Thames Water faces investigation over late delivery of environmental schemes
Thames Water is being investigated over late delivery of environmental improvement schemes, the industry regulator has announced.
Ofwat said the enforcement case against the company, currently fighting to secure its financial future amid a £19bn debt pile, aimed to determine whether it had breached its legal obligations.
The watchdog said that Thames itself had been in contact to alert it and the Environment Agency that it will be unlikely to deliver more than 100 of 812 improvements it had promised by a 31 March deadline.
The schemes fall under the Water Industry National Environmental Programme (WINEP) during the current 2020-2025 pricing period.
That ends at the end of March when Thames customers then face steep, inflation-busting increases to bills over the next five years from April to pay for further infrastructure improvements which include widespread storm overflow upgrades to prevent sewage spills.
Lynn Parker, Ofwat's senior director for enforcement, said: "Customers have paid for Thames Water to carry out these essential environmental schemes.
"We take any indication that water companies are not meeting their legal obligations very seriously. Therefore, we have launched an investigation to understand whether the delayed delivery of environmental schemes means that Thames Water has breached its obligations.
"If we find reason to act, we will use our full range of powers to hold Thames to account for any failures and will require them to put things right."
The regulator ultimately has the power to fine the relevant part of the business up to 10% of its annual turnover.
Previous, and recent, penalties paid by Thames include an £18m fine in December for breaking shareholder payout rules while it was also slapped with a £104m bill last summer for sewage failings.
2:31
Thames Water is grappling pressure over improvements to its day-to-day operations while scrambling to secure its financial future.
It has previously warned it will run out of money next month, raising the prospect of the utility entering a special administration regime, unless new financing and new equity is secured.
The company's preferred rescue plan is currently hanging in the balance due to a High Court fight between bondholders.
Thames is also yet to confirm whether it will appeal Ofwat's final ruling on how much it is allowed to raise bills by during 2025-30.
The average water and wastewater bill across England and Wales is set to go up from £480 to £603 during 2025/26 alone - an increase of about £10 a month.
Thames Water's 16 million customers face a 31% hike to £639 - a rise of £151.
It had sought an increase above 50% across the pricing period.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer must intervene over Thames Water crisis, say creditors
Sir Keir Starmer is facing pressure to intervene in efforts to save Thames Water amid concerns that rescue talks could stall and leave Britain's biggest utility facing collapse. Investors spearheading a bid for the stricken company say Ofwat's unwillingness to compromise on the issue of future fines threatens to scupper Thames's efforts to avoid special administration. As fears over a breakdown in discussions escalate, the Prime Minister is being urged to step in and compel the watchdog to soften its stance on financial penalties. 'We have had a year of dealing with one of the most intractable regulators I've ever had the misfortune of coming across,' an investor involved in the rescue talks said. 'They have failed in their job. Absolutely, we need intervention from Downing Street.' Another figure close to the planned deal added: 'I think what it takes is the Government and the regulator coming together – it needs the Environment Department, the Treasury, and even No 10 to say, 'what's the least worst outcome here?'' Growing criticism of Ofwat comes just days after the company's largest creditors tabled a proposal that would provide Thames with desperately needed fresh capital and repair its broken balance sheet. However, in return for a proposed £3bn cash injection and more than £2bn of new loans, the consortium of more than 100 creditors is demanding immunity from billions of pounds in future fines – a request the watchdog is reluctant to grant. Creditors have calculated that Thames could be on the hook for more than £1bn in further pollution and environmental failing penalties, The Telegraph understands. In an attempt to persuade Ofwat to soften its stance, creditors are already preparing a second, sweetened bid that could see the consortium willing to offer more cash and write off a larger slug of debt. One FTSE 100 infrastructure fund warned that Ofwat's intransigence could weigh on Labour's attempts to drum up appetite among foreign investors for UK assets. 'There is £500bn of investment that's needed across UK infrastructure that is contingent on stable regulation,' an investor at the fund said. A source close to Thames's creditors said: 'Ofwat is undermining the Government's aim to attract private capital and deliver growth and reform across the water sector.' With the rescue talks at risk of being derailed, Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing, is demanding to rejoin the auction for Thames. It comes after KKR, the preferred bidder, abandoned its pursuit of the business earlier this month. Mr Li's CK Infrastructure (CKI) Holdings wrote to Sir Adrian Montague, the chairman of Thames Water, urging him to readmit them to the process. However, any such move is expected to be fiercely resisted by creditors who question whether CKI's ties to China will trigger a lengthy investigation under the National Security and Investment Act. It is understood they have already raised such concerns with Ofwat, while also warning about the amount of time needed for CKI to undertake due diligence. A source close to the creditors expressed surprise that ministers were yet to get involved: 'They've got a regulator that continues to care more about showing they can punish this company and throw billions in fines at an insolvent business. That is not going to improve performance for customers.' 'Not been supportive' Another pointed the finger directly at David Black, the Ofwat chief executive. 'It's well known Black has not been that supportive of some of these initiatives,' the source said. A spokesman for the creditors added: 'These investors have the funding and experience required to deliver a transformation which is intended to mark a departure from past failings, creating a 'new' Thames Water that works effectively alongside government, regulators, and customers to deliver for the environment and economic growth.' The institutions behind the plan include Assured Guaranty, Aberdeen Investments, Apollo, Attestor Asset Management, Royal Bank of Canada, Elliott, Prudential, Pimco, Invesco, Silver Point Capital, and Voya Financial. An Ofwat spokesman said: ''Our focus is on ensuring that the company [Thames] takes the right steps to deliver a turnaround in its operational performance and strengthen its financial resilience to the benefit of customers.' Ofwat is 'assessing whether the plans are realistic, deliverable and will bring substantial benefits for customers and the environment,'' they added.
