‘La Casa De Los Famosos All Stars' Contestant Aleska Génesis Gets Arrested After Eviction From Telemundo Reality Competition
Aleska Génesis was not only evicted from Telemundo's La Casa de los Famosos All Stars but also arrested and taken into custody by police after viewers voted her out.
It doesn't get more real than what happened to Aleska on Monday night's shock eviction from the reality series competition. After 35 days on the show, the Venezuelan model didn't survive the nominations block and became the fifth evicted housemate.
More from Deadline
'La Casa De Los Famosos All-Stars' Cast Photos: Meet The 23 Celebrity Contestants Of Telemundo's Competition Series
'The Braxtons' Renewed For Season 2 By We TV
'Married To Medicine's Dr. Heavenly Kimes On Ointment For Contessa Metcalfe "Itch" & Future Of Lateasha "Sweet Tea" Lunceford Friendship
However, minutes after Aleska was to have a sit-down interview with the show's co-host, Jimena Gállego, to talk about her time in the house, she was approached by Mexican police because she had an arrest warrant in her name.
Aleska was arrested on suspicion of robbery, something she had been arrested for in the past, before entering La Casa de los Famosos Season 4 in 2024. The former model is accused of taking part in the robbery of expensive watches and was taken into custody when she landed in Mexico City to take part in the reality competition. She was released shortly after and appeared on the Telemundo show where she came in sixth place.
La Casa de los Famosos All Stars viewers tuned into the Telemundo competition to find out if Aleska would appear on the show but her seat remained empty. Host Javier Poza and Gállego shared video of Aleska's arrest moments after her eviction from the house.
Based on the Celebrity Big Brother format, the show brings a group of high-profile personalities in a house and shuts them out entirely from the outside world. The show is expected to bend the rules and tell Aleska's former housemates what happened to her following her eviction, which will shock close allies Lupillo Rivera and Luca Onestini, who has not taken her eviction well.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by La Casa de los Famosos (@lacasadelosfamosostlmd)
Best of Deadline
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
The 25 Highest-Grossing Animated Films Of All Time At The Box Office
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Miguel Vargas scores on Michael A. Taylor's walk
Tyler Seguin Can Play Role Of Spark Plug To Counter Edmonton Stars The Dallas Stars currently find themselves ahead after the Western Conference Final kicked off on Wednesday night. The Stars came out of the gates of their series guns blazing as they out played the Edmonton Oilers, 6-3. Dallas not held Edmonton's stars in check, they also received help from one of their own, Tyler Seguin. Coming into Wednesday's Game 1 matchup, Seguin was riding an 11-game scoreless streak that he broke with a pair en route to victory. 1:38 Now Playing Paused Ad Playing
Fox Sports
10 hours ago
- Fox Sports
Whether ratings are good or not, Thunder-Pacers could be a series true basketball fans enjoy
Associated Press OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — It's No. 25 Indiana vs. No. 47 Oklahoma City in the NBA Finals. That's not their seeding. That's their media market ranking. To some, that might matter. To others, it probably won't — and probably shouldn't — matter whatsoever. A title matchup that starts Thursday night between the Pacers and Thunder — two young, fun teams that score a ton and are led by marketable stars in reigning MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for Oklahoma City and Olympic gold medalist Tyrese Haliburton for Indiana — is the type of series that real basketball fans clamor for. It has everything: star power, good coaching, All-Stars on both sides. And it adds to the NBA's recent run of parity. That the good news. Here's the inevitable other side: The ratings, especially at the start of the series, probably aren't going to be good because the home markets are so small. Those who like the NBA won't be dissuaded by that. Those who don't like the NBA will tout it as great failure. 