
Zampino grilled over 'mystery' faxes and hard drive at municipal corruption trial
Frank Zampino, the former head of Montreal's executive committee, was grilled Tuesday by a Crown prosecutor about faxes addressed to him that he says he never saw, and a hard drive seized from his house by police that he says was not his.
Zampino — second-in-command to former city mayor Gérald Tremblay from 2001 to 2008 — continued testifying at his trial on charges of fraud, conspiracy and breach of trust in connection with an alleged municipal bid-rigging scandal.
Several times Judge Silvie Kovacevich admonished Crown prosecutor Nicolas Ammerlaan to stop interrupting Zampino's answers as he tried to explain the mysterious faxes and hard drive.
"What was seized at my house was a hard drive that I had never seen. It's equipment I never purchased," Zampino testified.
Ammerlaan asked, "you're saying the black hard drive that was on a shelf in your home, you'd never seen that? Are you saying the police planted that?"
Zampino replied, "no, that's not what I'm saying. But it was not a hard drive I purchased. I have no idea where that hard drive came from."
"It was not a piece of equipment that I had ever seen in my home," he said.
Zampino conceded that he was generally familiar with most of the material investigators eventually discovered on the hard drive, but he offered no other explanation as to how the drive might have ended up in his home office.
Faxes 'remain a mystery'
In that same office was a fax machine.
Last week, Zampino testified about several faxes sent to that fax number and to the number of a fax machine in his office — faxes he claims he never saw.
The faxes were sent by Bernard Trépanier, the former head of financing for Zampino's party, Union Montreal.
The prosecution alleges Zampino, with Trépanier's help, put in place a system allowing 13 engineering firms to share 34 public contracts with a total value of $160 million between 2004 and 2009.
In return, the engineering firms would allegedly make a donation of three per cent of the value of each contract to Union Montreal, as well as an initial donation — sort of like an entry fee to participate in the scheme — ranging from $50,000 to $200,000.
Trépanier died of cancer in 2018.
The faxes Zampino was asked about were all by Trépanier to Zampino's attention, sometimes with a note saying "as discussed" or "following our meeting."
They generally included the name of an engineering firm identified as having won a municipal contract, the amount of the contract and the names of firms that offered losing bids.
Zampino testified Friday he had never seen any of these faxes.
Ammerlaan asked him Tuesday how that was possible.
"To this very day it still remains a mystery to me. I can't explain where those faxes came from and why I've never seen them," Zampino replied.
He continued to vehemently deny any knowledge of a municipal bid-rigging scheme.
"I never participated in any arrangement where there's an exchange of political donations for contracts with whomever," Zampino said.
"I never received, I never requested, I never facilitated any amount of monies in exchange for contracts," he said.
Key witness died during first trial
Four other people are also facing charges: former director of public works for the city, Robert Marcil, and the heads of three engineering firms, Kazimierz Olechnowicz, Bernard Poulin and Normand Brousseau.
This is the second trial for Zampino and his co-accused after he was arrested in 2017.
The judge in the first trial ordered a stay of proceedings after determining that wiretap evidence gathered by investigators — including recordings of Zampino and his co-accused talking with their lawyers — was unconstitutional.
That decision was appealed to the Quebec Court of Appeal, which concluded that even though the wiretap evidence was indeed unconstitutional, it was not enough to justify a stay of proceedings and that a new trial should be held without using the wiretap evidence.
That decision was appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, which last year refused to hear the case, leading to this new trial which began in February.
Zampino testified Tuesday that he had hoped Trépanier might be able to shed light on the mysterious faxes during the first trial.
He said he knew Trépanier was in fragile health at the time, and that his legal team asked the Crown to skip a preliminary hearing in the case so that Trépanier's testimony might occur before his health worsened.
But it was too late. The Crown refused to wave the preliminary hearing and Trépanier died while the first trial was still underway, before he could testify.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
18 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Alberta resumes buying U.S. alcohol, months after pause meant to fight tariffs
EDMONTON – Alberta is buying American alcohol and gambling machines again, three months after Premier Danielle Smith announced restrictions aimed at fighting back against U.S. tariffs. Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally says the move signals a 'renewed commitment to open and fair trade' with the United States. Smith said in March that the province would no longer buy U.S. alcohol and video lottery terminals, or sign contracts with American companies. That came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped heavy tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. Nally says the decision to resume buying U.S. alcohol and gambling machines 'sets the stage for more constructive negotiations' ahead of a renewal of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement. The minister says Albertans are encouraged to continue supporting local producers, even as more U.S. options return to store shelves. Nally said in April that the province was pausing its policy around procurement from U.S. companies 'in the spirit of diplomacy.' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. He said since the province's retaliatory measures were first announced in early March, the Trump administration had put a hold on further tariffs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025.


CTV News
29 minutes ago
- CTV News
Plan to better shield Winnipeg bus drivers moving ahead
Jeff Keele reports on the city's search for a manufacturer to build an improved shield to protect bus drivers. The City of Winnipeg has released an expression of interest to see if someone can make an extension or full shield to completely surround drivers on transit buses. Shields were installed on all city buses in 2019, following the 2017 stabbing death of a driver. Right now they cover most of the area around the driver's seat. Amalgamated Transit Union President Chris Scott said it protects drivers from getting sucker punched from behind but still leaves them vulnerable. 'Now assailants have become more brazen and they're now reaching around the shield to get at the operator to the point where they're even grabbing the steering wheel, which puts everybody on the bus and outside the bus in jeopardy,' said Scott. Public Works Committee Chair, Coun. Janice Lukes, agrees. 'It's a different world now, unfortunately, it is a different world now, it's a crazy world,' said Lukes. Both Lukes and Scott say the option to replace the current ones with a full shield might make the most sense for both safety and cost. 'I'm hoping it comes back and we get a reasonable price on a full wrap-around (shield). That's what I'm hoping for,' said Lukes. 'If an extension is going to cost $10,000 to $15,000 and we can find a full enclosure for that price from a provider, then why not put the smart money on the full enclosure?' said Scott. Lukes said there is around $2.4 million in the budget for the shield upgrades. She said that might not be enough to retrofit all 600 buses but suggested the province could help foot the bill.


CBC
40 minutes ago
- CBC
New regulations for businesses using environmental claims to sell products, services
New guidelines are out on how businesses can use environmental claims to sell their products and services. This comes after Canada's Competition Bureau faced backlash when it expanded rules around what can and cannot be claimed in advertising and marketing last year. As Jessica Cheung explains, reaction is pouring in about how effective these will be.