Garda seeks restraining order against superior for harassment and bullying
A garda and his wife are using anti-stalking laws to secure a civil restraining order against a high-ranking superior officer claiming harassment and bullying.
They lodged an application at Dublin District Court, which came before Judge Aine Clancy on Thursday.
Advertisement
The proceedings are being held in camera, meaning the public cannot attend, and parties involved cannot be identified due to reporting restrictions.
Brian Gageby BL, instructed by the Chief State Solicitor's Office, acted for the respondent, and the judge noted that they had filed a 63-page affidavit.
Counsel described it as an unusual case where the applicants have alleged bullying and harassment; however, the senior officer's case was that he was acting in the course of his duty.
The couple are representing themselves.
Advertisement
The garda's wife said the respondent's affidavit amounted to misinformation, which she described as horrendous. Her husband also contended that the manner in which the documents were served on him "has caused severe distress and personal alarm to me and my family."
He added that in future, he was agreeable to collecting any further material from a Garda premises, and he raised concerns that at an earlier stage in the proceedings, other gardaí were in court as part of a police plan allegedly at the request of the respondent.
The couple have summoned six other officers to give evidence, and the respondent has already given a personal assurance to stay away from the couple, their home, children and pets.
Ireland
Woman tells court of sexual abuse by her mother, u...
Read More
Mr Gageby said that there was no difficulty with that continuing.
Advertisement
Judge Clancy ordered the officer and his wife to file responding affidavits by July 30, and the case will be listed for mention the following day. She set aside a whole day for the hearing of the action in early October.
The civil restraining orders were introduced in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2023 as a measure for people seeking protection. The District Court may issue an order to prevent the respondent from violence or threats, stalking, harassing or approaching the applicant's home, work, or school. It can run for up to five years but may be shorter.
Breaking it could mean jail for up to a year and a maximum of €4,000 fine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
23 minutes ago
- Sky News
Teachers given new guidance in dealing with AI-generated child sexual abuse material
Guidelines on how to deal with AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) have been issued to 38,000 teachers and staff across the UK. The guidelines are an attempt to help people working with children tackle the "highly disturbing" rise in AI-generated CSAM. They have been issued by the National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF). The AI-generated content is illegal in the UK and is treated the same as any other sexual abuse imagery of children, even if the imagery isn't photorealistic. "The rise in AI-generated child sexual abuse imagery is highly disturbing and it is vital that every arm of society keeps up with the latest online threats," said safeguarding minister Jess Phillips. "AI-generated child sexual abuse is illegal and we know that sick predators' activities online often lead to them carrying out the most horrific abuse in person. "We will not allow technology to be weaponised against children and we will not hesitate to go further to protect our children online," she said. The guidelines suggest that if young people are using AI to create nude images from each other's pictures - known as nudifying - or creating AI-generating CSAM, they may not be aware that what they're doing is illegal. Nudifying is when a non-explicit picture of someone is edited to make them appear nude and is increasingly common in "sextortion" cases - when someone is blackmailed with explicit pictures. "Where an under-18 is creating AI-CSAM, they may think it is 'just a joke' or 'banter' or do so with the intention of blackmailing or harming another child," suggests the guidance. "They may or may not recognise the illegality or the serious, lasting impact their actions can have on the victim." Last year, the NCA surveyed teachers and found that over a quarter weren't aware AI-generated CSAM was illegal, and most weren't sure their students were aware either. More than half of the respondents said guidance was their most urgently needed resource. The IWF has seen an increasing amount of AI-generated CSAM as it scours the internet, processing 380% more reports of the abuse in 2024 than in 2023. "The creation and distribution of AI-manipulated and fake sexual imagery of a child can have a devastating impact on the victim," said Derek Ray-Hill, interim chief executive at the IWF. "It can be used to blackmail and extort young people. There can be no doubt that real harm is inflicted and the capacity to create this type of imagery quickly and easily, even via an app on a phone, is a real cause for concern." Multiple paedophiles have been sent to jail for using artificial intelligence to create child sexual abuse images in recent years. Last year, Hugh Nelson was sentenced to 18 years in jail for creating AI-generated CSAM that police officers were able to link back to real children. "Tackling child sexual abuse is a priority for the NCA and our policing partners, and we will continue to investigate and prosecute individuals who produce, possess, share or search for CSAM, including AI-generated CSAM," said Alex Murray, the NCA's director of threat leadership and policing lead for artificial intelligence. In February, the government announced that AI tools designed to generate child sex abuse material would be made illegal under "world-leading" legislation. In the meantime, however, campaigners called for guidance to be issued to teachers. Laura Bates, the author of a book on the spread of online misogyny, told MPs earlier this month that deepfake pornography "would be the next big sexual violence epidemic facing schools, and people don't even know it is going on." "It shouldn't be the case that a 12-year-old boy can easily and freely access tools to create these forms of content in the first place," she said.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Post Office scandal: Government has not done enough to ensure compensation for victims, committee of MPs finds
