logo
Federal election fact check: Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's record on housing attacked

Federal election fact check: Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's record on housing attacked

Yahoo19-04-2025

Hedy Fry, the longtime Liberal MP for Vancouver Centre, has called out Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre on his housing record.
In a post on the social-media platform X, Fry said it was strange to see Poilievre suddenly talking about enticing municipalities to get housing built.
'He not only voted against Liberal housing, partnering with municipalities, but forbade his MPs to help their (municipalities) get Lib housing grants. Funny what u do when u are desperate,' wrote Fry.
This is misleading.
It's true that Poilievre voted against some Liberal housing policies but he also supported some Liberal policies. And he proposed his own housing policies as leader of the Conservatives, which weren't supported by the Liberals.
That's a matter of different policy approaches to increasing housing, not whether Poilievre supports more housing being built.
In 2023, as Opposition leader, Poilievre proposed Bill C-356, dubbed the Building Homes Not Bureaucracy Act, to establish targets for completion of new homes in high-cost cities that would increase 15 per cent each year and tie federal infrastructure funding to those targets.
The Liberals, NDP and Bloc Quebécois voted against the measure.
In 2023, Poilievre supported a Liberal bill that called for a federal framework on housing for individuals with non-visible disabilities. All parties supported the bill.
In 2022, Poilievre didn't vote in favour of Liberal Bill C-31 that proposed a one-time rental benefit of $500 for low-income earners.
Before the snap election was called in March, Poilievre had announced that if his party formed government, he would tackle housing affordability by slashing the GST on home purchases under $1 million. He has bumped that up to $1.3 million in the election campaign.
Poilievre pledged a Tory government would pay for the GST cuts by axing the Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund as well as the Housing Accelerator Fund, which provides billions of dollars to municipalities and First Nations.
However, some Conservative MPs had written to the federal government in support of municipalities' applications for the accelerator funding, something that Poilievre has since barred his MPs from doing.
Twice in 2021, under the Justin Trudeau-led government, the Conservatives proposed bills on housing supply, including one to review and consolidate all federal properties in Canada in order to make at least 15 per cent available for residential development. That bill, as well as another, also proposed banning foreign investors from purchasing Canadian real estate.
The Liberals, including Fry, voted against those bills, although in 2023 the Grits did bring in a ban on foreign buyers. In 2024, the Liberals also said they would free up federal land for housing.
In 2017, also under a Liberal-led government, the NDP sponsored a bill that proposed a change to the Canadian Bill of Rights to guarantee the right to housing at a reasonable cost and free of unreasonable barriers.
The Conservatives, including Poilievre, voted against the bill. So, did the Liberals, including Fry.
In 2019, another NDP-sponsored housing bill that called for building 500,000 units of quality, affordable housing within 10 years was voted against by the Conservatives, including Poilievre, and the Liberals.
Poilievre and the Tories also voted in 2013 against an NDP-sponsored bill to create a national housing strategy that the Liberals supported. The Conservatives had a majority government at the time.
This election, Poilievre has said cities should free up land, speed up permits and cut development charges to build 15 per cent more homes a year. If they don't, federal funding will be withheld. Poilievre also plans to sell 15 per cent of the federal government's 37,000 buildings to be turned into affordable housing.
The Grits, under Leader Mark Carney, propose to double the pace of home construction to 500,000 new units a year with the help of a new federal government agency, modelled on a program used to build starter homes after the Second World War. Carney has also promised to encourage cities to cut housing construction red tape and lower development charges, as well as eliminate the GST for first-time homebuyers on homes under $1 million.
ghoekstra@postmedia.com
x.com/gordon_hoekstra
Poilievre's plan to cut federal housing deals puts funds Ottawa promised to cities at risk, minister says
Federal election: Metro Vancouver voters have mixed feelings on housing promises

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble
EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble

