logo
Trump administration opens federal probe into Washington's transgender student policy

Trump administration opens federal probe into Washington's transgender student policy

Yahoo01-05-2025

Apr. 30—Trump administration officials on Wednesday launched an investigation into the authority overseeing Washington's public schools, questioning state policy surrounding transgender students' sports participation, pronoun use and parental notification.
The Title IX Special Investigations Team, an initiative between the U.S. Department of Education and the Department of Justice, announced the investigation into the Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction into whether it has violated Title IX, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment.
The investigation is at least the third opened by the Trump administration into state school systems. Washington joins California and Maine as states under investigation for their transgender student policy.
U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement Wednesday that the investigation into the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction was the "first of its kind."
"Washington State appears to use its position of authority to coerce its districts into hiding 'gender identity' information from students' parents and to adopt policies to covertly smuggle gender ideology into the classroom, confusing students and letting boys into girls sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms," McMahon said. "If true, these are clear violations of parental rights and female equality in athletics, which are protected by federal laws that will be enforced by the Trump Administration."
According to the announcement, the alleged violations could result in the loss of federal education funding. On average, federal dollars make up just under 7% of Washington school districts' revenue. Much of that is tied up in congressionally mandated formula allocations for poor students or students with disabilities, for example.
In a statement Wednesday, Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal said the investigation is "the latest target in the Administration's dangerous war against individuals who are transgender or gender-expansive."
"Washington public schools have a responsibility to provide a safe and nondiscriminatory environment for all students, including transgender and gender-expansive students so that all students can thrive," Reykdal said in a statement.
Reykdal said his office would "enforce our current laws as we are required to do until Congress changes the law and/or federal courts invalidate Washington state's laws."
"Unless, and until that happens, we will be following Washington state's laws, not a president's political leanings expressed through unlawful orders," Reykdal said.
The announcement of the investigation answers a call by some local school districts.
In March, the Mead School Board sent a letter to federal officials requesting an investigation to the state schools chief and directives that contradicted several of the president's executive orders.
Later that month, the U.S. Department of Education wrote to education officials throughout the country, warning that schools must allow parents to review all education records, including any document related to a student's gender identity.
Reykdal said Wednesday it was not "the role of the school system to facilitate private conversations that should be happening between students and their parents or guardians, and the federal government should not force schools to play the role of parents when it comes to gender identity."
The Mead School Board politically aligns with the Trump administration and its approach to female athletics, wishing to exclude transgender girls from girls school sports, citing fairness and privacy for cisgender girls.
According to Reykdal, Washington law has prohibited discrimination on the basis of gender identity since 2006, and the state has allowed students to participate in school-based athletics that align with their gender identity since 2007.
"These protections fit within the scope of what is allowed by federal law and have been successfully established and implemented for nearly two decades," Reykdal said Wednesday.
Of the 250,000 student-athletes, five to 10 are transgender, according to Washington Interscholastic Activities Association, the independent governing body of nearly 800 public and private middle and high schools in Washington
Earlier this month, the WIAA representative assembly rejected two amendments to its transgender athlete policy, which would have restricted girls teams to those assigned female at birth and created a third ungendered competition category in addition to boys and girls.
Following a legal review by the Washington State Attorney General's Office, the vote was changed to an advisory vote after it was found the amendments might violate state and federal civil rights law.
"Federal law itself — which has not changed, despite the President and Department of Education's letters, memos, or executive orders — similarly prohibits discriminating against student-athletes based on their gender identity," Emily Nelson, assistant attorney general in the Wing Luke Civil Rights Division, wrote in a letter explaining the potential violation.
The Mead School Board and OSPI have also clashed on the district's "transgender students" policy, with Reykdal's office recently telling the district their current policy is out of compliance with state civil rights standards.
As they reviewed the policy, school board members were reluctant to make changes agreeable to the state and instead drafted language indicating that they'd obey federal guidance over state directives.
In a provided statement, Mead School Board President Michael Cannon wrote of his gratitude to federal officials.
"This investigation, prompted by concerns in the La Center School District, affirms our stance against policies that restrict parental notification of gender identity changes and allow sports participation based on gender identity rather than biological sex," Cannon wrote.
Central Valley School Board is in the midst of filing a similar complaint, on Monday drafting a letter imploring investigation of the state for allowing trans girls to play girls sports. The drafted complaint alleges Title IX violations.
Central Valley is set to review their complaint at a special virtual meeting on Monday.
The investigation is the latest battle between Washington and the federal government over school policies.
Washington joined 18 other states last week that challenged a directive by the Trump administration that warned state education agencies could lose funding if they have diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
Following the letter, Reykdal told the 295 school districts in Washington not to take action, saying the office is working to "understand the legality of the directive and our next steps," echoing his past guidance that school districts shouldn't comply with federal directives that contradict state law.
According to the Washington State Attorney General's Office, the federal government provides the state with $1.4 billion a year through congressionally appropriated funds.
Elena Perry's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Means to Provoke, Not Pacify
Trump Means to Provoke, Not Pacify

