Testimony resumes in Karen Read retrial. Follow live updates.
Testimony resumes Wednesday — 8:39 a.m.
.cls-1{clip-path:url(#clippath);}.cls-2,.cls-3{fill:none;}.cls-2,.cls-3,.cls-4{stroke-width:0px;}.cls-5{clip-path:url(#clippath-1);}.cls-3{clip-rule:evenodd;}
Link copied
By Travis Andersen
Testimony resumes Wednesday in Karen Read's murder retrial in Norfolk Superior Court
Jurors on Tuesday heard testimony from Dighton police officer Nicholas Barros, who testified that when he saw Read's Lexus SUV outside her parents' residence, just one section of the right side of her taillight was missing, whereas a photo of the taillight later at the Canton police garage showed more extensive damage.
Advertisement
Barros initially told prosecutor Hank Brennan that he mentioned the difference when he testified at Read's first trial last year. But after Brennan showed him a transcript of that testimony, he acknowledged he didn't mention it.
'I know what I saw,' Barros told Brennan. 'And that wasn't it.'
Read, 45, has pleaded not guilty to charges including second-degree murder for allegedly backing her SUV in a drunken rage into her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, early on Jan. 29, 2022, after dropping him off outside a home on Fairview Road following a night of bar-hopping.
Her lawyers say she was framed and that O'Keefe entered the house, owned at the time by a fellow Boston police officer, where he was fatally beaten and possibly mauled by a German Shepherd before his body was planted on the front lawn.
Advertisement
Read's first trial ended in a hung jury and she remains free on bail.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Karen Read defense expert challenges hit-and-run theory with collision tests showing key inconsistencies
Karen Read's legal team is nearing the end of the case for her defense with crash reconstruction expert Dr. Daniel Wolfe called to the stand Friday. Dr. Wolfe played video for the jury that showed multiple recreations of an impact involving a 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV and a crash dummy to simulate that alleged impact of Read's vehicle of the same make and model on her former boyfriend, John O'Keefe, whom she is accused of killing in a drunken hit-and-run. In each simulation, at speeds ranging from 10 to 29 mph, the damage to the vehicle's taillight was "inconsistent" with that damage police recorded on Read's actual taillight. Karen Read Denis Noticing Confrontation Between Deceased Boyfriend And Atf Agent WATCH: Crash expert plays video reconstruction of Lexus SUV on crash dummy While most of the impacts shattered the outer lens, internal components that were destroyed in Read's vehicle remained intact in multiple test taillights. Read On The Fox News App "Did you reach any opinions or conclusions as to whether the damage to the right rear tail light of the subject vehicle is consistent or inconsistent with an impact to a right arm during a high-speed reversing maneuver?" asked defense attorney Alan Jackson. "It was inconsistent," Wolfe replied. Wolfe also obtained sweatshirts that were the same brand and fabric blend of the one O'Keefe was wearing when he died. Notably, the impacts did not produce similar holes in the cloth. Karen Read Defense Floats Theory That 'Jealous' Brian Higgins Fought John O'keefe Before Death "Do you have an opinion or conclusion as to whether or not the damage that you saw to the hoodie related to John O'Keefe is consistent or inconsistent with an impact from a right rear taillight of the subject SUV?" Jackson asked. "It was inconsistent," Wolfe replied. "And what do you base that opinion on?" Jackson followed up. "Based upon all of the impact testing that we did with the closed ATD arm in the laboratory, as well as the field," Wolfe said, using an acronym that refers to the formal name for crash dummies – Anthropomorphic Test Device. Judge Beverly Cannone called a midday lunch break around 12:40 p.m. Special prosecutor Hank Brennan was expected to kick off cross-examination when court resumes. Friday marks the 28th day of her retrial on murder and other charges in the death of O'Keefe, a 46-year-old Boston police officer. Wolfe is the director of accident reconstruction at a firm called ARCCA. Earlier in his testimony, he said ARCCA designed a specialized "cannon" to simulate throwing a cocktail glass at Read's taillight and determined that similar damage could have been caused if someone threw the glass at around 31 mph and 37 mph. "From the 37 mile per hour test, we are getting damage that's generally consistent, and by that I mentioned we have portions of the outer lens missing, the underlying diffuser," he said. Karen Read Defense Gets Boost As Plow Driver Testifies He Saw No Body In Snow During Boston Cop Death Case "There was also some fracturing on the backside of the assembly. So again we observed damage that was generally consistent with that of the subject taillight." Wolfe said he gave an opinion that the damage Read's SUV was generally consistent with someone throwing that drinking glass at least 37 mph. Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X In another ARCCA test, the reconstructionists wanted to see if an impact between the taillight and the back of O'Keefe's head could've caused his skull fracture. Wolfe said he tested at 15 mph. Damage to the test taillight was significantly more than Read's taillight at that speed – but it didn't generate enough force to cause a skull fracture. ARCCA obtained sweatshirts from the same company and of the same fabric blend as the one O'Keefe was wearing when he died and also simulated strikes to see if the fabric would puncture in the same way. At 10 and 17 mph, the taillight sustained different levels of damage but the fabric remained undamaged. Sign Up To Get The True Crime Newsletter Prosecutors accused Read, 45, of hitting O'Keefe with her 2021 Lexus SUV and driving away as he died on the ground with a skull fracture during a blizzard. Investigators recovered a broken cocktail glass and a black straw from the scene and found additional glass on Read's bumper. However, experts testified earlier at trial that the bar glass was not a match for the fragments found on her car. The defense denies that she struck him and has called witnesses who have attributed his injuries to other causes, including a dog bite and a potential fistfight with a man Read was flirting with behind his back. GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub Special prosecutor Hank Brennan unsuccessfully tried to have Wolfe and a colleague, Dr. Andrew Renstchler, blocked from testifying before the start of the trial. Wolfe testified during the first trial, which ended with a deadlocked jury, that damage to Read's SUV is inconsistent with a collision involving O'Keefe. Read told reporters outside court Wednesday that her defense could rest as soon as next Tuesday. There was no court on Thursday. She could face up to life in prison if convicted. Her first trial, in which the defense claimed she had been framed, ended with a deadlocked jury last article source: Karen Read defense expert challenges hit-and-run theory with collision tests showing key inconsistencies
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Karen Read live updates: Crude text messages from fired state trooper read to jury
Editor's note: This page summarizes testimony in the Karen Read trial for Thursday, May 8. For the latest updates on the Karen Read retrial, visit USA TODAY's coverage for Friday, May 9. Another Massachusetts state trooper took the stand in the murder trial of Karen Read on May 8, reading crude text messages sent by one of his subordinates during the investigation. Read, 45, is accused of hitting her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her Lexus SUV and leaving him for dead outside the home of a fellow cop in January 2022. Prosecutors say Read deliberately hit O'Keefe, 46, in a drunken rage. The testimony comes after defense attorneys sparred with an expert over the timing of a star witness' Google search. An analysis of the phone of Jennifer McCabe, a friend of the couple who testified for the prosecution, found she Googled how long does it take to die in the cold the day O'Keefe was found. A second expert testified that the search was made after O'Keefe was found unconscious, not before as the defense has suggested. Read's lawyers say she was framed for O'Keefe's murder. Court ended May 7 with prosecutors playing a clip of Read saying "Jen McCabe, it's me or her. Either I'm going down, Jen, or you are." The case out of Dedham, Massachusetts has turned into a years-long whodunnit legal saga that has garnered massive intrigue from true-crime fans across the country, spurring an array of podcasts, movies, and television shows. The former financial professor is back in court after a 2024 trial ended in a hung jury. The first full day of testimony was April 23. Judge Beverly Cannone estimated the trial could last between six and eight weeks and told jurors recently that the proceedings are on or slightly ahead of schedule. One of Read's attorneys questioned Yuri