Manchester United's debacle in Asia boosts case against post-season tours
As the dust settles on Manchester United's post-season tour of Malaysia and Hong Kong, the question must be asked: was it worth it? United may have pocketed around £10m from their six-day, two-match visit to Asia but what they lost was arguably worse. And no, we're not just talking about their 1-0 defeat against the 'Asean All Stars' in Kuala Lumpur, a scratch, invitational side that had never previously played together.
Omar Berrada, United's chief executive, had excitedly hailed the tour as an 'opportunity for us to collaborate with our valued commercial partners, and to deepen relationships with our fans'. That vision probably didn't include Amad Diallo sticking his middle finger up at supporters, a gesture for which he refused to apologise, the winger insisting he did it in response to insults about his mother. Nor did it allow for Alejandro Garnacho sulking and yawning through his various off-pitch duties. It remains to be seen how many key performance indicators were met by the Argentinian, who finished the tour by posting a one-word caption on the runway as United departed home to Europe: 'finally'.
Advertisement
Related: PFA chief Molango voices concern over effects of post-season tours on players
At least Matthijs De Ligt, Joshua Zirkzee, Ayden Heaven and Patrick Dorgu put on a brave face, smiling and waving through the sparsely-attended open-top bus tour of Kuala Lumpur, as an accompanying PA system blared out 'Glory, Glory, Man United'. Hours later, United lost their first match of the tour, against the All Stars. Ruben Amorim did little to spin the defeat into anything positive. 'The boos from the fans, maybe it is something we need because every game that we lost in the Premier League they were always there,' the Portuguese manager said.
'We don't have it in us not to choke in every exercise, in every game – that is what happened. We should win these kind of games, no matter what.'
United went 1-0 behind against Hong Kong on Friday but rallied to win the second match of the tour 3-1.
Advertisement
After a disastrous season in which United finished just above the relegation zone, this was meant to be a money-making charm offensive – the club promising 'a summer like no other' – but the tour seems to have done more harm than good. It ended up as another opportunity for defeat and derision, enforcing the idea that United are a spent force, and widening the gap between the team and their supporters.
There were thousands of unsold tickets, while fans hoping to watch the first game in Kuala Lumpur on the club's YouTube channel were treated to extensive buildup and the first 35 seconds of the match before being redirected to a pay-per-view MUTV broadcast. Amid all the selfies and handshakes and suggestions of 'glory', there is a sordid and calculated underbelly here. Yes, money was made, but is £10m worth it to a team that is about to spent £62.5m on a new forward?
The disastrous nature of United's jaunt to Asia brings into question the viability of post-season tours in general. In a world where elite clubs are all too vocal in complaining about fixture congestion and injuries, these tours add mental and physical fatigue to already exhausted bodies, not to mention needless air miles with adverse environmental impact. United's players left for Malaysia on 25 May, just hours after their final Premier League of the season, against Aston Villa. Having landed on Saturday, most of the senior squad will now report for international duty before World Cup qualifiers this weekend. United's senior players will not have any meaningful break until mid-June and are expected back for pre-season in early July, before the club's pre-season tour to Sweden and the US.
United are not alone in these missteps. Tottenham and Newcastle embarked on post-season tours to Australia this time last year and played each other in Melbourne on 22 May 2024, three days after the final day of the 2023-24 season. Kieran Trippier, who captained Newcastle in that Melbourne fixture, admitted the trip was 'not ideal' before his commitments with England at Euro 2024, a tournament in which the right-back struggled for fitness.
Advertisement
Injuries and fatigue plagued Tottenham's start to the season, too. And if Spurs' post-season tour wasn't directly responsible for that it certainly didn't help, while Daniel Levy's comments at a Tottenham fans' forum in September that he 'would like to see less games, but higher-quality games' were subsequently difficult to stomach.
It is difficult to determine exactly how big the environmental impact is for these tours. The pre-season before Sir Jim Ratcliffe bought a stake in Manchester United, the club offset 450 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions to cover the necessary air travel by players and staff to the US. Perhaps unsurprisingly for a club that is now part-owned by a company with interests in everything from petrochemicals to mass plastic production, there has been no mention of offsetting emissions for the trip to Malaysia and Hong Kong, which included 14,000 air miles for the team alone.
