WhatsApp fights Yvette Cooper's ‘dangerous' attempt to break encryption
Mark Zuckerberg's WhatsApp has challenged a 'dangerous' attempt by the Home Office to secretly force Apple to build a backdoor in its encryption technology.
The private messaging app said it had intervened in a case at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, submitting evidence criticising an order by Yvette Cooper's department that requires Apple to break an 'advanced data protection' feature that encrypts iPhone back-ups.
Will Cathcart, the head of Meta-owned WhatsApp, said: 'Liberal democracies should want the best security for their citizens. Instead, the UK is doing the opposite through a secret order.
'This case could set a dangerous precedent and embolden nations to try to break the encryption that protects people's private communication.'
Apple is challenging the 'technical capability notice' from the Home Office, issued in January, that ordered it to secretly install a backdoor into the encryption feature it introduced in 2022.
The iPhone-maker was legally barred from confirming the existence of the order, which emerged in US media reports. Disclosing the existence of the demand is illegal under UK surveillance laws.
However, in February, Apple said it would be withdrawing the feature in the UK and said it would 'never build a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services and we never will'.
Ms Cooper's order has prompted criticism from the White House and senior Republicans.
Donald Trump described the demand as 'something that you hear about with China'. Tulsi Gabbard, the US national intelligence director, called it 'egregious'.
WhatsApp said it would be arguing that the case should be heard in public.
Mr Cathcart said: 'WhatsApp would challenge any law or government request that seeks to weaken the encryption of our services and will continue to stand up for people's right to a private conversation online.'
In April, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, a secret court that hears cases about intelligence matters, ruled against the Home Secretary's push for the case to be heard in total secrecy. This would have meant that even the existence of the dispute could not be publicised.
The Home Office argued that any coverage of the matter could be 'damaging to national security'. However, after an intervention by media groups, including The Telegraph, privacy advocates and a group of US politicians, Lord Justice Singh, the president of the tribunal, and Mr Justice Johnson dismissed the effort to keep even the 'bare details' of the case private.
The court said it was possible that some of the future developments in the case could be made public.
Britain's security services and the Home Office have long sparred with the tech industry, warning that the rise of heavily encrypted messaging and digital storage makes it harder to stop terrorism and catch child abusers.
Last week, US politicians attacked Britain's demands in a hearing in Congress. Andy Biggs, a Republican House of Representatives member, said the Home Office's demand 'threatens the privacy and security rights, not only of those living in the UK, but of Apple users all over the world'. He added that the UK was 'attacking America's data security and privacy'.
The Home Office was contacted for comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta and energy company announce plans for geothermal plant in New Mexico
Meta and a California-based geothermal energy company announced plans on Thursday to build a geothermal power plant in Northwestern New Mexico, as Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham and other officials touted a report outlining how the state has the resources to produce substantial geothermal power. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, and XGS Energy aim to build a geothermal energy site capable of producing 150 megawatts at a location that has not yet been named. A recent report indicates the Santa Fe region, as well as portions of Sandoval and Tao counties, are particularly well positioned to produce geothermal energy. "We sit on, no kidding, one of the best dry hot rock energy resources not just in Western United States but in the entire world," said Josh Prueher, XGS Energy CEO, during a news conference at the state Capitol, flanked by Lujan Grisham. "The statistics are staggering." Meta in 2019 opened a sprawling data center in Los Lunas where the tech giant stores videos, photos and other media that its billions of users have posted to the social network. It is unclear whether the new geothermal power plant would support its existing footprint in New Mexico and the Southwest or a future expansion. Prueher said XGS is considering public, private and tribal lands to site the planned plant and is engaged with landowners in each of those categories. Asked whether Sandoval, Santa Fe and Taos counties might be potential locations, Prueher said they could be. The 200-page "The Future of Geothermal in New Mexico" report, published by Project InnerSpace in collaboration with New Mexico Tech and the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, notes the potential for 163 gigawatts of geothermal power to be generated in the state. The Future of Geothermal in New Mexico The vast subsurface heat present in the state could help boost the Land of Enchantment's clean energy future, advocates of the project say. "It's a big damn deal," Lujan Grisham said, praising the economic and job creation impact the project could have. Geothermal resources, typically reservoirs of hot water that exist at various temperatures, generate renewable energy from hot water sources deep beneath Earth's surface. Most of the geothermal power plants in the U.S. are in western states and Hawaii, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, where geothermal energy resources are close to the earth's surface. California generates the most electricity from geothermal energy. Lujan Grisham said the project is not receiving state money at this time. The geothermal power plant in Northwestern New Mexico would be the second in the state, with one such power plant already in operation in Hidalgo County. This is a developing story and will be updated.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Padilla denies claims he lunged at Noem during LA press conference
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) denied the Trump administration's claims that he lunged at Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a Thursday presser in Los Angeles. 'I wasn't lunging at her or anybody, and yes, I identified myself,' Padilla told CNN's Erin Burnett Thursday night after being forcibly removed from the presser and placed in handcuffs. The lawmaker said he attended the press briefing to ask why the National Guard was deployed by the president to address local protests sparked by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids last week. 'I'm just trying to do my job as a senator when we ask questions in committee and don't get answers,' he added. Padilla said he used the press conference to try a different approach with the Trump administration to gain information on immigration operations after officials failed to respond to letters from lawmakers. 'I had a potential audience with the secretary, and I took it. Sadly, still not forthcoming with any sort of data or details,' the senator said, before describing his brief meeting with Noem following the incident. 'You would think, you would hope that that's how the meeting would have started, but no apology, no acknowledgment whatsoever. But it's the Trump administration, so I'm not holding my breath for decency, decorum or manners,' he told CNN. 'One of the big points I was trying to make with her is I get if the Trump administration was doing what Trump said on the campaign trail, let's focus on dangerous, violent criminals for detention and deportation. There's no disagreement there. There's no debate there. But that's not what's happening on the streets of Los Angeles and throughout the country,' he added. Padilla said instead lawful residents are being wrongfully removed and detained. 'Where is this going? It's going to keep getting worse. This is how authoritarianism happens, unless and until the people speak up and push back. So that's why you've seen so many protesters, vast majority peaceful protesters, not just in and around Los Angeles this last week, but increasingly in other cities,' he told CNN. 'So, we have to continue to exercise our First Amendment rights, keep it peaceful. Violence is not tolerated. Violence is not condoned. That will have its consequences. But people need to continue to speak up because this is not normal,' he added. Some Republican lawmakers have called for Padilla to be federally prosecuted over the outburst with Noem while Democrats defended his actions. The incident with Padilla follows the federal indictment of Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) for allegedly impeding and interfering with law enforcement officers at an immigration detention center and the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D-N.J.) for trespassing at the same site.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AMA Group Limited's (ASX:AMA) 10% loss last week hit both individual investors who own 46% as well as institutions
The considerable ownership by retail investors in AMA Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership Insiders have bought recently We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. If you want to know who really controls AMA Group Limited (ASX:AMA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 46% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 10% price drop, institutions with their 37% holdings also suffered. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of AMA Group, beginning with the chart below. View our latest analysis for AMA Group Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AMA Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AMA Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. AMA Group is not owned by hedge funds. TIGA Trading Pty Ltd, Asset Management Arm is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.7% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. We can report that insiders do own shares in AMA Group Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own AU$24m worth of the AU$450m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AMA Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 3.5%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. We can see that public companies hold 8.0% of the AMA Group shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand AMA Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - AMA Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
