Trump says Gabbard and US intelligence ‘wrong' on Iran nukes as he warns Tehran could have bomb in ‘weeks'
President Donald Trump on Friday slammed his handpicked Director of National Intelligence and the U.S. Intelligence Community's assessment of Iran's nuclear weapons program and claimed Tehran could produce a working weapon within 'a matter of weeks' while offering no evidence to support the alarming assertion.
The president was speaking to reporters after arriving in New Jersey, where he will spend the weekend at one of the golf resorts he owns while occasionally huddling with advisers regarding Israel's week-old war against Tehran. When he was asked to compare the current claims being made about Iran's nuclear program with the assertions made about Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction in the run-up to the 2003 American invasion, Trump replied that the difference is that Iraq had no such weapons and claimed that he never believed Iraq possessed any to begin with.
But he then pivoted to claiming that Iran has a 'tremendous amount' of nuclear material, which he said could permit the Islamic Republic to produce a working weapon 'within a matter of weeks, or certainly within a matter of months.'
'We can't let that happen,' he said.
Trump's claims about Iran's nuclear program directly contradict what Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told Congress during a hearing last month on worldwide national security threats.
The former Hawaii congresswoman, who testified under oath, said the U.S. Intelligence Community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon' and noted that Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had 'not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.'
'She's wrong.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Texas may soon enact restrictions on when and how students can protest
T he state of Texas could be set to pass a law putting major limits on protests at its public universities, including banning demonstrations at certain times of day and barring all protests during the final two weeks of the semester. The law, whose Republican backers describe as an explicit response to the state's pro-Palestine campus protests, would impact more than one million students at one of the nation's largest public university systems and has drawn criticism from free speech advocates and students. 'While the world watched Columbia, Harvard and other campuses across the country taken hostage by pro-terrorist mobs last year, Texas stood firm. UT allowed protest, not anarchy,' State Senator Brandon Creighton told The Washington Pos t about his bill. 'No First Amendment rights were infringed — and they never will be. This is how we protect student safety, defend our institutions, and safeguard freedom for generations to come.' The bill, Senate Bill 2972, would prohibit protests between 10pm and 8am, ban students from erecting tents and wearing disguises like masks, bar the use of drums and microphones, and halt 'expressive activities' during the final two weeks of class. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has until the end of the week to decide on the law, which will go into effect if he declines to act. His office has not indicated how he will proceed. Civil rights advocates argue the bill's provisions contradict the spirit of a 2019 Texas law, passed when Republicans largely argued campuses overly restricted conservative speech, that mandated universities ensure all outdoor common areas were considered traditional public forums where anyone could protest as long as they weren't breaking the law or disrupting university functions. 'S.B. 2972 threatens the free expression of all Texans, regardless of political beliefs,' Caro Achar of the Texas branch of the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a statement. 'This bill imposes broad restrictions that allow school officials to restrict how, when, and where Texans can speak on campus — undermining the First Amendment rights of students, faculty, staff, and the general public.' 'I don't know that we've seen a law regulating campus expression that's this restrictive,' Tyler Coward, a lawyer with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, told The New York Times of the bill. The 'expressive activity' limited in the bill could range from a conversation to a t-shirt with a slogan, others warned. In 2024, Texas saw large-scale campus pro-Palestine protests, and state officials responded by sending in over 100 state troopers to clear out a protest encampment at the University of Texas at Austin. All told, over 150 were arrested at state universities last April. In the wake of widespread pro-Palestine encampments on campus last year, universities across the country reiterated existing restrictions and imposed new rules on protest, including mask bans and time-place-and-manner limits. During the recent Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, Donald Trump unilaterally claimed masks were no longer allowed at protests, despite having no legal authority to make such a demand. Protest restrictions have also been a key sticking point in the administration's negotiations with top universities like Harvard and Columbia, which the White House has alleged aren't doing enough to stop campus antisemitism that flared during the protests. The administration has sought to pause funding to these Ivy League schools unless they submit to wide-ranging reforms. Harvard has challenged the administration, while Columbia has largely acceded to the Trump demands, including partially banning face masks.