The government has not done enough to ensure all victims entitled to compensation from the Post Office scandal have applied for it, a report has found. Many current and former postmasters affected by Horizon IT failings and associated miscarriages of justice are not yet receiving fair and timely compensation, according to the report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Only 21% of the 18,500 letters the Post Office sent to postmasters to make them aware of the Horizon Shortfall Scheme had been responded to, figures provided by the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) show. About 5,000 further letters are expected to be sent in 2025. Long-time Post Office victims campaigner Sir Alan Bates told Sky News: "What is evident is that the PAC, along with ourselves, are dismayed about the length of time all this is taking and the failure of all victims to be contacted. "It really only goes to support what I have been saying time and time again, that government departments are the entirely wrong people to run these types of schemes as they only grind them into the dust with bureaucracy." Under the scheme, current and former postmasters who were financially affected by the Horizon IT system, but who were either not convicted or did not take the Post Office to the High Court, can either settle their claim for a final fixed sum of £75,000 or have it fully assessed. There is also the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS), which is for sub-postmasters who had their convictions quashed after the passing of the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act last year. The 800 or so sub-postmasters who are eligible to claim under the HCRS are entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or the option to pursue a full claim assessment. By the end of March, 339 had accepted the settlement sum, the report by the PAC, which is made up of MPs from all sides of the House of Commons, found. But the PAC report states the government has no plans to follow up with people who are, or may be, eligible to claim but are yet to apply. 3:09 The committee recommends that the DBT should outline what more it will do to ensure every affected postmaster is fully aware of their options for claiming. A third scheme provides compensation to sub-postmasters who were wrongly convicted of fraud, theft and false accounting. Of the 111 sub-postmasters eligible to claim for the Overturned Convictions Scheme and who are either entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or to pursue a full claim assessment, 25 have not yet submitted a claim, some of whom represent the most complex cases. The DBT has taken over the management of the scheme from the Post Office, and the PAC report recommends the department should outline how it plans to handle the remaining cases under the scheme. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, chair of the PAC, said thousands of people were "deeply failed" by the system during "one of the UK's worst ever miscarriages of justice". He added: "This committee would have hoped to have found government laser-focused on ensuring all those eligible were fully and fairly compensated for what happened. "It is deeply dissatisfactory to find these schemes still moving far too slowly, with no government plans to track down the majority of potential claimants who may not yet be aware of their proper entitlements. "It is entirely unacceptable that those affected by this scandal, some of whom have had to go through the courts to clear their names, are being forced to relitigate their cases a second time."
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Post Office: Police identify seven suspects related to Horizon scandal
Police investigating the Horizon Post Office scandal have now identified seven suspects, with more than 45 people classed as "persons of interest". A "scaled-up" national team of officers has been in place for over six months as part of Operation Olympos - dedicated to looking at crimes related to the Horizon Post Office scandal. The number of suspects has increased to seven since before Christmas, as part of a UK-wide investigation involving 100 officers. Four have now been interviewed under caution. Hundreds of subpostmasters were wrongfully convicted of stealing after faulty computer software created false accounting shortfalls in Post Office branches between 1999 and 2015. Commander Stephen Clayman, Gold Command for Operation Olympos, described a "huge shift" in terms of their investigation and "significant progress". "We've got over four million documents that are going to rise to about six million documents," he said, "but we're beginning to methodically work through those and looking at individuals who are associated with certain prosecutions." He described a "pool of about 45 people plus" classed as "persons of interest", with that number "expected to grow". He added that officers have questioned "some" in the past and "more recently" and are looking at the offences of perverting the course of justice and perjury. The "wider pool" of persons of interest is made up of Post Office investigators, lawyers, and "management" across Fujitsu and the Post Office. 11:28 The team of officers will be identifying actions which could amount to criminal offences on both an individual and corporate basis. Any decisions made on whether to charge will not happen until after the Post Office inquiry findings are "published and reviewed". The Operation Olympos officers are part of four teams - a London hub and three regional teams - who have been described as "highly motivated" across England and Wales. Police Scotland and the Police Service of Northern Ireland are also helping. Cmdr Clayman said that officers "will be building a robust case" to pass on to the Crown Prosecution Service. He also added that, compared to the inquiry, his officers will have to "prove this to the criminal standard…a much, much higher standard". He described feeling "optimistic" and "confident" that the teams will have "some successful outcomes", and said they are "working as hard and as quickly as (they) can". Teams are involved in what has been described as a "focused strategy which gets to the heart of the issues". Their investigations are being overseen by the National Police Chiefs' Council and the Metropolitan Police. Victims have also been told that the police will not be reinvestigating every case but "taking a speculative look at cases" to focus on key people involved and evidence for prosecution. Operation Olympos is also making use of special software to help process the amount of evidence to sift through material in relation to key events and identified cases. Of the four suspects interviewed under caution, two were questioned in late 2021, one in late 2024 and the most recent in early 2025.
