Tired of Touchscreens? These 6 Cars Offer the Best Physical Controls
If carmakers' return to physical controls isn't evidence enough that screens are distracting, there is also mounting outcry from car buyers, as well as push from safety regulatory bodies like Europe's NCAP (European New Car Assessment Program for the return of essential physical controls.
In today's automotive market, big touchscreens and digital interfaces dominate the cabin experience, often at the expense of usability and safety. While these features offer a high-tech aesthetic and access to a virtual library of fancy features, they also increase the time to execute the most basic automotive operations, like adjusting climate and audio. Fortunately, a few automakers still understand the value of intuitive physical controls-dials, knobs, and buttons placed within easy reach of the driver. We laud certain manufacturers in 2025 for their commitment to driver-focused ergonomics, blending modern tech with excellent switchgear that makes life behind the wheel simpler and safer. From compact SUVs to versatile pickups, these vehicles strike an ideal balance between innovation and intuitive operation.
The Mazda CX-50 ($30,500) offers one of the most attractive and driver-centric interiors in the industry. Mazda continues to focus on great physical controls, even for its latest vehicles, because at the end of the day, the brand is still about the driving experience. While many automakers are moving toward tablet-style screens and capacitive buttons, Mazda has held the line on usability by preserving a rotary infotainment controller and a smart, well-organized dashboard layout. The CX-50 is a standout, not because it's got the fanciest cabin in the Mazda stable but because its physical controls are nearly peerless. The CX-50 exemplifies how physical controls can enhance the driving experience without sacrificing modern tech.
Physical Control Highlights:
Rotary Dial for Infotainment: The CX-50's rotary Commander controller, located on the center console between the front seats, allows users to navigate menus without reaching for the screen. It has satisfying action and can be operated without a touchscreen, which Mazda tends to eschew in order for drivers to focus on the road. The knob is right-sized and knurled for easy gripping and operation. There's also a convenient audio knob parked right next to it. Dedicated Climate Control Panel: The CX-50 has grippy temperature adjustment knobs and a simple line of physical buttons for dual-zone climate settings that remain easily accessible on the center stack. They're also precise and well-placed for easy reach while driving. Steering Wheel Controls: Buttons are located above and below toggle switches, and they control audio, cruise, and phone functions without confusion or accidental activation. They're well-placed and hard to mash accidentally, a big bonus.
It was high time Toyota built the three-row Grand Highlander ($40,860). It's big, attractive, and tremendously practical. It even comes in a hybrid variant. We continue to marvel at the Grand Highlander's cabin, not just because of its space and comfort but also because it has some of the best physical controls for a 7-passenger family SUV. Toyota's Grand Highlander isn't just a larger variant of the popular Highlander-it's a three-row SUV that impresses with thoughtful design and real-world functionality. In fact, its physical controls are even better than the regular Highlanders. Despite offering a massive 12.3-inch touchscreen in higher trims, Toyota wisely keeps the most essential functions tied to physical controls, and the result pays off for the driver. Toyota's approach is simple: keep tech available, but never let it become a barrier to core vehicle operations. That makes the Grand Highlander a top pick for families seeking ease of use.
Physical Control Highlights:
Big Climate Controls: The central climate command controls are 100% physical. Two large temperature adjustment knobs are front and center. The row of switches between them manages the remainder, and they're all easily accessible and intuitive.Heated and Ventilated Seat Buttons: The climate control knobs are flanked by seat heat/ventilation buttons instead of being parked behind layers of menus on the touchscreen. Additional climate control buttons and toggles on the panel make adjustments a cinch. A Simple Audio Knob: A staple feature that Toyota retains, making quick audio adjustments seamless. It's right on the frame of the infotainment screen, adjacent to the driver's right hand. Of course, you can also use the steering wheel audio control, but it's nice to see a physical audio knob right where it belongs.
The 2025 Toyota RAV4 ($29,250) is about to get redesigned for next year, but the current model is still a bastion of ergonomic brilliance. It remains one of the best-selling vehicles in America, and part of that success lies in its highly functional cabin with some of the best physical controls in any crossover at any price. The moment we used the rubberized, turbine patterned audio knob grips, we were in love. Though not as luxurious as other entries on this list, the RAV4 delivers consistent, intuitive control placement across all trims, including hybrid and plug-in hybrid versions. Whether you're commuting or road-tripping to the country, the RAV4 ensures you don't have to guess which part of the screen adjusts your fan speed.