'I think this finals is a great representation with the two teams that are in it," Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. "You know, they're teams that play good, exciting styles of basketball. Players that have great individual stories, teams that have a great story collectively. And we're proud to be a part of that.' People are watching; they just may not be watching on television. The social media tracking site Videocites says NBA content is getting consumed at a 64% higher clip than last season — 32 billion views and counting so far in these playoffs. Gilgeous-Alexander is the most viewed player, Haliburton is No. 3 and playoff clips of those two have about 1.5 billion views between them to this point. That's billion, with a B. And speaking of that, there are 76 billion reasons the NBA won't be bothered by whatever the ratings are over the next couple of weeks. The new media rights deals — an 11-year, $76 billion pact between the NBA and broadcast partners Disney (ABC/ESPN), Peacock (NBC) and Amazon (Prime Video) that kicks in at the start of next season — show that clearly somebody is watching NBA games or consuming NBA content. The days of straight relying on Nielsen ratings seem to be long gone, with more and more people ditching cable for streaming and more and more young fans just watching everything on their phones and often in condensed versions. If the ratings tank for Pacers-Thunder, those deals are still worth $76 billion. The ad buys for these playoffs have long been paid for. So, the numbers for this series are largely irrelevant to the NBA's bottom line. Haliburton was asked Tuesday what fans who watch will see if they tune in to these finals. 'I think (they'll see) two high-level teams that play an elite style of basketball, who share the ball really well, a lot of different people that can chip in,' Haliburton said. 'I think that's the exciting part about this. I don't want to say it's like a passing of the torch because the old heads are still here. They're still playing very, very well. But definitely to see two young teams, two young organizations, fighting to win a championship, I think is a very big deal." Late in the regular season, as numbers were bouncing back from a slow start to the season, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said the league's ratings were down about 2% from a year ago. 'But in this environment, where particularly when you're largely featured in legacy media and particularly cable, and no question cable subscriptions are going down, that seems like a victory,' Silver said. In short, nobody at the league office is panicking about ratings, especially right now. Whichever team wins will be the seventh different champion in the last seven seasons, and without question the Thunder and Pacers will be featured in more national broadcasts next season than they were this season and their ratings will be higher — as proven by recent finals runs by Milwaukee, Denver and Dallas. Go ahead and expect Indy and OKC in the Christmas Day package next season as well; neither team was among the 10 picked for that this season, which was probably a mild disappointment for the Pacers and was a huge disappointment for the Thunder. 'I'd love to play on Christmas Day,' Gilgeous-Alexander said earlier this season. 'And I think we're that caliber of team. The NBA makes their decisions. Can't slight them for it. Ball's in our court to prove to them why we deserve to be in that game.' It can easily be argued that both teams did it right: didn't overspend, didn't go into the luxury tax — it's the first finals between two non-taxpayer teams in about two decades — and tried to build around young stars. And the Thunder and Pacers were teams that combined to win 49 games just three seasons ago; their success now has to be a reason for hope for teams like Utah, Washington, Portland, Charlotte and others that have been sputtering. Turnarounds can happen, and they can be rewarded. Some people will watch, some won't, but true fans probably are expecting a pretty good series. 'I think that's exciting,' Haliburton said, 'for any basketball fan.' ___ AP Sports Writer Michael Marot in Indianapolis contributed to this report. ___ On Basketball analyzes the biggest topics in the NBA during the season. More AP NBA: recommended
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Whether ratings are good or not, Thunder-Pacers could be a series true basketball fans enjoy
Oklahoma City Thunder players and coaches celebrate after Game 5 of the Western Conference finals of the NBA basketball playoffs against the Minnesota Timberwolves, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, in Oklahoma City. (AP Photo/Nate Billings) OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — It's No. 25 Indiana vs. No. 47 Oklahoma City in the NBA Finals. That's not their seeding. That's their media market ranking. To some, that might matter. To others, it probably won't — and probably shouldn't — matter whatsoever. Advertisement A title matchup that starts Thursday night between the Pacers and Thunder — two young, fun teams that score a ton and are led by marketable stars in reigning MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for Oklahoma City and Olympic gold medalist Tyrese Haliburton for Indiana — is the type of series that real basketball fans clamor for. It has everything: star power, good coaching, All-Stars on both sides. And it adds to the NBA's recent run of parity. That the good news. Here's the inevitable other side: The ratings, especially at the start of the series, probably aren't going to be good because the home markets are so small. Those who like the NBA won't be dissuaded by that. Those who don't like the NBA will tout it as great failure. 