Construction on Vittoria Trattoria in ByWard Market begins after years of delays
The remains of Vittoria Trattoria on William Street in Ottawa's ByWard Market, as it is seen on Aug. 22, 2023. The restaurant was destroyed by fire April 12, 2019. (Ted Raymond/CTV News Ottawa)
The owner of Vittoria Trattoria says he is ready to begin rebuilding this summer over six years after a devastating fire gutted the historic building in the ByWard Market.
Owner Domenic Santaguida told Newstalk 580 CFRA's Ottawa Now with Kristy Cameron Tuesday that he's excited to break ground on the popular Italian restaurant after years of construction delays related to the pandemic and economic uncertainty.
'Since the pandemic and all the trade stuff going on with steel… we've just been planning and waiting and saving our pennies to put everything back together,' he said.
A massive fire on April 12, 2019 destroyed the William Street restaurant and other nearby businesses on York Street, causing more than $2 million in damage. The fire was deemed accidental.
fire_graham.jpg
Massive fire on the roof of Vittoria Trattoria in Ottawa's ByWard Market, Friday, April 12, 2019. (Graham Richardson / CTV News)
Since then, only the restaurant's exterior façade and sign has remained with little noticeable progress on rebuilding.
Interest rates and red tape, including about $600,000 of development fees, has hindered much of the progress on the construction, Santaguida says.
With the permits now approved, work has already started on the restaurant's plumbing and water lines.
Despite the setbacks, Santaguida says never wanted to quit on the ByWard Market.
'We have another restaurant in the south end, but its not in my nature to give up,' he said.
'I'm still very bullish on the ByWard Market. I think people need to come back and give the market another chance.'
The new property will include a larger space than before, including a new restaurant, a leasable space in the basement and a 14-unit 'boutique hotel' with short-term rentals upstairs and a terrace on the roof.
'We're hoping to bring something that will bring a spark back to the market and something that we'll be talking about for the next 100 years' he said.
He hopes to have the restaurant open by the spring or summer of 2026 and for it to coincide with the redevelopment of the the ByWard Market, which will eventually make William Street a pedestrian-only zone.
'We're looking forward to being a contribution to the market, preserving the old and bringing in something new,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
9 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
John De Goey is questioning long-held beliefs within the financial services industry
In the first episode of season two, Brenda speaks with John De Goey, a well-known advisor and author who isn't afraid to question industry norms. John's bold ideas and critical perspective have set him apart from most of his peers in the financial services world. With books like 'The Professional Financial Advisor' and 'Stand Up to the Financial Services Industry,' he pushes for changes that better serve investors. John talks about his upbringing on a southwestern Ontario farm, explains why he thinks advisors paint an overly optimistic picture of the market, and outlines what red flags to look out for when choosing your advisor.
Globe and Mail
25 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Non-profit housing tower in Etobicoke stalled over ‘employment lands' conflict
A planning application proposing one of the largest privately owned affordable-housing developments in Toronto has been stalled amid differences between provincial and city policies on converting land once zoned for industrial and commercial use to residential. The proposal filed in late 2024 seeks to turn a plot of land in Etobicoke into four condo towers containing 1,819 apartments. If approval is given, one of those towers, with 342 apartments, would be conveyed to the not-for-profit Community Affordable Housing Solutions (CAHS) group, which combines members from affordable housing organizations such as Habitat for Humanity GTA and St. Clare's Multifaith Housing Society. 'We would own it and those units would be affordable in perpetuity. It's exactly the type of housing the city wants,' said Joshua Bénard, a board member with CAHS and vice-president for real estate development for Habitat for Humanity GTA. The city has 120 days to make a decision after an application is complete on the request to convert the property, which the city deems to be 'employment land' to residential use. That should have meant a decision in early May, but there has been silence from a department of city planning said to be reviewing the matter. 'We've been kinda stonewalled. … I don't know what to make of it, I'm very frustrated by it,' said Mr. Bénard. According to advocates for the proposal and land-use experts, the source of the tension appears to be Toronto's long-standing desire to protect hundreds of hectares of employment-zoned land from residential redevelopment, and a provincial government that, since 2023, has been making it easier for landowners to apply for conversions of that same land. New builds drive rent decreases, but also leave tenants vulnerable to steep hikes, experts say In 2023's Helping Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, Ontario narrowed the definition of 'employment area' so that lands used for retail and commercial office space would no longer be covered (with some exceptions, such as attachments to larger warehousing or manufacturing facilities). In 2024, the Provincial Policy Statement kicked away other bureaucratic hurdles that allowed cities to avoid considering conversions of employment land. Despite this new landscape, the CAHS team said the only objection to its proposal seems to be related to an outdated view of employment lands. 'They refused to recognize that this is not an area of employment. They somehow thought it should regenerate for employment uses,' said David Charezenko an urban planner and principal at Bousfields Inc. who made the application on behalf of CAHS and the landowners. He said that, early on, he knew there was opposition from some parts of the planning department but believed the merits of the application would win out. 