Physical Control Highlights:
Rubberized Climate Knobs: Large, textured knobs with integrated temperature displays make them easy to operate-even with gloves. They're large and protrude dramatically for no-brainer grip. The set temp is clearly displayed right next to them with hot and cold bars for easy interpretation. A great traditional shift knob: We love that there's no shift buttons for the transmission. Instead, Toyota keeps a right-sized physical shift knob that's not too stubby nor too tall. It's still doesn't take up a lot of real estate, so there's room for the drive mode selector. Physical Drive Mode Selector: No screen controls here. Just a large, easy-to-use drove mode control knob that toggles between Eco, Normal, and Sport modes. Push the center of the knob to go back to Normal without even looking.
The sixth-generation Honda CR-V ($30,100) is a marvel and not just for its handsome exterior and wonderful hybrid variant. Honda's latest CR-V cabin redesign embodies the same great thinking behind its sheetmetal with one of the best-executed interiors in its class. The look, the feel, and the ergonomics just make sense. The interior is refreshingly analog in the best way, offering an ideal mix of screen-based features and physical switches. While we wish the infotainment system was better, the physical controls shine through. It seems like nothing escaped scrutiny because it's echelons better than its predecessor. The CR-V interior feels familiar and functional, which is a welcome change in a market drifting toward overly complicated interfaces.
Physical Control Highlights:
Separate HVAC Controls: Real knobs and push buttons govern the climate system, laid out cleanly beneath the central honeycomb patterened vents. The triple knobs that are well-sized and nicely spaced control temperature and fan speed. They don't require any interpretation when driving, and they actuate with precision. The line of climate buttons occupies the lower row, and they're big and simple, just the way we like 'em. Tactile Audio Controls: On the left portion of the infotainment screen frame lies physical audio controls: a volume knob, tuning buttons, and a home and back button for easy operation. .Conventional Gear Selector: Unlike its own Pilot and Passport stablemates, the CR-V gets a real PRND shift lever. It's much more intuitive than the pushbutton setup in other Honda SUVs, and you don't even have to look at it to shift. It's so simple, it's brilliant.
The redesigned 2025 Hyundai Kona ($24,550) bears almost no resemblance to its predecessor. The second-generation model has taken a huge leap forward in style and technology, yet it retains an emphasis on tactile control to the same degree, but with way better looks. Even in higher trims with dual 12.3-inch screens, Hyundai balances the digital with superb analog controls, making the cabin accessible for drivers of all ages and tech comfort levels. The center stack is awash with clean knobs and buttons, as is the center console. We think it's even better than the revised interior of the pricier Tucson. The Kona's success lies in not overwhelming the driver with unnecessary complexity. It provides just enough buttons to make control intuitive without feeling cluttered.
Physical Control Highlights:
Dedicated HVAC Panel: A panel of actual buttons controls temperature, airflow, and fan speed independently of the infotainment. The Kona's climate buttons are simple, easily reached, and fuss-free. Superior Audio Controls: The clean line of audio controls is spaced perfectly above the climate control panel. The contoured buttons and backlit knobs provide quick control of audio functions, and they look as good as they work. Intuitive Column-Mounted Shift Lever: Hyundai uses a stalk for gear shifts. While it doesn't move up and down like an old-school version, it's large grooved rectangular shape rotates forward for drive, back for reverse, and pushes in for park. Easy peasy. It's way better than most column-mounted versions.
Who would've imagined Ford would revive an old nameplate from a '70s compact car and turn it into a hot-selling compact pickup truck? The 2025 Ford Maverick ($28,145) is everyday practical with its 54-inch bed length, great storage choices, and up to 42 mpg city from the hybrid model. It also has some of the easiest physical controls found in any truck, and Ford did them right by not making them complex or overwrought. Although the 2025 Maverick upsizes its formerly 8-inch infotainment screen to a much larger 13.2-inch version, it still makes use of great, knobs and buttons to control climate and audio. Whether you're hauling lumber or navigating city streets, the Maverick's physical controls allow you to focus on the task at hand without fiddling with screens or menus.
