
EU slaps sanctions on alleged culprits of attacks on Syria's Alawites
The European Union has lifted a wide range of sanctions on Syria but slapped new ones on people and groups it says participated in attacks on civilians during a wave of violence in the coastal region in March.
The move removed most sanctions that had been imposed on the country, including on its financial system.
But sanctions remain in place on individuals and organisations the EU says violated human rights or for "security grounds."
That includes the extended family of former President Bashar al-Assad or the country's chemical weapons programme, according to the text of the European Council on the decision.
The EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas had announced plans to lift the sanctions last week.
She said the move was "conditional" and that sanctions could be resumed if the new government of Ahmad al-Sharaa, a former rebel commander who led the charge that ousted al-Assad in December, doesn't keep the peace.
Kallas said in a statement that removing sanctions "is simply the right thing to do, at this historic time, for the EU to genuinely support Syria's recovery and a political transition that fulfils the aspirations of all Syrians."
But Wednesday's decision also slapped "restrictive measures" on two people and three armed groups accused of "targeting civilians and especially the Alawite community."
That referred to the religious minority to which al-Assad belongs, during violence in March on the coast and of torture and "arbitrary killings of civilians."
The two people targeted by the new sanctions are Mohammad Hussein al-Jasim, leader of the Sultan Suleiman Shah Brigade and Sayf Boulad Abu Bakr, leader of the Hamza Division, both armed groups that the EU said had taken part in the attacks.
The militias were also slapped with new sanctions, as was another armed group, the Sultan Murad Division.
Clashes erupted after a group of al-Assad loyalists attacked security forces near the coastal city of Latakia.
Rights groups reported widespread revenge killings as militants from Syria's Sunni majority, some of them officially affiliated with the new government's security forces, targeted Alawites, regardless of whether they were involved in the insurgency.
Hundreds of civilians were killed in the clashes.
The new government in Damascus has promised to hold perpetrators accountable, but a body formed to investigate the violence has yet to release its findings.
While there have not been large-scale attacks on Alawites since March, members of the community remain fearful and say that individual incidents of kidnappings and killing continue to take place.
Since seizing power, al-Sharaa's government has struggled to weld a patchwork of undisciplined former rebel factions together into a national army.
The lifting of the broader sanctions on Syria comes days after the United States granted Syria sweeping exemptions from sanctions in a first step toward fulfilling President Donald Trump's pledge to lift a half-century of penalties on a country shattered by 13 years of civil war.
A measure by the US State Department waived for six months a tough set of sanctions imposed by Congress in 2019.
The easing of sanctions removes one of the major barriers to reconstruction of the country, which the United Nations in 2017 estimated would cost at least $250 billion (€221 billion).
Some experts now say that number could reach at least $400 billion (€354 billion).
The United Nations estimates that 90% of Syrians live in poverty and state-supplied electricity comes as little as two hours per day.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Islamic State group claims first attack on new Syria forces since Assad fall
The Islamic State (IS) group claimed its first attack on Syria's new government forces since the fall of longtime Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Thursday, two war monitors said on Wednesday, May 29. SITE Intelligence Group said it was the first IS-claimed attack on Syria's new government, with the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights saying that one person was killed and three members of the Syrian army's 70th division injured when their patrol was hit by a remotely detonated landmine on Wednesday.


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
What comes next in Trump's legal battle over tariffs?
What is in the US Court of International Trade's original ruling -- which the Trump administration is appealing -- and what options does the administration have? Which tariffs were affected? The three-judge trade court ruled Wednesday that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing blanket tariffs by invoking emergency economic powers. The judgment -- although temporarily halted -- affected levies unveiled on April 2, which involve a 10-percent tariff on most trading partners and higher rates on dozens of economies including China and the European Union. These higher levels are currently suspended while negotiations take place. The ruling also applies to tariffs imposed on Canada, Mexico and China over their alleged roles in allowing an influx of drugs into the United States. But it left intact sector-specific levies like those on steel, aluminum and auto imports. Why a pause? The ruling by the little-known court, which has nationwide jurisdiction over tariff and trade disputes, initially gave the White House 10 days to complete the process of unwinding the levies. But the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday granted a temporary stay "until further notice" while the Trump administration's appeals process plays out. This means the tariffs can remain in effect for now, while a longer-term outcome is yet to be determined. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told Fox News the administration is "very pleased with the ruling," dubbing it a victory. What are Trump's alternatives? The appeals court could eventually uphold the trade court's original decision to block Trump's sweeping tariffs. The president, however, has other means to reinstate his tariff agenda, said Thibault Denamiel, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. These include Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, "which is intended to deal with a balance of payments emergency but does not require a formal investigation," Denamiel told AFP. The authority restricts tariffs to 15 percent and they can only last 150 days. But it is among the policy levers that Trump could pull as he seeks a "bridge" towards more lasting actions, said KPMG chief economist Diane Swonk. Another option is Section 338 of the Trade Act of 1930, allowing the administration to impose tariffs of up to 50 percent on countries that discriminate against the United States, Denamiel said. Does this affect trade talks? The US trade court's ruling did not remove the threat of US tariffs for Europe or end the need for negotiations, said Andrew Kenningham, chief Europe economist at Capital Economics. This is because the threat of reciprocal tariffs remains if the White House wins its appeal, he said. Trump could also turn to sector-specific means as he did in his first term or seek congressional approval for tariffs, though this is less likely, Kenningham said. It is not clear if negotiations will lose steam, Swonk added, given that the administration wants to leverage the threat of tariffs "very aggressively." Even if the original ruling is eventually upheld, US officials could still buy time to exert pressure on other economies including the European Union and China. What about the broader economy? The court process "introduces greater ambiguity around the future direction of US trade policy," especially because the appeal is ongoing, said EY chief economist Gregory Daco. "This legal development amplifies longer-lasting uncertainty for businesses navigating cross-border supply chains," he added in a note. US stocks closed higher Thursday, but economic fallout has already occurred in recent months with Trump's see-sawing approach to unveiling tariffs and pausing them selectively. Financial markets have been roiled by policy shifts, and shipping halts due to high tariffs bring disruptions that cannot be cleared overnight, analysts said.


