
Summer vacations thrown into chaos as hotel reservations in popular Caribbean hotspot are ruled ILLEGAL
Americans considering summer vacations to a popular Caribbean island won't be able to plan travel through popular Expedia Group websites amid a landmark court ruling declaring bookings to property sized during the Cuban Revolution illegal.
A Miami federal court ordered the Expedia and affiliates Hotels.com and Orbitz to pay a staggering $30 million to an American-Cuban who fled the bloody overthrow of the government by Fidel Castro and Che Guevara in the late 1950s.
Bookings to hotels on the small island of Cayo Coco off the northern coast of the Ciego de Avila province, 280 miles east of Havana, are no longer possible through Expedia amid the travel site's long-running legal dispute brought by Cuban refugee Mario Echevarría.
The ruling in the Southern District of Florida found that Expedia and its affiliates illegally promoted and sold bookings to hotels on land that belonged to the Echevarría family.
It's the first ruling of its kind under the 1996 Helms-Burton Act, which allowed US nationals to sue companies that profited from the 'trafficking' of properties sized by the Castro regime without compensation.
Enforcement of the act had been suspended until 2019 when Donald Trump triggered the Title III provision that allowed Echevarría to sue. A two-week jury trial found he had 12.5 percent ownership of the land and was entitled to $9.95 million in damages - with the jury tripling the amount to $29.85 million because Expedia continued promoting the hotels after the lawsuit was filed.
Echevarría first notified Expedia in August 2019 that the family would be seeking legal action for the group's business dealings with hotels that were located on the tourist hot spot.
It is understood Expedia has no pending reservations at the island and has no intent to resume bookings.
Mario Echevarría won a $29.8 million judgment against Expedia and two of its affiliates after a jury found that the booking sites violated the the Helms-Burton Act, which protects U.S. nationals who owned property that had been illegally confiscated by the Cuban government from. The jury determined the sites made financial gains by doing business in such properties
Echevarría's attorney Andrés Rivero said the ruling was a 'major victory' not only for his client 'but also for the broader community of Cuban-Americans whose property was wrongfully taken and has been exploited by U.S. companies in partnership with the Cuban communist dictatorship'.
'We are proud to have played a role in securing justice under a law that had never before been tested before a jury,' he said.
Judge Federico A. Moreno has scheduled additional hearings to determine the payout.
It is unknown if each travel booking company will have to pay $ 29.8 million in damages or if it will be split evenly. All three companies must appeal by July if they are not in accordance with the decision.
'We are disappointed in the jury's verdict, which we do not believe was supported by the law or evidence,' an Expedia spokesperson told The Daily Mail.
'We believe the court was correct to decline immediate entry of judgment and look forward to the court's consideration of the legal sufficiency of the evidence presented to the jury.'
A search on all three travel booking web sites showed that listings to hotels had been removed.
In a January interview with UniVista TV, Echeverría revealed his great aunt was chosen by his great grandfather to administer the land before the Castro-led revolution swept across Cuba.
The family's properties were taken away in 1961, two years after the new government's Agrarian Reform Law was enacted.
'I thought that the triumph of the Revolution would bring democracy to Cuba,' Echeverría said. 'I didn't know who Fidel Castro was.'
Echeverría fled Cuba in 1967 and settled in Spain before he moved to the United States.
He lived in New York and Connecticut before he settled down in Miami and became an important figure in the Cuban exile community.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
22 minutes ago
- Wales Online
URC considers shock US expansion as it waits on WRU decision over cutting teams
URC considers shock US expansion as it waits on WRU decision over cutting teams The URC is considering further expansion The United Rugby Championship could look very different in the future (Image: Huw Evans Picture Agency Ltd ) The United Rugby Championship is considering expanding into the US, with Chicago and Miami potential destinations for two new franchises, WalesOnline has learnt. There is a big push to improve rugby in the US given the fact they are hosting the World Cup in 2031, and the URC could include two American sides in the future. The URC is no stranger to expansion having initially started as a Celtic league before inviting Italian and South African teams into the competition. Georgian outfit Black Lion have also been in negotiations with the URC but the US route is being seriously considered. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack to get exclusive news stories and insight from behind the scenes in Welsh rugby. Were the URC to allow two US sides into the competition there would have to be a significant financial uplift to its current shareholders, while the cost of travel and player welfare would also have to be taken into consideration. News of the US interest comes as the URC are engaged in ongoing talks with the WRU over how many Welsh teams will participate in the competition going forward. The union is strongly considering cutting down to three or even two professional clubs after serving notice on the current status quo of four equally funded sides. If the WRU does decide to cut teams, a potential expansion into the US could be more attractive to the current URC shareholders. Join WalesOnline Rugby's WhatsApp Channel here to get the breaking news sent straight to your phone for free Article continues below While the quality of the sides competing in the URC cannot be questioned it is often criticised for its excessive travelling, especially since the introduction of teams from South Africa. There is already a professional league in the US called Major League Rugby which was only founded in 2017 with 11 teams in total but it is nowhere near the level required if the US are to compete with tier one nations. 'As the URC, we have always had expansion in DNA," said URC CEO Martin Anayi in a press conference last week. "We have been the Celtic League, and we moved, and we have tried to grow each time. And we have done that. "I think we have genuinely made it a better league. 'I think it is important that we continue to look outwards. But also, the bar is very high because, for every game you add, there is a player welfare issue to engage with. 'And that is something you have to make sure you aren't compromising. "You have logistics, especially when we are transcontinental, and then you have the sporting element, and we want it to be as competitive as ever. 'So I would never say never, but I think the bar is very high to do that. "We play less rugby with the URC model and format. We don't have home and away games in every match. Get the latest breaking Welsh rugby news stories sent straight to your inbox with our FREE daily newsletter. Sign up here. 'And it also allows us to not play across international weekends. "We have almost 320 internationals playing in the league, which is almost double what you have in the Premiership or Super Rugby. Article continues below 'If we do expand in the future, it has to be in the right way, and we don't fall into the traps of those who have done it in the past, and it hasn't been successful."