Physical Control Highlights:
Simple HVAC Interface: There are two large climate control knobs, one for fan speed and the other for temperature with an easy readout embedded within. Between those knobs are buttons for seat temperature and other climate adjustments. They're right below the big center vents and within easy reach. They're also big just like a proper pickup truck's should be. Easy Audio Control: Parked just below the infotainment screen are excellent audio controls. Knobs and a line of buttons make for quick audio adjustment. The fact that they are angled upward toward the driver makes operation that much easier. One of Best Rotary Shifters: Some might malign non-traditional shift knobs, but the rotary version on the Maverick is one of the best. Its easy-trip trim and satisfying click make it intuitive to shift gears without even looking. The center park button is also a cinch to use.
Final thoughts
In an era of increasing digitization, physical controls offer a tactile and distraction-reducing alternative to fully touchscreen-based interiors. The Mazda CX-50, Toyota Grand Highlander, Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, Hyundai Kona, and Ford Maverick prove that automakers can-and should-strike a balance between innovation and usability. These six vehicles demonstrate that physical controls still play an essential role in making driving safer, easier, and more enjoyable. We can't wait to see what other automakers will bring to the table when they return to physical controls of their own.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Olympics get Honda as auto sponsor for 2028 Summer Games in Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES — The organizing committee for the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles signed Honda as a 'founding partner' Monday, giving the upcoming Summer Games their sixth new sponsor this year and their first tier-one sponsor since 2021. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Price tags for this level of sponsorship have been reported to start at around $200 million. The deal fills a hole for LA28 in the automotive category, which is considered one of the most important in the Olympic world. Toyota had been the Olympics auto sponsor before declining to renew its deal after 2024. Delta and Comcast are the other top-level sponsors for LA28. John Slusher, the CEO of U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Properties, told Sports Business Journal that the new deal brings the operation to more than $1.5 billion in sponsorship sales, with a goal of $2.5 billion. Part of this deal calls for Honda to work with the organizing committee on a vehicle fleet to help move athletes and officials around Southern California during the games. ___ AP sports:


Associated Press
5 hours ago
- Associated Press
Olympics get Honda as auto sponsor for 2028 Summer Games in Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The organizing committee for the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles signed Honda as a 'founding partner' Monday, giving the upcoming Summer Games their sixth new sponsor this year and their first tier-one sponsor since 2021. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Price tags for this level of sponsorship have been reported to start at around $200 million. The deal fills a hole for LA28 in the automotive category, which is considered one of the most important in the Olympic world. Toyota had been the Olympics auto sponsor before declining to renew its deal after 2024. Delta and Comcast are the other top-level sponsors for LA28. John Slusher, the CEO of U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Properties, told Sports Business Journal that the new deal brings the operation to more than $1.5 billion in sponsorship sales, with a goal of $2.5 billion. Part of this deal calls for Honda to work with the organizing committee on a vehicle fleet to help move athletes and officials around Southern California during the games. ___ AP sports:
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
What We Know About Ukraine's Mass Drone Assault On Russian Bombers
A day after Ukraine's audacious attack using drones launched from trucks to strike nearby Russian bombers, the scope of the damage and how the mission was pulled off is just starting to come into focus. While there are still questions as to just how many bombers were destroyed, the attack was a major blow to Russian strategic aviation, regardless, a subject you can read more about in a separate story we posted earlier today. You can also catch up with our initial report on the attack here. Ukraine claims it struck 41 Russian aircraft in its attack on Sunday, according to Ukrainian Lt. Gen. Vasyl Malyuk, head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), which carried out the attack known as Spiderweb. All told, 117 first-person view (FPV) drones struck the Belaya, Dyagilevo, Ivanovo and Olenya air bases, the SBU says. On June 1, the Security Service of Ukraine carried out a brilliant operation— on enemy territory, targeting only military objectives, specifically the equipment used to strike Ukraine. Russia suffered significant total, 117 drones were used in the operation – with a… — Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) June 2, 2025 'The Security Service of Ukraine conducted an unprecedented and unique special operation to simultaneously destroy four military airfields in the rear of the Russian Federation, where enemy aircraft are deployed,' the SBU stated on Telegram on Monday. 