logo
Germany's AfD insists it is not just a party of the east anymore

Germany's AfD insists it is not just a party of the east anymore

Yahoo21-02-2025

Long seen as having a stronghold in eastern Germany, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) is poised to make major gains in the west in Sunday's parliamentary elections, party leaders say.
And a YouGov poll released on Thursday backs them up. The data showed that the AfD, which is classified by Germany's domestic intelligence agency as a suspected far-right extremist group, looks set to even double the levels it reached in the west in the last national election.
In 2021, the far-right party polled between a low of 5% in Hamburg to a high of 10% in the small state of Saarland. For Sunday's vote, YouGov sees a range of 12% in both Hamburg and Bremen to 21% in the south-western state of Baden-Württemberg, where just four years ago the AfD stood at 9.6%.
"We could crack the 10% mark," said Robert Offermann, AfD spokesman in Hamburg. The party obtained 5.3% of the vote in the northern city state in 2021.
Party fuelled by immigration, economic fears
The rise of the AfD has many Germans worried - as seen by recent mass demonstrations against working with the party.
But party leaders say they are making gains because of their focus on illegal immigration, and following a string of deadly attacks from immigrants in Magdeburg, Aschaffenburg and Munich - although in at least two of the incidents the suspects were in the country legally.
Apart from security issues, Germany's poor economy is also helping the far-right party.
"Five years ago it was mainly retirees, but now we have a lot of younger people," Kurt Kleinschmidt, the AfD chairman in Germany's most northern state of Schleswig-Holstein, told dpa.
"The economy is going down the drain," he said. People "feel they have to do something," he added, noting that AfD membership in Schleswig-Holstein rose from 743 in 2022 to 1,500 now.
Conrad Ziller, a political science professor at the University of Duisburg-Essen, says the often simple solutions offered by the AfD appeal to some people in these difficult times.
"People who are insecure and emotional are receptive to simple solutions," he told dpa. The AfD's anti-elite narrative is also appealing to people who feel they are being left behind, he says.
Number one in the east
That's one reason why Ziller and others argue the party is so popular in the east, where the YouGov poll sees the AfD leading in all five states with vote shares ranging from 29% in Brandenburg to 37% in Saxony.
"The AfD is the east's revenge on the west, which is blamed for all the upheavals after 1990," retired sociology professor Detlev Claussen told Foreign Policy magazine last year following the AfD's resounding success in east German state elections in Saxony and Thuringia.
He viewed the strong showing in the east as an outcome of "resentment against the West," over the way in which unification between West and East Germany was conducted. For many east Germans, the merging of the two Germanies in 1990 was more like an expropriation than a reunification. It resulted in a major upheaval - not only of their economy but of social and private lives.
"In the east the AfD has successfully capitalized on the history of the former East Germany ... even among young people who have no direct experience of the former East Germany," Ziller said.
From anti-euro to anti-immigrant
The AfD formed in February 2013 - just seven months before national elections - and its raison d'etre at the time was the euro. The party's founders were critical of the eurozone, a 20-member common currency group, especially since the European Union was in the middle of dealing with Greece's debt crisis.
"In 2013, the AfD was therefore what some call a single-issue party," said an analysis by the Munich-based ifo economics institute. The party failed, in that election, to achieve the 5% needed to enter parliament - but only by 0.3%.
After that, the AfD's priorities expanded, though its "fiscal focus remained," the institute said. In 2014 it won seven seats in the European Parliament.
The party's central focus switched to an anti-immigration platform after Germany started to take in some 1 million immigrants in 2015, according to official figures. Fears, especially among working-class males, of being overrun by immigration, helped.
In the 2017 general elections, the AfD won 12.6% of the vote and became the the third biggest party in parliament. While it did very well in eastern Germany, it outperformed the national average in several western German districts, ifo noted.
"The AfD's heartland is eastern Germany," ifo wrote, but "the AfD is not only a phenomenon of the east."
What a difference an election can make
Although the party made good gains in 2017, by the time 2021 rolled around, the coronavirus and not immigration was the main focus, with the AfD campaigning on an anti-vaccine position.
"That's one of the reasons why we lost ground," Robin Classen, spokesman for the party in the western state of Rhineland-Palatinate told dpa.
But for this election - a combination of anti-immigrant sentiment, the recent attacks, a poor economy and anti-establishment attitudes is expected to more than reverse the losses seen last time around.
This does not mean that the AfD will join the government anytime soon. With the mainstream parties - including the conservatives who are expected to win the election - all having ruled out working with the far right, the party is set to become the biggest opposition bloc.
But, as the AfD looks set to achieve the best result for a far-right party in Germany's post-Nazi era history, it has already firmly set its eyes on 2029.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Images of unrest, political spin distort the reality on the ground in L.A.
Images of unrest, political spin distort the reality on the ground in L.A.

