NC Senate passes bill easing concealed carry gun restrictions
RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — A bill loosening gun restrictions in North Carolina continues to move forward.
Senate Bill 50 passed through the chamber Thursday afternoon on a 26-18 vote.
SB 50 S50v0.pdf, also named the 'Freedom to Carry NC' act, ultimately allows a person to carry a concealed handgun without a permit. The bill applies to individuals who are at 18 and older and a U.S. citizen unless otherwise prohibited by law.
All North Carolina counties under burn ban due to hazardous forest fire conditions
During the meeting, primary sponsor of the bill, Sen. Danny Britt (R- Hoke, Robeson, Scotland), said, 'We're just trying to make sure that people's constitutional right is protected. We believe the Constitution is worth fighting for.'
Britt said 29 other states currently allow the carry of concealed firearms without permits. The bill states there are some restrictions where it would still be unlawful to carry a concealed firearm including a law enforcement or correctional facility, private facilities where a notice is posted, and areas prohibited by federal law.
Wednesday, some lawmakers and people who spoke during public comment at the meeting voiced their concerns about SB 50. Questions of safety and education remained a key focus.
Sen. Paul Lowe (D- Forsyth) said, 'I get the constitutional right side and to be able to get a gun if you want one… I get that. But the education of how to handle a firearm is my concern.'
Currently, North Carolina law requires an eight-hour minimum of training to obtain a concealed carry permit. If SB 50 passes, Britt said the training would not be required.
'To be able to use a firearm safely, that takes years of training, not just through an 8-hour class,' said Britt. 'What we're doing is making it easier for our law abiding citizens to constitutionally carry, and most of those folks I believe are adequately trained to handle a firearm.'
Britt also noted that education is not currently a requirement for open carry in North Carolina.
'I don't know what bills have been put in place or filed to our open-carry statutes, it seems as though that's been fine,' he said.
Before hearing from members of the public, Sen. Ralph Hise (R-Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Caldwell, Haywood, Madison, Mitchell, Watauga, Yancey), spoke in support of SB 50.
NC bill legalizing marijuana faces uncertainty with only Democratic support
'I will continue to get and renew my concealed carry permit even after this bill because I've traveled to South Carolina and Florida and it sure makes the purchasing process a whole lot easier.' He added, 'I really just want to ask an attorney a question. Can you name any other constitutional right in which we would require government education before you can exercise your right?'
In response, Sen. Julie Mayfield (D- Buncombe) replied, 'We require women to go through all sorts of education to seek a legal, safe abortion in this state.'
Mayfield said her biggest concern is reducing barriers to people obtaining guns. She included, 'We had a speaker in there who talked about the rise in gun violence and death by gun is the now the leading cause of death among children. I just think bills like this that make it easier for people to obtain guns is going in the wrong direction.'
The Senate bill has also created concerns among law enforcement. In a statement, Durham County Sheriff Clarence Birkhead said, 'This will undermine public safety, and I think we should take our time… to study this a little bit more to get some more data and have conversations with law enforcement because SB 50 could potentially increase the chance of violence in even the most minor of law enforcement interactions with the public. My deputies in Durham County will have to treat every traffic stop, every encounter, like a felony stop. That puts everybody at risk.'
The Wake County Sheriff's Office also shared the following statement: 'Sheriff Rowe and the Wake County Sheriff's Office remain committed to ensuring the safety of our community. Please know that we are actively monitoring this legislation and will continue to work with lawmakers to advocate for policies that prioritize the well-being of our community and law enforcement officers. We encourage residents to share their concerns with their local representatives as well.'
In 2023, the North Carolina legislature also overturned former Gov. Roy Cooper's veto and passed a law that no longer required a pistol purchase permit from the sheriff's office in order to buy a handgun. It eliminated the process of the agency's ability to run a background check.
SB 50 maintains the option to obtain a permit for purposes of reciprocity with other states and other personal reasons.
