&w=3840&q=100)
Trump open, Zelenskyy ready but is Putin willing to join Turkey-proposed 3-way summit to end Ukraine war?
Even as US President Donald Trump is willing to join a peace summit in Turkey with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Vladimir Putin, the Russian president is unlikely to join such peace talks. read more
The White House has said that President Donald Trump is open to joining Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian leader Vladimir Putin for a peace summit in Turkey. The response came Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that he wants to host a summit of US, Ukrainian, and Russian leaders.
Erdogan said, 'My desire is to bring Putin and Zelenskyy together in Istanbul or Ankara. Also to invite Trump to this meeting as well… We will take steps for this meeting after the latest talks.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Even though Ukrainian and Russian delegations met on Monday for the second round for direct talks in Istanbul, no major breakthrough emerged from the talks — not that one was expected. They exchanged term sheets and agreed to exchange more prisoners of war and bodies of as many as 12,000 soldiers.
Why Putin doesn't want to join Zelenskyy in talks
Trump has said that no progress is going to be made in peace talks unless he sits down with Putin. Ukraine has, however, maintained that the fate of the country cannot be decided without Ukraine being at the table. Zelenskyy has asked Putin to join him in leader-level talks.
Putin has so far refused to join Zelenskyy in such direct talks.
Putin is unlikely to sit across the table from Zelenskyy in any talks as doing so would legitimise Zelenskyy as the head of a sovereign state. That would go against the basis of the Russian war on Ukraine that rejects Ukraine's sovereignty and labels Zelenskyy and the current Ukrainian government as illegitimate.
Even though Trump has frequently trashed Zelenskyy and Ukraine and remained friendly with Putin, it is Putin who has rejected all of his ceasefire proposals and personal pleas to not attack Ukrainian civilians. On the other hand, Ukraine has accepted all ceasefire proposals so far. Despite such defiance, Trump rewarded Putin last month by giving up his own demand for an immediate ceasefire and endorsing Putin's position of direct talks with Ukraine.
It is an open secret that Putin has been prolonging the conflict to inflict maximum damage inside Ukraine and maximise gains on the ground so that it could have more leverage to press maximalist demands in talks.
Zelenskyy calls for punitive actions, Putin presses maximalist demands
As Putin neither accepts a ceasefire proposal nor an invitation for direct leader-level talks, Zelenskyy has called for tougher sanctions on Russia.
In the United States, a bipartisan movement has picked up pace to impose 500 per cent tariffs on Russia and its trading partners. However, considering the ties between Trump and Putin, such proposals are unlikely to be implemented.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
On his part, Putin has continued to push his maximalise demands.
The Russian terms for peace, as reported by Interfax news agency, include the international legal recognition of Crimea and four other Ukrainian provinces that Russia has annexed. As Russia does not control these four provinces fully, Russia has demanded the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from these provinces.
Among other demands, Russia has also sought Ukraine's neutrality in the sense that it would not join Nato and limits on Ukraine's military.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
North Korea's Kim says he'll 'unconditionally support' Russia's war against Ukraine
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un told a visiting top Russian official that his country will 'unconditionally support' Russia's war against Ukraine, the North's state media reported on Thursday (June 5, 2025), the latest sign of expanding cooperation between the two nations. In April, the two countries officially confirmed North Korean troops' deployment to Russia for the first time, saying that soldiers of the two countries were fighting alongside each other to repel a Ukrainian incursion into Russia's Kursk border region. At the time, Russian President Vladimir Putin thanked North Korea's participation in the war and promised not to forget their sacrifices. Also Read | Russia may have helped North Korea with new warship, Seoul says In a meeting with Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu in Pyongyang on Wednesday (June 5, 2025), Mr. Kim affirmed that North Korea will 'unconditionally support the stand of Russia and its foreign policies in all the crucial international political issues including the Ukrainian issue,' the official Korean Central News Agency said. The two discussed how to solidify a strategic partnership between North Korea and Russia and reached a consensus on the Ukraine issue and other unspecified international situations, KCNA said. It didn't elaborate. Russia's state Tass news agency, citing the Russian Security Council's press service, reported that Shoigu and Kim also discussed prospects for rebuilding the Kursk region and outlined steps to commemorate the contribution made by North Korean soldiers. Russia claimed in April 2025 that it had fully reclaimed the Kursk region, though Ukraine insists it still has troops present there. Ukraine's top army chief Oleksandr Syrskyi reiterated Saturday that Ukrainian forces were still holding territory in Russia's Kursk region. Shoigu last visited North Korea in March for a meeting with Mr. Kim. North Korea and Russia haven't said how many North Korean troops are in Russia. But U.S., South Korean and Ukraine intelligence officials earlier said North Korea dispatched 10,000-12,000 troops to Russia last fall in its first participation in a major armed conflict since the 1950-53 Korean War. South Korean authorities recently said North Korea sent around 3,000 additional troops to Russia earlier this year. North Korea has been supplying a vast amount of conventional weapons to Russia as well. South Korea, the U.S. and their partners believe Russia has provided economic and military assistance to North Korea in return. They worry Russia might also transfer sophisticated technologies to help North Korea enhance its nuclear weapons program targeting its rivals.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Ukraine's drone attack hit fewer Russian warplanes than claimed, US says