'As a result of drone strikes, 41 aircraft were hit, including the A-50, Tu-95, Tu-22M3, and Tu-160.' 'In general, we are talking about the defeat of 34% of strategic cruise missile carriers at the main airfields of the Russian Federation,' Malyuk claimed. 'This was not just a devastating blow to enemy aircraft, but a serious slap in the face of the power and terrorist essence of the Russian Federation.' Andriy Kovalenko, head of the Ukrainian government's center for counteracting disinformation, said that so far, there is evidence that 13 aircraft were destroyed. '…even more were damaged …(over 40 in total),' he claimed on Telegram, though that figure could rise. We must make clear that all of this still needs to be confirmed. Meanwhile, Russian sources discount the damage. Again, The War Zone cannot independently verify either claims. Adding to the challenges of doing so is that many of the air bases attacked are under cloud cover, making verification through traditional satellite imagery impossible. Satellite mapping images taken by synthetic aperture radar (SAR) over the Belaya airbase appear to indicate that four Tu-95s and four Tu-22M3s were destroyed at the base. There are further indications that four Tu-95s and one An-12 were destroyed at Olenya, for a total of 13 airframes. No images have yet emerged of Dyagilevo or Ivanovo, so the total number of aircraft destroyed or damaged could be higher. When it comes to SAR imagery, especially of the commercial variety, it should be treated as an indicator and not conclusive for evaluating damage like this. Pairing what is imaged with other intelligence-related products can help bridge the certainty gap. So, we will have to wait for more information. The revetted parking positions. — Chris Biggers (@CSBiggers) June 2, 2025 Olenya/Olenegorsk/Vysokiy (part two).Burning An-12: 68.146555, 33.450901Destroyed Tu-95MS from part 3 at 68.145419, 33.449928 identified as RF-94257 '22 Red' — Evergreen Intel (@ 2025-06-02T14:24:07.929Z There was also some indication that a Tu-95MS may have also been destroyed at the Ukrainka air base. Yesterday's drone attack on Ukrainka Air Base in the Amur Oblast of Russia's Far East, right on the border with China, which was initially believed to have been a total failure, with the truck and drone container seen burning on the side of the road after some kind of… — OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) June 2, 2025 There are additional suggestions that two more Tu-95s may have been damaged, as well as an Il-76 Candid transport aircraft. Updated BDA of Operation Pavutyna as of 1500 EST June 2nd 2025. Olenya Airfield 4x Destroyed TU-95 1x Likely Destroyed TU-951x Destroyed AN-12(Typo on my part kept accidentally typing AN-22) Belaya Airfield3x Destroyed TU-95 1x Damaged TU-95 4 TU-22M3 in total… — Intelschizo (@Schizointel) June 2, 2025 'At the Olenya airbase in the Murmansk region, where Pantsir was actively working, only one Tu-95MS was lost and another was seriously damaged,' the Russian Military Chronicle Telegram channel claimed. 'The only thing that saved us was that the planes were standing empty for routine maintenance, without missiles. According to other sources, 8 Tu-95MS units were partially or completely lost, including possibly an Il-76 (the pictures are not clear). Also, 4 Tu-22M units and 1 An-12 were disabled.' No imagery has yet emerged of damaged or destroyed Tu-160 Blackjack bombers, the A-50 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft, or the transport airframes. Several videos were posted immediately after the attacks showing Russian bombers being struck, burning, as well as the drones being launched. Ukrainian drones struck Russian strategic aviation at the Belaya air base in Irkutsk – 4,800 km from Kyiv. — Michael MacKay (@mhmck) June 1, 2025 Locals filmed dozens of small FPV-like drones which reportedly struck multiple aircraft and other targets at the base. In short, a truck drove up to a gas station in the town next to the base and launched at least 20 drones.#BudanovApproves#OSINT — OSINT Intuit (@UKikaski) June 1, 2025 The Russian aviation-connected Fighterbomber Telegram channel downplayed the scope of the damage but acknowledged the seriousness of the attack. '… 34% of strategic cruise missile carriers were hit. This is pure bullshit,' Fighterbomber wrote on Monday morning. 