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
NATO chief to call for four-fold increase in Europe's air defense spending
LONDON — Washington's European allies must make a 'quantum leap' in military spending to deter Russia, the head of NATO is expected to say Monday, calling for a 400% increase in the continent's air and missile defense budget. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's comments are set to be among the strongest yet from the organization as it attempts to improve the continent's insufficient defenses against Russi a while also avoiding the political ire of President Donald Trump. 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defense,' Rutte is expected to say in a speech to the London-based think tank Chatham House, in remarks released beforehand by the alliance. 'The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defense plans in full. The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends.' Trump's clear signaling that he would like to at least significantly reduce decades of American military support for Europe has sent its nations scrambling to beef up their own arms industries. The American president's suggestion that NATO allies should up their minimum defense spend from 2% to 5% of GDP was once seen as outlandish; but last month Rutte too backed this idea and said he expected it to be adopted at NATO's June 24-25 summit. On Monday he will make a similarly ambitious call, according to NATO's pre-released remarks. He will ask for a '400% increase in air and missile defense' and add that 'militaries also need thousands more armored vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation, and medical support.' 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe,' he will say. 'We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' Rutte's comments would come against the backdrop of European powers vowing to spend more on their military budgets, having relied for decades upon America's protection first against the Soviet Union and now Putin's revanchist Kremlin. NATO's constituents must also maintain a balancing act when it comes to Ukraine — which is not a member. Kyiv's allies want to support a neighbor it sees as a bulwark against Russian aggression, while keeping onside a White House increasingly sympathetic to Moscow's worldview. Trump has previously described his 'very, very good relationship' with Putin, a man considered a pariah by former President Joe Biden and other Western leaders. Many officials and analysts in Europe acknowledge that Trump is right to demand that wealthy nations such as Germany be able to look after themselves without Washington's help. However many of these same commentators have expressed their horror at the tactics used by Trump, who has suggested that the United States would not protect underpaying allies, and openly inviting Russia to 'do whatever the hell' it wants to them. That risks shattering the central premise of NATO: Article 5 of its founding charter — an 'all-for-one and one-for-all' mutual defense promise suggesting that if one ally is attacked, the rest would come to its aid. The scenario the founders had in mind was that the U.S. would join the fight if Russia decided to launch an act of aggression against a smaller European country. In practice however, the only time it has been used in the real world was the other way round, when the alliance lent Washington symbolic defensive help after 9/11. Previous American presidents have always seen this as a good trade off: America underwrites European security, and in return has a huge influence over political, diplomatic and even cultural happenings on the continent and beyond. The soft power return on investment was always seen as a profitable one. However, Trump has repeatedly questioned this logic, not only undermining the promise behind Article 5 but using hostile language against those historically considered Western brethren. The realization among European allies that Washington is no longer committed to its mutual defense has sparked a drive to push up defense budgets and revive the long-since dormant arms industry on the continent.


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Why you probably shouldn't book a hotel on your laptop
An expert has revealed an important hack that could save you hundreds of pounds on your next hotel booking. With third-party websites such as Expedia and an increasingly popular choice for finding a deal, most of us are quick to begin our search on our laptops. But according to a travel expert, you'd be better off starting on your phone to get the best price. In a clip shared on Tiktok, the expert from Which? explained how reaching for her mobile saved her £270 on an apartment in Amsterdam via In another example, she said that using a mobile app instead of her laptop helped her slash almost £100 off a weekend getaway in Florence. She said: 'I would never book a hotel on a computer without checking the price on a mobile phone first. 'We slashed £270 off the price of an apartment in Amsterdam on and we saved almost £100 on Expedia just by booking a mobile exclusive.' Businesses often offer so-called 'mobile exclusive' deals in order to drive up traffic on apps and social media. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Mobile-only pricing is also used as a marketing tool to generate faster sales. The Which? expert also revealed that she would never book a flight with a travel agent without first checking the price directly with the airline. She explained this is because, while travel websites can appear to work out cheaper at first glance, added costs for extras such as baggage and seat selection can fast whack up the total cost. Booking directly with the airline can often mean getting these extras at a better price. Speaking of airline extras, she explained that, where possible, she avoids paying extra to reserve a seat. This is because many carriers, including British Airways and Jet2, always try to seat groups together 'wherever possible', meaning if you check in in good time, you have a reasonable chance of staying together. However, on two airlines, Wizz Air and Irish giant Ryanair, you are far more likely to be split up if you don't specifically select and pay for seats next to each other. And in another useful tip, she advised against buying insurance cover with hire car companies. More Trending Booking insurance with a third party is not only cheaper and also usually gets you a more comprehensive cover. 'Book through a third-party company before you go, and don't cave to the pressure at the car hire desk.' And in one last important tip, the expert said she would never exchange money at an airport change bureau. View More » This is because exchange rates at travel hubs are 'notoriously terrible'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Major European holiday destination opens e-gates to British travellers just in time for summer MORE: Planning a family holiday? How to save up to 40% on your 2026 Discovery Cove Orlando Tickets MORE: Ireland has a US border — it could help travellers nervous about Trump's America Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.