R.I. General Assembly OKs renaming Sakonnet River Bridge after fallen Tiverton veteran
A pair of boots shows a placard for U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Christopher Potts of Tiverton during the 'Boots on the Ground' installation at Fort Adams State Park in Newport over Memorial Day Weekend in 2021. Potts was killed in action in Taji, Iraq, on Oct. 3, 2004. Over 7,000 pairs of boots are displayed each year, each representing a U.S. service member killed in action since the post-9/11 global war on terror. (Photo by Janine L. Weisman/Rhode Island Current)
Legislation to rename the Sakonnet River Bridge after a U.S. Army soldier from Tiverton killed in action in Iraq in 2004 has cleared the Rhode Island General Assembly.
The 'Staff Sergeant Christopher Potts Sakonnet River Bridge' would be the new name of the span connecting Tiverton and Portsmouth via Route 24 under the bill that passed the House on April 10 and the Senate version that passed in concurrence on May 1. Both chambers approved the legislation unanimously.
The bill now heads to the desk of Gov. Dan McKee, who can sign it, veto it, or allow it to become effective without his signature.
'To rename this major Rhode Island bridge in his honor is a worthy tribute to a true Rhode Island hero who gave his life so that we all may live in a world free of tyranny and persecution,' Rep. Samuel Azzinaro, a Westerly Democrat and chair of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, said in a statement Thursday.
'And now, hopefully whenever someone drives over this bridge, they will be compelled to look up who Staff Sergeant Potts was and discover how his legacy will live on in the state that he loved so much,' Azzinaro, a retired National Guardsman and former member of the Army Reserve, added.
Potts served in the Rhode Island National Guard for over 14 years. He deployed to Iraq in March 2004 and was killed in Taji, Iraq, on Oct. 3, 2004, his 38th birthday. Potts' fellow servicemembers who testified on the bill during a February committee hearing said that Potts had found a stockpile of weapons with ammo, guns, rockets, mortars, artillery rounds and more, shortly before he and a medic were executed by insurgent groups.
Bill would rename Sakonnet River Bridge in honor of Tiverton soldier killed in Iraq War
'We think that by him finding this cache — it was the largest cache in Iraq at the time — it put a damper on the insurgents' operations against us and saved a lot of lives,' Command Sgt. Maj. Raymond Viens, who served alongside Potts, said during the Feb. 6 Special Legislation committee hearing where Azzinaro's bill was first heard.
Potts posthumously received the Bronze Star Medal with Combat 'V' and the Purple Heart.
Sen. Walter Felag, a Warren Democrat, sponsored the legislation in his chamber. Like Azzinaro, Felag chairs the veterans' affairs committee in his chamber.
'Renaming the Sakonnet Bridge in his honor will serve as a fitting reminder of what our service members sacrifice in order to protect the ideals and freedoms that we deeply cherish,' Felag said in a statement Thursday.
The bill underwent one minor revision since being introduced by Azzinaro on the House floor in January. The original version of the bill suggested naming the structure the 'Staff Sergeant Christopher Potts Sakonnet Bridge' and the successful legislation simply retains the 'River' in the current name.
McKee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday, but the Democratic governor has historically used his veto powers selectively, and usually after the legislative session ends in June. Several bills have become laws in the 2025 legislative session without McKee's signature.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
Watch CNBC's full interview with House Speaker Mike Johnson
House Speaker Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss the public feud between President Trump and Elon Musk, Musk's criticism of the GOP reconciliation package, fate of the bill in the Senate, cutting government spending, and more.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Race heats up to replace Connolly on powerful Oversight panel
The race to become the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee is heating up — and getting crowded. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) this week threw her hat into the ring to replace the late-Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who died last month of esophageal cancer, making her the fourth member of the committee — and the second member of the Congressional Black Caucus — to vie for the seat. She joins Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.) and Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), who all announced their bids last week. Not only is the list unusually long for such a race, but it features two veteran septuagenarians and two congressional newcomers who are decades younger — setting the stage for another tense debate over the seniority system Democrats have favored for generations, but has come under increasing scrutiny in an era when the party's popularity is well underwater. 'It's usually two, every now and then three [candidates]. I'd have to go back a while to remember four horses trying to get out of the gate at the same time,' Mfume acknowledged. 'We've got some bright young members, some very distinguished and wise older members, and I think there's got to be a melding of those age groups and those thoughts and those priorities,' he continued. 'Because at the end of the day, we'll all either win together or we'll lose together.' At 76 years old, Mfume is the oldest candidate in the race, but not the most senior on the committee. That distinction goes to Lynch, 70, who has served as the interim ranking member since Connolly stepped back from the role in April. The elder statesmen are citing their long experience as an asset, while also vowing to tap the unique strengths of the newer members of the committee, who tend to have a better finger on the pulse of digital outreach and social media. 'I fully appreciate that the effectiveness of our Committee in presenting the truth to the American people is dependent on our ability to maximize and elevate the diversity of talent within our Democratic membership,' Lynch, a former ironworker and union leader, wrote recently to his fellow Democrats. Mfume, a former head of the NAACP, agreed, saying Democrats can't be effective without a united approach. 