The Professional Footballers' Association's sustainability champion, David Wheeler, has spoken of the harm caused by such tours. 'It's not only irresponsible from a climate point of view, but from a player care point of view, physically and mentally,' Wheeler said. 'They are human beings. They get paid very well, as we know, but they have a limit to what their bodies can take and how they cope with it from a mental health point of view'. The organisation's chief executive, Maheta Molango, has also 'expressed concern about these post-season tours'.
Despite the arguments to the contrary, post-season tours look here to stay, part of a new footballing landscape almost nobody asked for. And there will be plenty of other clubs that plead poverty and set sail for distant lands in the future. For now, we have to find something else to watch before the start of the Club World Cup in a couple of weeks' time – a month-long tournament absurdly relaunched by Fifa, with a $1bn (£775m) prize pot. Manchester United must wish they had an invite.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
8 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Hong Kong Bolsters Top Court With First Foreign Judge in a Year
Hong Kong has appointed a retired New Zealand judge to its top court, the first foreign justice named to the appellate body in over a year following record resignations that threatened to undermine confidence in the judicial system. The city's lawmakers on Wednesday approved William Young's appointment as a non-permanent judge at the Court of Final Appeal. The move partly restores overseas judges who quit after Beijing imposed a national security law and curbed political freedoms.
Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China's Services Activity Picked Up in May After Trade War Truce
China's services activity expanded at a faster pace in May, a private survey showed, in a sign the consumer economy is stabilizing while higher US tariffs threaten demand for exports. The Caixin China services purchasing managers' index rose to 51.1 from 50.7 the month before, according to a statement from Caixin and S&P Global on Thursday. The median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg was 51. Any reading above 50 suggests expansion.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
North America takes the bulk of AI VC investments, despite tough political environment
Despite what some experts have characterized as an environment increasingly hostile to AI R&D, North America continues to receive the bulk of AI venture dollars, according to data from investment tracker PitchBook. Between February and May of this year, VCs poured $69.7 billion into North America-based AI and machine learning startups across 1,528 deals. That's compared with $6.4 billion that VC firms invested in European AI ventures across 742 deals across the same period. Asia-based startups have fared a bit worse than their European counterparts, according to PitchBook. Between February and May, VCs invested just $3 billion in Asia-based AI startups across 515 deals. Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. has dramatically cut funding to scientific grants related to basic AI research, made it more difficult for foreign students specializing in AI to study in the U.S., and threatened to dismantle university-housed AI labs by freezing billions of dollars in federal funds. The administration's trade policies, meanwhile, including its retaliatory tariffs, have led to a chaotic market unfavorable for risky new AI ventures. In a post on X in March, AI pioneer and Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton called for billionaire Elon Musk, who until recently advised Trump's cost-cutting group, the Department of Government Efficiency, to be expelled from the British Royal Society "because of the huge damage he is doing to scientific institutions in the U.S." One might expect that Europe, which has pledged to become a global leader in AI, would attract more venture capital in light of Trump's controversial policies in the U.S., which have created uncertainty and confusion for founders, investors, and researchers alike. Moreover, the EU has committed hundreds of billions of euros to support the development of AI within its member countries and already has a number of successful, well-funded AI startups in its ranks (see Mistral, H, and Aleph Alpha, to name a few). But that anticipated shift in global investment hasn't come to pass. There isn't any sign of a mass VC exodus to the bloc, or of significant upticks in AI funding overseas — at least not yet. The same is true for China, which has spawned high-profile AI startups like DeepSeek and Butterfly Effect — the company behind the agentic platform Manus — but where VC activity in the country and the broader Asian region remains relatively austere. (Export controls impacting the ability of certain Asian countries to procure AI chips are almost certainly a factor.) In 2024, North American startups secured 75.6% of all VC AI funding — $106.24 billion. That share has only increased this year. So far in 2025, North American AI investments represent 86.2% ($79.74 billion) of all VC funding for AI globally. It paints a somewhat surprising picture. Even amid mounting political and regulatory headwinds under Trump's second term, the U.S. remains the undisputed center for AI capital, meaning investors, fatigued as they may be by the administration's unpredictability, are still counting on U.S. innovation to deliver the biggest returns, at least for now. Sign in to access your portfolio
