logo
Warning over IVF concierge clinics: 'I paid £15,000 then it went bust'

Warning over IVF concierge clinics: 'I paid £15,000 then it went bust'

BBC News14 hours ago

IVF patients are being warned over unregulated "concierge clinics" after a popular one went bust leaving scores of clients without treatment or refunds.As the number of privately funded IVF cycles has risen, online concierge companies have emerged, acting as "middlemen" between patients, donors and doctors.The fertility watchdog has said that as these clinics do not provide IVF treatment directly, it does not have powers to regulate them. It is calling for the law to be strengthened to protect patients.Syreeta Sandhu lost nearly £15,000 when her concierge clinic went bust. "You're on your knees," she said. "Upset has turned to frustration and anger."
The 40-year-old mother-of-two contacted online firm Apricity Fertility after four failed rounds of IVF and five miscarriages, in the hope of having a third child.She paid Apricity, which matched her with an egg donor and contracted established clinic King's Fertility. She was due to start treatment in December last year when her appointments were cancelled without explanation.Syreeta found out via the company's app that it was ceasing operations on 1 January.When she contacted King's, the clinic said data protection rules meant it did not have access to her file or details of her egg donor. It had not been paid by Apricity so her treatment could not begin."When you're on this journey, every month counts. You'll do anything, and you do throw lots of money at it," she said."It takes a long time to meet [medical staff] you can trust," she said. "I spent almost 12 months building that trust and it just dropped off."
Concierge clinics offer services like matching patients with donors and doctors, booking appointments and posting medication.It is not clear how many there are operating in the UK but experts believe their number is growing.Satellite arrangements – where patients attend medical appointments with one doctor, usually their own GP, and then undergo the IVF process elsewhere – is an established set-up in fertility care. But concierge clinics don't have physical premises or store eggs, sperm or embryos themselves.The fertility watchdog, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), is warning patients that these new services are not covered by its protections.Clare Ettinghausen, director of strategy and corporate affairs at the HFEA, said: "The fallout from Apricity's closure and the effect it had on patients highlights how the current law does not reflect the range and type of fertility treatments being offered today."She said the watchdog was calling for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act to be revised to take account of the different ways fertility services are provided.Syreeta is one of 52 patients owed money by Apricity. The company owes a total of £119,000 to its patients, according to the liquidator appointed to manage its debts, Cork Gully.
'There was no communication'
Beth Rodgers, 32, from Belfast has Turner syndrome, a rare genetic condition that means her ovaries do not produce eggs. Because Northern Ireland has a severe shortage of donor eggs, Beth had to secure a donor in England. She and her partner paid Apricity £4,600 and had been matched with an egg donor."Then I saw a comment on a Facebook group saying 'thinking of everyone affected by the Apricity news,'" she said. "There was no communication, no number to call."The couple were able to claim some of the money back on their insurance but it did not cover a £385 fee for a doctor's appointment and £985 for donor compensation. "Time was probably the biggest thing I felt I lost. It was such a long process," said Beth.She has now restarted treatment with a regulated clinic. She has had appointments with a doctor in the Republic of Ireland and travelled to Manchester for the embryo transfer. That transfer was unsuccessful but she will be able to get another round of IVF on her insurance with a different egg donor.
'No realistic chance of a refund'
In recent years, more British couples have paid for private fertility treatment, in part because IVF on the NHS is a postcode lottery.Jonathan, not his real name, and his wife went through five failed rounds of IVF before they went to Apricity. They paid £10,000 for treatment with their savings and a loan."We've been told there's no realistic chance of getting our money back," he said. "We haven't been able to resume treatment yet as we're still trying to raise finance."Cork Gully told Jonathan and other patients in a letter seen by the BBC: "It is unlikely that there will be funds to pay to patients."It said any affected patients should get in touch.
The BBC asked Mel Chacksfield, who was chief executive of Apricity when it ceased operations, why the business had gone under and if patients would be refunded but she did not respond to our request. However, Caroline Noublanche, one of the company's founders and the previous chief executive, told the BBC it had "faced sudden and irreversible financial difficulties in December when planned investment from an investor was withdrawn".
Clinics falling into regulatory gap
Prof Emily Jackson is a researcher in medical law and ethics at the London School of Economics. She said: "You need a licence to do things with embryos and sperm and eggs but you don't need any licence to offer to arrange things on the internet. "For people thinking about their options, it is probably sensible to opt for treatment in an HFEA-licensed clinic, because they have responsibilities towards patients in the event of closure."Those responsibilities mean that if an HFEA-licensed clinic closes, it has to give patients information and ensure they are supported. The clinic must also ensure all eggs, sperm and embryos that are in storage are kept safe.
A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care told BBC News: "While digital or 'virtual' clinics do not currently fall within the remit of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ministers have met with its chair to discuss the emerging regulatory challenges."The government is currently considering the HFEA's recommendations on modernising fertility law. We would advise all those looking at using digital clinics to carry out thorough research before making any decisions."
King's Fertility, which was providing Syreeta's treatment, was a contractor of Apricity's and is now a creditor of the company.Its director, Dr Ippokratis Sarris, a consultant in reproductive medicine, said it was likely more concierge clinics would emerge in the future as patients look for convenience and flexibility."The shift toward more remote and digital models of care is an inevitable progression in today's world. This is increasingly what patients want, and often prefer, so it's important that we don't deny them that choice."But he advised patients to do careful research before choosing a provider, and to be cautious about paying upfront for multi-cycle packages."It's wise to look into how long a clinic has been established, who owns it (NHS, private individual, or private equity), and make an informed choice," he added."We shouldn't resist change, but we do need to be proactive in shaping it responsibly."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved
Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved

The Government could have saved hundreds of thousands more lives if it had maintained the amount of money given to vaccinate children in the world's poorest countries, campaigners have claimed. In 2020, former prime minister Boris Johnson pledged £1.65 billion over five years to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. But now the Government has announced that it will give £1.25 billion between 2026 and 2030. While some have praised the pledge, others have said that a reduction in the amount given to Gavi will lead to fewer lives being saved. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said that the money will help Gavi protect up to 500 million children from some of the world's deadliest diseases such as meningitis, cholera and measles. Announcing the funds at Gavi's global summit in Brussels, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Gavi's global impact is undeniable. Over one billion children vaccinated, over 18 million lives saved, over 250 billion dollars injected into the global economy. 'I'm immensely proud of the role the UK has played in reaching these milestones. Our ongoing partnership with Gavi will give millions of children a better start, save lives and protect us all from the spread of deadly diseases.' Commenting on the pledge, Adrian Lovett, the ONE Campaign's UK executive director, said: 'This is an important pledge from the UK to Gavi, a vital force in the fight against preventable disease. 'But despite this good news, we are seeing the harsh impact of the Prime Minister's deep cut to overall aid levels. 'The UK's contribution to Gavi could have saved almost 400,000 more lives if it had been maintained at the same level as before. And further impossible choices are looming.' Dr Philip Goodwin, chief executive for the UK Committee for Unicef, said: 'This investment shows the UK's ongoing commitment to global partnerships that protect children around the world from preventable disease. 'However, cuts to the aid budget still pose a grave threat to children. 'We urge the UK Government to maximise this Gavi commitment by also funding other critical health services that make immunisation fully effective.' Elsewhere, GSK and Bharat Biotech announced that the price of the world's first malaria vaccine for children in countries where malaria is endemic will be reduced by more than half, to less than five dollars a vaccine. The jab is expected to be rolled out in 12 endemic countries in Africa through routine immunisation programmes by the end of 2025. It comes as a new report revealed that global vaccination coverage against deadly diseases had stalled in recent decades. The new review, published in The Lancet, concludes that as a result, millions of children around the world are left vulnerable to preventable disease and death. Senior study author Dr Jonathan Mosser, from the University of Washington in the US, said: 'Routine childhood vaccinations are among the most powerful and cost-effective public health interventions available, but persistent global inequalities, challenges from the Covid pandemic, and the growth of vaccine misinformation and hesitancy have all contributed to faltering immunisation progress. 'These trends increase the risk of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, polio and diphtheria.' In May the new aid minister, Baroness Jenny Chapman, said that the days of the British Government acting as a 'global charity' are 'over'. Her appointment followed the resignation of Anneliese Dodds, who quit as development minister in protest at the decision to cut the aid budget to fund increased defence spending.