'It's important for the new ranking member to gather all the Democrats together on that committee, close the door and figure out what the agenda is going forward as a team,' he said. But the younger challengers see the Oversight vacancy as a rare opportunity to reimagine the Democratic brand and revive the party's image with new faces and fresh ideas. 'For me, it's about, how do we excite the base?' said Crockett, 44. 'And to be perfectly honest — while I can't put a poll in the field fast enough and get some answers — I can tell you that, tangentially, looking at the entire field, I am the type of member that potentially will inject a little bit of that energy that we're missing right now for our base. And I think that we have to take that into consideration.' Democratic leaders are well aware of the generational tensions, and are making clear their intent to stand aside and allow the process to play itself out ahead of a vote of the full caucus, which is scheduled for June 24. 'As we've said before, seniority and length of tenure is always a factor, but it is one of many factors that members consider,' Rep. Pete Aguilar (Calif.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, told reporters this week. 'Our job is to just make sure that it's done in a fair way.' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), a prominent member of the CBC, downplayed the notion that the race — which features two CBC members in Mfume and Crockett — might lead to bad blood within the group. He noted that he had defeated former Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), who had once headed the CBC, for the Caucus chair position in 2018, and she remains 'a great friend and colleague.' 'Leadership, of course, remains aggressively neutral,' Jeffries added. 'We don't put our thumb on the scale.' With subpoena power and broad jurisdiction over virtually every facet of the federal government, the Oversight Committee ranks among Capitol Hill's most potent panels, making the ranking member spot a highly coveted position for ambitious lawmakers seeking a new level of national prominence. That's especially the case for the minority Democrats this year, when they're scrambling for an effective strategy to combat the norm-smashing actions of President Trump, who has used the early months of his second administration to dismantle many of the federal institutions the Democrats hold dear. Connolly, 75, in seeking the spot after last November's elections, had run into the same questions about age, image and passing the torch that are being raised now. He dismissed those concerns, citing a track-record of fierce advocacy for democratic traditions and the federal workers Trump has sought to purge. And he easily won the closed-ballot contest despite facing a formidable challenger in Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), 35, an icon of the left with a huge national following. Ocasio-Cortez has since left the Oversight Committee, jumping to the powerful Energy and Commerce panel in January, and declined a bid to replace Connolly. Garcia, 47, was among the Oversight members who had waited to learn Ocasio-Cortez's intentions before announcing his own. With her out of the race, he quickly jumped in, touting his experience as the former mayor of Long Beach and his position in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. He's also vowing to help the party disseminate its message more effectively with modern-age tools. 'Democrats are the party of working families — but we must meet people where they are,' he wrote in his pitch to colleagues. 'Traditional media isn't enough — to drive real policy wins, we must break through the noise, capture public attention, and energize people to act.' Crockett delivered a similar pitch, stressing the need for Democrats to highlight wins and make information accessible to voters. But she also noted the role is more than just communications. 'At the end of the day, I am a trial lawyer,' she said, noting her years as a public defender and her familiarity in 'dealing with criminals.' At the mention of the word, her mind turned to Trump. 'To be perfectly honest, there's probably only one person that the president does not want to head up Oversight, and I can tell you that it's me,' Crockett said. 'That alone should actually — hopefully — get my colleagues to say that's probably the one that we want, because I am the one that he's afraid of.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Problems proliferate in Senate for Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Problems are multiplying for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and other Senate negotiators in their bid to pass legislation to enact President Trump's agenda by July 4. Some Republican senators are barraging leadership with concerns about spending cuts for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), while budget hawks are demanding more deficit reduction and railing against a House compromise to lift the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. The latest headache for Thune and other Senate negotiators is a proposal being pushed by fiscal conservatives to root out more than $200 billion in what they're calling waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare — a controversial prospect giving the program's popularity. There are also differences between senators and the Trump White House about making permanent corporate tax cuts, such as 100 percent bonus depreciation for short-term investments and immediate expensing for research and development. Senate Republicans control 53 seats and can only afford three defections on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says he will vote 'no' because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. And Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) says he's a 'hard no' on the House-passed bill because it doesn't do enough to bring the nation back to a pre-pandemic level of spending. Here are the issues that threaten to derail the Senate bill. Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) are threatening to vote against the bill if it reduces Medicaid benefits to constituents, and they have yet to see what language the Senate Finance Committee will roll out on the issue. Senate and House GOP leaders insist the legislation won't cut Medicaid benefits, but the Congressional Budget Office released a report Wednesday projecting 10.9 million Americans will lose health insurance if the bill passes due to changes to Medicaid and Affordable Care Act coverage. 