Is India's foreign policy decided in Delhi or Washington, asks Former Union Min Chidambaram
TIRUCHY: Is India's foreign policy decided in Delhi or Washington?" senior Congress leader and former union minister P Chidambaram asked on Sunday, while speaking in a public meeting, organised to honour Indian Army's success in Operation Sindoor
"US President Donald Trump first declared that India and Pakistan had agreed to a ceasefire. This was later confirmed by India's Foreign Secretary. This raises serious concerns", Chidambaram said adding "Imagine the confusion and disappointment among our soldiers who were risking their lives, only to learn about the ceasefire from a foreign leader." Further, he criticised the union government for maintaining silence on the issue for over 15 days.
Citing Trump's statement in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, where he claimed credit for brokering the ceasefire for trade-related reasons, Chidambaram said, "One is forced to wonder is Trump now directing India's national policy? This is a matter of deep concern for every citizen."
Also, he questioned the government's silence and Parliament not being convened to debate the matter. "We welcome the ceasefire, but we demand to know how it happened. When decisions about India are announced from Washington, people are right to worry," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Rahul Gandhi's tongue is like Pakistan': Giriraj Singh's fierce attack on LoP
Union Minister Giriraj Singh launched a scathing attack on Rahul Gandhi on Friday, calling him "useless" and accusing him of insulting the army. Singh made these remarks while commenting on Rahul Gandhi's visit to Bihar, saying that Rahul Gandhi's words resemble those of Pakistan and that he doesn't respect the nation. While speaking to reporters, Giriraj Singh said, "Rahul Gandhi opposed India's valour, questioned its Army's bravery, and tarnished the army's reputation worldwide. The Bihar public will oppose him, why would they vote for someone who doesn't respect the army or the nation? Rahul Gandhi's tongue is like Pakistan, and he does not respect the nation." Singh also stated, "PM Modi isn't being insulted. Did the army win in 1971, or did Indira ji win? It's the army that won. Atal ji was in the opposition, and he said there's no party now, only Bharat. And this useless person (Rahul Gandhi) is mocking and making fun of the nation's bravery and the army. Such a person should be boycotted." The leader of the Opposition, Rahul Gandhi, arrived at Gaya Airport in Bihar on Friday. According to the official Congress account on X, he is scheduled to address the 'Constitution Conference' and participate in multiple programs. Earlier, Rahul Gandhi visited Darbhanga, interacted with students, and discussed issues such as caste census and reservation. The LoP reached Ambedkar Hostel in Darbhanga in May to deliver an address despite being denied permission by Bihar Police, which also led to a case against him by the district administration. He emphasised the importance of social justice and criticised the government's policies, highlighting the need for a caste census, stating that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was forced to announce it due to public pressure. The Bihar Assembly elections are expected to be a multi-cornered contest with the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), led by the Janata Dal (United) (JD(U)) and the BJP, facing off against the Mahagathbandhan (Grand Alliance) comprising the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), the INC, and other parties. The last assembly elections were held in October-November 2020. The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) has won a simple majority in Bihar, winning 125 seats in a closely contested election. The BJP won 74 seats while the JD(U) secured 43 seats. The Mahagathbandhan, including Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), Congress, and Left parties, managed to secure 110 seats in the state's 243-seat legislative assembly. The Bihar Legislative Assembly election for all 243 constituencies is scheduled to be held in October or November this year.
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Action taken against those visibly responsible': Siddaramaiah defends government's response in Bengaluru stampede case
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Friday hit out at the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for politicising the stampede at Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium, which claimed 11 lives and left dozens injured. The incident occurred during RCB's IPL victory celebrations on June 4. Responding to allegations from the BJP that the Congress-led state government was scapegoating the police, Siddaramaiah told ANI that action had been taken against officials found 'visibly responsible' and 'negligent in their duty.' 'They [BJP] are doing this for politics. I don't do politics. We have taken action against those who were found visibly responsible,' the Chief Minister said. (Also Read: 'Doesn't listen to anyone': Nikhil Kamath recalls what a politician said about suspended Bengaluru top cop B Dayananda) Meanwhile, Karnataka BJP President BY Vijayendra accused the government of acting under pressure, pointing out that key decisions, including the suspension of senior police officers and the registration of FIRs — only came after public outrage. 'The government acted only when pressure mounted. The real accused are Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, Deputy CM DK Shivakumar, and Home Minister G Parameshwara. They should be investigated,' Vijayendra said. Following the tragedy, the government suspended multiple senior police officials, including Bengaluru Police Commissioner B Dayananda. He was replaced by senior IPS officer Seemant Kumar Singh, who officially took charge on Friday. The list of suspended officers includes Additional Commissioner of Police Vikash Kumar Vikash, DCP (Central) Shekhar HT, ACP Balakrishna, and Cubbon Park Police Inspector Girish AK. In parallel, Karnataka Police registered an FIR against the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB), event organisers DNA Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), alleging 'irresponsibility' and 'carelessness' in crowd management. In response, the KSCA board, including President Raghuram Bhat, Secretary A. Shankar, and Treasurer E.S. Jairam, filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court seeking to quash the FIRs. The plea will be heard later on Friday by a bench led by Justice Krishna Kumar. (Also Read: Bengaluru stampede: KSCA officials move High Court, seek quashing of FIR)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Cancelling contracts, making big disclosures: Who loses what in Musk-Trump breakup?