'I think this finals is a great representation with the two teams that are in it," Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said. "You know, they're teams that play good, exciting styles of basketball. Players that have great individual stories, teams that have a great story collectively. And we're proud to be a part of that.' People are watching; they just may not be watching on television. The social media tracking site Videocites says NBA content is getting consumed at a 64% higher clip than last season — 32 billion views and counting so far in these playoffs. Gilgeous-Alexander is the most viewed player, Haliburton is No. 3 and playoff clips of those two have about 1.5 billion views between them to this point. Advertisement That's billion, with a B. And speaking of that, there are 76 billion reasons the NBA won't be bothered by whatever the ratings are over the next couple of weeks. The new media rights deals — an 11-year, $76 billion pact between the NBA and broadcast partners Disney (ABC/ESPN), Peacock (NBC) and Amazon (Prime Video) that kicks in at the start of next season — show that clearly somebody is watching NBA games or consuming NBA content. The days of straight relying on Nielsen ratings seem to be long gone, with more and more people ditching cable for streaming and more and more young fans just watching everything on their phones and often in condensed versions. If the ratings tank for Pacers-Thunder, those deals are still worth $76 billion. The ad buys for these playoffs have long been paid for. So, the numbers for this series are largely irrelevant to the NBA's bottom line. Haliburton was asked Tuesday what fans who watch will see if they tune in to these finals. Advertisement 'I think (they'll see) two high-level teams that play an elite style of basketball, who share the ball really well, a lot of different people that can chip in,' Haliburton said. 'I think that's the exciting part about this. I don't want to say it's like a passing of the torch because the old heads are still here. They're still playing very, very well. But definitely to see two young teams, two young organizations, fighting to win a championship, I think is a very big deal." Late in the regular season, as numbers were bouncing back from a slow start to the season, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said the league's ratings were down about 2% from a year ago. 'But in this environment, where particularly when you're largely featured in legacy media and particularly cable, and no question cable subscriptions are going down, that seems like a victory,' Silver said. In short, nobody at the league office is panicking about ratings, especially right now. Whichever team wins will be the seventh different champion in the last seven seasons, and without question the Thunder and Pacers will be featured in more national broadcasts next season than they were this season and their ratings will be higher — as proven by recent finals runs by Milwaukee, Denver and Dallas. Go ahead and expect Indy and OKC in the Christmas Day package next season as well; neither team was among the 10 picked for that this season, which was probably a mild disappointment for the Pacers and was a huge disappointment for the Thunder. Advertisement 'I'd love to play on Christmas Day,' Gilgeous-Alexander said earlier this season. 'And I think we're that caliber of team. The NBA makes their decisions. Can't slight them for it. Ball's in our court to prove to them why we deserve to be in that game.' It can easily be argued that both teams did it right: didn't overspend, didn't go into the luxury tax — it's the first finals between two non-taxpayer teams in about two decades — and tried to build around young stars. And the Thunder and Pacers were teams that combined to win 49 games just three seasons ago; their success now has to be a reason for hope for teams like Utah, Washington, Portland, Charlotte and others that have been sputtering. Turnarounds can happen, and they can be rewarded. Some people will watch, some won't, but true fans probably are expecting a pretty good series. 'I think that's exciting,' Haliburton said, 'for any basketball fan.' ___ AP Sports Writer Michael Marot in Indianapolis contributed to this report. ___ On Basketball analyzes the biggest topics in the NBA during the season. More AP NBA:
