France urges restraint, diplomacy after "concerning" US strikes on Iran
France urges restraint, diplomacy after "concerning" US strikes on Iran
PARIS - France's foreign minister said on Sunday that Paris was concerned by U.S. air strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites overnight and urged all sides to show restraint and move to towards a negotiated solution to the crisis.
Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot wrote on X that France, which had held talks with Iran on Friday in Geneva along with its European partners, had neither participated in these strikes nor in their planning.
"France has noted with concern the strikes carried out last night by the United States against three Iranian nuclear programme sites," Barrot, who spoke with his U.S. counterpart Marco Rubio on Saturday evening, said.
"France is convinced that a lasting resolution to this issue requires a negotiated solution within the framework of the Non-Proliferation Treaty," Barrot wrote on X. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
43 minutes ago
- Business Times
Markets set for rocky opening after Trump's plunge into Middle East war
[SINGAPORE] When the major markets reopen on Monday (Jun 23), investors in Asia and other parts of the world will be bracing themselves for a volatile few days ahead, with oil prices likely to surge and inflation forecasts coming under renewed scrutiny. This after US President Donald Trump's stunning U-turn from his earlier position that he would keep the United States out of Middle Eastern wars. On Saturday, he ordered a strike against three Iranian nuclear facilities, giving a boost to Israel's efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. His decision has already prompted analysts to describe it as Trump's biggest foreign-policy gamble of his two presidential terms. In a televised address from the White House, Trump called the strikes a 'spectacular military success' and warned Teheran against any retaliation, adding that Iran would face more attacks if it did not agree to peace. 'This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' said the president. Terence Wong, the chief executive officer of investment fund Azure Capital, expects the markets to be choppy on Monday. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Given Trump's generally anti-war stance and opposition to overseas defence spending, this was a surprising move and definitely marks a significant escalation in the Middle East conflict. The big question is how Iran will react,' he told The Business Times. Vasu Menon, managing director of investment strategy at OCBC, expressed some optimism that things may not turn out as bad as others fear. He said the 'unfazed response' from markets in the Middle East that were open on Sunday offers hope that the fallout for other global markets when they start trading on Monday may not be dramatic. 'Even if there is a sharp pullback among global markets on Monday, they may not be down and out. The response may be temporary and a rebound could materialise eventually,' he noted. 'Much depends on what Iran will do next, but the shock and awe of the US attack and the warning from Trump not to retaliate or suffer significant consequences, may prevent Iran's leaders from responding aggressively.' How Iran reacts over the next few days or even weeks 'may keep investors nervous' and markets volatile in the short term, he added. 'Of greater consequence to markets may be the reciprocal tariffs that Trump will decide on by Jul 9. Trade concerns have taken a back seat due to the developments in the Middle East, but could re-emerge to the forefront in the coming weeks.' Higher risk premium for oil As for oil, prices are likely to go up by between US$3 and US$5 per barrel when trading resumes, said market analysts on Sunday, with the gains expected to accelerate only if Iran – the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries' (Opec) third-largest crude producer – retaliates in a major way and causes a major disruption to oil supply. Jorge Leon, the head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy and a former Opec official, said: 'An oil-price jump is expected. Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium.' UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said that such risk premiums typically fade when there are no supply disruptions. 'The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions – which would likely result in higher prices – or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium,' he explained. In an extreme scenario in which the Strait of Hormuz ends up being shut, the price of oil could even go above US$130 a barrel, weighing on global growth and driving consumer prices higher, according to a Bloomberg Economics analysis. The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial choke point between Iran and Oman through which about 20 per cent of global oil and gas demand flows. Flight disruptions Singapore Airlines (SIA) said on Sunday that it had cancelled two flights between Singapore and Dubai – SQ494 and SQ495 – following a 'security assessment' of the ongoing situation in the Middle East. The carrier added that it would be reaching out to all affected customers, with those impacted to be put on alternative flights or given the option to seek a full refund of the unused portion of their ticket. Other SIA flights between Singapore and Dubai may also be affected as the situation remains fluid, the airline said. British Airways cancelled several flights to Dubai and diverted two planes bound for Doha on Sunday, according to data from Flightradar24. The flight-tracking website noted that most airlines have maintained their flight diversions around the region due to recent missile exchanges. The website showed that airlines were not flying in the airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. Many carriers have opted for other routes such as north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even if these mean higher fuel and crew costs and longer flight times. Operation Midnight While the rest of the world continues to make sense of the US attacks and the fallout, senior figures from the Trump administration said the ball was now firmly in Iran's court and that it should make peace. All in, the US strikes involved 14 bunker-buster bombs, over two dozen Tomahawk missiles and more than 125 military aircraft. General Dan Caine, the nation's highest-ranking military officer, said the strike was named 'Operation Midnight Hammer'. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a briefing at the Pentagon that the US 'devastated' the Iranian nuclear programme, adding that the operation 'did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people'. '(Trump) seeks peace, and Iran should take that path. This mission was not, and has not, been about regime change,' he noted.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
J.D. Vance says US at war with Iran's nuclear programme, not Iran
US Vice-President J.D. Vance accused Iran of not negotiating in good faith, which he said served as a catalyst for US strikes. PHOTO: AFP J.D. Vance says US at war with Iran's nuclear programme, not Iran Follow our live coverage here. WASHINGTON - US Vice-President J.D. Vance said on June 22 the US was not at war with Iran but at war with its nuclear programme, adding the programme had been pushed back by a very long time due to American strikes ordered by President Donald Trump. Mr Trump said he had 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight with massive bunker-busting bombs, joining Israel's assault against its Middle East rival in a significant new escalation of conflict in the region. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' Mr Vance said in an interview on NBC's 'Meet the Press with Kristen Welker' show 'I think that we have really pushed their programme back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many, many years before the Iranians are going to be able to develop a nuclear weapon.' Mr Vance accused Iran of not negotiating in good faith, which he said served as a catalyst for US strikes. The US had been in diplomatic talks with Iran about Tehran's nuclear programme. Tehran vowed to defend itself, while UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he was 'gravely alarmed' by the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. 'We don't want a regime change,' Mr Vance added. 'We do not want to protract this... We want to end the nuclear programme, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here.' Mr Vance said Mr Trump made the final decision to strike Iran right before the strikes took place, and that Washington has received some 'indirect' messages from Tehran since the strikes. Mr Vance said the US 'had no interest in boots on the ground.' Mr Trump said on June 20 he was going to decide in the next two weeks about direct US involvement in the Israel-Iran war which began with Israel's attacks on Iran on June 13. The war has raised alarm in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. US ally Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons, and says it struck Iran to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is peaceful, is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. Many Democratic US lawmakers said Mr Trump's actions were unconstitutional and that it was the US Congress that had the power to declare war on foreign countries. Mr Vance responded to that criticism by saying Mr Trump had 'clear authority to act to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
‘American deterrence is back': The message that will strike Asia
US President Donald Trump in the White House Situation Room on June 21. Mr Trump said on the same day that US forces had struck three Iranian nuclear sites. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Follow our live coverage here. American deterrence is back, said US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon briefing on Sunday that laid out the details of the US strikes on Iran. 'The scope and breadth of what happened will take your breath away. Planes flew from the middle of America (all the way to Iran) almost undetected,' he added. It is a message that will resonate around the world, but principally in Asia. Long used to cartography as defined in Western terms, the world refers to the area Iran is in as the Middle East. In truth, it is in West Asia - and that should not be missed, as we digest the day's events. The first use of the MOPs bombs and the second-ever use of the B-2 bombers in war have both taken place in Asia, the first time being in Afghanistan. The level of planning that went into this operation, from the ruses that had some B2s heading toward the Pacific while another 'package' headed to West Asia to the integrated deployment of hard military assets over land, undersea and in the air, alongside cyber and space resources - both the Space Force and the Space Command were involved, carrier strike groups shuffled around with swift efficiency - all bespeak a force that, despite all the talk of suffering some degradation in recent years, remains an unparalleled military machine in its lethality. To add to that, US President Donald Trump has signalled clearly that although he abhors war and peace is his principal preference, he is willing to use his men and materiel to force his will upon a situation. Suddenly, Mr Hegseth's speech at the recent Shangri-La Dialogue about Indo Pacific being the 'priority theatre' and Mr Trump's mission being 'restore the warrior ethos, rebuild our military and reestablish deterrence' does not look all about empty warnings clothed in puffy language. The Asian leader likely to be most nervous about what has taken place will be North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, whom I have described before as 'the boy with the nuclear toy'. But allies, partners, and rivals all will study the developments closely, and make their own assessments. In Japan, the 'spear and shield' defence relationship with the US - the Americans as the spear and Japan providing the security shield for US forces - which some thought was at risk of wearing thin under this American president, will likely take on a new credibility. China will be compelled to take additional measures to not only protect its nuclear sites and underground submarine bases, but also worry about what this awesome military machine can do to the military facilities it has built in the South China Sea. In South Asia, Indians and Pakistanis will not sleep easy for awhile. If Mr Trump asks New Delhi to talk Kashmir with Islamabad, it cannot easily ignore the request. This president, since he allows him no boundaries set by international rules, norms, or decorum, will pursue his ends without regard to the means. It is what makes him both so troublesome to handle, and also to be feared. Russia, whose territory falls both in Europe and East Asia, also will study the developments closely. Moscow will draw comfort that it is the vast nuclear resources it owns, and the delivery mechanisms it possesses, that has Mr Trump's respect and gives it the elbow room to stretch his patience over his thus far futile attempts to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine. That insight will not be lost on China. Sadly, I am inclined to think that the fundamental message we were delivered by Mr Trump - 'peace through strength' - will mean a ramping up of deterrence capabilities across the board at enormous cost, not reduce the risk of conflict but elevate it. Ravi Velloor is senior columnist at The Straits Times. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
