Pakistan and Turkey join hands to threaten this 'friend' of India, not Armenia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, will Modi govt...
Pakistan is not learning its lesson, despite receiving a befitting reply from India each time. It continues to spread false propaganda. Countries such as China and Turkey have been key supporters of Pakistan. This time, Turkey is trying to intimidate India's ally, Greece, and elevate Pakistan's fraudulent claims.
Recently, Turkey's conservative media outlet, TR Haber, published a story that said Pakistan shot down six India's Rafale jets during the India-Pakistan conflict, and cautioned Greece about purchasing Rafale aircraft, as these baseless claims could be part of a continued propaganda strategy to confuse and put pressure on allies in the region. India has not confirmed any loss of fighter aircraft, including the French-made Rafale jets.
According to a report from TR Haber, Athens has voiced concerns regarding the capabilities and dependability of the Rafale jets, as they have now cited the alleged downing of a Rafale by Pakistan's Chinese-manufactured JF-17 fighter. Greece has purchased 24 Rafale jets from France, of which they have received all 18 between 2021 and 2023, with 6 more due for delivery by December 31st, 2024, which will be stationed at Tanagra Air Base.
Turkish media outlet TR Haber reported, 'Greece, which aims to establish air superiority over Ankara with Rafales, became concerned after the developments. Questioning the performance of the Rafales could lead Greece to reconsider its defence strategy.'
Turkish media outlet TR Haber claimed that Greece, which hopes to gain an edge over Turkey with its Rafale jets, is now feeling uneasy after recent events. The report said some Greek media are questioning the Rafale's performance, which might lead Greece to rethink its defence plans—though it didn't name any sources. It also added that Turkey's push for homegrown weapons and its fast-growing military strength are making Greece more nervous.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Should China-Nehru link be investigated?': BJP MP Nishikant Dubey slams Rahul Gandhi; asks if 1962 war was 'imposed'
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey (left) and Rahul Gandhi/ File photos NEW DELHI: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey on Monday intensified his criticism of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi , calling for a probe into the alleged historic links between the Nehru-Gandhi family and China. His demand stemmed from what he described as "revelations" found in declassified documents from the 1961 Belgrade Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). In a sharply worded X post shared on Monday, Dubey took aim at India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru , questioning his foreign policy choices during the formative years of the Cold War. 'Rahul Baba, do you know that at China's behest, your family's patriarch Nehru ji created the new gimmick of non-aligned countries? Look at the member countries of the first conference in Belgrade in 1961. After isolating India from both Russia and America, did any country come to India's defence during or after the 1962 war with China?' Dubey asked. — nishikant_dubey (@nishikant_dubey) The BJP MP went on to allege that the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), championed by Nehru, eventually "benefited" China rather than serving India's strategic interests. Citing the 26th declaration adopted at the Belgrade Summit, Dubey argued that the text revealed Nehru's alignment with Chinese interests. 'Tibet to China, Panchsheel for China, and after making China a permanent member of the United Nations, this conference ordered the UN to recognise China as the sole representative state. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo By siding with China, did your family impose the 1962 war on India or not?' he said. He followed up with a pointed query directed at Rahul Gandhi: 'Should the relationship between China and the Nehru family be investigated?' The 1961 Belgrade Summit was the inaugural meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement — a coalition of states aiming to stay independent from both the Western and Soviet power blocs. Nehru was a key architect in shaping the principles and objectives of the movement. This is not the first time Dubey has targeted the Congress leadership. He previously accused the Nehru-Gandhi family of compromising India's interests in relation to Pakistan, particularly citing the Indus Waters Treaty. He had also flagged India's financial commitments to Pakistan under the treaty, claiming they were the result of Congress-era policies that weakened India diplomatically.
