USCIRF hails Pope Leo for global religious freedom work
Pope Leo XIV draws praised for boldly defending rights of persecuted faith communities early in his papacy May 20, 2025
Pope Leo XIV shakes hands with US Vice President Vance. (Photo: Vatican News)
By Kate Scanlon, OSV News
The US Commission on International Religious Freedom, an independent, bipartisan US government commission that monitors religious freedom around the globe, praised Pope Leo XIV on May 16 for demonstrating the Vatican would continue its advocacy for international religious freedom during his papacy.
"USCIRF commends His Holiness Pope Leo XIV for highlighting the importance of freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) for persecuted religious communities," Schneck said in a statement.
"Throughout the world, we are seeing a significant rise of religious persecution against Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and other religious minorities. It is heartening to see His Holiness speak forcefully on religious freedom so early on in his pontificate."
USCIRF pointed to comments by Pope Leo, the first US-born pontiff, in his May 8 speech on the importance of building "bridges and dialogue."
"We are hopeful that Pope Leo's expressed concern for international religious freedom, including the fight against antisemitism, will bring greater tolerance and respect for the rights of persecuted religious communities," Meir Soloveichik, USCIRF vice chair, said in a statement. "The ability to practice one's faith openly and freely is a universal right that must be defended and protected."
USCIRF uses international standards to monitor religious freedom violations globally and makes policy recommendations to the president, the secretary of state and Congress. The commission was created by the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act.
At the Vatican, religious freedom was among the topics covered in a May 19 meeting US Vice President JD Vance had with Archbishop Paul R. Gallagher, Vatican foreign minister, according to a Vatican statement. The meeting with the archbishop followed a closed-door meeting Vance had with the pope; U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio attended a portion of that meeting.
The Vatican press office released a communique outlining only what general themes were discussed during the "cordial talks held at the Secretariat of State" with Archbishop Gallagher and Vance. The two parties expressed their satisfaction with the "good bilateral relations" between them, and "the collaboration between church and state was discussed, as well as some matters of special relevance to ecclesial life and religious freedom."--ucanews.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
India intensifies expulsion of suspected foreigners to Bangladesh
FILE PHOTO. Police officers stand next to men they believe to be undocumented Bangladeshi nationals after detained during raids in Ahmedabad, India, April 26, 2025. - Photo: Reuters file GUWAHATI, (India): India has started to push people it considers illegal immigrants into neighbouring Bangladesh, but human rights activists say authorities are arbitrarily throwing people out of the country. Since May, the northeastern Indian state of Assam has "pushed back" 303 people into Bangladesh out of 30,000 declared as foreigners by various tribunals over the years, a top official said this week. Such people in Assam are typically long-term residents with families and land in the state, which is home to tens of thousands of families tracing their roots to Muslim-majority Bangladesh. Activists say many of them and their families are often wrongly classified as foreigners in mainly Hindu India and are too poor to challenge tribunal judgements in higher courts. Some activists, who did not want to be named for fear of reprisal, said only Muslims had been targeted in the expulsion drive. An Assam government spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Assam, which has a 260 km (160 mile) border with Bangladesh, started sending back people last month who had been declared as foreigners by its Foreigners Tribunals. Such a move is politically popular in Assam, where Bengali language speakers with possible roots in Bangladesh compete for jobs and resources with local Assamese speakers. "There is pressure from the Supreme Court to act on the expulsion of foreigners," Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma told the state assembly on Monday. "We have pushed back 303 people. These pushbacks will be intensified. We have to be more active and proactive to save the state." He was referring to the Supreme Court asking Assam in February why it had not moved on deporting declared foreigners. Bangladesh's foreign affairs adviser, Touhid Hossain, did not immediately reply to an email seeking comment. Last week, he told reporters that people were being sent to his country from India and that the government was in touch with New Delhi over it. Aman Wadud, an Assam-based lawyer who routinely fights citizenship cases and is now a member of the main opposition Congress