&w=3840&q=100)
Summonses issued to Saluja's lawyers cause unrest among legal fraternity
Not taking kindly to the Enforcement Directorate's (ED's) summons -- later withdrawn -- to two senior advocates Pratap Venugopal and Arvind Datar, legal experts have said though the agency can send such notices, this should be done only in the rarest of the rare cases.
'Normally and ideally unless the ED has concrete clear and irrefutable evidence as to the complicity of the lawyer in the matter of circumvention of any criminal law, a lawyer is a professional and the rules of confidentiality govern the relations with the clients and therefore the lawyer should not ideally be subject to any kind of investigation,' senior advocate Sanjoy Ghose told Business Standard.
'It is the independence of the judiciary which is at stake because if agencies proceed against lawyers, then the lawyers will not be defending their clients,' Ghose said.
The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) on Friday wrote to the chief justice of India, deploring the ED's action and seeking suo motu cognizance of the issuance of the summons to Venugopal. It said the ED's action had ramifications for 'independence of the legal profession' and the 'foundational principle of lawyer-client privilege'.
Earlier this month, the ED had first sent notice to Datar, asking him to appear before the agency in connection with legal advice he had given Care Health Insurance on employee stock options (ESOPs) issued to former Religare Enterprises chairperson Rashmi Saluja. After protests from lawyers and representations before the Supreme Court, the notice was withdrawn.
On June 18, the agency issued a second summons, this time to Venugopal in connection with the same issue. In its notice, the ED asked Venugopal to furnish records pertaining to communication between him and Care Health Insurance as well as Religare Enterprises. He was also asked to furnish these details on the legal opinion given for the grant of ESOPs to Saluja after the rejection of the grant by the insurance regulator.
The summons also required Venugopal to tender details of payment made by Care Health, Religare Enterprises, and other associate entities against the legal service sought by the companies. He was asked to appear on June 27 before the assistant director of the ED in Mumbai.
'Legal opinion falls under the protection of attorney-client privilege. However, the issue becomes legally complex when legal opinion is allegedly used to facilitate an illegal transaction, such as money laundering or/and when the notice does not directly seek privileged communication, but circumstantial information such as payments received or internal communications,' said Alay Razvi, managing partner of law firm Accord Juris.
Though lawyers can be summoned under procedural laws like the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, it is contentious and opposed by the legal fraternity, Razvi said.
Himanshu Vidhani, partner at law firm Chandhiok & Mahajan, said the ED issuing summons to Datar and Venugopal appeared to be unprecedented.
Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (previously Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act), provides protection of the attorney-client privilege. The Madras High Court had in 2002 deprecated the issuance of a summons to an advocate.
'Allowing investigative agencies to question advocates on advice given to clients would destabilise the foundation and independence of the legal profession, particularly in connection with criminal and white collar defence,' said Divyam Agarwal, partner at law firm JSA Advocates & Solicitors.
Chinmay Bhosale, advocate at Bombay High Court, said: 'In no way can an advocate be considered responsible for his or her client's actions.'
An ED statement said: 'ED has issued a Circular for the guidance of the field formations that no summons shall be issued to any Advocate in violation of Section 132 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Further if any summons needs to be issued under the exceptions carved out in proviso to section 132 of the BSA, 2023, the same shall be issued only with the prior approval of the Director, ED.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Summons sent to lawyer for his role as co's ind dir: ED
Representative Image NEW DELHI: Faced with criticism, Enforcement Directorate Friday said it issued summons to senior advocate Pratap Venugopal as part of its ongoing investigation against Care Health Insurance Ltd (CHIL) in which Venugopal was an independent director. ED's Mumbai zonal office is conducting a money laundering investigation in which it has been alleged that shares of CHIL were issued at a much lower price in the form of ESOPs on May 1, 2022, in spite of the rejection of the same by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI). "As part of the investigation, summons was issued to Pratap Venugopal, an independent director of CHIL, to understand the circumstances under which the company has issued ESOPs despite its rejection by IRDAI and subsequent discussions in the board of CHIL in this regard," the agency said about the summons which it withdrew after protests by lawyers' bodies. In a statement, the agency emphasised that IRDAI on July 23, 2024, had directed CHIL to revoke or cancel any ESOPs that were yet to be allotted and had also imposed a penalty of Rs 1 crore on CHIL for non-compliance with regulatory directions. "In view of the fact that Pratap Venugopal is a senior advocate in Supreme Court, the summons issued to him has been withdrawn and the same has been communicated to him," the agency said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo In the said communication, it was also stated that if any documents were required from him in his capacity as an independent director of CHIL, the same would be requested to be submitted by email, the agency added. Further, ED has asked its units not to issue summons to lawyers, saying summoning them would be violative of Section 132 of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. "If any summons needs to be issued under the exceptions carved out in proviso to Section 132 of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, the same shall be issued only with the prior approval of the director, ED," the agency said.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Prajwal Bhat
Stories written by Can Zohran Mamdani, the first South Asian to run to be New York mayor, pull off an upset? He's got slick campaign videos and a progressive agenda. But can the 33-year-old politician convince voters that he's got what it takes to run the complex city? Prajwal Bhat · 20 minutes ago Firms linked to Keventer group bought electoral bonds worth Rs 600 crore while it faced ED probe This would make the Keventer group the third-largest purchaser of the bonds. Prajwal Bhat , Sachi & Project Electoral Bond · Mar 15, 2024 · 08:21 pm
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC lawyers' body asks ED to respect independence of Bar, exercise restraint
Representative Image Sections 132 and 134 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, protect lawyer-client communications from disclosure. The Enforcement Directorate message to Venugopal read, "Please refer to the trail mail in this regard. The summons for June 24 issued to you hereby stands withdrawn with immediate effect." By afternoon, the SC Bar Association's executive body, led by senior advocate Vikas Singh, condemned the ED summons to Datar and Venugopal. "Issuance of such illegal notices and summons to senior advocates and to the advocate-on-record reflect a disturbing trend, striking at the very foundations of the legal profession and undermining the independence of the bar, which is a core pillar of Indian democracy," it said, calling upon ED to respect independence of bar and exercise restraint. SCAORA requested the CJI to "examine the legality and propriety of such summons issued to legal professionals for opinions rendered in good faith; safeguard the constitutional and professional protections accorded to advocates; and lay down guidelines to prevent further erosion of professional protection to lawyer-client communications and uphold independence of bar". SCAORA said the unwarranted steps taken by ED against senior advocates for discharge of their professional duty set a "dangerous precedent" that could have a chilling effect on the entire legal fraternity and dissuade them from giving honest and independent legal opinions to clients. Bar Association of India, too, criticised ED and said, "Issuance of summons is also an egregious example of overreach by the agency and is an attempt to undermine attorney-client privilege protected under the provisions of BSA."