'The number of planes hit is in the single digits. (Hit does not always mean destroyed) And our carriers are Tu-95, Tu-160 and Tu-22. But yes, even one destroyed [strategic bomber] is a huge loss for a country that does not yet make such aircraft and has nowhere to get them.' In addition to more information about the number of types of aircraft destroyed, more details are emerging about how this attack was carried out. 'First the SBU transported FPV drones to Russia, and later – mobile wooden houses,' the SBU said Monday. 'Already in the territory of the Russian Federation, drones were hidden under the roofs of houses, placed on trucks. At the right moment, the roofs of the houses were remotely opened, and the drones flew to hit the designated targets – Russian bombers.' One video shows one of the drones hovering over a bomber as it slowly approaches its point of detonation. SBU spokesman Artem Dekhtiarenko declined to offer more details, adding that for now, he can only share the information provided in the official statement. 'Some things may be told only upon approval at a determined time,' he told us. 'We disclose the details only when it will not hamper the future operations.' Footage showing a Ukrainian FPV Drone striking one of the fuel tanks on a Tu-95MS Long-Range Strategic Bomber at Olenya Airbase in Murmansk today during Operation Spiderweb. — OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) June 1, 2025 It's been a long time since I worked with ArduPilot Mission Planner, but I think this screenshot suggests this drone navigated to the airfield autonomously and then was hand-flown into the target. "PosHold", "0m>6" and the map in the upper left are the clues. 1/ — John Wiseman (@lemonodor) June 1, 2025 Spiderweb, more than 18 months in the making, was a marvel of operational security, timing and logistics. It took place in secret, in different time zones, and required the manufacture and movement of drones, the trucks they were launched from, and the structures they were launched from. The simplicity in this plan makes it. Use existing unwitting logistical avenues to drive your weapons to a location near unsuspecting enemy positions and unleash your attack.I'd love to know how they got these structures into Russia. — TheIntelFrog (@TheIntelFrog) June 2, 2025 As we mentioned yesterday, containers with the drones were assembled in Russia, according to Russian milblogger Sergey Kolyasnikov. 'We found a warehouse where containers with drones were collected, Chelyabinsk, Sverdlovsk tract 28A,' he wrote on Telegram. 'It was rented for 350,000 rubles (about $4,500). That's why the truck in the Amur region had Chelyabinsk license plates – they were leaving from there.' Russian sources claim geolocation shows Ukrainian FPV drones used in the airbase attacks were assembled inside a rented warehouse at 28A Sverdlovsky Trakt, Chelyabinsk, claimed facility lies just near the Kazakhstan border, possibly a supply route for components. — Clash Report (@clashreport) June 1, 2025 Ukrainian operatives duped those around them, the Kyiv Independent (KI) reported on Monday. Those operatives, 'likely supported by embedded agents or sympathetic locals—built First Person View (FPV) drones using materials sourced from within Russia,' the publication wrote. 'These strike platforms were hidden inside wooden modular cabins constructed to look like prefabricated houses. Beneath the roof panels, drone bays were concealed between structural beams, with remotely operated opening mechanisms to allow launch on command.' Unique footage and details of the preparation of the operation to destroy Russian air bases published by the SBU! Drones were hidden in the roofs of camouflaged cargo to SBU sources, Ukraine's Security Service conducted a special operation called… — Special Kherson Cat (@bayraktar_1love) June 1, 2025 Once sealed, 'the cabins were loaded onto civilian trucks. The vehicles were then handed over to unwitting Russian drivers, recruited by Artyom, a 37-year-old ethnic Ukrainian who coordinated logistics under the cover of a private construction job,' KI noted. 'The drivers were told they were transporting portable homes to regions like Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ryazan, and Ivanovo. Each was given a delivery plan, a route, and a schedule. During transit, a mysterious intermediary would call and issue final location instructions—always near military infrastructure.' Russia's defense ministry said it had detained an undisclosed number of 'participants in the terrorist attacks,' the Financial Times reported, citing state media. How Ukraine's Special Services conned Russian truck drivers into delivering drones that then destroyed $7 billion of Russia's most irreplaceable — Kyiv Insider (@KyivInsider) June 2, 2025 Zelensky on Sunday offered another supposed detail. 