US Justice Department to probe leak of intelligence on Venezuelan gang, official says
By Andrew Goudsward
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department is investigating a leak of what it called classified information collected by U.S. intelligence agencies about the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, a senior official said on Friday.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche called the disclosure "a selective leak of inaccurate, but nevertheless classified, information."
"We will not tolerate politically motivated efforts by the Deep State to undercut President (Donald) Trump's agenda by leaking false information onto the pages of their allies at the New York Times," Blanche said, referring to a term embraced by Trump and his allies to describe government officials opposed to him.
It was not entirely clear what reporting Blanche was referencing. The New York Times reported on Thursday that U.S. intelligence agencies circulated findings that Tren de Aragua was not acting at the direction of the Venezuelan government.
The conclusion appeared to contradict President Donald Trump's basis for invoking an 18th-century wartime law to deport members of the gang.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mediator proposes $20 million settlement in Trump's CBS lawsuit, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -A mediator has proposed that Paramount Global and U.S. President Donald Trump settle his lawsuit against CBS News over an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris for $20 million, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday. The proposal would include a $17 million donation to Trump's presidential foundation or museum, as well as millions more in legal fees and public service announcements on Paramount-owned networks to fight antisemitism, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter. The White House and Paramount did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS in October, alleging the network deceptively edited a "60 Minutes" interview with then-vice president and presidential candidate Harris to "tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party" in the election. In an amended complaint filed in February, Trump bumped his claim for damages to $20 billion. Both parties have remained far apart on terms of a settlement. Paramount in May had offered $15 million to settle, according to WSJ, while Trump's team wanted more than $25 million and was also seeking an apology from CBS News. Paramount entered the mediation in April to try and settle the lawsuit. According to some analysts, the lawsuit is seen as a major roadblock to the $8.4 billion Paramount and Skydance Media merger, which requires approval from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-NATO's Trump flattery buys time but dodges tough questions
By Andrew Gray, Sabine Siebold, Lili Bayer and Anthony Deutsch THE HAGUE (Reuters) -Lavishing praise, playing the royal card and copying his slogans – NATO pulled out all the stops to keep Donald Trump happy and hold the alliance together at a summit in The Hague. The plan came off, although it largely avoided tough topics of vital importance to NATO such as the war in Ukraine, Russia strategy and a likely drawdown of U.S. troops in Europe. Sooner or later, NATO will have to deal with them too. As NATO boss Mark Rutte had planned, the main summit outcomes were a vow by the allies to heed Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defence - a big increase on the current 2% target - and a renewed U.S. commitment to NATO's mutual defence pact. That is a far cry from a few months ago, when transatlantic ties were so tense that Friedrich Merz, now Germany's chancellor, wondered openly after his election win whether NATO would exist in its current form by the time of the Hague summit. There was nothing subtle about NATO's strategy to keep Trump on board. Rutte gushed with compliments in a message to Trump, made public by the U.S. president as he flew to The Hague. "You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done," the former Dutch prime minister said in his message, putting some of his words in capitals like Trump. "Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win." Right before the summit, in another sign of chumminess with Trump, Rutte reacted to the U.S. president's comments berating Iran and Israel by saying that "daddy has to sometimes use strong language". Given Trump's threats to quit NATO in his first term and not to protect allies who failed to spend enough on defence, the stakes for NATO have been high. Most NATO members see Russia as an increasingly direct threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and know they would struggle badly to defend themselves against attack without their nuclear-armed superpower ally. After the summit, Trump's previously harsh rhetoric on NATO had been replaced by something very different. "I left here saying that these people really love their countries. It's not a rip-off, and we're here to help them, protect them," he told reporters. Trump only criticised Spain for not signing up to the new defence spending target and said it would pay up another way - in its trade relations with the United States. Many European nations will find it tough economically to meet the target, but that issue was left for another day. CHARM OFFENSIVE As part of NATO's Hague charm offensive, Trump was granted the rare honour of staying overnight at the ornate royal palace of Dutch King Willem-Alexander before the summit. The king hosted a three-course meal for leaders prepared by 20 chefs and served by 18 footmen in the baroque 17th century "Orange Hall" in the Huis ten Bosch palace. At the start of the summit, other NATO leaders lined up to praise Trump. Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda suggested the alliance adopt the motto "Make NATO Great Again". Rutte kept the summit short and simple, minimising the risks of any blow-ups with Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner rather than the main meeting, although he held a separate meeting with Trump after the summit. The summit's final statement ran to just five paragraphs - compared with 38 in the text from last year's leaders' meeting in Washington. It does not explicitly describe Russia's military action in Ukraine as a war or invasion, nor does it repeat or reaffirm a previous pledge that Ukraine will one day join the alliance. By focusing on reaffirming commitments to NATO and the new spending pledge, it papered over major differences between Washington and many European allies on Russia and Ukraine. To the discomfort of many Europeans, Trump has taken a more conciliatory stance with Moscow and been less supportive of Kyiv than his predecessor Joe Biden as he seeks to end the war. While such diplomatic fudges may hold NATO together for now, it will be hard for the alliance to function effectively if there is a major long-term difference between the United States and Europe on a question as fundamental as how to handle Russia. "A NATO summit that essentially ignores the war that is still raging in Ukraine should worry all of us," said Julianne Smith, who served as the U.S. ambassador to NATO under the Biden administration. Peter Bator, Slovakia's former ambassador to NATO, said "we have just missed an opportunity to send a strategic message to the ruler in the Kremlin. And it will cost us in our security". NATO officials will now be watching to see whether Trump's newfound enthusiasm for the alliance is reflected in his administration's ongoing review of U.S. military posture, as Europe relies heavily on U.S. forces for its security. European leaders say they are committed to taking on more of that responsibility but they are anxious to ensure any transfer is done in an orderly and gradual way. "You can feel the anxiety when talking to senior European officials about this," said Oana Lungescu, distinguished fellow at RUSI and former NATO spokesperson. "Most expect the Pentagon to start pulling out some troops and capabilities, but nobody knows how many and how soon." (Additional reporting by John Irish, Jeff Mason and Gram Slattery; Editing by Aidan Lewis)
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NJ Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver pleads not guilty to assault charges after chaotic visit to Newark immigration center
Rep. LaMonica McIver pleaded not guilty Wednesday to federal charges accusing her of assaulting and interfering with immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center during a congressional oversight visit at the facility. 'They will not intimidate me. They will not stop me from doing my job,' she said outside the courthouse in Newark after the brief hearing. McIver, a Democrat, was charged by interim US Attorney Alina Habba, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, following the May 9 visit to Newark's Delaney Hall. Immigration and Customs Enforcement uses the privately owned, 1,000-bed facility as a detention center. Advertisement 5 New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver greeting supporters outside US Court in Newark after pleading not guilty to assault charges stemming from an altercation outside a migrant detention center in May on June 25, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Segar This month she was indicted on three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials. Two of the counts carry a maximum sentence of up to eight years in prison. The third is a misdemeanor with a maximum punishment of one year in prison. During Wednesday's hearing, McIver stood and told US District Judge Jamel Semper: 'Your honor, I plead not guilty.' The judge set a Nov. 10 trial date. Advertisement Outside the courthouse, McIver warned that anyone who pushes back against the Trump administration will find themselves in a similar position. McIver's lawyer, former US Attorney for New Jersey Paul Fishman, said McIver pleaded not guilty because she is not guilty. He said federal agents created a risky situation at Delaney Hall. A message seeking comment Wednesday was left with Habba's office. 5 Protesters holding signs demanding that all federal charges against McIver be dropped. REUTERS/Mike Segar Advertisement Among those at McIver's side Wednesday were her family and elected officials, including Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was outside the detention center with McIver and other legislators on May 9. Baraka was also arrested on a trespassing charge that was later dropped and is suing Habba over what he called a malicious prosecution. Baraka accused the Trump administration of using law enforcement as 'an appendage of their ideology to begin to hammer us.' 5 McIver clashing with federal law enforcement officers outside of Delaney Hall in Newark on May 9, 2025. U.S District Court for the District of New Jersey Advertisement 5 McIver's elbow going into a law enforcement officer during the scuffle. U.S District Court for the District of New Jersey The indictment of McIver is the latest development in a legal-political drama that has seen the Trump administration take Democratic officials from New Jersey's largest city to court amid the president's ongoing immigration crackdown and Democrats' efforts to respond. The prosecution is a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress for allegations other than fraud or corruption. A nearly two-minute video clip released by the Department of Homeland Security shows McIver at the facility inside a chain-link fence just before Baraka's arrest on other side of the barrier, where other people were protesting. McIver and uniformed officials go through the gate, and she joins others shouting that they should circle the mayor. The video shows McIver in a tightly packed group of people and officers. At one point her left elbow and then her right elbow push into an officer wearing a dark face covering and an olive green uniform emblazoned with the word 'Police.' 5 McIver was indicted on three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials for the Delaney Hall incident. AP Photo/Angelina Katsanis It is not clear from police bodycam video if the contact was intentional, incidental or the result of jostling in the chaotic scene. The complaint alleges that she 'slammed' her forearm into an agent and then tried to restrain the agent by grabbing him. The indictment also says she placed her arms around the mayor to try to stop his arrest and says again that she slammed her forearm into and grabbed an agent. Advertisement Democrats including New Jersey Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez, who were with McIver at the detention center that day, have criticized the arrest and disputed the charges. Members of Congress are legally authorized to go into federal immigration facilities as part of their oversight powers, even without notice. Congress passed a 2019 appropriations bill spelling out that authority. McIver, 39, first came to Congress in September in a special election after the death of Rep. Donald Payne Jr. left a vacancy in the 10th District. She was then elected to a full term in November. A Newark native, she was president of the Newark City Council from 2022 to 2024 and worked in the city's public schools before that.
