Zia Yusuf announces return to Reform UK two days after quitting as chair
Zia Yusuf has said he will return to Nigel Farage's Reform UK, just two days after quitting the party.
Yusuf was the rightwing party's chair but resigned on Thursday after suggesting it was 'dumb' of the party's newest MP to ask the prime minister if he would ban the burqa.
Less than 48 hours later, Yusuf said his decision to quit was a 'mistake' that had resulted from 'exhaustion' after working long hours and facing reams of racist abuse on social media.
Farage and Yusuf announced on Saturday that Yusuf would return to the fold and would take on several jobs, though his formal title has not been announced.
One of his roles will be to lead what the party is calling its 'Doge team' – based on the 'department of government efficiency' set up in the US by Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
Yusuf will also act as a spokesperson for Reform and have a say in its policymaking and fundraising efforts.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Yusuf said his intervention over the burqa had been an 'error'. Yusuf tweeted on Thursday that Sarah Pochin, the Reform MP for Runcorn and Helsby, had been 'dumb' to ask Keir Starmer at prime minister's questions whether he would ban it.
Hours later he announced he was quitting, saying he did not believe working to get a Reform government elected was a good use of his time.
'When I pushed that tweet out it was a coming together of a bit of exhaustion and a feeling that all I got in return for it was abuse,' he said on Saturday. 'I was doing so many things, in the foreground and in the background.'
'What has happened since then is that I've been inundated with messages from Reform members and supporters who were saying they were devastated and heartbroken and asking me to really reconsider my decision.
'I left my business interests behind, I've volunteered full-time, because I love my country and I believe the best way to save it and turn it into a great one is for Nigel to be prime minister.
'It made me realise that in that moment I was turning my back on that – and I didn't want to do that.'
Yusuf, who is a practising Muslim, insisted he did not have 'any strong views about the burqa itself' and said that 'if there were a vote and I was in parliament, I would probably vote to ban it actually'.
He described the fallout over Pochin's comments as 'an internal miscommunication issue' and said he had found out about her remarks for the first time on X. 'I don't mind saying that it frustrated me,' he said.
He added that he did not think the issue of burqas 'is one of the most important [to] British people when they go about their day-to-day lives'.
Earlier on Saturday, Farage said: 'When Zia says anything you cannot believe the absolute tirade of personal racist abuse that he gets … I just think he snapped.' The Reform leader told Times Radio the abuse came 'from the very hard extreme right' and blamed 'Indian bots'.
Yusuf was brought in by Farage to be Reform's chair last year, months after he donated £200,000 to the party.
He is widely credited within Reform for having professionalised the party, hiring new people, setting up more branches and making it run in a more corporate way.
However, he also rubbed some of the Reform old guard up the wrong way with his management style and by overseeing the departures of several long-serving former members of staff.
Some of Reform's members have turned against Yusuf over his role in the departure of one of the party's most rightwing MPs, Rupert Lowe, after the pair clashed earlier this year.
The Sunday Times reported that Yusuf's former role of chair will now be split into two. There will be a front-facing chair tasked with touring the country and speaking to the media, and a deputy in charge of organisational matters.
Ellie Reeves, the Labour party chair, said: 'Reform's revolving door shows that the party is all about one person – Nigel Farage. Zia Yusuf's humiliating hokey cokey is laughable but there is nothing funny about Farage's £80bn in unfunded commitments.'
A spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats said: 'It looks like Reform are playing musical chairman.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
6 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Labour's Big Worry Is No One Will Feel Record Spending Surge
Britain's Labour government will make an historic investment into the country's battered public services this week — a £300 billion ($406 billion) uplift for areas such as health care, education and transport, amounting to the largest sustained funding increase since at least 2010. The danger is the public won't notice.
Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Italians vote on citizenship and job protections amid low awareness and turnout concerns
ROME (AP) — Italians vote over two days starting Sunday on referendums that would make it easier for children born in Italy to foreigners to obtain citizenship, and on providing more job protections. But apparent low public awareness risks rendering the vote invalid if turnout is not high enough. Campaigners for the change in the citizenship law say it will help second-generation Italians born in the country to non- European Union parents better integrate into a culture they already see as theirs. Italian singer Ghali, who was born in Milan to Tunisian parents, urged people to vote in an online post, noting that the referendum risks failure if at least 50% plus one of eligible voters don't turn out. 'I was born here, I always lived here, but I only received citizenship at the age of 18,'' Ghali said, urging a yes vote to reduce the residency requirement from 10 to five years. The new rules, if passed, could affect about 2.5 million foreign nationals who still struggle to be recognized as citizens. The measures were proposed by Italy's main union and left-wing opposition parties. Premier Giorgia Meloni has said she would show up at the polls but not cast a ballot — an action widely criticized by the left as antidemocratic, since it will not help reach the necessary threshold to make the vote valid. 'While some members of her ruling coalition have openly called for abstention, Meloni has opted for a more subtle approach,' said analyst Wolfango Piccoli of the Teneo consultancy based in London. 'It's yet another example of her trademark fence-sitting.'' Rights at stake Supporters say this reform would bring Italy's citizenship law in line with many other European countries, promoting greater social integration for long-term residents. It would also allow faster access to civil and political rights, such as the right to vote, eligibility for public employment and freedom of movement within the EU. 'The real drama is that neither people who will vote 'yes' nor those who intend to vote 'no' or abstain have an idea of what (an) ordeal children born from foreigners have to face in this country to obtain a residence permit,' said Selam Tesfaye, an activist and campaigner with the Milan-based human rights group 'Il Cantiere.' 'Foreigners are also victims of blackmail, as they can't speak up against poor working conditions, exploitation and discrimination, due to the precariousness of the permit of stay,' she added. Activists and opposition parties also denounced the lack of public debate on the measures, accusing the governing center-right coalition of trying to dampen interest in sensitive issues that directly impact immigrants and workers. In May, Italy's AGCOM communications authority lodged a complaint against RAI state television and other broadcasters for a lack of adequate and balanced coverage. 'This referendum is really about dignity and the right to belong, which is key for many people who were born here and spent most of their adult life contributing to Italian society. For them, a lack of citizenship is like an invisible wall,' said Michelle Ngonmo, a cultural entrepreneur and advocate for diversity in the fashion industry, who has lived most of her life in Italy after moving as a child from Cameroon. 'You are good enough to work and pay taxes, but not to be fully recognized as Italian. This becomes a handicap for young generations, particularly in the creative field, creating frustration, exclusion and a big waste of potential,' she said. The four other referendums aim to roll back labor reforms, making it harder to fire some workers and increase compensation for those laid off by small businesses, reversing a previous law passed by a center-left government a decade ago. One of the questions on the ballot also addresses the urgent issue of security at work, restoring joint liability to both contractors and subcontractors for workplace injuries. Many expected to abstain from voting Opinion polls published in mid-May showed that only 46% of Italians were aware of the issues driving the referendums. Turnout projections were even weaker for a vote scheduled for the first weekend of Italy's school holidays, at around 35% of around 50 million electors, well below the required quorum. 'Many believe that the referendum institution should be reviewed in light of the high levels of abstention (that) emerged in recent elections and the turnout threshold should be lowered,' said Lorenzo Pregliasco, political analyst and pollster at YouTrend. Some analysts note however that the center-left opposition could claim a victory even if the referendum fails on condition that the turnout surpasses the 12.3 million voters who backed the winning center-right coalition in the 2022 general election. ___ Associated Press writer Colleen Barry in Rome contributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Penrith MP indicates he will vote against assisted dying bill
A Cumbrian MP has indicated that he is likely to vote against the assisted dying bill - despite previously voting for it. The Labour MP for Penrith and Solway Markus Campbell-Savours told the BBC that he still is "a supporter of assisted dying" but said the proposed bill crosses a 'red line' in protecting the vulnerable. Cumbria's MPs were split on the issue when it was first voted on in parliament with Josh MacAlister (Whitehaven and Workington, Labour) and Markus Campbell-Savours (Penrith and the Solway, Labour) voting for the bill and Julie Minns (Carlisle, Labour), Michelle Scrogham (Barrow, Labour) and Tim Farron (Westmorland and Lonsdale, Liberal Democrat) all voting against the bill. Opponents to changing the law have argued some people could feel pressured to have an assisted death against their will and have called for more focus on improving and ensuring equal access to palliative care. Campaigners who are terminally ill or have watched loved ones die in pain have called the existing legislation 'unbelievably cruel' and pointed out that animals suffering severely can be legally euthanised. Since the last vote, Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, has brought forward amendments for a so-called 'judge plus' system, after hearing concerns during expert evidence sessions last month. She has now proposed a judge-led Voluntary Assisted Dying Commission that she said would give a greater role to experts, including psychiatrists and social workers, in overseeing applications. The commission would be led by a High Court judge or a senior former judge and receive all applications and reports from two independent doctors, which would then be referred to a three-member panel chaired by what has been described as a senior legal figure. READ MORE: RSPCA issues warning after cat dies of antifreeze poisoning in Cumbria | News and Star "I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives," said Mr Campbell-Savours to the BBC. "I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life."