The need to grow the Canadian economy in the face of tough economic times was underscored by the release of the latest unemployment numbers by Statistics Canada on Friday. The unemployment rate in May rose to 7.0%. That's the highest it has been since September 2016, excluding the 2020 and 2021 pandemic years, and a 12.9% increase from 6.2% a year ago in May. The Canadian economy generated a net increase of just 8,800 jobs in May, far short of the roughly 30,000 per month needed to keep pace with population growth. A total of 1.6 million Canadians were unemployed in May, an increase of 191,000, or 13.8%, compared to May 2024. A smaller share of people who were unemployed in April found jobs in May (22.6%), compared to a year ago (24.0%), and spent an average of 21.8 weeks searching for work, compared to 18.4 weeks in May 2024. Unemployment in Ontario (7.9%); Alberta (7.4%); Newfoundland and Labrador (9.7%); Prince Edward Island (8.2%); and Nunavut (9.0%) were all above the national average, as was the case in a number of cities, including Windsor (10.8%); Oshawa (9.1%); Toronto (8.8%); Calgary (7.8%); and Edmonton (7.3%). Canada recorded its largest merchandise trade deficit of $7.1 billion in April, the first full month of the tariff war with U.S. President Donald Trump, compared to $2.3 billion in March. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development last week projected meagre 1% economic growth for Canada this year and 1.1% in 2026, noting Trump's global tariff war is expected to hit the economies of Canada, Mexico, China and the U.S. hardest. Prime Minister Mark Carney proposed measures to bolster the economy on Friday, including eliminating federal barriers to interprovincial trade, increasing labour mobility and shortening the process for approving major infrastructure projects. Those are worthy long-term goals, since internal impediments to trade cost our economy $200 billion annually, raise consumer prices up to 14.5% and reduce economic growth as measured by gross domestic product up to 8% annually. But they are also long-term solutions, underscoring the importance of Carney's government producing a budget as soon as possible to reveal the Liberals' specific plans to boost the economy. For better or worse, Carney decided to delay releasing the budget until fall.

LEDREW: Tyranny over, Liberals once again free to disagree with prime minister
LEDREW: Tyranny over, Liberals once again free to disagree with prime minister

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

LEDREW: Tyranny over, Liberals once again free to disagree with prime minister

Debate and differences of opinion are permitted once again in the Liberal Party – the children are no longer in charge. Canada is no longer run by a cockwomble. What a difference a mature prime minister makes! A prime minister who does not pick the weakest for cabinet so that his PMO will be totally in charge. A prime minister who can obviously change his mind, all the way from 'net-zero' to thinking of utilizing resources. A prime minister who will not impoverish Canadians and embarrass Canada by telling other heads of state that there is 'no business case' for exporting LNG to needy nations with lots of cash to pay us. Refreshingly, we now have a natural resources minister – Tim Hodgson – who has travelled to the once-separating Alberta to support new oil and gas infrastructure to trade in overseas markets and supply energy to Eastern Canada! How novel – jobs and riches for Canadians. LILLEY: Mark Carney offers words – Pierre Poilievre's words – but we need action GOLDSTEIN: Carney can't fix Canada's underperforming economy on his own LILLEY: Trudeau lowered bar so much, Carney gets credit for being an adult Under the regime of the last ten years, ideas that may be contrary to the dogma of the PMO could not even be broached. The late Bill Graham, an experienced and tested and worldly intellect, and former Liberal leader, was once told in no uncertain terms by some kid in the PMO that his advice on a complex issue was not necessary because 'we have this, thank you very much.' This closure of the mind was aided and abetted by appointees in the PMO who did not have the wherewithal to think through even the simplest situations. Remember the SNC-Lavalin scandal? I seriously doubt that any lawyers in the new PMO will be contacting prosecutors in any Crown office in Canada in an attempt to change a decision on criminal charges. Senior and thoughtful Liberal senators were removed from the Liberal caucus – their views not needed. Only members of parliament were allowed in caucus – people who either had their positions because of the PM or wanted a promotion that only the PM could offer, gutless supplicants who would never offer up an opinion differing from the official PMO stand. The Liberal Party itself was reduced to an insignificant triviality, its supporters cowed into silence, because if you dared offer a differing viewpoint then you were considered disloyal, and banished – or at least branded as no longer a Liberal. I had turned down government appointments, and was not seeking invitations to state dinners in Ottawa, so over the last decade I could be critical of many Trudeau positions that now, after he has been dumped, many others suddenly seem to understand were idiotic. And for that difference of opinion with the Trudeau government, lifelong friends, many of whom had partaken of my hospitality over the years, who had enjoyed the perks of power from being in favour in Ottawa (gotta love those government jets), would actually turn their heads at the sight of me – or not invite me to events that I had helped create decades ago. Several dowagers of the party tried to rip strips off me. Friends tell me that the big shots of Ottawa and Montreal hate me with a passion for daring to challenge the Trudeau government. I was 'no longer a Liberal.' The truth is that I am a Liberal – I believe in well-managed government, fiscally prudent, socially progressive, encouraging of debate, with an eye on providing the freedom and impetus to build a better Canada. I believe in the rule of law – not the fiat of unnamed, well-paid, political helpers. Much to the detriment of my finances, I have volunteered tens and tens of thousands of hours of tough slugging in the service of the Liberal Party. Now that things are returning to some degree of normalcy, I would gladly do so again, and encourage others to do so – politics is a noble calling. Canada, and the debate, needs you.

TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash
TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash

Lifestyle influencer Tara Langdale talked to Fox News Digital about how she received hurtful messages from critics after a not-so-serious fashion post describing what she views as "unchic" went viral, spawning a cascade of events that made her apolitical post a victim of attacks. The self-described stay-at-home working mom amassed some 250,000 views and found herself on the receiving end of some hate after an April 7 TikTok of her seated, drinking from a wine glass with nicely done hair, gold jewelry and manicured nails as she skimmed through a list of "unchic" fashion sins. Tattoos, Lululemon, baggy denim, camouflage and visible panty lines were just a few that made part one of Langdale's controversial "unchic" list, which drew backlash from seething critics who called her out with a political twist. "Voting for Trump is unchic," one said. Vogue Attacks Melania Trump's Official White House Portrait, Compares Her To 'Freelance Magician' "To her, privilege = chic. Hope this helps!" said another. Read On The Fox News App A third said, "just say you're a republican and go lmao," while a slew of commenters took exception to her tattoo stance and ranted about classism. The video even caught The Guardian's attention, prompting an article that coined "chic" as "a shorthand for a type of conservative-coded aesthetic" and spoke of the "rigid and airbrushed" looks of Trump allies, sch as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Though Langdale diddles cribe herself as conservative when speaking to Fox News Digital, she insists not everything is about politics. "When I get dressed in the morning, I'm not thinking about my political party and how I should dress to showcase that," Langdale said. "I think conservativism is more of culture, religion – all of those things go into your conservativist mindset. Now, if you're talking about conservative style of dress… that's also going to be more like religion and culture," she went on. "Of course, if I'm going to church on Sunday, I'm dressing very conservative. I'm going to keep it classy, but if you see me in the street in my regular day-to-day, I am not at all conservative. I would never consider my style to be conservative. But am I conservative? Absolutely, so I can differentiate the two. I know that the internet has a hard time doing that." Mom Living With Alopecia Reacts To Liberal Women Shaving Heads To Be 'Unattractive' After Donald Trump's Win Langdale addressed the politicized dogma, saying she doesn't understand why TikTok users jumped to conclusions about "conservative" or "Republican makeup" as they did. "Because I'm blonde, because I have more of a natural look about me, I'm not fully glammed all the time… I'm really not sure how that makes me appear conservative, but, again, I just think when people don't agree with what you say, they have to find a way to discredit you, and that's just an easy tactic," she continued. At the same time, Langdale pushed back against the idea of her video implying that people too poor to afford expensive items are automatically "unchic," and pointed to brand-name items like athletic apparel brand Lululemon, Apple Watches and Golden Goose sneakers – all of which can be pricey – as evidence pointing to the contrary. "Just keep in mind that money talks and wealth whispers, and I don't know any wealthy people that are wearing Gucci across their chest," she said in her original post. Langdale explained that the TikTok trend of users showcasing "things I find incredibly chic" grabbed her attention as they began circulating on the app. She found them "pretentious and off-putting," so she felt compelled to take her own stab at the video. New York Times Guest Essay Suggests Fashion Industry Has 'Given Up' On 'Woke' Values "Of course, my video came off as pretentious and off-putting as well, but it felt like a certain level of cringe for me, and I don't like to personally attack anybody on social media, so I wouldn't go after a specific creator. I just kind of wanted to hop on the trend… so that was my initial, 'Why I created the video.'" Langdale shared that her direct messages on the platform have been "insane" with threats and comments about her family since the video went viral. "It does make you step back and take a pause," she shared. "Like, is this really worth it for how crazy people react? And I would never want to put my family in danger, but I think a lot of it is just the keyboard pirates that are just back there behind their computer typing whatever they can to try to get more likes in the comments," Langdale article source: TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store