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is Rima Hassan, European Parliament MP accompanying Greta Thunberg to Gaza
Israel intercepted the Gaza bound Freedom flotilla and prevented the activists onboard from reaching the blockaded Palestine territory. The boat named Madleen embarked from the Sicilian port of Catania from June 1 to deliver aid to Gaza. Among those onboard the ship are Rima Hassan, French-Palestinian member of European Parliament. Born Rima Hassan Mobarak in Aleppo, Syria, she is a French jurist and politician. At the age of nine she arrived in France and settled with her family in Niort. After becoming an adult, she obtained french nationalisty and started pursuing studies. She studied in University of Montpellier, until 2014 and pursued studies in law and obtained her bachelor's degree. For masters in international law she went to Panthéon-Sorbonne University. Also read: Greta Thunberg's Freedom Flotilla 'attacked'? Crew claims drones dropped white substance on them In 2019, Hassan founded the 'Refugee Camps Observatory', an NGO dedicated to the study and protection of refugee camps worldwide. Hassan joined the French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) in 2016 and and after 18 months, she worked at the National Court of Asylum Law. In 2023, she joined La France Insoumise to contest the 2024 European Parliament election and was elected to the European Parliament on 9 June 2024. Currently, she serves as a member of the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Subcommittee on Human Rights, and the Delegation for Relations with Palestine. Hassan has been vocal about the conditions of refugees and has voiced concerns about the health and security effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in refugee camps. Since the beginning of the Gaza war, she has also been critical of the actions taken by Israel. In an interview with the French newspaper Le Monde, she expressed her view on the Israel Palestine war saying that the creation of a democratic bi-national state is the solution to the conflict. On 24 February 2025, Hassan was denied entry to Israel as part of an EU-Palestine delegation, with Israeli authorities citing her support for anti-Israel boycotts.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry
Sydney, When US President Donald Trump introduced sweeping new tariffs on Chinese imports the goal was to bring manufacturing back to American soil and protect local jobs. However, this process of re-shoring is complex and requires years of investment and planning – far too slow for the world of ultra-fast fashion, where brands are used to reacting in weeks, not years. Many clothing companies started to move production out of China during Trump's first term. They relocated to countries such as Vietnam and Cambodia when the initial China-specific tariffs hit. This trend accelerated with the newer 'reciprocal' tariffs. Instead of re-shoring production, many fashion brands are simply sourcing from whichever country offers the lowest total cost after tariffs. The result? The ultra-fast fashion machine adapted quickly and became even more exploitative. From Guangzhou to your wardrobe in days Platforms such as Shein and Temu built their success by offering trend-driven clothing at shockingly low prices. A USD 5 dress or USD 3 top might seem like a bargain, but those prices hide a lot. Much of Shein's production takes place in the so-called 'Shein village' in Guangzhou, China, where workers often sew for 12–14 hours a day under poor conditions to keep pace with the demand for new items. When the US cracked down on Chinese imports, the intention was to make American-made goods more competitive. This included raising the tariff on Chinese goods as high as 145 per cent , and closing the 'de minimis' loophole, which had allowed imports under USD 800 to enter tariff-free. But these tariffs did not halt ultra-fast fashion. They just rerouted production to countries with lower tariffs and even lower labour costs. The Philippines, with a comparatively low tariff rate of 17 per cent, emerged as a surprising alternative. However, the country can't provide the industrial scale and infrastructure to match what China can offer. So why does Australia matter? Much of the cheap fashion previously bound for the US is now flooding other markets, including Australia. Australia still allows most low-value imports to enter tax-free, and platforms such as Shein and Temu have taken full advantage. Australian consumers are among the most frequent Shein and Temu buyers per capita globally. Just 3 per cent of clothing is made in Australia and most labels rely on offshore manufacturing. This makes Australia an ideal target market for ultra-fast fashion imports. We have high purchasing power, lenient import rules and strong demand for low-cost style, especially due to the cost-of-living crisis. The hidden costs of cheap clothes The environmental impact of fast fashion is well known. However, amid the chaos of Trump's tariff announcements, far less attention has been paid to how these policies – together with the retreat from climate commitments – worsen environmental harms, including those linked to fast fashion. The irony is that the tariffs meant to protect American workers have, in some cases, worsened conditions for workers elsewhere. Meanwhile, consumers in Australia now benefit from faster delivery of even cheaper goods as Temu, Shein and others have improved their shipping capabilities to Australia. Australian consumers send more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing to landfill each year. But the deeper problem is structural. The entire business model is built on exploitation and environmental damage. Factory workers bear the brunt of cost-cutting. In the race to stay competitive, many manufacturers reduce wages and overlook hazardous working conditions. Will ethical fashion ever compete? Fixing these problems will require a global rethink of how fashion operates. Governments have a role in regulating disclosures about supply chains and enforcing labour standards. Brands need to take responsibility for the conditions in their factories, whether directly owned or outsourced. Transparency is essential. Alternatives to fast fashion are gaining traction. Clothing rentals are emerging as a promising business model that help build a more circular fashion economy. Charity-run op shops have long been a sustainable source of second-hand clothing. Australia's new Seamless scheme seeks to make fashion brands responsible for the full life of the clothes they sell. The aim is to help people buy, wear and recycle clothes in a more sustainable way. Consumers also matter. If we continue to expect clothes to cost less than a cup of coffee, change will be slow. Recognising that a USD 5 t-shirt has hidden costs, borne by people on the factory floor and the environment, is a first step. Some ethical brands are already showing a better way and offer clothes made under fairer conditions and with sustainable materials. These clothes are not as cheap or fast, but they represent a more conscious alternative especially for consumers concerned about synthetic fibres, toxic chemicals and environmental harm. Trump reshuffled the deck, but did not change the game Trump's trade rules aim to re-balance global trade in favour of American industry, yet have cost companies more than USD 34 billion in lost sales and higher costs. This cost will eventually fall on US consumers. In ultra-fast fashion, it mostly exposed how fragile and exploitative the system already was. Today, brands such as Shein and Temu are thriving in Australia. But unless we address the systemic inequalities in fashion production and rethink the incentives that drive this market, the true cost of cheap clothing will continue to be paid by those least able to afford it. PY PY This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