Atlantic

time11 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Trump Means to Provoke, Not Pacify

President Donald Trump is about to launch yet another assault on democracy, the Constitution, and American traditions of civil-military relations, this time in Los Angeles. Under a dubious legal rationale, he is activating 2,000 members of the National Guard to confront protests against actions by ICE, the immigration police who have used thuggish tactics against citizens and foreigners alike in the United States. By militarizing the situation in L.A., Trump is goading Americans more generally to take him on in the streets of their own cities, thus enabling his attacks on their constitutional freedoms. As I've listened to him and his advisers over the past several days, they seem almost eager for public violence that would justify the use of armed force against Americans. The president and the men and women around him are acting with great ambition in this moment, and they are likely hoping to achieve three goals in one dramatic action. First, they will turn America's attention away from Trump's many failures and inane feuds, and reestablish his campaign persona as a strongman who will brush aside the law if that's what it takes to keep order in the streets. Perhaps nothing would please Trump more than to replace weird stories about Elon Musk with video of masked protesters burning cars as lines of helmeted police and soldiers march over them and impose draconian silence in one of the nation's largest and most diverse cities. Second, as my colleague David Frum warned this morning, Trump is establishing that he is willing to use the military any way he pleases, perhaps as a proof of concept for suppressing free elections in 2026 or 2028. Trump sees the U.S. military as his personal honor guard and his private muscle. Those are his toy soldiers, and he's going to get a show from his honor guard in a birthday parade next weekend. In the meantime, he's going to flex that muscle, and prove that the officers and service members who will do whatever he orders are the real military. The rest are suckers and losers. During the George Floyd protests in 2020, Trump was furious at what he saw as the fecklessness of military leaders determined to thwart his attempts to use deadly force against protesters. He's learned his lesson: This time, he has installed a hapless sycophant at the Pentagon who is itching to execute the boss's orders. Third, he may be hoping to radicalize the citizen-soldiers drawn from the community who serve in the National Guard. (Seizing the California Guard is also a convenient way to humiliate California Governor Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, with Trump's often-used narrative that liberals can't control their own cities.) The president has the right to 'federalize' Guard forces, which is how they were deployed overseas in America's various conflicts. Trump has never respected the traditions of American civil-military relations, which regard the domestic deployment of the military as an extreme measure to be avoided whenever possible. Using the Guard could be a devious tactic: He may be hoping to set neighbor against neighbor, so that the people called to duty return to their home and workplace with stories of violence and injuries. In the longer run, Trump may be trying to create a national emergency that will enable him to exercise authoritarian control. (Such an emergency was a rationalization, for example, for the tariffs that he has mostly had to abandon.) He has for years been trying to desensitize the citizens of the United States to un-American ideas and unconstitutional actions. The American system of government was never meant to cope with a rogue president. Yet Trump is not unstoppable. Thwarting his authoritarianism will require restraint on the part of the public, some steely nerves on the part of state and local authorities, and vigilant action from national elected representatives, who should be stepping in to raise the alarm and to demand explanations about the president's misuse of the military. As unsatisfying as it may be for some citizens to hear, the last thing anyone should do is take to the streets of Los Angeles and try to confront the military or any of California's law-enforcement authorities. ICE is on a rampage, but physically assaulting or obstructing its agents—and thus causing a confrontation with the cops who have to protect them, whether those police officers like it or not—will provide precisely the pretext that some of the people in Trump's White House are trying to create. The president and his coterie want people walking around taking selfies in gas clouds, waving Mexican flags, holding up traffic, and burning cars. Judging by reactions on social media and interviews on television, a lot of people seem to think such performances are heroic—which means they're poised to give Trump's enforcers what they're hoping for. Be warned: Trump is expecting resistance. You will not be heroes. You will be the pretext. Conor Friedersdorf: Averting the worst-case scenario in Los Angeles Instead, the most dramatic public action the citizens of Southern California could take right now would be to ensure that Trump's forces arrive on calm streets. Imagine the reactions of the Guard members as they look around and wonder what, exactly, the commander in chief was thinking. Why are they carrying their rifles in the streets of downtown America? What does anyone expect them to do? Put another way: What if the president throws a crackdown and nobody comes? This kind of restraint will deny Trump the political oxygen he's trying to generate. He is resorting to the grand theater of militarism because he is losing on multiple fronts in the courts—and he knows it. The law, for most people, is dreary to hear about, but one of the most important stories of Trump's second term is that lawyers and judges are so far holding a vital line against the administration, sometimes at great personal risk. Trump is also losing public support, which is another reason he's zeroing in on California. He is resolutely ignorant in many ways, but he has an excellent instinct for picking the right fights. The fact of the matter is that tens of millions of Americans believe that almost everything about immigration in the United States has long been deeply dysfunctional. (I'm one of them.) If he sends the military into L.A. and Guard members end up clashing in high-definition video with wannabe resistance gladiators in balaclavas, many people who have not been paying attention to his other ghastly antics will support him. (For the record, I am not one of them.) So far, even the Los Angeles Police Department—not exactly a bastion of squishy suburban book-club liberals—has emphasized that the protests have been mostly peaceful. Trump is apparently trying to change that. Sending in the National Guard is meant to provoke, not pacify, and his power will only grow if he succeeds in tempting Americans to intemperate reactions that give him the authoritarian opening he's seeking.