'I hope not benefit cuts, that's my bottom line,' Hawley said Thursday afternoon. GOP senators have raised concerns about proposals to limit states' ability to use health care provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding and to require people earning between 100 percent and 138 percent of the federal poverty level to pay higher co-pays for Medical services. Several Senate Republicans are also raising concerns over a projected $267 billion in spending cuts to the SNAP, including Collins and Moran. The Senate Agriculture Committee is hoping to roll out text for its portion of the budget reconciliation bill next week but Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-Ark.) says the issue remains unresolved. 'We're still working on it,' Boozman told The Hill, adding, 'I wish it was' resolved.' Collins says she's concerned about language in the bill that would shift many of the burdens of administering the programs onto the states and penalize those states that have older systems for monitoring benefits. A growing number of Republicans are joining budget hawk Sen. Ron Johnson's (R-Wis.) call for more spending cuts in the bill, which Republicans project will reduce spending by roughly $1.6 trillion over the next decade. GOP senators, including Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the chairman of the Budget Committee, are calling for bigger cuts. 'I think the bill needs to be more fiscally responsible,' he told reporters Thursday afternoon. Some Republicans are now looking at a proposal to root out 'waste, fraud and abuse' in the Medicare Advantage program and are rallying around a proposal sponsored by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) to crack down on insurance companies 'upcoding' diagnoses to collect more Medicare reimbursement money. But the idea is dividing GOP senators. Hawley on Thursday said it would be 'insane' to start cutting Medicare, even though proponents of Cassidy's bill say it would be strictly targeted to waste, fraud and abuse and note that Democrats such as Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) support it. Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, are digging in their heels over language in the House-passed bill to auction off government-owned spectrum, which they fear could impede the Defense Department's use of those frequencies for radar and communications. Rounds said the House language is a 'deal breaker' and urging that negotiators add language in the bill to protect spectrum frequencies used by the Pentagon for as long as the auction period lasts. 'It has to be modified,' he said. 'They've indicated that they would protect the spectrum [for defense] for the first round of auction items but one day after [the first round of auction] it's not protected,' he said. 'If they're serious about protecting that particular part of the spectrum, they just simply protect it until the auction authority expires in 2034,' he said. 'I've talked to the leadership here in the Senate.' The newest flashpoint in the negotiations is language in the bill that would restrict states' ability to regulate artificial intelligence for 10 years. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) says she would have voted against the House bill had she known that it 'strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years.' Other conservatives are flagging the provision as a major problem. 'I have a lot of concern about normal people who want to keep their job, want to protect their personal information. So we're just going to say for a decade that nobody can protect people? That's just nuts to me,' Hawley told reporters Thursday. Senate Republicans and Trump White House officials disagree over making corporate tax breaks, such as bonus depreciation and research and development expensing, permanent. The House bill phases out some of the most popular corporate tax cuts after 2029, and White House officials see an advantage in letting them expire after Trump's term in office, say GOP senators familiar with the negotiations. Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee made a pitch to Trump and his economic team at the White House Thursday to make the business tax proposals permanent, but the issue remains unresolved. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said that members of the Finance panel expressed their desire to make those tax provisions permanent, but he's not sure they moved the needle with Trump. 'I'm not convinced that we moved the needle. I think he certainly realizes how important it is to us, and I think he will go back and revisit it with his people,' he said. Republican senators say they're going to rewrite the deal Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) reached with House Republicans from New York, New Jersey, and other high-cost Blue States to raise the cap on SALT deductions from $10,000 to $40,000 for households earning up to $500,000 a year. The House-crafted SALT deal is projected to cost $350 billion over 10 years, and Republican senators aren't happy about it. GOP senators believe they can lower the cap somewhere between $10,000 and $40,000 — or find another way to substantially reduce the cost of the provision — and still get the bill through the House. 'It is too high,' Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) of the $40,000 cap on SALT deductions. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who is pushing for deficit reduction in the bill, called the SALT compromise a giveaway to 'an exceptionally wealthy, exceptionally small group of really high-income earners from a small handful of very highly taxed states.' 'We're subsidizing those states that impose high taxes,' he said. He said an 'overwhelming share of Republican senators' don't support the $40,000 cap level. 'There's a lot of support for setting that back down to some lower number, perhaps back down to $10,000,' Lee noted. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has warned Senate Republicans that they risk imperiling passage of the bill if they blow up the SALT deal. If the Senate modifies the legislation, it would need to pass the House again before heading to Trump's desk. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