Bukhenik, a Massachusetts State Police trooper, about the thoroughness of his investigation, including whether he investigated the possibility that O'Keefe was involved in a physical altercation before his death. Bukhenik said it was possible he told the medical examiner's office on Jan. 29, 2022, that O'Keefe had potentially been struck in the face with a cocktail glass. Bukhenik said he did not go into the house or secure the lawn as a crime scene on the day O'Keefe was found outside. But he said he interviewed the homeowner, Brian Albert, and two witnesses, McCabe and her husband, to determine if anyone in the house had been involved in an altercation. Read's attorney asked if witnesses who were in the house would be motivated to lie if they were involved an altercation with O'Keefe. Bukhenik said he couldn't answer that, but later acknowledged that someone who appears to be a cooperating witness could be a suspect who's lying. Bukhenik is expected to return to the stand on May 9. One of Read's attorney started questioning by pressing Bukhenik about the involvement of his former subordinate, Michael Proctor, in the investigation. Bukhenik said Proctor, who was later fired for unrelated charges, was involved with collecting evidence, authoring search warrants and conducting interviews. But Bukhenik denied that Proctor had a major role in the investigation in the contentious back and forth. Ultimately, Bukhenik said bias and Proctor's involvement did not taint the investigation. 'This investigation was conducted professionally with integrity and all the evidence collected, all the statements collected pointed in one direction,' Bukhenik said. 'All the evidence pointed in one direction and one direction only,' he later added. Bukhenik read aloud to the jury crude text messages sent by an officer he supervised during the investigation into Read. In the August 2022 messages, trooper Michael Proctor used a slur and said he was going through a person's phone but had found 'no nudes so far.' Bukhenik did not identify the people Proctor was referring to in the messages. Bukhenik said an internal investigation later found he failed to adequately supervise Proctor and gave an inaccurate quarterly performance review. He said he lost five vacation days as a result. Proctor, who testified in Read's first trial, was fired in March for reasons unrelated to the text messages. Bukhenik also described the process of finding evidence as the snow melted in the days following O'Keefe's death including his hat, a drinking straw and more pieces of clear and red plastic. Prosecutors played Ring and dash camera footage showing the damage to Read's taillight. Bukhenik began to walk jurors through surveillance footage from the two restaurants where Read and O'Keefe went drinking the night prior to his death before the court broke for lunch. Bukhenik told jurors what Read said to police and what O'Keefe's body looked like the day he died. Bukhenik said blood was pooled beneath O'Keefe's head and seeping into the sheets of his hospital bed after his death. Both of O'Keefe's eyes were swollen and discolored and there were small cuts on his face. Bukhenik said there were also cuts and bruises on his right arm, hand and knee. Bukhenik showed jurors pieces of clothing O'Keefe was wearing the day he died. He said he found it 'very significant' that one of O'Keefe's shoes was missing and while he was at the hospital, he began to theorize that O'Keefe had been struck by a car. 'I was suspecting that he was hit out of his shoes,' Bukhenik said. O'Keefe's sneaker was later found at the scene, according to previous testimony. Bukhenik then went to talk to Read at her parents' home, where he saw that a large piece of the red taillight cover was missing from her SUV. When asked about the damage, Read said, 'I don't know how I did it last night.' Read told police that after a night of drinking, she dropped O'Keefe off at 34 Fairview Road. She said she made a three-point turn and left without seeing him go into the house, according to Bukhenik. When asked how O'Keefe might have sustained his injuries, Read told police O'Keefe had bumped his head two nights before and had asked her about it. Police then seized Read's vehicle and cell phone, Bukhenik said. Jessica Hyde, a digital forensics examiner, said a tab was opened on Jennifer McCabe's phone at 2:27 a.m. on Jan. 29 and multiple searches were made at some point, including for sporting events, a video of the song It's Raining Men and two crucial, misspelled questions 'hos (sic) long to die in the cold' and 