Donald Trump and Elon Musk have called time on their friendship in the most shocking of ways — social media posts were fired off, threats were made, and big bombshells were dropped. In the aftermath of it, Tesla stocks tanked, and the world's richest man's personal net worth declined. Yes, this breakup could be costly for both. Here's how read more The aftermath of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's breakup raises the question: Who has the most to lose? File image/Reuters No one believed that the Donald Trump-Elon Musk friendship would be one that would last forever. But the fact that it ended in the most spectacular of ways and that too so quickly was not anticipated. On Thursday (June 5), America's two most powerful men — one is the US president and the other is the world's richest man — spent time on social media trying to destroy each other's reputations with threats and secrets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Their spectacular breakup also means the end to perhaps the most powerful of alliances in the US with many pondering who emerges as the bigger loser in this spat. Does Trump have more to lose or will Musk be the one to suffer? A bromance turns nasty It was last July when Elon Musk endorsed Trump for president and became an integral part of his campaign machinery — who can forget Musk manically jumping around at Trump rallies, funding a massive super-PAC on his behalf. Later, when Trump became US president, he returned the favour by appointing Musk to take charge at Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). When Elon Musk attached himself to Trump many began speculating when these two massive egos would, eventually, clash and that their strategic partnership would flame out spectacularly. And crash and burn the relationship did. Since late May, Musk has been vocally critical of Trump's so-called big, beautiful spending bill. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk told the TV programme CBS Sunday Morning. But Trump kept his cool and bid adieu to Musk as he called time on his service to the White House. Once out of government, though, the Tesla chief took his criticism against the bill even further. He called the bill a 'd isgusting abomination ,' threatened to politically retaliate against its supporters, and argued it would increase the debt. Social media posts by US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are displayed on smartphones. Trump has threatened to revoke government contracts from Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk as a public feud escalates over Musk's criticism of the Trump administration's policies. AFP The US president then shot back on Thursday, while he had a sit down in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ' I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said. 'He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He further stated, ' I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Trump then took the fight online, writing in one social media post, 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' And this led Musk to hit back. Musk argued, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election' and accused Trump of 'such ingratitude.' And that wasn't the end, the feud kept going with Musk levelling a serious allegation, '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Consequences of the big, nasty breakup But who shall suffer from this breakup? After all, it was a mutual relationship benefiting both individuals. Many analysts and Trump watchers believe Musk shall be the big loser from this breakup. In fact, as the two bickered on social media, Tesla shares slumped — dropping 14 per cent, wiping out roughly $150 billion in market value in one of the worst days in months. Analysts and pundits believed that the losses were an indication of what might be at stake for Musk. Musk's personal net worth also took a tumble on Thursday — it fell by nearly $34 billion, making him the biggest daily loser on Bloomberg's list of the world's 500 richest people. Trump could even take the fight further with cancelling government contracts with Musk's various companies, including SpaceX and Tesla. In fact, the US president even suggested this while feuding with Musk online. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California. If the Trump administration pauses government contracts, SpaceX will lose billions of dollars. Reuters According to data available, last year, Musk's companies were promised $3 billion in nearly 100 contracts with 17 government agencies. Additionally, Reuters reported that if Trump did go ahead with this move, about $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts would be at risk. In addition to hitting his businesses, this feud could also threaten Musk's stay in the US. Musk is not a natural-born American — he was born in Pretoria, South Africa and thanks to his mother, Maye Musk, obtained Canadian citizenship in 1989 when he was 17 years old. This helped him move to North America for his studies and eventually to the United States. It was only in 2002 that he became a naturalised US citizen. Moreover, Musk has already lost his fan base on the liberal side and now with the fight with Trump, he will also lose his Conservative supporters. This will be bad for Musk — personally and from a business standpoint. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On June 5, Elon Musk and Donald Trump ended their friendship in the most spectacular way. File image/Reuters But many also note that the Trump-Musk feud also has the potential to hurt the US president. How? When Trump was campaigning, Musk emerged as one of his major donors. The SpaceX chief spent more than $250 million to get Trump elected. Now imagine if he used that same financial clout against the US president. Musk could fund campaigns against Republicans, hurting Trump in the long run. Moreover, he could also align with fiscally conservative lawmakers to block Trump's signature tax bill in the Senate. Besides this, Musk could also use the time he has spent with Trump against him. After spending a lot of time closely with the US president, he could use information that the two shared to hurt Trump. He could make big revelations, which have the ability to hurt the US president. For instance, on Thursday, amid the online battle Musk claimed that the US president was part of the Epstein Files STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk could also use X against Trump — the X owner has more than 220 million followers compared to the US president's 105.6 million followers. As some note, Musk could use the platform to keep airing his grievances against Trump. In fact, on Thursday, he called for the impeachment of the US president and even asked his followers 'is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle?' It's left to be seen if Trump or Musk will win this battle, but for now, we can buckle up and wait for their next steps. With inputs from agencies