'The most interesting thing – and we can already say this publicly – is that the 'office' of our operation on Russian territory was located right next to the FSB of Russia in one of their regions,' the Ukrainian president claimed. In the aftermath of the attacks, video emerged of Russian authorities stopping trucks for inspection, creating large traffic jams across the nation as authorities try to determine if there are any more attacks in the offing. Traffic jams are being reported today all across Russia, with trucks seen backed-up for miles in the Irkutsk Oblast, as the Federal Security Service (FSB) and other law enforcement agencies frantically search for any additional drone carriers, fearing another large-scale drone… — OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) June 2, 2025 While the damage from Sunday's attack was still being assessed, both sides launched new cross-border barrages. Video emerged on social media of claimed attacks on the Lipetsk and Voronezh regions, though the results of those incidents are unclear. 'In Lipetsk Oblast, a drone crashed behind a three-story apartment building in Lebedyan, causing a fire and shattering windows from the blast wave,' Euromaidan Press reported. 'Local reports suggested drones attempted to target the Novolipetsk Metallurgical Plant NLMK industrial plant that produces steel.' 'Voronezh Oblast experienced infrastructure damage when a high-voltage wire broke on the M-4 'Don' highway,' according to Euromaidan Press. 'Governor Alexander Gusev reported broken windows in houses and vehicles but stated there were no civilian casualties among the 15 drones intercepted in the region. Local residents reported attacks on the Borisoglebsk military airfield, which houses an aviation repair plant previously targeted in January 2025, according to Russian independent media Astra.' The Russian Defense Ministry claimed that 'air defense systems on duty intercepted and destroyed 162 Ukrainian aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles' overnight. That included 27 UAVs over the Lipetsk region, 16 over the Voronezh region, 11 over the Bryansk region and 11 over the Ryazan region. Drones are heavily attacking Lipetsk-2 airbase, NLMK steelworks, and ammunition warehouses. — Ukraine Front Line (@EuromaidanPR) June 2, 2025 Overnight, Russia was again under a massive attack reporting downing 162 Ukrainian drones across 8 regions.A military airfield was targeted in Voronezh Oblast, according to local residents. The airfield also houses an aviation repair plant that was previously hit in January… — Euromaidan Press (@EuromaidanPress) June 2, 2025 Russia launched attacks as well, firing 80 Shahed attack drones and simulator drones of various types along with three Iskander-M/KN-23 ballistic missiles and an Iskander-K cruise missile, according to the Ukrainian Air Force. 'The main areas of the air strike are Kharkiv, Chernihiv, Donetsk and Kherson regions,' the Air Force stated on Telegram. In the morning, the enemy struck one of the enterprises of the Chernihiv region. Firefighters localized the fire to an area of 6800 sq. m. There is no threat of further spread. — The Ukrainian Review (@UkrReview) June 2, 2025 Meanwhile, Ukraine and Russia held the second round of talks aimed at ending the conflict, now in its fourth year. Negotiations concluded in a little more than an hour, with little additional progress made. The two sides did agree on an exchange of prisoners and remains, according to Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov. Ukraine and Russia have agreed to an 'all-for-all' exchange of seriously wounded and ill prisoners of war, as well as all service members aged 18–25, Umerov told reporters. Both sides have also agreed to begin exchanging the bodies of 6,000 service members each, he added. Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov states following today's peace talks in Istanbul, that Ukraine and Russia have agreed to a 'all-for-all' exchange of seriously wounded and ill prisoners of war, as well as all servicemembers aged 18–25. He adds that both sides have also… — OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) June 2, 2025 While Ukraine was seeking a full ceasefire as a starting point in negotiations, Moscow's top negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, stated that Russia proposed a partial ceasefire at the talks in Istanbul, The Guardian reported. 'We have proposed a specific ceasefire for two to three days in certain areas of the front line,' Medinsky said, 'so that commanders can collect the bodies of their soldiers.' There was no immediate response to that from Ukrainian negotiators. Another key point that emerged was Ukraine handing Russia a list of 'several hundred' children that Kyiv wants returned from Russia, according to Umerov. These abductions were the subject of an international criminal court arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin as well as other Russian officials. It is unknown at the moment how Russia will respond to having its bombers successfully attacked on such a scale from inside its own borders, however, the devastation of even a portion of its strategic bomber fleet will likely engender a response beyond the scope of what have become almost routine drone and missile attacks. Contact the author: howard@