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
Louisiana's Ten Commandments law struck down by US appeals court
June 20 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Friday blocked Louisiana from enforcing a law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in all classrooms of the state's public schools and universities. Calling the law "plainly unconstitutional," a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans unanimously upheld a November 2024 ruling by a lower court judge who enjoined the law's enforcement. It is a victory for parents and students who accused Louisiana of trampling on their religious rights, and a defeat for Republicans and conservative groups trying to make expressions of faith more prominent in society. The appeals court is widely considered among the country's most conservative, though two judges on Friday's panel were appointed by Democratic presidents. According to published reports, Louisiana's Republican attorney general, Liz Murrill, will ask the full appeals court and perhaps eventually the U.S. Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, to review the case. Murrill's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Nine families, including several clergy, with children in public schools sued to block the law, saying it violated the First Amendment prohibition against state establishment of religion. "We are grateful for this decision, which honors the religious diversity and religious-freedom rights of public school families across Louisiana," said Darcy Roake, a Unitarian Universalist minister who with her Jewish husband Adrian Van Young is among the plaintiffs. Louisiana's law requires the display of posters or framed versions of the Ten Commandments that are at least 11 inches by 14 inches, with the Commandments being the "central focus" and printed in a large, easy-to-read font. The law, signed by Republican Governor Jeff Landry, covers K-12 schools and state-funded colleges, and was scheduled to take effect on January 1. In Friday's decision, Circuit Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez cited a 1980 Supreme Court decision, Stone v. Graham, that struck down a Kentucky law requiring similar displays of the Ten Commandments because it had no "secular legislative purpose." Louisiana said the Stone decision no longer applied because it relied on a precedent that the Supreme Court has disavowed. It also said that even if Stone applied, Louisiana's case differed because schools could display the Ten Commandments with documents such as the Declaration of Independence, reflecting a secular "historical and educational" purpose. Ramirez, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, nonetheless cited several legislators who expressed religion-based justifications for Louisiana's law. These included that the Ten Commandments were "God's law," and that opponents were waging an "attack" on Christianity. "If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments are to have any effect at all, it will be to induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments," Ramirez wrote, quoting the Stone decision. "This is not a permissible state objective." Ramirez also rejected Louisiana's argument that the Supreme Court's 2022 decision favoring a Washington state high school football coach who prayed with players at the 50-yard line after games required upholding the Ten Commandments law. She said this was in part because the Washington case primarily concerned First Amendment provisions governing free speech and the free exercise of religion. Louisiana was the first U.S. state requiring displays of the Ten Commandments since the Kentucky law was struck down. The case is Roake et al v Brumley et al, 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-30706.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘I think you and I are at war': the Australians suddenly united in grief over the Israel-Iran conflict
When Israel triggered a war last Friday after it sent a wave of airstrikes into Iran, Saina Salemi and Oscar were at work in Melbourne, sitting at arm's length away from each other at their desks. Salemi saw the news headline first. She turned to Oscar and said: 'I think you and I are at war.' 'I thought she was kidding,' Oscar, who asked for his last name to not be used, recalled. 'I didn't understand. And then we went to the news, and it had all started, and my heart just sunk immediately.' Salemi, who is 26, moved to Australia from Tehran when she was 7, and Oscar, who is 24 and from Israel, says for the past week they've shared in a grief that feels unending – but there has been a release in sharing it together. The pair became friends when they started work the same day as each other 18 months ago. Since last week, finding out what is happening overseas and if it is affecting their families has become a shared obsession. While sitting next to each other at work, they keep track of the rolling live coverage. Salemi also watches Persian news sources while Oscar watches the Hebrew channels. 'We're translating documents for each other. We're tracking where the missiles are being hit and seeing if they're close to our family members,' Oscar tells Guardian Australia, both he and Salemi speaking on the phone together from their office. 'If we find out information we want the other to know, we text each other, no matter what time of night it is,' Salemi says. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Oscar's parents, who were visiting Israel when tensions flared are – for now – stuck there. Salemi's grandparents, aunts, and uncles live in Tehran. Their shared grief has not just been defined by doomscrolling and sharing news about loved ones. Salemi says their focus is on the civilians suffering and the governments 'making the choice' to continue it. 'My people, Palestinians and Israelis are being used as political shields for geopolitical aims,' Salemi says. Oscar says he is also battling a feeling of guilt, despite having no control over what is going on. 'I really care about her family. I feel so guilty, and even though obviously I'm not responsible for the actions of the Israeli government, but nevertheless, it really pains me to just see even more suffering being inflicted.' 'I don't want people to become desensitised to what is happening in the region, and the … scale of pain that is taking place every day. It's getting worse.' By Friday, Israeli strikes on Iran had killed at least 657 people and wounded 2,037 others, according to Washington-based group Human Rights Activists. Of those dead, the group identified 263 civilians and 164 security force personnel. Iran has not given regular death tolls during the conflict and has minimised casualties in the past. In its last update, delivered last Monday, it put the death toll at 224 people and 1,277 wounded. Salemi says she has not heard from her family since the Iranian authorities blocked the internet. 'My auntie woke up in the middle of the night thinking that she was having a heart attack because the initial missile was so close to where she lived,' she says. 'I haven't heard from my family members in 36 hours, and there's a great sense of numbness when you worry that maybe that's the last time you've ever heard from your family members,' she says. Oscar says he sometimes has difficulty reaching his parents by phone to check in on how they are. He struggled with the news that a hospital – where his nan had gotten care once after she had a stroke – had been hit by an Iranian rocket. Salemi says while the bombs are falling from Israel, she also blames the Iranian regime – unpopular among many – for failing to protect its people. She points to there being no bomb shelters for people to turn to and disruptions to internet access that could help in planning escape routes with loved ones. Despite the ruling regime being unpopular, Salemi is frustrated by rhetoric from Israel's president, Benjamin Netanyahu, that Israel could support regime change. 'Regime change in Iran will come internally, at the hands of my own people,' she says. Oscar and Salemi say the war has inflamed the grief they were already feeling for the thousands of people killed by Israeli strikes in Gaza. Oscar said on top of this he is also grieving loved ones that died when Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October. Since Israel and Iran began trading strikes, over 100 people in Gaza have been killed while seeking aid. 'The safety of Israel can't come from anything other than peace – lasting, negotiated peace,' Oscar says. 'I want a serious political solution and a lasting peace.' Asked if there is anything they want the Australian government to do, Salemi says it should focus on getting Australian citizens out of each conflict zone. Australia's foreign minister Penny Wong said on Friday there were about 2,000 Australians and their families in Iran and approximately 1,200 in Israel who wanted to evacuate. 'The security situation is obviously very difficult,' Wong said. ' The airspace remains closed.' Oscar says that last Friday, after Israel first struck Iran, he and Salemi sat on the steps outside their work together. They already felt it could be different to the 'tit-for-tat' strikes in past months. 'I remember I turned to her and said, 'when will this end? How much longer does this have to go on?'.'