Britain slashes global vaccine budget, putting millions of women and girls at risk
Britain slashes global vaccine budget, putting millions of women and girls at risk

Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Britain slashes global vaccine budget, putting millions of women and girls at risk

Britain has slashed its funding for the Gavi global vaccine partnership by 40 per cent in real terms, putting millions of women and girls at risk from cervical cancer and other diseases. The government will now contribute £1.25 billion to Gavi – which facilitates the vaccination of nearly half of the world's children – for the next five years, down from the £1.6 billion pledge given in 2020. It comes as Britain and other western powers have dramatically cut their aid budgets in recent months as they prepare to ramp up spending on defence. Speaking exclusively to The Telegraph, Baroness Chapman, the Minister of International Development said: 'We've had to make some really tough choices. But we've decided as a government that we want to invest in defence, because that's the world we are in. 'When we cut the aid budget, we knew we'd have to cut things that are globally good. Gavi would be something it would be great to put more money into in future and I hope we can, but for today this is a good pledge from the UK,' she said. Britain's funding cut represents a 40 per cent reduction in real terms after accounting for inflation. It will threaten funding for 23 million child vaccinations over the next five years, potentially causing an additional 350,000 deaths, according to estimates by the ONE campaign. Andrew Mitchell, former Conservative International Development Secretary, condemned the government's 'brutal' cut to Gavi, warning it will 'leave Britain less safe and more vulnerable to disease.' In another major blow, the US announced at Gavi's pledge summit in Brussels today that it would cut its support entirely for the organisation. It had given $1.13 billion in the organisation's last funding round. In an inflammatory video message delivered to the summit, US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior accused Gavi of neglecting vaccine safety, and criticised its decision making around Covid-19 immunisation recommendations and the use of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTPw) vaccine in low-income countries. Global vaccine experts rejected the jibe, saying they had 'full confidence' in the DTPw vaccine. Gavi is relying on raising at least $9 billion to support its work between 2026-2030. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, is a public-private partnership that procures and distributes vaccines at significantly reduced prices to the world's poorest countries. It targets diseases such as HPV, malaria, yellow fever, COVID-19, Ebola, measles, and typhoid. It was founded by the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, the World Bank and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000. It has immunised over a billion children worldwide and is estimated to have saved more than 18 million lives. The UK has historically been the organisation's largest sovereign donor. Baroness Chapman, appointed Minister for International Development earlier this year shortly after the UK government cut its aid budget from 0.5 to 0.3 per cent of gross national income – the lowest level in 25 years – said foreign assistance should not just be about 'doing good' but about helping countries to 'stand on [their] own two feet.' However, experts argue that Gavi is one of the best ways to achieve that goal. The International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm), Gavi's innovative funding mechanism which former Chancellor Gordon Brown helped design, is widely regarded as one of the most effective and sustainable aid projects in history. Every dollar invested in Gavi is estimated to generate a $54 return on investment – far outperforming traditional markets like the Dow Jones, which returned $2.26 per dollar over the past decade. Over the past 25 years, 19 countries, including Indonesia and India, have successfully transitioned out of Gavi support and are now donors themselves. The UK government has been a key champion of Gavi's accelerated rollout of the HPV vaccine to adolescent girls in developing countries, aiming to eradicate cervical cancer, which kills around 300,000 women annually. During Gavi's 2026–2030 strategic period, it plans to vaccinate an additional 120 million girls with the HPV vaccine. However, these plans may be scaled back due to the funding shortfall. 'The HPV vaccine is a real game changer in the fight against cervical cancer [...] But again, we have had to make a decision about putting more money into defense. Therefore there's less money to spend on overseas aid,' Baroness Chapman said. The organisation's work does not just benefit its recipients, say experts, but protects all countries from the risk of future pandemics. 'We've learned through Covid that if you have a pandemic, or if you have viruses emerging from other parts of the world, no matter how far away they might be, that none of us are safe, it is a global challenge and Gavi is huge part of that answer,' said Baroness Chapman. Gavi's CEO Sania Nishtar told The Telegraph: 'The UK relationship for GAVI is super important. The UK is where GAVI was born. We've had bipartisan support from both sides of the aisle in the last 25 years. We're very grateful for the pledge at this very difficult moment.'