Los Angeles Times

time9 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Images of unrest, political spin distort the reality on the ground in L.A.

Driverless Waymo vehicles, coated with graffiti and engulfed in flames. Masked protesters, dancing and cavorting around burning American flags. Anonymous figures brazenly blocking streets and shutting down major freeways, raining bottles and rocks on the police, while their compatriots waved Mexican flags. The images flowing out of Los Angeles over nearly a week of protests against federal immigration raids have cast America's second most populous city as a terrifying hellscape, where lawbreakers rule the streets and regular citizens should fear to leave their homes. In the relentless fever loop of online and broadcast video, it does not matter that the vast majority of Los Angeles neighborhoods remain safe and secure. Digital images create their own reality and it's one that President Trump and his supporters have used to condemn L.A. as a place that is 'out of control' and on the brink of total collapse. The images and their true meaning and context have become the subject of a furious debate in the media and among political partisans, centered on the true roots and victims of the protests, which erupted on Friday as the Trump administration moved aggressively to expand its arrests of undocumented immigrants. As the president and his supporters in conservative media tell it, he is the defender of law and order and American values. They cast their opponents as dangerous foreign-born criminals and their feckless enablers in the Democratic Party and mainstream media. The state's political leaders and journalists offer a compelling rebuttal: that Trump touched off several days of protest and disruption with raids that went far beyond targeting criminals, as he previously promised, then escalated the conflict by taking the highly unusual step of sending the National Guard and Marines to Southern California. Reaction to the raids by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and the subsequent turmoil will divide Americans on what have become partisan lines that have become so predictable they are 'calcified,' said Lynn Vavreck, a political science professor at UCLA. 'The parties want to build very different worlds, voters know it, and they know which world they want to live in,' said Vavreck, who has focused on the country's extreme political polarization. 'And because the parties are so evenly divided, and this issue is so personal to so many, the stakes are very high for people.' As a curfew was imposed Tuesday, the sharpest street confrontations appeared to be fading and a national poll suggested Americans have mixed feelings about the events that have dominated the news. The YouGov survey of 4,231 people found that 50% disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of deportations, compared with 39% who approve. Pluralities of those sampled also disagreed with Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to Southern California. But 45% of those surveyed by YouGov said they disapprove of the protests that began after recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions. Another 36% approved of the protests, with the rest unsure how they feel. Faced with a middling public response to the ICE raids and subsequent protests, Trump continued to use extreme language to exaggerate the magnitude of the public safety threat and to take credit for the reduction in hostilities as the week progressed. In a post on his TruthSocial site, he suggested that, without his military intervention, 'Los Angeles would be burning just like it was burning a number of months ago, with all the houses that were lost. Los Angeles right now would be on fire.' In reality, agitators set multiple spot fires in a few neighborhoods, including downtown Los Angeles and Paramount, but the blazes in recent days were tiny and quickly controlled, in contrast to the massive wildfires that devastated broad swaths of Southern California in January. Trump's hyperbole continued in a fundraising appeal to his supporters Tuesday. In it, he again praised his decision to deploy the National Guard (without the approval of California Gov. Gavin Newsom), concluding: 'If we had not done so, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated.' The Republican had assistance in fueling the sense of unease. His colleagues in Congress introduced a resolution to formally condemn the riots. 'Congress steps in amid 'out-of-control' Los Angeles riots as Democrats resist federal help,' Fox News reported on the resolution, being led by Rep. Young Kim of Orange County. A journalist based in New Delhi pronounced, based on unspecified evidence, that Los Angeles 'is descending into a full-blown warzone.' Veterans Affairs Secretary Douglas Collins suggested that the harm from the protesters was spreading; announcing in a social media post that a care center for vets in downtown L.A. had been temporarily closed. 