£1.5m Highland lochside manor house comes with its own spa and sauna
A baronial manor house set on the banks of Loch Linnhe, which comes with its own luxury spa and sauna, has hit the market.
Ardrhu House is located on Scotland's West Coast, near the village of Onich, around 10 miles from Fort William.
The lochside property is currently used as a luxury hotel and venue for smaller and more intimate weddings.
The main manor house was built in the baronial style typical of Scottish manor houses.
It has retained many characterful features such as turrets, high ceilings and original fireplaces.
Ardrhu House is currently listed with Strutt and Parker for £1,500,000.
The manor house has a grand entrance hall which flows into the drawing room, featuring a corner turret and two fireplaces, but with modern finishings.
The large windows provide great views out over Loch Linnhe.
There is also a sitting room, currently set up for guests, with a corner fireplace and dark wood panelling.
The heart of the house is the dining room/kitchen which has been modernised with wall and base units, a central island and modern integrated appliances.
There is also a connected commercial chefs' kitchen with wine store.
Off the dining area is a ground floor bedroom with ensuite that can be accessed from the dining room.
Lastly on the ground floor is the conservatory, with a vaulted glazed roof and French doors opening onto the terrace.
Heading upstairs there are two double bedrooms with corner fireplaces, two bedrooms with ensuite and one smaller bedroom.
In addition, there is a separate toilet and large bathroom with bathtub and shower.
The master bedroom makes a statement, with a corner fireplace and huge bathroom.
The highlight is the free-standing bathtub with gold dragon taps, situated within the turret overlooking the loch.
Ardrhu House is also equipped with spa facilities, over two floors.
The spa has a dedicated entrance and caters to bridal parties on the big day.
On the ground floor there is a spa treatment room with ensuite bathroom and a spa reception area which doubles as a hairdressers.
Upstairs is the jacuzzi deck with a hot tub offering more loch views, as well as a steam room and sauna.
All bathrooms within the house are fitted with underfloor heating.
The manor house is approached by a gravelled driveway with private parking.
To the west of the house is a detached outbuilding comprising three garages, one currently used as a laundry.
The garden surrounding the property is laid mainly to level lawn with direct access to the shore of Loch Linnhe.
There are several seating areas including three fully glazed pods, and a paved terrace off the conservatory.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - LVMH would be better off without M and H
LONDON, June 11 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Bernard Arnault likes empire-building, not the other way around. Yet the LVMH ( opens new tab boss's $270 billion luxury company, whose 75 brands span Louis Vuitton bags, Moët champagne and Hennessy cognac, is now saddled with a conglomerate discount. The struggling drinks unit, which brings few synergies and faces tobacco-like risks, should be jettisoned. Selling or spinning off Moët Hennessy sounds like heresy. That's not just because it accounts for two letters in the French luxury group's name: LVMH was created in 1987 through the merger of Moët Hennessy and Louis Vuitton. Pricey tipples like Dom Pérignon champagne, which sells for about 200 pounds ($270) a bottle – and higher for those made in the best years – have also acted as a hedge, as they are less exposed to economic cycles than some goods like shoes or handbags. Yet that argument is starting to look shaky, as consumers increasingly hunt out cheaper drinks, opens new tab. The unit, accounting for about 7% of group sales, has been the worst-performing among LVMH's six divisions in the past year. Sales fell 8% to 6 billion euros last year, whereas LVMH's total revenue rose 1%. For now, Arnault seems focused on fixing the business, but it's a good time to rethink where it belongs. Unlike Sephora – LVMH's lower-margin beauty retailer – it neither provides valuable intel that can help shape strategy for the rest of the group, nor offers much opportunity for cross-selling. Moreover, the world is changing rapidly, with the next generation of aspiring luxury consumers willing to embrace a future without alcohol. A pariah status akin to tobacco could damage the very brand desirability that LVMH has so painstakingly curated. LVMH's 66% stake in the drinks unit could be worth 12 billion euros, if valued on the same average multiple of 14 times 2026 operating profit fetched by rivals Diageo (DGE.L), opens new tab and Pernod Ricard ( opens new tab. Given its size, and current challenges, a spinoff probably makes more sense than a sale for now. Listing the unit separately would leave behind a simpler, faster-growing luxury group, which should be valued more highly by investors. A simple sum-of-the-parts calculation suggests that LVMH could be worth some 369 billion euros including net debt, a 47% uplift on its current enterprise value. Selling the drinks business would still be a big step for Arnault, not least because his son Alexandre, who is in the closely watched succession contest among five siblings, is currently its deputy CEO. Still, the fact that Big Tobacco stocks like British American Tobacco (BATS.L), opens new tab are now valued at just 9 times operating profit suggests that the drinks unit could have further to fall. LVMH is better off without M and H. Follow Yawen Chen on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