The bill now heads to the House.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Goes All In on Bonkers MAGA Conspiracy in Late-Night Post
President Donald Trump has doubled down on what appears to be his new favorite conspiracy theory in a late-night, all-caps Truth Social meltdown. Last week, Trump sounded off about 'the Biggest Scandal in American History'—other than the 'rigged' 2020 election—claiming someone had 'usurped' a mentally declining Joe Biden and used an 'autopen' to push through a radical-left agenda while Biden was president. An autopen is a machine used to replicate signatures which has become the center of a MAGA conspiracy theory focused on the pardons Biden granted in his last weeks in office. It's not known whether Biden even used the device to sign pardons. Early on Wednesday, Trump was at it again. 'With the exception of the RIGGED PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2020,' he began, as he did in his previous post. Then, smashing the 'caps-lock' button, he raged: 'THE AUTOPEN IS THE BIGGEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN AMERICAN HISTORY!!!' Some figures in the movement believe, as Trump has now suggested twice, that Biden did not call the shots during his presidency and that someone else undercut him and wielded presidential power with the clandestine use of an autopen. Trump's Department of Justice has even launched a probe into Biden's pardons, which came at the end of his term last year. The investigation, headed by Ed Martin, the department's pardon attorney, will also examine whether an autopen was used nefariously. According to an email seen by Reuters, Martin said the probe aims to find out whether Biden 'was competent and whether others were taking advantage of him through use of AutoPen or other means.' Legal experts point out that the U.S. Constitution grants the president broad clemency powers and states that there is no requirement for a handwritten signature on pardons. A 2005 Department of Justice memo supports the use of autopen for signing official documents, stating that the president may direct a subordinate to affix his signature using such a device. Martin himself, in soft-launching the probe last month, even admitted there was no issue. 'If you use the autopen for pardon power, I don't think that that's necessarily a problem,' he said. His new move, however, seems to be an attempt to get around that. Martin's email did not state who instigated the probe, or exactly which of Biden's family members will be investigated. The 82-year-old pardoned his son Hunter in November after he pleaded guilty to tax violations and was convicted on firearms-related charges. His pardon drew bipartisan criticism. The then-president also pre-emptively pardoned his brothers James and Frank and his sister Valerie Biden Owens. Their respective spouses were also shielded. In delivering the pardons, Joe Biden cited a desire to shield family members from future politically motivated prosecutions. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the Daily Beast on Tuesday that the probe was fair, given Biden's apparent condition by the time his term ended. 'The American people deserve to know the extent to which unelected staffers and an autopen acted as a proxy president due to the incompetence and infirmity of the previous president,' he said in a statement. 'President Trump was elected to restore the integrity and transparency of the office, and answering the question of who was actually running this country for four years is well within the president's rights.' The Department of Justice declined to respond. A Biden spokesperson was also contacted for comment.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump DOJ takes 'unprecedented' step admonishing foreign judge in free speech centered on Rumble
The Department of Justice (DOJ) sent an unprecedented letter to a Brazilian Supreme Court justice in May, admonishing the judge for ordering American-based video platform Rumble to restrict the free speech of a user on U.S. soil, describing the orders as international overreach that lack enforceability. Rumble, a popular U.S.-based video-sharing platform that bucks censorship efforts frequently found on other video and social media platforms, is at the center of an international battle to protect free speech that has been ongoing for months. Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the suspension of Rumble in the South American country back in February over claims the U.S. company did not comply with court orders, including removing the accounts of a Brazilian man living in the U.S. and seeking political asylum. "If you look at what's happening around the world, it's clear we're living through a perilous moment for anyone who believes in freedom of expression — a fundamental human right enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and recognized globally, even by the United Nations," Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski exclusively told Fox News Digital Tuesday following the DOJ's May letter. "The fact that Rumble has become a central player in this global fight for free speech is a powerful validation of our mission. We're proud to stand at the front lines of this effort and grateful that President Trump and his administration have made this battle a foreign policy priority." Moraes is now in the U.S. government's crosshairs after the DOJ sent a letter to him in May outlining his reported international overreach into U.S. law affecting the First Amendment, as well as Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealing in a congressional hearing that the Brazilian judge could face U.S. sanctions. Moraes had ordered Rumble to remove a user from its platform as he stands accused of spreading false information online and is considered a fugitive in Brazil. Rumble refused and was threatened with financial penalties for the lack of cooperation. The DOJ letter, dated May 7 and made public Thursday, argued that Moraes' orders are not enforceable in the U.S. "These purported directives to Rumble are made under threat of monetary and other penalties," the letter, signed by DOJ official Ada E. Bosque, reads. "We take no position on the enforceability of the various orders and other judicial documents directing Rumble to act within the territory of