'To the violent mobs in Los Angeles rioting in support of illegal immigrants and against the rule of law,' his post on X said, 'your actions are interfering with Veterans' health care.' A chyron running with a Fox News commentary suggested 'Democrats have lost their mind,' as proved by their attempts to downplay the anti-ICE riots. Many Angelenos mocked the claims of a widespread public safety crisis. One person on X posted a picture of a dog out for a walk along a neatly kept sidewalk in a serene neighborhood, with the caption: 'Los Angeles just an absolute warzone, as you can see.' In stark contrast to the photos of Waymo vehicles burning and police cars being pelted with rocks, a video on social media showed a group of protestors line dancing. 'Oh my God! They must be stopped before their peaceful and joy filled dance party spreads to a city near you!' the caption read. 'Please send in the Marines before they start doing the Cha Cha and the Macarena!' And many people noted on social media that Sunday's Pride parade in Hollywood for the LGBTQ+ community went off without incident, as reinforced by multiple videos of dancers and marchers celebrating along a sun-splashed parade route. But other activists and Democrats signaled that they understand how Trump's position can be strengthened if it appears they are condoning the more extreme episodes that emerged along with the protests — police being pelted with bottles, businesses being looted and buildings being defaced with graffiti. On Tuesday, an X post by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass reiterated her earlier admonitions: 'Let me be clear: ANYONE who vandalized Downtown or looted stores does not care about our immigrant communities,' the mayor wrote. 'You will be held accountable.' The activist group Occupy Democrats posted a message online urging protesters to show their disdain for the violence and property damage. 'The moment violence of property damage begins, EVERY OTHER PROTESTER must immediately sit on the floor or the ground in silence, with signs down,' the advisory suggested. 'The media needs to film this. This will reveal paid fake thugs posing as protesters becoming violent. ….The rest of us will demonstrate our non-violent innocence and retain our Constitutional right to peaceful protest.' Craig Silverman, a journalist and cofounder of Indicator, a site that investigates deception on digital platforms, said that reporting on the context and true scope of the protests would have a hard time competing with the visceral images broadcast into Americans' homes. 'It's inevitable that the most extreme and compelling imagery will win the battle for attention on social media and on TV,' Silverman said via email. 'It's particularly challenging to deliver context and facts when social platforms incentivize the most shocking videos and claims, federal and state authorities offer contradictory messages about what's happening.' Dan Schnur, who teaches political science at USC and UC Berkeley, agreed. 'The overwhelming majority of the protesters are peaceful,' Schnur said, 'but they don't do stories on all the planes that land safely at LAX, either.' Though it might be too early to assess the ultimate impact of the L.A. unrest, Schnur suggested that all of the most prominent politicians in the drama might have accomplished their messaging goals: Trump motivated his base and diverted attention from his nasty feud with his former top advisor, Elon Musk, and the lack of progress on peace talks with Russia and Ukraine. Newsom 'effectively unified the state and elevated his national profile' by taking on Trump. And Bass, under tough scrutiny for her handling of the city's wildfire disaster, has also gotten a chance to use Trump as a foil. What was not disputed was that Trump's rapid deployment of the National Guard, without the approval of Newsom, had little precedent. And sending the Marines to L.A. was an even more extreme approach, with experts saying challenges to the deployment would test the limits of Trump's power. The federal Insurrection Act allows the deployment of the military for law enforcement purposes, but only under certain conditions, such as a national emergency. California leaders say Trump acted before a true emergency developed, thereby preempting standard protocols, including the institution of curfews and the mobilization of other local police departments in a true emergency. Even real estate developer Rick Caruso, Bass' opponent in the last election, suggested Trump acted too hastily. 'There is no emergency, widespread threat, or out of control violence in Los Angeles,' Caruso wrote on X Sunday. 'And absolutely no danger that justifies deployment of the National Guard, military, or other federal force to the streets of this or any other Southern California City.' 'We must call for calm in the streets,' Caruso added, 'and deployment of the National Guard may prompt just the opposite.'

Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests
Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests

As President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard and the United States Marines to Los Angeles in the wake of violent protests over federal immigration raids, Americans have soured on the president's response as Angelenos continue to take to the streets. Forty-five percent of adults disapprove of Trump deploying the California National Guard, while 38% approve, according to a YouGov poll released on Tuesday. The poll also shows that 17% of Americans are not sure about the deployment. Another YouGov poll released Tuesday showed that more Americans disapprove than approve of the Pentagon sending the Marines to Los Angeles, with 47% disapproving and 34% approving. There are 19% — about 1 in 5 — who are unsure. Conducted on June 10, the YouGov poll surveyed 4,309 U.S. adults. Since protests began on Friday, June 6, Trump has repeatedly defended his actions. On Monday, he took to Truth Social to suggest that Los Angeles would be 'completely obliterated' if he did not send in the National Guard. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. due to an incompetent Governor and Mayor,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. Gov. Gavin Newsom did not approve or consent to Trump's deployment of the National Guard and has attacked the president's actions since last week. When Trump and White House border czar Tom Homan floated the idea that Newsom should be arrested for not approving, Newsom dared them to arrest him. Among several elected Republican lawmakers who have criticized Newsom and the developments out of Los Angeles, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the governor should not be arrested. But he offered an outdated alternative. 'I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested but he ought to be tarred and feathered, I'll say that,' Johnson told reporters. Newsom saw this and replied in an X post. 'Good to know we're skipping the arrest and going straight for the 1700s style forms of punishment,' the governor wrote Tuesday. As of Wednesday morning, Trump ordered the deployment of over 4,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Times reported. The Pentagon also deployed 700 U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton, with a military convoy heading from Twentynine Palms toward the City of Angels. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass ordered an 8 p.m. to 6 p.m. curfew on Tuesday, but 25 people were arrested in connection with violating the curfew, the Times reported. Colombian fugitive living 30 years in Mass. deported after deadly secret uncovered Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, 'secret police tactics' Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader Read the original article on MassLive.

Merz demands coalition unity as SPD Russia manifesto sparks backlash
Merz demands coalition unity as SPD Russia manifesto sparks backlash

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Merz demands coalition unity as SPD Russia manifesto sparks backlash

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is calling for unity within his governing coalition amid dissent from some members of the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) over the country's defence and Russia policy. Merz, a conservative who took office last month with the SPD as the junior coalition partner, said the parties in government were "in complete agreement on the assessment of the war that Russia is waging against Ukraine and on the consequences that must be drawn from it." "And I am counting on this unity to remain intact," he added, speaking during a meeting with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in Berlin. In light of recent Russian attacks on Ukraine, Merz warned that anyone "with a reasonably clear view" must recognize that "Russia is a threat to the security of the entire alliance." His comments come after prominent SPD figures issued a position paper calling for a shift in Germany's approach to Russia. The manifesto, signed by former parliamentary group leader Rolf Mützenich, ex-party chief Norbert Walter-Borjans, foreign policy expert Ralf Stegner, and several federal and state lawmakers, urges direct diplomatic talks with Moscow and criticizes the government's rearmament plans. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, a leading SPD figure and one of the country's most popular politicians, forcefully rejected the document. "This position paper amounts to a denial of reality," said Pistorius. "It exploits the desire of the people in our country for an end to the terrible war in Ukraine, for peace." The manifesto, which has been made available to dpa and was signed by more than 100 people, warns against "alarmist military rhetoric" and claims "huge armament programmes do not create more security for Germany and Europe, but lead to destabilization." Pistorius countered that while he shared a desire for peace, Russian President Vladimir Putin had rejected ceasefire offers and continued bombing Ukrainian cities with increasing brutality. "He breaks off negotiations. And when he does negotiate, he simultaneously bombs cities in Ukraine with even greater severity and brutality," Pistorius said. "He is pursuing a strategy of confrontation. Not us." Germany, the second-largest supplier of military aid to Ukraine after the United States, is set to push for a significant increase in NATO defence spending at the alliance's summit in July. Merz is advocating for members to spend at least 3.5% of economic output on defence, with an additional 1.5% on infrastructure. The paper's authors oppose this target and reject the stationing of new US mid-range missiles in Germany. They also call for "a return to dialogue with Russia once the guns fall silent, including on a peace and security order for Europe that is supported and respected by all," emphasizing the need for cautious diplomatic contacts and confidence-building measures. The SPD is expected to debate the manifesto and wider defence policy at its party conference later this month, a gathering likely to be contentious following the party's poor showing in February's elections. The SPD, one of Germany's two traditional mainstream forces, was relegated to third place behind Merz's conservative CDU/CSU bloc and the far-right Alternative for Germany.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store