All Quiksilver, Billabong and Volcom stores to close in U.S.
All Quiksilver, Billabong and Volcom stores will close in the U.S. after their operator filed for bankruptcy.
Altogether over 100 stores for the brands, that sell apparel for skaters, surfers and snowboarders, will close their doors.
Liberated Brands filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Sunday in Delaware bankruptcy court.
'The Liberated team has worked tirelessly over the last year to propel these iconic brands forward, but a volatile global economy, consumer spending changes amid a rising cost of living, and inflationary pressures have all taken a heavy toll,' Liberated Brands in a statement, according to Financier Worldwide. 'Despite this difficult change, we are encouraged that many of our talented associates have found new opportunities with other license holders that will carry these great brands into the future.'
Todd Hymel, the CEO of the Costa Mesa, California, based company, said in a declaration of support for the bankruptcy filing that a 'rapid and dramatic rise in interest rates,' inflation, supply chain delays, a decline in customer demand and shifting consumer preferences, cast 'significant pressure' on the operator.
He noted that during Covid-19 pandemic the brands saw a boom in business. During that time, Liberated expanded its retail footprint rom 67 to 140 stores, Hymel wrote. However, as the pandemic ended and interest rates and inflation went up, customer demand weakened.
The pandemic also saw an increased demand for online shopping, and led Liberated's brick-and-mortar retail footprint to impose 'a further drag on profitability.' Hymel also said consumer demand toward 'fast fashion' contributed to a decrease in profits.
Fans of the labels won't have to fear, though, as parent company Authentic Brands Group said it will transition to another operator.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bessent says US may 'roll the date forward' for some after 90-day tariff pause ends
June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday said the Trump administration is prepared to "roll the date forward" with trading partners negotiating in good faith if the deadline marking the end of the 90-day pause on President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs is reached with no deal. "It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." Bessent's remarks, in response to a question from a Democratic lawmaker, marked the first time a Trump administration official has indicated some flexibility around the expiration date for the pause. That date - July 8 - is now just four weeks away, and so far the White House has struck only one preliminary deal with a major foreign trading partner affected by the pause, Britain. A deal struck on Tuesday in London with China to de-escalate that bilateral trade war is proceeding on a separate track and timeline. The White House did not immediately respond to a question about whether Trump shared Bessent's view. Trump announced the pause on April 9, a week after unveiling "Liberation Day" tariffs against nearly all U.S. trading partners that proved to be so unexpectedly large and sweeping that it sent global financial markets into near panic. The S&P 500 Index (.SPX), opens new tab plunged more than 12% in four days for its heftiest run of losses since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. Investors were so rattled they bailed out of safe-haven U.S. Treasury securities, sending bond yields rocketing higher. The dollar sank. Markets started their recovery on April 9 when Trump unexpectedly announced the pause. A further leg up in the recovery followed in early May when the Trump team reached a preliminary deal to dial back the triple-digit tariff rates it had imposed on goods from China. The events have given rise to what some on Wall Street have parodied as the "TACO" trade - an acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. "The only time the market has reacted positively is when the administration is in retreat from key policy areas," Democratic Representative Don Beyer of Virginia told Bessent before pressing him on what should be expected at the end of the next deadline next month. "As I have said repeatedly there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals with those," Bessent said before going on to signal a willingness to offer extensions to those negotiating in good faith.