Fashion Network
7 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Trump officials downplay court ruling that blocked sweeping tariffs
Meanwhile, a second U.S. court issued a preliminary ruling against the tariffs on Thursday, temporarily blocking them from going into effect in a case brought by educational toy maker Learning Resources. U.S. District Court Judge Rudy Contreras issued a narrower decision that did not block the tariffs completely, but he stopped the tariffs from being levied on the toy company and ruled that its challenge could remain in his Washington, D.C. federal court. The administration immediately asked an appeals court to stay Wednesday's trade court ruling and allow the tariff regime to remain in place. Trump has put tariffs at the center of his effort to extract concessions from U.S. trading partners, including traditional allies such as the European Union. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett expressed confidence that the ruling would ultimately be reversed in an interview with Fox Business Network on Thursday. He also said it would not get in the way of signing new trade deals. "If there are little hiccups here or there because of decisions that activist judges make, then it shouldn't just concern you at all, and it's certainly not going to affect the negotiations," Hassett said. Indeed, at least two sets of scheduled trade talks appeared unaffected by the ruling. Japan's trade negotiator is scheduled to meet with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Washington on Friday for a fourth round of talks, while India still plans to send a trade team to Washington next week for talks, an India trade official told Reuters. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, a staunch proponent of higher tariffs, told Bloomberg TV that the Trump administration could rely on other laws to implement import taxes if the court's decision remains in place. Trump had invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law intended to address threats during national emergencies, to impose tariffs on almost every U.S. trading partner, raising fears of a global recession. The president temporarily suspended many of the tariffs until early July after markets swooned in response. The court found that the emergency powers law does not grant Trump the unilateral power to order such sweeping tariffs. Some sector-specific tariffs, such as those Trump has imposed on steel, aluminum and automobiles, were imposed under separate authorities on national security grounds and were unaffected by the ruling. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed the decision, saying it was "consistent with Canada's longstanding position" that Trump's tariffs were unlawful. Other U.S. trading partners offered careful responses. The British government said the ruling was a domestic matter for the U.S. administration and noted it was "only the first stage of legal proceedings." Both Germany and the European Commission said they could not comment on the decision. Several analysts said it was preliminary to conclude this closes the door entirely on Trump's sweeping tariffs, with legal paths other than IEEPA likely at his disposal. "We suspect the administration will lean on other legal authorities to maintain tariff levels around current levels," Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, wrote in a note to clients on Thursday. Some businesses and industry groups expressed exasperation amid continued uncertainty about how the tariff saga will play out. The ruling is "just another chapter in this difficult journey toward a clear, consistent and strategic trade policy," said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain for the National Retail Federation trade group. After prompting an initial surge in stocks in Asia, the ruling stimulated more muted reactions in Europe, where indexes were largely flat, and in the U.S., where gains were modest. The S&P 500 was up about 0.4%, having given back more than half of its initial rise at the opening bell. An early rally in the dollar also fizzled and the greenback was about 0.5% lower against a basket of major trading partner currencies. Bond yields also declined. Following a market revolt after his major tariff announcement on April 2, Trump paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive, and the court's suspension of the tariffs may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing into deals, analysts said. "Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs – which can't exceed 15% for the time being," George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers, said. Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and sneakers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen, supply chains have been disrupted and company strategies redrafted. Drinks company Diageo, opens new tab and automakers General Motors, opens new tab and Ford are among those that have abandoned forecasts for the year ahead. Non-U.S. companies including Honda, opens new tab, Campari, and pharmaceutical companies Roche, and Novartis have said they are considering moving operations or expanding their U.S. presence to mitigate the impact of tariffs.