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Thames Water investors beg Keir Starmer to step in and save debt-ridden water company from collapsing after clashing with Ofwat over future fines
Investors of Thames Water are begging Keir Starmer to intervene as Britain's biggest supplier crumbles under crippling fines and could be facing collapse. The stricken company is drowning under huge debts and the threat of further fines for pollution incidents. It was hit last month with a record £123 million in fines for sewage spills and dividend payments, by the industry regulator Ofwat. The fine, which is the largest the watchdog has ever issued, follows two 'big and complex' investigations by the regulator. Ofwat said Thames Water would pay £104.5 million for the wastewater breaches and a further £18.2 million for breaking rules on dividend payments. It said the fines would be paid 'by the company and its investors and not by customers'. Investors say that the regulator's unwillingness to go soft on the company over future fines could put it at risk of administration, as they scramble for a lifeline. Now they are pleading with the Prime Minister to compel the watchdog to adopt a more compromising position to its stance on financial penalties. An investor involved in rescue talks said: 'We have had a year of dealing with one of the most intractable regulators I've ever had the misfortune of coming across. 'They have failed in their job. Absolutely, we need intervention from Downing Street.' 'I think what it takes is the government and the regulator coming together - it needs the Environment Department, the Treasury and even Number 10 to say: "What's the least worst outcome here?",' another investor said. It comes just days after Ofwat received a proposal that would provide the water company the capital they desperately need to recover from the billions of pounds worth of fines looming over them. Creditors have said that Thames could be looking at more than £1 billion in further pollution and environmental failings, according to the Telegraph. But the watchdog have been reluctant to grant the request. The regulator's probe into how the company was managing its treatment works and wider wastewater network uncovered a number of failings. Ofwat said these amounted to a significant breach of the company's legal obligations, which has caused an 'unacceptable' impact on the environment and customers. Creditors are preparing a second bid in an attempt to soften Ofwat's stance that could see the company willing to offer more cash and write off a larger sum of debt. A FTSE 100 infrastructure fund warned Ofwat's stubbornness could dampen Labour's attempts to bring in foreign investors for UK assets. They said: 'There is a £500 billion investment that's needed across UK infrastructure that is contingent on stable regulation.' A source close to Thames' creditors said: 'Ofwat is undermining the government's aim to attract private capital and deliver growth and reform across the water sector.' Now with the risk of rescue talks being stalled, Hong Kong's richest man, Li Ka-shing, has demanded to rejoin the auction for Thames after KKR abandoned its bid fore the business earlier this month. However investors fear his links to China will trigger a long and drawn out investigation under the National Security and Investment Act.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Anglian Water profits surge after household bill hikes... but debts now top £7.7bn
Anglian Water's debt pile topped £7.7billion last years despite household bill hikes helping to drive a significant boost to profitability. The water provider for seven million people in the east of England posted a 15.2 per cent rise in operating profits to £496.5million for the year to 31 March. Profitability was driven by a 7.5 per cent revenue growth to almost £1.8billion after price hikes of 8.6 per cent over the course of the year. Since April, its bill payers are now shouldering another 19 per cent hike to an average of £626 a year for the 2025/26 financial year. But Anglian Water, which last month received a record fine for drinking water failures that affected around 1.3 million people, still saw net debts before derivatives grow by more than a tenth to £7.72billion last year. The debt burden grows as the water provider proceeds with plans to fund more than £1billion in improvements to water resources and infrastructure in the region. Anglian is privately owned by a consortium including major pension funds and investment firms. Earlier this month, the group was one of six English water companies banned from awarding bonuses to senior executives after failing to tackle sewage and pollution. Anglian, Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water are all subject to the ban for the 2024/25 financial year. It came as part of a broader crackdown under the Water (Special Measures) Act, designed to hold companies accountable for environmental harm and regulatory breaches. Environment Secretary Steve Reed warned water companies would be 'extremely foolish' to increase salaries in an attempt to get around the ban. Anglian boss Mark Thurston, who joined the firm alongside finance chief Michael Bradley during the financial year, said: 'We recognise the challenges ahead. 'While important progress has been made, returning the business to upper quartile performance is our priority. 'The strategies and plans being implemented give us confidence in our trajectory and provide a clear roadmap for delivering consistent, high quality outcomes for customers, colleagues, regulators, investors and the environment.'
