AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Qatar Islamic Insurance Group Q.P.S.C.
LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- AM Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of A- (Excellent) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of 'a-' (Excellent) of Qatar Islamic Insurance Group Q.P.S.C. (QIIG) (Qatar). The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) is stable.
The ratings reflect QIIG's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its strong operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management.
QIIG is a takaful insurer and operates through a hybrid model, whereby the shareholders' fund charges the policyholders' fund (PHF) a Wakala fee based on gross written contributions (GWC) and a Mudarabah fee based on investment income.
QIIG's balance sheet strength is underpinned by its risk-adjusted capitalisation at the strongest level, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR). AM Best assesses the company's risk-adjusted capitalisation on a combined basis, including its policyholders' and shareholders' funds, due to the strength of domestic regulation and requirement that the shareholders' fund would have to support the PHF were it to fall into deficit. Other positive balance sheet factors include the company's track record of internal capital generation through the retention of earnings and QIIG's accumulated surplus within the PHF. An offsetting factor to the assessment is QIIG's exposure to illiquid real estate assets and investments in associates, which accounted for 41.3% of its total investments as at year-end 2024. Despite this, the company maintains a robust level of liquidity, with its consolidated cash and deposits covering net technical provisions by 170.5% at year-end 2024, indicating that the company holds sufficient surplus capital to manage the higher investment risk appetite.
AM Best assesses QIIG's operating performance as strong, evidenced by a five-year (2020-2024) weighted average return on equity of 16.6%. QIIG's combined family and general takaful portfolios have exhibited excellent underwriting performance over the medium term, with the five-year weighted average combined ratio of 73.1%. Underwriting performance of the general takaful book was affected adversely by underperformance of the medical segment in 2023 and 2024; however, the company has taken actions to remediate this portfolio.
QIIG holds a niche position within its domestic insurance market, where it is a market-leading takaful player. The company has good diversification by line of business, offering a range of Sharia-compliant insurance products. In 2024, QIIG wrote GWC of QAR 551.2 million (USD 157.4 million). The business profile assessment is constrained by the company's geographical concentration and limited competitive position within the wider Qatari insurance market.
This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
30 minutes ago
- Business Wire
AM Best Downgrades Credit Ratings of Kentucky Farm Bureau Group Member
OLDWICK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- AM Best has downgraded the Financial Strength Rating to A- (Excellent) from A (Excellent) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating to 'a-' (Excellent) from 'a' (Excellent) of Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (KFB Mutual) (Louisville, KY), which is a member of Kentucky Farm Bureau Group. The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) has been revised to stable from negative. The ratings reflect KFB Mutual's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as strongest, as well as its marginal operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM). The rating downgrades reflect a revision of the group's business profile assessment to limited from neutral. As a single-state writer with correlating lines of business and an inherent exposure to weather-related events, the group has been impacted by increasing frequency and severity of weather loses. Volatile operating earnings have been driven by consistent and significantly elevated loss activity over the past few years, with this trend continuing in 2025. KFB Mutual's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as strongest, continues to be supported by its strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR), a conservative investment portfolio, strong liquidity position, and relatively low underwriting and reserve leverage measures. The group's marginal operating performance assessment reflects the deterioration in underwriting performance and remains aligned with other marginal-assessed rated carriers. The ERM assessment remains appropriate and includes a comprehensive reinsurance program, which provides top-level limit into its tail exposure. The stable outlooks reflect the group's strongest level of balance sheet strength assessment supported by the strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization, as measured by BCAR, and generally modest leverage measures. The outlooks further contemplate management's various corrective actions, including rate increases and reunderwriting initiatives, which are expected to result in earnings stabilization and corresponding maintenance of key balance sheet strength metrics. This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
USD still weighing decisions with NCAA settlement
SIOUX FALLS S.D. (KELO) — South Dakota universities are still deciding what path to take regarding the recent House v. NCAA settlement. 1 arrested in connection with last week's shooting According to the settlement, college athletic departments and the NCAA will pay $2.8 billion in back pay to student-athletes who competed in the NCAA from 2016 through June 6, 2025, which will be spread out over 10 years. The final details of the House v. NCAA settlement came after the state of South Dakota reached an agreement with the NCAA in April. South Dakota's Division I schools will pay a reduced amount towards a $2.8 billion settlement and a Women's Basketball Performance Fund will be created as part of the settlement. Now, college athletic departments across the country that opt into the House v. NCAA settlement agreement will be able to share revenue directly with student-athletes, starting at $20.5 million per school and rising each year. There will be a salary cap placed on the amount each student-athlete can receive from this $20.5 million. On Wednesday, South Dakota Athletics Director Jon Schemmel said in a post on X USD is still working on reaching a decision regarding the opt out. He added USD's main goal is to protect their student athletes roster spots this year and beyond. Schemmel ensured USD will not cut anyone due to roster limits this year regardless. 'If you weren't confused right now, you'd be crazy. I am too as is our entire industry including A4 schools,' Schemmel said about the details of the NCAA settlement. Schemmel said there are still many moving parts to all of this and they are currently are trying to get answers as quickly as we can. 'Our biggest hang-up initially was the roster limits and mainly how that ties into enrollment. For us we would have had to cut 50 kids if we opted in,' Schemmel said in an interview on The Nate Brown Show. 'Now part of the settlement where Judge Wilkens decision, now allows for grandfathering in of the rosters. We're really trying to assess what protects our student athletes the most and the rosters that we currently have.' The deadline for Division I schools outside the power conferences to officially opt into the recently-approved House v. NCAA settlement is June 30. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
AM Best Revises Outlooks to Positive for Reaseguradora Santo Domingo, S.A.; Affirms Credit Ratings
MEXICO CITY--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- AM Best has revised the outlooks to positive from stable and affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of B (Fair) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of 'bb+' (Fair) of Reaseguradora Santo Domingo, S.A. (REASANTO) (Dominican Republic). The Credit Ratings (ratings) reflect REASANTO's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, limited business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM). The rating outlook revisions reflect AM Best's expectation that REASANTO will continue with its positive trend in operating performance, reflecting prudent underwriting practices and profit generation capabilities. REASANTO is a reinsurance company founded in 1973 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. The company focuses its product offerings on the fire and allied business lines. In 2024, the company started underwriting business in Central America following its plan to expand operations to other countries; however, business continues to be concentrated in the Dominican Republic. The company's business profile is considered limited given its geographic and business line concentration. AM Best will continue to monitor the deployment of REASANTO's business strategy outside the country. REASANTO's balance sheet strength assessment of strong is based on its strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalization in 2024, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR). The company continues to adjust its exposures to probable maximum losses by actively managing its reinsurance program and aiming to reduce volatility in its capital base. Mitigating these factors is a conservative investment strategy and an adequate reinsurance panel. The company's operating performance is assessed as adequate, driven by consistent net income that is backed by contained expenses and claims targeted to diminish deviations in REASANTO's budget and improve its underwriting quality. The company's ERM is considered appropriate with defined policies and procedures to maintain risk tolerance levels. These are well-adhered to and reviewed periodically. Positive rating actions could occur if the company's underwriting performance and profit generation capabilities continue to strengthen, supporting the current level of risk-adjusted capitalization. Negative rating actions could take place if the company's risk-based capital erodes to a level no longer supportive of the current ratings resulting from a sharp deterioration in operating performance. This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments.