'It's a little bit frustrating. It really has been like we're caught in a bigger conversation on employment areas, and we're not getting to the point of what this proposal is about: affordable housing,' Mr. Charezenko said. The city didn't make anyone from the Planning Department available for an interview, but provided a statement that reflected that tension: 'Affordable housing is a major priority for the City of Toronto, and the City must weigh that against the need to protect stable employment areas that provide thousands of local jobs and ensure long-term economic viability, while creating complete communities for Torontonians,' it read. Corporate property owners fueling housing rent increases in Toronto According to background documents provided by city staff, as of 2023, employment areas hosted 21,900 enterprises that provided 26 per cent of all the jobs in the city (almost 400,000 people), and were responsible for almost 27 per cent of the city's $195-billion GDP. The area around the CAHS site, the 'South Etobicoke Employment Area,' is the second largest cluster of employment land in the city, responsible for 40,900 jobs in 2024. For Mr. Bénard, it's not a matter of disagreeing with those goals but of recognizing that not all employment lands are the same. 'It's not Triple-A employment lands: It's a parking lot next to a Golf Town [retail store] and the adjacent lots are single-family homes,' said Mr. Bénard. 'We do need to protect the right employment lands – this site isn't one of them.' 'The city does exist in a bit of a period of limbo with some of its employment areas,' said David Bronskill, partner in the municipal and land development group at Goodmans LLP, who on June 3 filed an appeal with the Ontario Land Tribunal to break the logjam and get the application moving. In an interview, he noted that, in part, the city's planning policies have yet to catch up to the new provincial direction after its first attempts to update its official plan were rejected by Ontario's Minister of Municipalities and Housing. 'For better or for worse, the lands they designated employment permitted office and general employment permitted large-format retail,' Mr. Bronskill said. 'That's a significant portion of the lands in Toronto that wouldn't meet the new provincial definition.' Even the appeal is somewhat unusual, given that a key protection in Ontario's Planning Act says that land owners can't appeal decisions related to employment area conversion applications. According to Daniel Artenosi, a lawyer with Overland LLP, there is a view among land-use experts that the city's most recent attempt to bring its official plan into alignment with the new provincial definitions on employment land (which is currently awaiting approval at the provincial legislature) is an attempt to preserve that appeal-denying power for most of its existing employment areas. 'The Planning Act allows cities to keep employment areas providing the use was 'lawfully established' prior to October, 2024,' he said. Toronto staff, according to Mr. Artenosi, have hinted at various times that they will interpret even nonconforming employment areas – with historical office or retail use permissions, in opposition to provincial definitions – as 'lawfully established' and side-step all the province's redefinitions. 'We think they are saying: 'We used to permit these, therefore they were lawfully established' … this exercise is trying to revive the status quo,' he said. There's also the possibility that the city could limit its own options if it succeeds in preserving all its current employment lands, since it could no longer approve office or retail uses in those areas if they didn't meet provincial definitions. The city's statement on the CAHS application offered more nuance. 'City Planning balances the provincial direction to protect economically vital employment areas with the City's housing objectives,' the statement said. 'Over the last few years ... staff reviewed over 150 requests for conversion on employment lands and recommended 64 conversions to allow residential uses to Council, which typically have affordable housing requirements.'
Globe and Mail
25 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Calgary Beltline condo's price sinks in a ‘downward-moving market'
836 15 Ave., S.W. No. 2002, Calgary Asking price: $424,900 (Mid-March, 2025) Previous asking price: $449,900 (Early March, 2025) Selling price: $414,000 (May, 2025) Taxes: $2,244 (2024) Property days on market: 67 Listing agent: Kamil Lalji, CIR Realty; Buyer's agent: Joel Gwillim, CIR Realty The owners of this two-bedroom condo a few blocks north of 17th Avenue hoped to sell it in the mid $400,000s, aware buyers would likely counter with a lower amount. Its appearance on the market in March seemed perfectly timed – it was the only unit available in the 21-year-old high-rise – until another property was put up for sale at an asking price $25,000 less than theirs. 'We were the only listing in that building, then the day after, someone else listed a similar size unit for $424,900,' said agent Kamil Lalji. 'We dropped to $424,900 within a couple of days.' Around the time this unit had its 10th visitor, a buyer came forward with an offer $10,900 lower than the revised asking price, and a deal was done. 'At this point, we're in a downward-moving market,' the agent said. 'Prices are dropping, and inventory is increasing. 'You don't know how far down things will drop, so sometimes, it's a race to the bottom.' This 875-square-foot unit has a wide and shallow layout with bedrooms on opposite sides of a living room with an electric fireplace and sliding doors to a balcony with a gas hookup. Set back from the floor-to-ceiling windows is a kitchen and two four-piece bathrooms, all with updated quartz countertops and mosaic tile backsplashes. The unit comes with a storage locker and parking spot. Monthly fees are $740 and cover heating and water in addition to concierge and use of recreational amenities. 'It's a nice, bright, airy unit with really good views of the mountains, and it's south-facing as well,' said Mr. Lalji. 'It's close enough to the core, but far enough that you're not right in it. There are good restaurants, bars and grocery stores all within a five-minute walk, so it's definitely a nice spot.'
