&w=3840&q=100)
Sebi proposes mandatory demat before IPO filings to plug regulatory gaps
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has proposed mandating the dematerialisation of securities held by key shareholders, including promoters and directors, before a company files for an initial public offering (IPO).
Despite multiple regulatory efforts by Sebi and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) to promote dematerialisation, a significant portion of shares held by critical pre-IPO shareholders remains in physical form, creating a regulatory gap that persists post-listing.
In a consultation paper released on Wednesday, Sebi proposed that shareholders such as promoters, directors, key managerial personnel (KMPs), senior management, selling shareholders, qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), domestic employees, and those with special rights must mandatorily dematerialise their shares before filing the IPO offer document.
Additionally, shares held by non-systemically important non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), stockbrokers, and other regulated entities will also need to be dematerialised.
Sebi highlighted that dematerialisation eliminates inefficiencies and risks associated with physical share certificates, such as loss, theft, forgery, and delays in transfer and settlement.
Since 2000, Sebi and MCA have introduced nearly 10 regulatory changes to encourage or mandate dematerialisation, yet gaps remain. Currently, Sebi's Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements (ICDR) Regulations require promoters' securities to be in demat form before an IPO filing.
To address these issues, Sebi proposes expanding Regulation 7(1)(c) of the ICDR Regulations to include a broader range of shareholders, ensuring a more robust and streamlined process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Sebi resolves over 4,400 complaints through SCORES portal in May
Capital markets regulator Sebi resolved 4,493 investor complaints through its online grievance redressal platform SCORES in the month of May. The regulator received 4,793 fresh complaints in the month and a total of 4,563 complaints remained unresolved at the end of May, slightly higher than the 4,263 complaints that were pending as of April 30, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) said in a public notice on Friday. The regulator also highlighted that the average resolution time taken by the entities to submit the Action Taken Reports (ATRs) in May was eight days, while the average time taken for complaints under First Level Review was five days. In a separate public notice, Sebi said that Smartowner Capital Growth Trust is the only entity whose investor complaint has remained unresolved for more than three months on its SCORES platform as of May 31.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
AIF investments rise 32% to ₹5.38 trillion by March 2025, shows data
Rising volatility and evolving macro trends are driving HNIs to invest more in AIFs, which reached ₹5.38 trillion by March 2025, as they move beyond traditional asset classes New Delhi Investments in Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) by India's high net-worth individuals (HNIs) rose to ₹5.38 trillion by the end of the March 2025 quarter, up 32 per cent from ₹4.07 trillion in the same period last year, according to data from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). The increase is linked to rising market volatility and shifting global macroeconomic trends, prompting affluent investors to diversify their portfolios and reduce exposure to traditional asset classes. The move towards AIFs reflects a growing interest in investment options that provide broader risk management and are less correlated with public markets. These evolving market conditions are encouraging HNIs to move away from conventional assets like equities and fixed income instruments, according to a report by Multi-Act Trade and Investments, an investment advisory firm. AIFs are privately pooled investment vehicles regulated by Sebi, which invest in line with a defined strategy. They are classified into three categories: Category I includes venture capital and infrastructure funds; Category II covers private equity and debt funds; and Category III consists of hedge funds and other complex strategies. These funds are typically accessed by institutional and wealthy investors. The trend marks a notable shift in allocation strategies among HNIs and family offices, with many focusing on private market opportunities that allow for longer investment horizons. 'Family office portfolios have a really long horizon, so their ability to participate in private investments is much higher than most other investors,' the report stated. The appeal of AIFs lies in their potential to deliver higher returns and offer stability during periods of market stress. The surge in interest has been driven by the need for diversification, a hedge against inflation, and access to expert fund management. HNIs are investing across a wide range of segments including private equity, venture capital, credit strategies, real estate-focused AIFs, long-short hedge funds, and other portfolio management strategies. Younger investors, in particular, are showing interest in ESG-linked funds, climate-tech ventures, and sustainable finance vehicles.
Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Committed to making India a global arbitration hub: Arjun Ram Meghwal
Invoking the country's ancient tradition of consensual dispute resolution, Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Law and Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Arjun Ram Meghwal said that the government is committed to making India a global arbitration hub. Addressing a National Conference on Institutional Arbitration, organised by the Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, in collaboration with ONGC and the India International Arbitration Centre (IIAC) on Saturday, the Minister said efforts are being made to promote institutional arbitration as the preferred mode of commercial dispute resolution. He said the government is also trying to highlight the IIAC as a globally competitive arbitral institution. The day-long Conference brought together senior officials from the Ministry of Law and Justice, representatives of Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs), legal experts and arbitration professionals. The Conference featured four technical sessions, each delving into key aspects of institutional arbitration. In addition to the participation of over 150 distinguished delegates, the Conference witnessed strong virtual engagement with over 1,600 views on social media. The first session, 'Strengthening Dispute Resolution in PSUs: The Role of Institutional Arbitration', addressed public sector-specific challenges and institutional arbitration's potential in transforming the dispute resolution landscape, particularly concerning infrastructure and public sector contracts. Speakers highlighted the need for capacity-building and called for structured, institutional processes over fragmented ad hoc mechanisms, with support from bodies like IIAC. The second session took a close look at the IIAC (Conduct of Arbitration) Regulations, 2023, breaking down key provisions and their practical relevance. A short film was also screened, showcasing IIAC's state-of-the-art infrastructure and signalling India's readiness to handle complex, high-stakes arbitrations. The third session, 'Best Practices During Arbitral Process — A Discourse', focused on procedural and institutional best practices to enhance the effectiveness of arbitration. Speakers advocated structured case management, suggesting that their regularisation under institutional rules would enhance clarity, expedite timelines, and minimise ambiguities in the arbitral process. The fourth session focused on learnings from international jurisdictions and the way ahead for the arbitration ecosystem in India. The discussion included global practices, emergency arbitration and access to legal research tools to make arbitration more accessible. The inaugural session opened with a welcome address by Justice Hemant Gupta (Retd.), Chairperson, IIAC, who discussed key challenges hindering the growth of institutional arbitration in India, particularly the continued reliance on ad hoc mechanisms. He emphasised the transition from the erstwhile International Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ICADR) to IIAC as a significant move by the Government and stressed the need for Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to adopt structured institutional frameworks.