party, said the government was "arbitrarily throwing people out of the country". "There is a lot of panic on the ground - more than ever before," he said. Some brought back Sarma said no genuine Indian citizens will be expelled. But he added that up to four of the people deported were brought back to India because appeals challenging their non-Indian status were being heard in court. One of them was Khairul Islam, a 51-year-old former government school teacher who was declared a foreigner by a tribunal in 2016. He spent two years in an Assam detention centre and was released on bail in August 2020. He said police picked him up on May 23 from his home and took him to a detention centre, from where he and 31 others were rounded up by Indian border guards and loaded into a van, blindfolded and hands tied. "Then, 14 of us were put onto another truck. We were taken to a spot along the border and pushed into Bangladesh," he said. "It was terrifying. I've never experienced anything like it. It was late at night. There was a straight road, and we all started walking along it." Islam said residents of a Bangladeshi village then called the Border Guard Bangladesh, who then pushed the group of 14 into the "no man's land between the two countries". "All day we stood there in the open field under the harsh sun," he said. Later, the group was taken to a Bangladesh guards camp while Islam's wife told police in Assam that as his case was still pending in court, he should be brought back. "After a few days, I was suddenly handed back to Indian police," he said. "That's how I made my way back home. I have no idea what happened to the others who were with me, or where they are." It is not only Assam that is acting against people deemed to be living illegally in the country. Police in the western city of Ahmedabad said they have identified more than 250 people "confirmed to be Bangladeshi immigrants living illegally here". "The process to deport them is in progress," said senior police officer Ajit Rajian. - Reuters
Rakyat Post
14 hours ago
- Rakyat Post
Knowing The History Of Israel-Palestine: Right Of Return And Right Of Self-Defence
Subscribe to our FREE This article first appeared in UN Resolution 181 is well-known as the resolution that unjustly partitioned Palestine. Another resolution, Resolution 194, recognised the Palestinians' right of return to where they had been expelled from. The breakout of hostilities following Resolution 181 led to the appointment by the UN of a peace mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte. The Israeli government agreed to his appointment as Bernadotte was president of the Swedish Red Cross and had been instrumental in saving many Jews from the Nazis during World War Two. Bernadotte arrived in Palestine on 20 May 1948, five days after the establishment of the state of Israel. What the Israelis did not expect was for Bernadotte to demand the unconditional return of all the Palestinian refugees and for the country to be redivided. Bernadotte made his recommendations to the UN. A paramilitary Zionist group responded by assassinating him in September 1948 while he was carrying out his official duties. In a sense, there is tragic irony here. Bernadotte paid with his life for trying to stand up for the Palestinians. He had survived the Nazis when he courageously negotiated the release of so many Jews. But when he courageously tried to secure the rights of the Palestinians, he could not escape death at the hands of the Zionists. This was just one example of Zionist Israeli terrorism. Ilan Pappe's book Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (from which much of the above account is taken) and other sources give a well-established history of Zionist Israeli acts of terrorism from the very birth of the state. What continues today in Gaza is part of a history of Israeli state terrorism that has simply never ended. Bernadotte's work, nevertheless, left a legacy – UN Resolution 194, adopted in December 1948 (after the establishment of Israel) by the same UN General Assembly that had voted for partition in November 1947. A key part of the resolution was its recognition of the Palestinian refugees' right to return to their homes. This has been ignored by Israel as it has with many other UN resolutions. This is an example of what has become habitual Israeli intransigence made possible by US military and diplomatic support over the years. Israel's admission to the UN in May 1949 was on condition it would accept Resolution 194 ( But that acceptance came to nothing. Israel's word could not be trusted – a trait that would be repeated time and again. The principle of an expelled people's right of return was again more recently underlined by a July 2024 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice to the UN General Assembly that Israel's presence in occupied Palestinian territory is unlawful. But again, this has been ignored. Right of self-defence? The 'tropish' question often asked is, doesn't Israel have the right to defend itself? The question is conceptually illogical. In his Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Pappe quotes Palestinian historian Walid Khalidi: 'The native people of Palestine like the native people of every other country in the Arab world, Asia, Africa, America, and Europe, refused to divide the land with a settler community.' This was in the context of a process that disrespected the Palestinians with circumstances forced upon them. Thus, at its root, the confiscation of land came with the loss of dignity, freedom and self-determination. A subjugated people cannot but be expected to revolt and resist – which is what the Palestinians have been doing ever since. Self-defence is when you are the victim of someone else's actions, and you therefore have to defend yourself. If you and your family are robbed and under threat, and you act against the robber to wrest back your property and remove the threat to your family, who is exercising the right of self-defence? You? Or the robber who thinks he is defending himself against your actions? And so it is with Israel and Palestine. Israel inserted itself into a situation by aggressive and violent means. Its victims, the native Palestinians, have always been far weaker and at a disadvantage. Some of this weakness has been due to internal problems. But that does not change the fact that a dominant force with imperial support came and forcefully displaced them and, over the years, sabotaged them. Thus, the real point is, it is the Palestinians who have the right to resist and defend themselves. Israeli 'retaliation' is not self-defence. It is force used by an occupier to enforce its illegal occupation. (Israel's occupation of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem has been ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice and by UN resolutions.) So long as the root causes of dispossession and subjugation of the Palestinian people are not addressed, there will be one form or other of fightback or resistance. It may take the form of Hamas, Hezbolah, Islamic Jihad, the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) or the Houthis with new incarnations to come. And all that time, there will not be the safety and security that Israelis themselves want. * That is why a lasting solution has to be a just political solution that recognises root causes and not one imposed by overwhelming armed might, which has now escalated into genocide in Gaza. (* It is enlightening to note the twisted ways in which Israeli leadership works, currently personified by Benjamin Netanyahu. He was quoted telling his Likud colleagues in March 2019: 'Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy, to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.' ( It also has to be noted that the Palestinians have not, contrary to unfair stereotyping, always only resorted to violent resistance. In many instances over decades, the Palestinian leadership has shown readiness to negotiate and compromise including recognition of the state of Israel. But Israel has always not responded in kind thus allowing it to continue using its might to increase its occupation of Palestine and to crush the will of the Palestinian people.) – By Tong Veng Wye, Aliran member. READ MORE: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Israel ultra-Orthodox party threatens government over draft law
JERUSALEM: Israel's ultra-Orthodox Shas party on Monday threatened to bring down Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government by backing a motion for early elections amid a row over military service. Netanyahu's coalition, one of the most right-wing in Israel's history, is at risk of collapsing over a bill that could reverse the long-standing exemption from the draft for ultra-Orthodox Jews. The exemption is facing growing pushback as Israel wages war on Palestinian Islamist militants Hamas in Gaza. Netanyahu is under pressure from within his Likud party to draft more ultra-Orthodox men and impose penalties on draft dodgers -- a red line for Shas. The party is demanding legislation to permanently exempt its followers from military service and gave Netanyahu two days to find a solution. 'We don't want to bring down a right-wing government, but we've reached our limit,' Shas spokesperson Asher Medina told public radio. 'If there's no last-minute solution (on conscription), we'll vote to dissolve the Knesset,' he said, referring to the Israeli parliament. Last week, a Shas source told AFP the party was threatening to quit the coalition unless a solution was reached by Monday. The opposition is seeking to place a bill to dissolve parliament on Wednesday's plenary agenda, hoping to capitalise on the ultra-Orthodox revolt to topple the government. Netanyahu's coalition, formed in December 2022, includes Likud, far-right factions and ultra-Orthodox parties. A walkout by the latter would end its majority. A poll published in March by right-wing daily Israel Hayom found 85 percent of Israeli Jews support changing the conscription law for Haredim. Forty-one percent backed compulsory military service -- currently 32 months for men -- for all eligible members of the community.