North Wales Chronicle
4 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Government ‘putting its money where its mouth is' with £200m for Acorn scheme
Ministers confirmed they are meeting in full the request for development funding for the Acorn project in Aberdeenshire – the first time a government has provided funding of this scale for such a project to proceed. The scheme, which proposes storing emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea, had previously been overlooked for support despite repeated calls from the Scottish Government and others for it to be backed. With the UK Government also pledging to support the Viking carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in the Humber, Mr Miliband insisted the two schemes will 'support industrial renewal' with 'thousands of highly skilled jobs'. According to the sector, Acorn could support about 15,000 jobs at its peak, with up to 20,000 jobs at the Viking project. As it develops, it is planned the Acorn site will link up with the former oil refinery at Grangemouth via more than 200 miles of pipelines. An existing 175 miles of gas pipes will be repurposed for this, with 35 miles of new pipeline also being built, allowing CO2 from the Grangemouth site to be transported to Acorn's storage facilities under the North Sea. The move is seen by many as being key in securing a future for the facility, where some 400 workers were recently made redundant. Speaking as he visited the site near Peterhead, Aberdeenshire, Mr Miliband said: 'This Government is putting its money where its mouth is and backing the trailblazing Acorn and Viking CCS projects. 'This will support industrial renewal in Scotland and the Humber with thousands of highly-skilled jobs at good wages to build Britain's clean energy future. 'Carbon capture will make working people in Britain's hard-working communities better off, breathing new life into their towns and cities and reindustrialising the country through our Plan for Change.' Mr Miliband visited the site the day after Rachel Reeves promised funding for Acorn in her spending review – although the Chancellor did not put a figure on how much support would be given in her statement to MPs. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said afterwards: 'The £200 million funding confirmed for the Acorn carbon capture project will help to support the design and preparation as it continues to progress. 'This is about revitalising our industrial communities and creating long-term economic opportunities for Scottish workers.' Tim Stedman, chief executive of Storegga, the lead developer of Acorn, said: 'We warmly welcome the UK Government's support for the Acorn project and the commitment to development funding that will enable the critical work needed to reach final investment decision.' He added the 'milestone' is 'key not only for Acorn but for establishing Scotland's essential CCS infrastructure needed to grow and scale the UK's wider carbon capture and storage industry'. Mr Stedman continued: 'We look forward to working with Government in the months ahead to understand the details of today's commitment, and to ensure the policy, regulatory and funding frameworks are in place to build and grow a world-leading UK CCS sector.' Graeme Davies, executive vice-president at Harbour Energy, which is leading the Viking project, said the commitment in the spending review 'sends a strong signal' that the project is 'an infrastructure-led economic growth priority' for the Parliament. He added: 'We will work with Government on the critical steps needed to progress Viking CCS towards a final investment decision.' However climate campaigners at Friends of the Earth said the money should instead be invested in public transport, energy efficiency and measures to support oil workers to transition to jobs in the renewables sector. Caroline Rance, head of campaigns at Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: 'This is an enormous handout of supposedly scarce public money that will only directly benefit greedy oil and gas companies. 'Politicians are paying hundreds of millions to keep us locked into an unaffordable energy system which is reliant on fossil fuels and is destroying the climate. 'Carbon capture technology has 50 years of failure behind it, so businesses, workers and the public are being sold a lie about its role in their future. 'Building new fossil fuel infrastructure will undermine the energy transition and embolden oil firms to keep on drilling in the North Sea. 'Both the UK and Scottish governments should instead be backing climate solutions that can improve people's lives such as upgrading public transport, ensuring people live in warm homes and creating green jobs for the long-term.'
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Why does Scottish Government think a UK wellbeing economy is possible?
