Union warns Glasgow Airport strikes could hit summer holidays
Holidaymakers have been warned of the potential for strike action at Glasgow Airport over the summer as more than 800 workers from five companies are involved in pay disputes.Unite the union said workers at Glasgow Airport Ltd, ICTS Central Search, Swissport, Menzies Aviation and Falck could be balloted for walkouts.The union said that if there is no successful resolution to the disputes in the coming days, it will move towards holding votes on industrial action within two weeks.It warned strikes could "ground planes and passengers".
More than 100 Swissport workers are locked in a dispute about rotas and work-life balance, according to Unite.It said the company "is demanding that workers at extreme short notice have to work shifts at various times and for various durations, which is directly impacting on their personal lives".Unite said some Swissport staff are "struggling with chronic fatigue", and walkouts could be held from the middle of July, should members vote for industrial action.A spokesperson for Swissport said: "We are in dialogue with Unite - the talks so far have been constructive and we remain focused on working together to address the issues being raised."
Companies affected by the dispute
The disruption warning from Unite covers a number of separate disputes between workers across five companies operating at the airport:250 ICTS Central Search workers, who deal with passengers directly in the security search area and process them for flights, are currently involved in a dispute over under-staffing, working conditions and pay120 workers employed by Glasgow Airport Limited have rejected a basic 3.6% pay increase, with staff including airport ambassadors, airside support officers, engineers and managers involvedThe same 3.6% pay increase was rejected by 50 Falck firefighters who perform fire safety functions at the airport300 Menzies Aviation workers, including dispatchers, allocators, airside agents and controllers, have rejected a basic uplift worth around 4.25%According to the union, all of these disputes have been going on for some time.
Unite's Pat Mcilvogue told BBC Scotland News that talks with the five employers have been ongoing "for months" but claimed they had tabled "frivolous" offers that are below inflation."It's not just about the pay, it's about the conditions, the working environment," he said."Our members are overstretched in the airport, suffer from fatigue. "There's poor rostering, there's poor organisation of work, staffing levels are low."He urged the companies to get round the table with Unite this week and to "table meaningful offers".Mr Mcilvogue added: "Let's work with Unite to avoid any disruption for the travelling public in July."We've got more than a month to fix this before any potential action takes place."Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said the companies involved "are all highly profitable and can easily afford to give our members better pay and working conditions."A spokesman for Glasgow Airport said: "We have ongoing dialogue with Unite regarding a pay deal for our direct workforce."Phil Lloyd, senior vice president UK at Menzies Aviation, said the company was committed to seeking a resolution and had made "an enhanced offer".He added: "We hope to reach an agreement which is workable for both the business and our employees at Glasgow airport. "We continue to work towards an agreeable solution to protect services for our airline and airport partners and their customers."Falck and ICTS Central Search have been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's raid on family businesses to cost his constituents 1,000 jobs
Labour's tax raid on family businesses is projected to cost hundreds of jobs in Sir Keir Starmer's constituency alone, new analysis shows. The revenue-raising scheme is also projected to hit the local economies of Labour constituencies harder than their Conservative, Reform and Liberal Democrat-voting counterparts. Analysis by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which represents nearly 200,000 UK businesses, revealed that the changes to business property relief (BPR) announced in Rachel Reeves's October Budget will stifle growth in Labour seats across the country. The CBI claims that the average gross value added (GVA) losses in seats that elected Labour MPs at the last general election will be over £24 million, compared to £20 million in Conservative seats and £18.5 million in Reform constituencies. The projections span from the October 2024 budget to April 2030, after the next general election. Only seats held by the Green Party fared worse with an average GVA loss of around £40 million, suggesting that cities and urban centres will be worst hit by the raid. The CBI expects the economic hit to result in thousands of job losses in the most-exposed constituencies. Sir Keir's seat of Holborn and St Pancras will be the fourth-worst hit constituency in the country with 1,037 jobs expected to be lost, according to the analysis. Cabinet ministers to feel the pinch in their seats Red Wall seats are also set to suffer. The analysis shows that of £14.9 billion in nationwide GVA losses, some £4.6 billion (31 per cent) of that will hit constituencies that the Tories won in 2019 and Labour won back in 2024. These seats include the 31 Red Wall seats in the North and Midlands along with other key marginal constituencies which Labour will hope to win again at the next election if it wants to stay in power. Senior Cabinet ministers will also feel the pinch in their constituencies. The second-worst hit seat in the country, Manchester Central, is currently represented by Lucy Powell, the Leader of the House of Commons. The third-worst hit seat is Birmingham Ladywood, represented by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary. Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, represents the ninth-worst-hit seat of Leeds South. In the October Budget, the Chancellor slashed BPR in an attempt to raise money from family businesses. BPR was originally introduced by a Labour government in the 1970s. It allows company shareholders to leave business assets to loved ones without paying inheritance tax on them. But in a sweeping change that will take effect in April 2026, full business relief will only apply to the first £1 million of a business's assets upon a shareholder's death, with everything above this subject to 20 per cent tax.