Los Angeles Protests: National Guard Troops Arrive In Los Angeles (Photos)
Los Angeles Protests: National Guard Troops Arrive In Los Angeles (Photos)

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Los Angeles Protests: National Guard Troops Arrive In Los Angeles (Photos)

Hundreds of National Guard members have been stationed across Los Angeles after President Donald Trump pledged to send 2,000 troops, despite objections from city and state officials, to quell protests across the city that broke out in response to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. June 8, 1:30 p.m. EDTAbout 300 members of the National Guard have been stationed across Los Angeles so far, The New York Times reported, the first soldiers as part of the 2,000 Trump has promised to station across the city as more protests are expected to take place this afternoon. 1 p.m. EDTLos Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told the Los Angeles Times said she tried to talk to the Trump administration to 'tell them that there was absolutely no need to have troops on the ground here in Los Angeles,' stating the protests on Saturday were 'relatively minor' and 'peaceful,' with about 100 protesters. 3:22 a.m. EDTBass appeared to rebuff Trump's claim the National Guard did a 'great job' in the city, stating in a post on X that the National Guard had not yet been deployed at that time in Los Angeles, while praising Newsom and local law enforcement. 2:41 said in a late-night Truth Social post the National Guard did a 'great job' in Los Angeles, while slamming Newsom and Bass and the 'Radical Left' protesters and stating protesters will no longer be allowed to wear masks: 'What do these people have to hide, and why???' 12:14 slammed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for 'threatening to deploy active-duty Marines on American soil against its own citizens' as 'deranged behavior.' June 7The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said it had arrested two people Saturday evening for alleged assault on a police officer, stating multiple officers had been injured by a Molotov cocktail, the Los Angeles Times reported. 10:34 exhibited 'violent behavior' toward federal agents and local law enforcement, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said in a statement, while clarifying it is not involved in federal law enforcement response and is instead focused on crowd and traffic control. 10:22 a post on X, Newsom said the federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying soldiers in Los Angeles solely to create a 'spectacle.' 10:06 announced in a post on X the Department of Defense is 'mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles,' stating Marines are standing by for deployment in case of violence. 9:17 House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced Trump would deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to address 'lawlessness,' citing protests targeting immigration officers. More protests are expected to take place Sunday, in what will be the third straight day of demonstrations against immigration raids in Los Angeles. Protests broke out Friday and Saturday in Paramount and Compton, cities adjacent to Los Angeles, over immigration raids conducted by ICE, during which the agency detained 44 immigrants Friday and 118 immigrants Saturday, the Associated Press reported. Police and protesters clashed over the weekend, according to local reports and videos on social media, with law enforcement using tear gas and flash grenades to break up the crowds while some protesters threw rocks and lit vehicles on fire. Trump