Wales Online
5 hours ago
- Wales Online
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for ‘faulty' PPE, High Court hears
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for 'faulty' PPE, High Court hears PPE Medpro is being sued for an alleged breach of contract over the supply of PPE during the Covid pandemic, with the Government claiming the gowns were unusable The company in court is linked to Baroness Mone (Image: PA Archive/PA Images ) A company linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a Government contract for 25 million surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic, the High Court has heard. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is suing PPE Medpro for allegedly breaching a deal for the gowns, with lawyers for the Government telling the court they were "faulty" because they were not sterile. The company, a consortium led by Baroness Mone's husband, businessman Doug Barrowman, was awarded Government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply PPE during the pandemic, after she recommended it to ministers. Any wrongdoing has been denied. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691. PPE Medpro said it "categorically denies" breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed the company had been "singled out for unfair treatment". Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: "This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. Article continues below "It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns." Mr Stanley said in written submissions the "initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone", with discussions about the contract then going through one of the company's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained "active throughout" the negotiations, Mr Stanley said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had "years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains". But he told the court Baroness Mone's communications were "not part of this case", which was "simply about compliance". He said: "The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody." In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October, 2020, with £121,999,219.20 paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December, 2020, and told the company it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage, unable to be used. In written submissions for trial, Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract, equating to one in a million being unusable. The DHSC claims the contract also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise the gowns using a "validated process", attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said "none of those things happened", with no validated sterilisation process being followed, and the gowns supplied with invalid CE marking. He continued that 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing. He said: "Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. "On that basis, DHSC was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs." In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the "only plausible reason" for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to "the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject", after they had been delivered to the DHSC. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not "representative of the whole population", meaning "no proper conclusions may be drawn". He said the DHSC's claim was "contrived and opportunistic" and PPE Medpro had been "made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors" by the department. He said: "It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. "In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money." He also said there was a "delicious irony" that Baroness Mone was mentioned in the DHSC's written submissions, when she had "zero relevance to the contractual issues in this case". Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence in the trial, and did not attend the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. A PPE Medpro spokesperson said the company "categorically denies breaching its obligations" and will "robustly defend" the claim. Article continues below The trial before Mrs Justice Cockerill is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected in writing at a later date.
Fashion United
9 hours ago
- Fashion United
Pinko returns to profitability following strategic restructuring and new leadership
After navigating several challenging years, Italian womenswear brand PINKO has successfully returned to profitability in the first quarter of 2025. This marks a significant achievement in its ongoing transformation, driven by a strategic overhaul and new leadership. The company, founded in 1986 by Pietro Negra and Cristina Rubini, reported Q1 sales exceeding 70 million euros and a positive EBITDA shift of 6 million euros, moving from -1.2 million euros to +5 million euros year-on-year. This turnaround comes as PINKO works to emerge from Italy's Composizione negoziata della crisi, a negotiated debt settlement procedure. Chairman Pietro Negra described it as a "real turning point," emphasizing a prudent, sustainable business plan designed to generate cash flow starting this year. A new phase under CEO Laura Manelli The arrival of CEO Laura Manelli in March 2025 signaled a decisive shift for PINKO. With extensive experience at leading fashion houses such as Armani, Versace, Fendi, and Sergio Rossi, Manelli brings a strong background in financial oversight and fashion operations. Under her leadership, PINKO has concentrated on redefining its business model, streamlining operations, and realigning with core brand values. "We prefer not to call it a relaunch," Manelli stated. "There is untapped potential in the brand. These results confirm that our new approach is working." She underscored the company's strengths in brand recognition and customer loyalty, attributing the recent progress to employee commitment and the new management team's direction. Lessons learned from overexpansion PINKO's current position follows a period of rapid expansion and financial strain. After growing revenue from 197 million in 2019 to 303 million euros in 2022, the company embarked on an ambitious international strategy targeting 500 million euros in turnover. However, significant investments in China and the US underperformed, leading to liquidity issues and a debt load exceeding 100 million euros by late 2023. "The post-Covid growth wave misled us," Negra admitted. "We invested too fast, especially in China, where market dynamics shifted rapidly. Our mistake wasn't going to China – it was going too fast." The restructuring blueprint To regain financial stability, PINKO implemented comprehensive restructuring measures, including closing underperforming stores, cutting operational costs, resizing the company, and simplifying its governance. The plan has been submitted to banks for final approval and is expected to conclude the debt resolution process by mid-year. Both Negra and Manelli emphasize that the crisis was financial, not a crisis of brand identity. "This was a financial crisis, not a crisis of image," Manelli noted. The brand's appeal remains intact, and current efforts are focused on refining market positioning and improving operational efficiency. Future outlook: Strategic recalibration Positioned firmly in the 'entry-to-luxury' segment, PINKO is recalibrating its international strategy with a more selective and geographically cautious approach. A new partnership with Lima Commercial Management in Shanghai, signed in February 2025, exemplifies this shift towards sustainable growth in China. Domestically and internationally, PINKO is also deliberately moving away from the post-pandemic pricing surge observed across the luxury sector. "We're lowering our prices," Negra stated. "Our aim is to offer the best value for money while maintaining our aspirational brand presence." With strong Q1 figures, a refined strategy, and new leadership at the helm, PINKO appears to be transitioning beyond crisis towards a more measured and resilient future.