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rangers don't need to cash-in on best players ahead of summer rebuild, insists new boss Martin
Russell Martin insists Rangers will be under no obligation to sell any of their star players during a major summer rebuild. Martin was appointed as the Ibrox club's new head coach on Thursday on a three-year deal and will be tasked with revamping the squad and playing style. With fresh investment of around £20million coming from the club's new American owners, chief executive Patrick Stewart has stated that 'a decent amount' of that will be made available to Martin. Nico Raskin and Mohamed Diomande have both been strongly linked with moves away from Rangers this summer. Midfield duo Raskin and Diomande are two of the club's top assets and have attracted interest from the English Premier League and across Europe. Any money raised from player sales will be reinvested in the squad, but new boss Martin insists the club are under no pressure whatsoever to sell. Asked about retaining top talent, he said: 'We have to try and keep our best players. I think we're all really aligned with that. 'So unless things come in that really help the club to build and move forward, I don't think it's a necessity to do that [sell] at all. That's my understanding of it. 'And we've all been really clear on it. So we'll just have to wait and see. But I'm looking forward to working with those guys. 'There are a few positions where we'll need to strengthen fairly quickly and fairly early on [with regards to Champions League qualifiers in July]. 'I'm pretty sure by then we'll have one or two in. I'm also willing to be surprised and I'm open to being surprised by some of the players we have here. 'I feel excited about the challenge of Europe, yeah. I think it's different in terms of obviously having a bit less awareness of the opposition, which is going to take a bit more working. 'But it's going to be about us. Whether we're playing in Europe, in the league, in the cup, whatever it is, it's going to be about us and trying to be the best we can be. 'But to experience that, the thought of having European nights here, it's hugely exciting and appealing. So we have to try and make that happen.' During his short loan stint at Rangers back in 2018, Martin played alongside club captain James Tavernier. The new head coach insists he is full of respect for the skipper, who has one year left on his deal. Despite Tavernier continuing to divide opinion among fans, Martin sees no immediate reason to change the captaincy. 'First and foremost, I'll speak to Tav, to explain things and have a discussion about the last two years, his thoughts on the team,' said the new Ibrox boss. 'I'll get his thoughts on what we're going to bring and how the players will feel about that. 'I think to play here for as long as he has, to be captain for as long as he has, takes a lot of energy. It's not easy. 'I've been at a club where sometimes you're the one that's been there the longest and you end up getting criticised a lot because you've been there the longest. You're an ageing player and all that stuff. 'I think he's been so important for this team and this club on and off the pitch and I'm looking forward to chatting in more detail with him and speaking to him about it all. 'Then how much he gets used on the pitch will be down to Tav and how he trains and how he plays, the same as every player. 'But he's going to be hugely important in the culture. I know what he's like a person behind the scenes and he's fantastic. 'He really was when I played with him and hopefully football hasn't beaten him up too much. It doesn't seem like it has. He still seems like he plays with a big smile and a lot of enthusiasm. 'It does carry a big weight to be captain of a club this size. I think he's done it incredibly well. 'How much he plays on the pitch, I can't sit here and tell you he's going to play 50 games, 20 games, whatever. It will be down to him in the way he performs and the way he buys into it, which I'm pretty sure he will. 'He's been the captain for a very long time. I don't see any reason to change that. And if he's not playing, it will be someone else.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's tariffs will cost UK steel industry £150m
US trade tariffs have dealt a £150 million blow to the UK steel industry as a wave of cheap products driven from American shores are being dumped in Britain, senior industry figures warn. The UK risks being hit harder than other countries in the tariff chaos despite having negotiated a deal with Donald Trump on exports of steel to the US. This, steel bosses say, is because the UK does not have 'the right defences' to prevent countries such as China from flooding our market with cheap steel that would have been sold to the US. That will drive down prices and crowd out domestic British steelmakers. By contrast, EU countries have erected barriers to protect their steel industries. Trade body UK Steel said imports were 'flooding on to the UK market depressing prices' as a result of the US tariffs, which last week rose to 50 per cent for steel and aluminium from a previous rate of 25 per cent. The UK managed to avoid the higher levy after securing a last-minute exemption. But Russell Codling, commercial director at Tata Steel, told MPs urgent measures were needed to protect UK industry. He said steel prices in the UK were tanking below those in Europe following the US tariffs – a price difference 'leading to something like a £100 million- £150 million-a-year loss in the UK compared with Europe.' The UK industry is already struggling to remain profitable due to high energy costs and environmental taxes, which are heavier than those on EU manufacturers. Codling added that the UK market for foreign steel imports was 'far more free-flowing than into mainland Europe'. The latest crisis comes hard on the heels of Government intervention to prevent the country's last blast furnaces at the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire, from being closed by Chinese owners Jingye in April. Codling, whose firm employs 8,000 people, said the UK needed to bring in measures to shield producers against cheap imports that 'are as least as good as our trading partners around the world.' A 25 per cent levy will still apply until the Government finalises a proposed trade deal with the US which should see tariffs cut to zero. Steel exports from Britain to the US are worth £400 million a year, making it the sector's second-biggest market. But UK bosses fear the Trump administration could alter the terms of any deal before it is signed. Gareth Stace, director general of UK Steel, said the Government needed to take 'decisive action' to protect producers. He added: 'The EU has stepped up its trade defences, and now we must do the same.' Respected industrialist Andrew Cook warned that the dumping of cheap steel would cause 'great damage'. He said: 'China built 600 million tons of surplus steel-making capacity to dump on foreign markets. This is the main reason why Britain's steel industry has suffered so badly.' Currently, the UK sets a quota for steel imports allowed into the country tariff-free. Imports above that level incur a 25 per cent levy. But UK Steel says the quotas do not offer 'adequate protection'. The UK's Trade Remedies Authority (TRA), which monitors unfair practices, is reviewing whether the measures, which are based on EU controls from 2018, suffice. Industry minister Sarah Jones insisted the Government – which is set to unveil its £2.5 billion steel strategy later this year – is backing the industry 'to the hilt'. She said: 'The TRA has been working at pace to identify stronger measures to defend the industry.' Rajesh Nair, head of Tata Steel UK, urged Ministers to ensure the US doesn't require British exports to have been 'melted and poured' in the UK to be tariff-exempt. This process now only happens at British Steel's Scunthorpe blast furnaces. Tata, which closed its UK blast furnace last year, is having to import steel until electric arc furnace steelmaking starts in Port Talbot in late 2027, Nair said.