Ukraine's weekend drone attack on Russian air bases hit up to 20 warplanes and destroyed around 10, according to US officials. While this is lower than Ukrainian President Zelenskyy's estimate, Washington still called the strike "highly significant."Zelenskyy had told reporters earlier on Wednesday that 41 Russian aircraft had been hit and that more than half were likely beyond repair. The US assessment cuts that number roughly in half but doesn't downplay the operation's impact, according to officials who spoke to was a major strike,' one official said, adding that the attack could harden Moscow's stance in US-brokered negotiations to end the war, now entering its fourth year. Ukraine said it launched 117 drones from containers positioned near four Russian air bases in a complex operation dubbed "Spider's Web." The Ukrainian military released dramatic footage showing drones striking Russian strategic bombers and even landing on the dome antennas of two A-50 military surveillance aircraft — rare and high-value assets in Russia's Vladimir Putin, in a call with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday, warned that Russia 'would have to respond' to the attack, according to a Trump post on social media."It was a good conversation," Trump said, "but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace."The incident has triggered new tensions between nuclear powers. Russia urged the US and UK to rein in Kyiv following the assault, highlighting the precarious balance between military support and strategic escalation. Together, the US and Russia hold about 88 per cent of the world's nuclear United States says it was not given any notice by Kyiv ahead of the attack. The war in Ukraine is intensifying despite nearly four months of efforts by Trump, who says he wants peace after the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War domestic security agency, the SBU, said the damage to Russia caused by the operation amounted to USD 7 billion, and 34 per cent of the strategic cruise missile carriers at Russia's main airfields were Defence Ministry has acknowledged that Ukraine targeted airfields in the Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan and Amur regions and were repelled in the last three locations. It has also said several aircraft caught fire in the Murmansk and Irkutsk regions.(With inputs from Reuters)Tune InMust Watch
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US is redirecting critical antidrone technology From Ukraine to US forces
The Trump administration is redirecting a key antidrone technology earmarked for Ukraine to American forces, a move that reflects the Pentagon's waning commitment to Kyiv's defense. The Pentagon quietly notified Congress last week that special fuzes for ground-based rockets that Ukraine uses to shoot down Russian drones are now being allocated to U.S. Air Force units in the Middle East. The move comes as President Trump said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin told him in a phone call that Moscow would have to respond forcefully to recent Ukrainian attacks, dampening the prospects for a halt in the war that began in early 2022. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth skipped a meeting Wednesday at North Atlantic Treaty Organization headquarters with European defense ministers on coordinating military aid to Ukraine. Hegseth has warned that European allies must provide the overwhelming share of future military assistance to Kyiv while casting the western Pacific as the Pentagon's 'priority theater." The defense chief went further in an internal memo last month. In it, he authorized the Pentagon's Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell, a Pentagon office that seeks to ensure that U.S. military commanders' urgent needs for weapons and logistics are met, to provide the fuzes to the U.S. Air Force, even though they were initially bought for Ukraine. The Pentagon told the Senate Armed Services Committee in the previously undisclosed message that the U.S. military's need for the fuzes was a 'Secretary of Defense Identified Urgent Issue." The Pentagon declined requests for comment. The decision to redirect the component illustrates the scarcity of key defense items as Ukraine steels itself for more Russian drone and missile attacks, while U.S. Air Force units in the Middle East prepare for a possible conflict with Iran or renewed fighting with Houthi militants in Yemen. Supporters of the move say the Pentagon has the flexibility to take such an action under the emergency military spending bill passed last year. But the move had prompted concerns among Ukraine's supporters in Congress, who say that the Pentagon hasn't explained what effect the move would have on Ukrainian defenses or whether the Air Force need is urgent. The Biden administration arranged to send the fuzes along with numerous other weapons systems under the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which authorized the spending of billions of dollars in U.S. government funds to buy weapons and components from American defense firms. Though the funds for the program have been expended, deliveries are scheduled to reach Ukraine this year and next unless the Trump administration diverts more systems to fill the U.S. military's inventories. The Trump administration inherited the authority to send Ukraine up to $3.85 billion in weapons from Pentagon's stocks but refrained from doing so. It hasn't asked for more funding for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. The fuzes are intended for the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System, a ground-to-air laser-guided rocket for defending against drones. The Pentagon has touted the effectiveness of the rockets. A critical component is the 'proximity fuze," which detonates explosives when the rocket nears a drone. The Air Force has adapted the rockets so that it can be fired by F-15E jet fighter to destroy Houthi or Iranian drones. The system is much cheaper than Sidewinder and AMRAAM missile air-to-air missiles. A photo of an F-15E equipped with the rocket pods were recently posted by the U.S. Central Command, which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East. The Senate Armed Services Committee is looking into ramping up production of components for the counterdrone system, including through the current reconciliation bill, a congressional aide said. Write to Michael R. Gordon at