UK pledge to global vaccine effort falls £400m to £1.25bn amid raft of aid cuts
UK pledge to global vaccine effort falls £400m to £1.25bn amid raft of aid cuts

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

UK pledge to global vaccine effort falls £400m to £1.25bn amid raft of aid cuts

The UK has reduced funding to a global vaccine alliance that immunises millions of children by £400 million, amid a wider raft of foreign aid cuts that campaigners fear will cost lives. Gavi – formerly the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunsations – helps buy vaccines and deliver them to low-income countries. It has set a goal of vaccinating 500 million children against diseases including measles, cholera and malaria over the next five years – saving up to eight million lives. Gavi is aiming to raise $9 billion (£6.6bn) for the next five years. The UK is one of Gavi's largest donors and has pledged £1.25 billion between 2026 and 2030. However, £1.65bn was pledged between 2021 and 2025. The ONE campaign, a poverty and health campaign group estimates the cut could lead to 365,000 extra deaths over five years and 23 million fewer child vaccinations, based on Gavi's own costs data. Adrian Lovett, the ONE Campaign's UK Executive Director, said: 'This is an important pledge from the UK to Gavi, a vital force in the fight against preventable disease. Today's announcement will save an amazing 1.1 million lives and lead to an incredible 72 million children being immunised around the world." 'But despite this good news, we are seeing the harsh impact of deep cut to overall aid levels. The UK's contribution to Gavi could have saved almost 400,000 more lives if it had been maintained at the same level as before. And further impossible choices are looming. A reduced but still strong investment in Gavi, as welcome as it is, means less money to educate girls, fight for climate justice, and prevent deadly conflict around the world.' While Gavi raises funds from a mix of governments, philanthropists and private donors including Shell, TikTok, Coca Cola and even the Mormon Church, the UK government has regularly topped the list of biggest donors. And the impact of the donation cut will likely be felt even more acutely with the US having already signalled it wants to remove funding for Gavi from its 2026 budget, with Donald Trump having already having slashed billions from America's foreign aid contributions. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "Gavi's global impact is undeniable. Over 1 billion children vaccinated, over 18 million lives saved, over $250 billion injected into the global economy. 'I'm immensely proud of the role the UK has played in reaching these milestones.' Dr Philip Goodwin, Chief Executive Officer for the UK Committee for UNICEF, said: 'This pledge from the UK government will bring Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, closer to its ambitious goal of reaching another 500 million children cuts to the aid budget still pose a grave threat to children. "We urge the UK Government to maximise this Gavi commitment by also funding other critical health services that make immunisation fully effective. That includes nutrition and primary health care which children need to survive and thrive. Committing at least 25 per cent of the UK aid budget to children will support the full range of services needed to ensure children grown up healthy and happy.' If it ends up with a funding shortfall, Gavi will face difficult choices about what to contribute to and what to cut back on – including the balance between vaccines used to prevent future disease compared with vaccines sent in response to emergency disease outbreaks. Gavi maintains stockpiles of vaccines so that, during a sudden disease outbreak, poorer countries can quickly access vaccines. The group says it has shipped tens of millions of doses from its global cholera stockpile, sent Mpox vaccines to Sierra Leone and Kenya and made yellow fever vaccines available to Colombia during a recent outbreak. As well as protecting the countries receiving the vaccines, this is part of preventing pandemics that cross borders. Nineteen countries formerly funded by the alliance have 'graduated' from Gavi funding since 2016 and are now able to pay for vaccines through their own national budgets. The alliance says its aim is for, 'all countries to eventually reach this stage – and for Gavi to put itself out of business'. Gavi CEO Dr Sania Nishtar said: 'Since 2000, we have helped halve child mortality in under-fives and today we are able to save even more lives as we roll out protections against malaria and cervical cancer. 'This is progress that we simply cannot afford to lose: the lives of 500 million children depend on it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store