'how long ti die in cikd (sic)' Hyde said 'hos (sic) long to die in cold' was the final search made in the tab at 6:24 a.m. O'Keefe was found around 6 a.m. Hyde is the second expert to tell jurors this search was made after 6 a.m. Ian Whiffin, a digital intelligence expert, testified on April 28 that forensic data showed the Google search occurred at about 6:23 a.m. Read's attorney attempted to poke holes in Hyde's testimony by pointing out differences between her previous testimony, her report and Whiffin's findings. CourtTV has been covering the case against Read and the criminal investigation since early 2022, when O'Keefe's body was found outside a Canton home. You can watch CourtTV's live feed of the Read trial proceedings from Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts. Proceedings begin at 9 a.m. ET. Contributing: Michael Loria, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Karen Read trial updates: Jurors hear crude texts from fired trooper
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
What did this star witness Google? Latest in Karen Read trial over killing of boyfriend
Editor's note: This page summarizes testimony in the Karen Read trial for Wednesday, May 7. For the latest updates on the Karen Read retrial, visit USA TODAY's coverage for Thursday, May 8. A Google search for how long it takes to die in the cold. Pieces of broken taillight found where prosecutors say the woman hit her cop boyfriend with her SUV and left him in the snow. And details from the autopsy. The new evidence introduced Wednesday is the latest in the trial of Karen Read, a 45-year-old woman accused of hitting Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe with her Lexus and leaving him for dead outside the home of a fellow cop in January 2022. Prosecutors say the former finance professor deliberately hit O'Keefe, 46, in a drunken rage. Read's lawyers say she was framed by cops. An analysis of the phone of Jennifer McCabe, a friend of the couple and star witness for the prosecution, found she Googled how long does it take to die in the cold the day O'Keefe was found. A forensic expert testified Wednesday that the search was made after O'Keefe was found unconscious, not before as the defense has suggested. Testimony heard May 7 – the 11th day of the trial – comes as jurors this week already heard anguished and enraged voicemails Read left O'Keefe the morning he died; a bombshell admission Read confessed to a first responder at the scene; and from investigators who used red Solo cups and a leaf blower to collect evidence from outside the Canton, Massachusetts home where O'Keefe was found. Read's lawyers say the investigation was marred by bias and incompetence. They have also called out inconsistencies in testimony of witnesses called by prosecutors, highlighting changes in what they said to the grand jury, at Read's first trial in 2024 and at the ongoing trial. Read is back in court after the 2024 trial ended in a hung jury. The first full day of testimony was April 23. Among evidence from the first two weeks of testimony, jurors heard from a star witness who testified that Read told her 'I hit him' three times; cryptic text messages a key witness for prosecutors sent other witnesses; and Read admitting to reporters that she drank heavily the night before O'Keefe died. The case out of Dedham, Massachusetts has turned into a years-long whodunnit legal saga that has garnered massive intrigue from true-crime fans across the country, spurring an array of podcasts, movies, and television shows. The former financial professor is back in court after a 2024 trial ended in a hung jury. Here's what else happened at the Norfolk County courthouse on Wednesday, May 7. Read's attorney attempted to poke holes in the testimony of Jessica Hyde, a digital forensics examiner, by pointing out differences between her previous testimony, her report and the findings of another expert witness for the prosecution, Ian Whiffin. Hyde determined that before O'Keefe was found around 6 a.m., his phone was last used at 12:20 a.m. But Whiffin, a digital intelligence expert, said the device was locked with its lock button for the last time at 12:32 a.m. Hyde said she could not contest Whiffin's findings because she had not evaluated that specific information. She later clarified to prosecutors that her report also found the last movement of O'Keefe's phone occurred at 12:32 a.m. Turning to McCabe's phone, Read's attorney also noted Hyde wrote in her report that a definitive reason for the 2:27 a.m. timestamp of the 'hos (sic) long