OVER the weekend, the independence movement will begin to address an issue that the Scottish Government has so far been unwilling to confront: the need to get practical about a wellbeing economy. On Saturday, I will deliver a session on the principles of the wellbeing economy in an independent Scotland as part of the IFS Summer Convention taking place in Perth, which will bring together representatives from across the independence movement. The desire for the independence movement to take the lead on the wellbeing economy reflects many of the conversations I've had this year. But before we can define a 'wellbeing economy', we need to examine its principles. What does a wellbeing economy look like? To do that, we must ask: What does a society built around wellbeing actually look like? Not just in theory – but how will it function, what will its values be, and what choices must it make? Within the independence movement, people don't struggle with the idea of a wellbeing economy, but their vision is often rather hazy. The conversation which starts on Saturday presents a unique opportunity to solidify the vision for a wellbeing economy in an independent Scotland. To ground the conversation, I offer three simple statements on which all of the readers, I hope, can agree. We do not have a wellbeing economy right now. A true wellbeing economy will look very different from today's economy. A wellbeing economy (whatever that looks like in the UK) seems further away each year. A wellbeing economy stands at the forefront of a progressive, independent Scotland. The concept of a wellbeing economy was one of the five key policy areas underpinning the Scottish Government's most recent economic prospectus (as part of the UK), the 2022 National Strategy for Economic Transformation. The report aimed to set out 'the priorities for Scotland's economy as well as the actions needed to maximise the opportunities of the next decade to achieve our vision of a wellbeing economy'. The strategy suggested that a wellbeing economy would deliver higher employment and wage growth rates and significantly reduce structural poverty. It would also improve health, cultural, and social outcomes for disadvantaged families and communities while part of the UK. In sum, the paper states that a wellbeing economy is possible in Scotland as part of the UK, a statement that I would strongly oppose. A Stronger Economy with Independence, released later in 2022, was the Scottish Government's vision for Scotland's economy once independent. It remains the most recent version. It opens with the line: 'We will use the full powers of independence to build an inclusive, fair, wellbeing economy that works for everyone in Scotland.' It is therefore easy to claim that the wellbeing economy is the destination for a better Scotland, whether as part of the UK or as an independent nation. However, as Aileen McLeod, director of WEAll Scotland, highlighted, a major concern for many in the wellbeing movement is that we can not deliver a wellbeing economy within the current economic system. READ MORE: John Swinney and Anas Sarwar clash over reports SNP figures plotting to oust FM McLeod said recently: 'While some progress has been made, there are concerns that the Government is retreating and falling back on an outdated economic model that cannot deliver the transformative change that people and communities across Scotland urgently need.' Like many general economic frameworks, a wellbeing economy is a contested term. Even in a relatively small group of activists and policymakers in Scotland, those engaged with the concept have differing views on the details or extent of the change required to create one. Is it a slow transition or a rapid transformation? Can we keep the best bits of capitalism and refocus our growth efforts? Do we simply need to de-prioritise the role of markets? Or do we require a new paradigm? The fork in the road To move the meeting on Saturday forward (and the movement as a whole), attendees will consider one question: Can our current economic system (or more precisely, the one in which we will begin our life as an independent nation again) deliver a wellbeing economy? It will be very interesting to see where the meeting lands. I believe that the Scottish Government is attempting to establish a wellbeing economy on economic foundations that will ultimately undermine its wellbeing policies. The IFS Summer Convention marks an opportunity for the movement to take the lead. If we accept that wellbeing is not part of the economic system at the moment, we open up space to think more radically – and more honestly – about what's needed. We can only assess that economic system if we understand it. READ MORE: UK economy sees biggest drop since October 2023 in blow for Rachel Reeves Since the late 1970s, we've been governed by a growth-first framework. Under neoliberalism, that system prizes an increase in GDP, productivity, and profit. There is little space for wellbeing. I have termed this the growth paradigm, and it views wellbeing policies – such as job guarantees, shorter workweeks, or community ownership – as non-essential. I would argue, in fact, that it views them as luxuries that we can not afford, or perhaps even as threats. But what does the independence movement think? Well, hopefully we will get a good idea of that over the weekend. The challenge is clear. How do we get from where we are now to a very different economy? Do we need to compromise? And if so, what social beliefs, ethical values and standards do we choose to include and which ones do we leave out? How will the economy we are likely to inherit when we are independent again support wellbeing policies? And the big one: How do we create the political and economic space in an independent Scotland to make that happen?