Brazil, which is a matter of Brazilian law. However, to the extent that these documents direct Rumble to undertake specific actions in the United States, we respectfully advise that such directives are not enforceable judicial orders in the United States." The DOJ did not have additional comment to provide when approached about the letter Tuesday. Pavlovski described to Fox Digital that the letter is "unprecedented" and draws a clear line to foreign nations that they cannot attempt to thwart U.S. laws and the First Amendment. "The letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to a foreign judge over censorship orders is unprecedented," Pavlovski said. "It draws a bright red line: foreign officials cannot issue censorship orders that violate the First Amendment or bypass U.S. law. That kind of extraterritorial overreach is incompatible with American sovereignty. And that's good news, not just for Americans, but for free societies everywhere." The letter continued that there are established channels for international legal proceedings, which the DOJ said the judge bypassed, and directed the Brazilian judge to various proper procedures he could take regarding the court orders. Rumble facing restrictions in foreign nations is hardly new, with the platform currently disabled in China, Russia and France, as well as Brazil. It has also previously received censorship demands in nations such as the U.K., Australia and New Zealand, but has maintained its free speech objective. The DOJ's letter comes as Rubio revealed in a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing in May that the State Department is considering sanctions against Moraes under the Magnitsky Act. The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act authorizes the U.S. government to sanction individuals overseas if determined responsible for human rights abuses or corruption. "We've seen pervasive censorship, political persecution targeting the entire opposition, including journalists and ordinary citizens," Republican Florida Rep. Cory Mills asked Rubio at the hearing in May. "What they're now doing is imminent, politically motivated imprisonment of former President Bolsonaro. This crackdown has extended beyond Brazil's borders, impacting individuals on U.S. soil., the 2023 Financial Times article actually talked about this. What do you intend to do? And would you be looking at Supreme Court justice sanctioning of Alexandre de Moraes under the Global Magnitsky Act?" Rubio responded, "That's under review right now, and it's a great, great possibility that will happen." Days later, Rubio posted to X that the State Department will roll out visa restrictions on foreigners found "complicit" in censoring Americans. "For too long, Americans have been fined, harassed, and even charged by foreign authorities for exercising their free speech rights," Rubio wrote on X. "Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign officials and persons who are complicit in censoring Americans. Free speech is essential to the American way of life — a birthright over which foreign governments have no authority." "Foreigners who work to undermine the rights of Americans should not enjoy the privilege of traveling to our country," Rubio added, not naming specific individuals responsible for such actions. "Whether in Latin America, Europe, or elsewhere, the days of passive treatment for those who work to undermine the rights of Americans are over." Moraes is also overseeing the upcoming trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of allegedly attempting to overturn his 2022 election results. Brazil President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva slammed the U.S. for threatening sanctions against Moraes in comment this week. "It is unacceptable for the president of any country in the world to comment on the decision of the Supreme Court of another country," da Silva said Tuesday, according to Reuters. The Brazilian president added that the U.S. should understand the importance of "respecting the integrity of institutions in other countries." Fox News Digital reached out to Moraes' office Tuesday but did not immediately receive a reply.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
US Attorney blasts Mayor Wu over ICE comments
Calling 'federal agents 'secret police' is offensive. There are no secret police. ICE agents, along with other federal law enforcement partners, are making immigration arrests. That is no secret,' she said. Wu recently told WBUR that peope are 'terrified' for their relatives and neighbors amid the ICE crackdown. 'Folks [are] getting snatched off the street by secret police who are wearing masks, who can offer no justification for why certain people are being taken and then detained,' Wu Foley said agents are arresting people who are in the country without authorization, and that each arrest is conducted 'within the bounds' of the Constitution and the law. Advertisement 'To claim otherwise is a gross misrepresentation and a disservice to the public,' Foley said. 'Federal agents in marked jackets and vests are masking their faces because people like Mayor Wu have created false narratives about their mission.' Foley said federal agents are wearing masks because they and their children are being threatened and doxxed. 'That is why they must hide their faces,' Foley said. She said suggesting that federal agents are arbitrarily 'snatching' people off the street is false. Advertisement 'On the contrary, every arrest and detention is pursuant to and sanctioned by federal law,' Foley said, adding that 'we will not apologize for doing our job.' An uptick in immigration sweeps in recent weeks has alarmed local authorities and communities. Last week, immigration agents arrested an estimated 'This conduct poses significant public and officer safety risks,' Foley said in a statement. 'It is conduct that should be vilified rather than glorified.' 'This federal administration is making hard-working, tax-paying, God-fearing people afraid to live their lives,' Wu said. 'A city that's scared is not a city that's safe. A land ruled by fear is not the land of the free.' A spokesperson for Wu couldn't immediately be reached for comment. Material from prior Globe stories was used in this report and this posting will be updated. Travis Andersen can be reached at
