures were first announced in early March, the Trump administration had put a hold on further tariffs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025. The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store