Argentina judge approves house arrest for ex-president Kirchner
Argentina's former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner stands on a balcony, on the day the Federal Court of Criminal Appeals confirmed a prison sentence on charges of alleged corruption in the awarding of public works during her presidency, in Buenos Aires, Argentina November 13, 2024. REUTERS/Matias Baglietto/File Photo
BUENOS AIRES - An Argentine judge on Tuesday approved a request from former president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner to serve out her six-year prison sentence for corruption at home.
Kirchner, 72, a polarizing leftist figure who was president from 2007 to 2015, was convicted by a trial court in 2022 over a fraud scheme involving public road projects in Patagonia that allegedly benefited a close ally.
Argentina's Supreme Court last week upheld the conviction and sentence, which also includes a lifetime ban from holding public office. Kirchner has denied wrongdoing, claiming political persecution.
The judge ruled she should serve the sentence, effective immediately, at her Buenos Aires residence due to her age. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Appeals court questions judges' ability to review Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Marines stand watch as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and federal immigration sweeps during a No Kings Day demonstration in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder/File Photo Members of a federal appeals court questioned during a hearing on Tuesday what role courts should have in reviewing President Donald Trump's authority to deploy the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and civil unrest. The three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is considering the Trump administration's bid to extend a pause it issued last week on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's ruling that the president had called the National Guard into service unlawfully. The panel members pressed lawyers for the administration and the state of California on whether courts could review Trump's decision at all. Justice Department lawyer Brett Shumate told the panel that Breyer had "improperly second-guessed the president's judgment" about the need to call up the National Guard in order to protect federal property and personnel from "mob violence" in Los Angeles. "There is no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision," Shumate said. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in a city in the midst of protest and turmoil over the president's immigration raids. U.S. Circuit Judge Mark Bennett, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, suggested on Tuesday that Breyer's initial ruling may have gone too far and could improperly prevent a president from exercising his discretion in an emergency situation. 'Even if we were to agree with you that there is some limited role of judicial review, how can that test be met here?' Bennett asked California's attorney, Samuel Harbourt. Bennett and U.S. Circuit Judge Jennifer Sung, who was appointed by Democratic former President Joe Biden, separately asked Harbourt to address a U.S. Supreme Court precedent that states 'the authority to decide whether the exigency has arisen belongs exclusively to the president.' Harbourt said the 1827 decision did not apply to the case because it involved different circumstances and it came before Congress passed Section 12406 of Title 10, a law allowing the president to take control of the National Guard to address rebellions or invasions, which Trump cited when deploying the troops. The 9th Circuit panel, which also included Circuit Judge Eric Miller, a Trump appointee, did not issue a ruling on Tuesday. But Bennett suggested that the court could act before a hearing that Breyer has scheduled in the case for Friday. Breyer, in San Francisco, had ruled last week that Trump unlawfully took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard, but Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marines' mobilization. Breyer said Trump had not complied with requirements of Title 10, and ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom, who sued over the deployment. The administration argues that the law gives the president sole discretion to determine whether a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" requires a military response, and that neither the courts nor a state governor can second-guess that determination. But, Harbourt said Section 12406 requires both dire circumstances such as a rebellion or invasion to exist, and consultation with a state's governor - and none of those conditions were met. Shumate disagreed, saying that Trump alone has the authority to determine whether the National Guard should be called in, and his failure to include Newsom in the decision was at most a "technical violation" of the statute. "The governor is merely a conduit, not a roadblock or a core executive, when the president decides it's necessary to call out the Guard," Shumate said. California's lawsuit, filed on June 9, argues that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violate the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they were instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. Harbourt urged the panel on Tuesday to let Breyer's ruling go into effect. Further pausing the ruling would "profoundly injure the state of California and our nation more generally." "It would allow defendants to further escalate tensions and the risk of violence in the city of Los Angeles," Harbourt said. "And it would defy our constitutional traditions of preserving state sovereignty, of providing judicial review for the legality of executive action, of safeguarding our cherished rights to political protest and of keeping the military." Shumate said that the lower court ruling should be blocked, because it undermined Trump's authority under the U.S. Constitution over the military and his ability to respond to national emergencies. He said troops were doing important work defending ICE agents. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Carney, Modi hold talks to reset India and Canada ties after tense two years
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi shake hands before posing for a photo during the G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, in Alberta, Canada, June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Amber Bracken Carney, Modi hold talks to reset India and Canada ties after tense two years KANANASKIS, Alberta - The leaders of India and Canada on Tuesday held their first bilateral meeting since then-Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused New Delhi in 2023 of involvement in the killing of a Canadian Sikh separatist. Relations have been poor for almost two years but there was no sign of tension when Prime Minister Mark Carney warmly welcomed Indian counterpart Narendra Modi to the Group of Seven summit he is chairing in Alberta. India denied Canada's allegations of involvement in the murder, and both nations are looking to shore up global partnerships as trade tensions and wars are recasting long-standing alliances. Carney has previously said he invited India, which is not a G7 member, due to its importance in global supply chains. "It is my great honor to have you here," Carney told Modi, saying their meeting was a "testament to the importance of your country" and the issues they needed to tackle together. These included energy security, artificial intelligence, and the fights "against terrorism" and against transnational repression. Carney did not mention the furor sparked when Trudeau accused India's government of involvement in the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil. Modi did not mention the case either. Speaking through an interpreter, he said the two nations could work together to strengthen democratic values. "I'm sure, under your leadership, we will be able to work together in a positive way," said Modi, paying his first visit to Canada for a decade. India is Canada's top source of temporary foreign workers and international students, as well as an important market. Greg Cherewyk, president of the Pulse Canada industry group, said Canadian farmers hope to export more agricultural products to the world's most populous nation, including lentils. Canada's Sikh community, the largest outside of the Indian state of Punjab, has voiced outrage over Modi's visit, saying Canada should have set conditions before inviting him. A few dozen Sikh protesters in downtown Calgary tore apart Indian flags in protest on Tuesday. Modi's government has denied involvement in the killing and accused Canada of providing a safe haven for Sikh separatists. Last year, Canada expelled six Indian diplomats, linking them to Nijjar's murder and alleging a broader government effort to target Indian dissidents in Canada. Four men have been charged with his murder. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
North Korea's Kim met Russia's top security official, state media say
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un meets Russia's Secretary of the Security Council Sergei Shoigu (not pictured) in Pyongyang, North Korea, June 4, 2025, in this picture released by the Korean Central News Agency. KCNA via REUTERS/File Photo North Korean leader Kim Jong Un meets with Secretary of Russia's Security Council Sergei Shoigu, in Pyongyang, North Korea, June 17, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS North Korean leader Kim Jong Un meets with Secretary of Russia's Security Council Sergei Shoigu, in Pyongyang, North Korea, June 17, 2025. KCNA via REUTERS SEOUL - North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Tuesday met with Sergei Shoigu, secretary of Russia's Security Council, in Pyongyang, state media KCNA reported on Wednesday. Kim and Shoigu discussed cooperation plans for what Russia calls its "special military operation" in the Kursk region bordering Ukraine, the report said, confirming earlier reports of the meeting by Russian media. Plans to commemorate the "heroic feats" of North Korean soldiers in the operations in the Kursk region, a part of Russia which Ukrainian forces infiltrated last year, were also discussed during the meeting, KCNA said. North Korea will send thousands of military construction workers and sappers to the region to help rebuild it after the Ukrainian incursion that North Korean troops helped Moscow repel this year, Shoigu was cited as saying by the Russian state news agency TASS on Tuesday. His visit to Pyongyang and meeting with Kim came nearly two weeks after the last meeting with the leader of the reclusive state on June 4. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