reportedly said in a memo he is invoking Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which allows the federal government to deploy the National Guard if the United States is 'invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation,' or if there is a 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Vice President JD Vance said in a post on X on Saturday night the influx of immigrants, which he called 'Biden's border crisis,' amounts to an 'invasion,' rebuffing critics who have questioned whether Trump had the authority to deploy troops. Trump's move has faced some pushback from constitutional scholars. 'For the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling,' Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, told the Los Angeles Times. The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A. (Los Angeles Times)

Gina Ortiz Jones says there's no time to waste as San Antonio mayor
Gina Ortiz Jones says there's no time to waste as San Antonio mayor

Axios

time13 minutes ago

  • Axios

Gina Ortiz Jones says there's no time to waste as San Antonio mayor

San Antonio mayor-elect Gina Ortiz Jones tells Axios she's not waiting to be sworn in to start tackling issues like a potential new Spurs arena, an expected budget deficit and the impact of Trump administration policies. Why it matters: The nonpartisan mayor's race became distinctly about politics as it drew money and influence from across Texas and the country. Now that it's over, Ortiz Jones must tackle the reality of everyday issues facing a city on the cusp of pivotal changes. Catch up quick: Ortiz Jones, who had national Democratic backing, beat out Republican Rolando Pablos 54% to 46%, cementing San Antonio as a reliably blue city. The big picture: Ortiz Jones will lead San Antonio at a critical time, as officials seek to gain public support for a new downtown Spurs arena that could be surrounded by a sports and entertainment district. Voters could be asked to weigh in on the project as soon as November. She will also lead the city through the remaining years of the Trump administration, under which San Antonio has lost millions of dollars in federal funding. The city is also expecting a budget deficit. What they're saying: "There's no time to waste, and I'm not going to wait until I am actually in the seat, because I think there's a lot of work and conversations we can have now that will be helpful to ensure (it's) as smooth a transition as possible," Ortiz Jones told Axios on Saturday. When asked about how she can get things done on a City Council poised to have a starker political divide, she said "I think there's going to be a lot that we can agree on ... I'm quite confident that we'll get to six (votes)." State of play: Ortiz Jones, who is the first openly gay woman elected San Antonio mayor, served as the Air Force undersecretary in the Biden administration and was twice the Democratic nominee for the 23rd Congressional District. She grew up on San Antonio's Far West Side. Between the lines: Pablos and his supporters appeared to both outraise and outspend Ortiz Jones in the runoff election, campaign finance reports show. Pablos got a big boost from the Texas Economic Fund, a political action committee run by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's former political director. Ortiz Jones had help from Fields of Change, a national Democratic PAC, and Emily's List. The bottom line: Ortiz Jones, who takes office June 18, says it was her personal background that helped her break through a crowded mayoral field.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store