to die in cold' search is 'unknown.' Hyde described in detail the best practices for extracting data from an iPhone, including putting the phone on airplane mode or in a Faraday box or bag to prevent it from being wiped and stop new data from coming in. Hyde agreed data in her report indicated this best practice wasn't followed, but said this had no impact on her conclusions. Hyde said a key witness searched 'hos (sic) long to die in cold' after O'Keefe was found unconscious, not before as the defense has suggested. Hyde said a tab was opened on Jennifer McCabe's phone at 2:27 a.m. on Jan. 29 and multiple searches were made at some point, including for sporting events, a video of the song It's Raining Men and two crucial, misspelled questions 'hos (sic) long to die in the cold' and 'how long ti die in cikd (sic)' McCabe is a star witness for the prosecution who testified that she heard Read say 'I hit him, I hit him, I hit him,' that morning and shared vivid details about discovering the body of 'one of her closest friends.' Catch up on the murder case: Who is Karen Read and why is she on trial again? Hyde said 'there is a really scary danger' that an untrained examiner might assume the search was made at 2:27 a.m., but the timestamp actually reflects when the tab was first opened or backgrounded. 'You could erroneously implicate a search was done hours or even days before it actually occurred. Some of us leave our tabs open forever,' she said. Hyde said 'hos (sic) long to die in cold' was actually the final search made in the tab at 6:24 a.m. O'Keefe was found around 6 a.m. Hyde is the second expert to tell jurors this search was made after 6 a.m. Whiffin testified on April 28 that forensic data showed the Google search occurred at about 6:23 a.m. Whiffin gave a live demonstration of why, according to his analysis, the earlier timestamp is inaccurate. Connor Keefe, a Massachusetts State Police trooper assigned to the Norfolk County District Attorney's office homicide unit, showed jurors more pieces of evidence found near the area where O'Keefe was found lying in the snow. Keefe, who was tasked with bagging evidence uncovered by the team searching the lawn and street in front of 34 Fairview Road, unsealed evidence bags in court containing a shoe and pieces of broken taillight found at the scene. Jurors previously heard from the leader of the search team that sifted through the snow using rakes and brooms to find the evidence. Keefe also attended the autopsy of O'Keefe, which he said is common practice for law enforcement. On cross-examination, Read's attorney attempted to question Keefe about injuries to O'Keefe's arm seen during the autopsy, but faced repeated objections from the prosecution. Keefe said he did not provide a theory of what happened to O'Keefe to the medical examiner, but agreed he provided information to her during the autopsy. A judge agreed to keep testimony from the Sandra Birchmore case, another notorious death in Canton, out of the Karen Read murder trial. Birchmore's death, initially ruled a suicide, is now a federal case against former Stoughton cop Matthew Farwell. Prosecutors came around to what family and friends of Birchmore had said from the beginning: Farwell killed her and made the scene look like she had taken her own life. Farwell has pleaded not guilty. Guarino, who has testified multiple times in Read's second trial, worked both cases. Guarino initially failed to identify any messages from Farwell's phones to Birchmore. Investigators later revealed 32,709 messages between the two from December 2019 to her death in February 2021. Critics say Guarino botched data analysis in the O'Keefe case as well. In a Tuesday, May 6 ruling, Judge Beverly Cannone sided with prosecutors who argued that "[t]estimony about this unrelated death investigation would result in a trial within a trial, with much information being inadmissible, confidential or offered without a proper foundation." Cannone left a loophole: If "the door is opened" to Birchmore-related testimony, it could theoretically be allowed into Read's second trial CourtTV has been covering the case against Read and the criminal investigation since early 2022, when O'Keefe's body was found outside a Canton home. You can watch CourtTV's live feed of the Read trial proceedings from Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts. Proceedings begin at 9 a.m. ET. Contributing: Chris Helms, The Enterprise; Michael Loria, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Karen Read trial: Star witness' Google search scrutinized
