Review of fossil fuel subsidies stalls as Argentina halted communication with Canada
A peer review of fossil fuel subsidies between Canada and Argentina — already years behind schedule — stalled after Argentina ceased communication following its 2023 election and subsequent change in government.
The review was first launched in 2018 as part of a G20 commitment to eliminate all "inefficient" subsides to the fossil fuel sector. It was only supposed to take about two years to complete.
But it was clear as early as 2019 that it would be behind schedule and it now seems to have fallen off the rails entirely.
Canada says Argentina ceased communication and participation in the process after Argentines voted into office President Javier Milei — a right-wing populist who has referred to climate change as a 'socialist lie.'
'Following its 2023 election, Argentina's domestic policies with respect to the environment and climate change shifted significantly,' a spokesperson for Environment and Climate Change Canada said in a statement to The Canadian Press.
Argentina's negotiators left the annual UN climate talks in 2024 and reports earlier this year suggested Milei was considering withdrawing from the Paris climate pact altogether.
The department declined an interview request. It said in a followup statement that while Canada had some engagement with Argentina on the planning for a peer review process, 'no additional progress has been made since Argentina's election.'
Argentina's embassy in Canada forwarded a request for comment to authorities in Buenos Aires but did not provide a response.
Similar peer reviews undertaken between the United States and China, Germany and Mexico, and Italy and Indonesia took between 12 and 24 months to complete. As of 2021, 11 G20 peer reviews had been completed.
The studies serve as a way to independently take stock of a country's fossil fuel subsidies, better define what constitutes a subsidy and determine whether a subsidy is achieving the desired impact.
"I would not say that it had a lot of impact in phasing out subsidies," said Jonas Kuehl, a policy adviser in the energy program at the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
"It maybe has some impact on, like, what's the transparency about it and how do you structure them in such an inventory."
In 2023, Canada ended federal subsidies specific to the oil and gas sector. It still pays subsidies to the industry through programs which are also available to companies in other sectors.
Environmental organizations say Canada still spends billions of dollars to support oil and gas companies. A report by Environmental Defence says Canada spent close to $30 billion in 2024 to support the sector.
It's not clear if that money is part of general corporate subsidies also paid to companies in other sectors — like the Canada Growth Fund, which helps to support clean growth projects, or tax credits for technology that help companies lower their emissions.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 24, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
27 minutes ago
Fragile ceasefire leaves Iranians outside country torn about returning home
Overnight on Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump jubilantly announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, only to be visibly disappointed Tuesday morning when both sides were accused of violating it. For Iranians at the Kapikoy-Razi border crossing in eastern Turkey, there was a mix of optimism and confusion — hope that a delicate truce could be maintained despite the violent swings that have gripped the region over the past 12 days. While all welcomed the prospect of peace — even a fragile one — Iranians remained wary of speaking too openly about the effect the conflict has had on Iranian society and the long-ruling regime. When CBC News approached a group of young Iranian women sitting on the pavement, surrounded by their large suitcases, one said she would like to speak but couldn't. We are afraid, she said. Our government is shit. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has ruled the country since 1989. Under him, Iran has continued to develop its nuclear program, which Israel and the U.S. called a pressing threat in justifying the decision to launch recent airstrikes. Iran and Israel have been firing missiles at each other since June 13, and on the weekend, the U.S. stepped in, dropping bunker-busting bombs at Iranian nuclear facilities, including one buried below a mountain. WATCH | About That: Inside the U.S.'s bunker-busting strike on Iran: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Inside the U.S.'s bunker-busting strike on Iran's nuclear program | About That The U.S. military says secrecy and misdirection were key to the success of its attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Operation Midnight Hammer deployed B-2 Spirit Bombers to drop nearly half a million pounds of bunker-buster bombs. Andrew Chang breaks down how the U.S. carried out the attack and what could come next. Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters. 1:15 - Misdirection and mixed messages 4:42 - Three-part assault 10:42 - Unanswered questions In Iran, where the majority of the population is Shia Muslim, the regime has created an environment of violent suppression of any form of protest or dissent, leading to a climate of fear. Growing unrest Over the last decade, Iranians have taken to the streets on numerous occasions to protest the ruling clerics and the state of the economy. In 2022, the death of a woman named Mahsa Amini in police custody for an alleged dress code violation led to months of demonstrations as well as a brutal crackdown. At the Kapikoy-Razi border crossing on Tuesday, where waves of people are heading in and out of Iran, a few dual citizens told CBC News that Iranian authorities were searching their cellphones and looking at photos and contacts before they crossed. WATCH | Iranians flee to Iran-Turkey border as missile attacks increase: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Hundreds flee to Iran-Turkey border as airstrikes intensify Some Iranians are fleeing the country to escape attacks from Israel and the U.S., while others are trying to enter Iran to reunite with their families. CBC's Briar Stewart reports from the Iran-Turkey border. One Iranian, who didn't want CBC News to use his name, asked to know the details of the ceasefire, because his phone hadn't been working and he wasn't able to get updates. It looked like [shooting] was supposed to stop officially at 4 a.m., but then we heard news about some missiles shooting.… So we were like, OK, what the hell is going to happen? he said. I don't really have any clear understanding of who is really eager for a ceasefire. The man, who is in his 20s, teaches English to international students online. With widespread internet outages in Iran, he feared he was about to lose his job. He had left the capital, Tehran, a few days after the airstrikes began. Then on Tuesday morning, he decided to leave for Turkey, where he will try to stay with friends for a few months. He said Iranians have mobilized around three separate viewpoints: those who want to overthrow the regime at any cost; those who remain loyal to it; and those who don't really like the government, but are angered by Israel and, to a lesser extent, the United States. I mean, I don't support the [regime] at all, he said. But what's happening … there are casualties, and that's not nice at all. Talk of regime change On Tuesday, Iran's Health Ministry said more than 600 people have been killed in the airstrikes in the past 12 days, along with some 4,700 injured though some groups have said that's likely an undercount. In Israel, at least 28 people have been killed, according to the United Nations (new window) . Both Israel and the U.S. have talked publicly about the potential of regime change in Iran. On Sunday, Trump stated that new leadership could make Iran great again, but on Tuesday shifted his message, saying that regime change typically creates chaos. He previously said that the country's supreme leader was in hiding, but still an easy target. Trump then proclaimed he wouldn't be killed, at least for now. Amid Trump's changing rhetoric, there are reports that top clerics, appointed by Khamenei, have been working to identify possible replacements, creating a succession plan in case he is killed. Israel says throughout its offensive, it has targeted Iran's military and security infrastructure, along with top officials and nuclear scientists. The country's defence minister said it was not only striking regime targets but also agencies of government repression. Last week, Israel targeted the headquarters of Iran's state broadcaster, and on Monday, the notorious Evin prison in Tehran, where political opponents and westerners accused of sabotage are jailed. 'I hope that the ceasefire will happen' Milad, another Iranian who crossed into Turkey on Wednesday and only wanted to be identified by his first name, told CBC News he thought Iran's government would start rebuilding infrastructure right away, which would further cripple Iran's sanctioned, inflation-plagued economy. I feel that people are tired and … they don't have the energy to fight or to think of regime change, because we only try to stay alive, he said. Maybe something happens, maybe it won't. It all depends on the political leaders — the United States, whether it decides which side loses the war or wins the war. It's not up to the people. While Milad was looking to settle somewhere until it was clear the fighting had stopped, on Tuesday, hundreds headed in the other direction into Iran. Among them was Musa Ramesh, who had been out of the country with his family to attend his daughter's graduation in Cyprus. When one of his younger relatives suggested he shouldn't be doing an interview, Ramesh waved off the suggestion, insisting he wanted to talk. My government and Israel, there are some problems, but I hope that the ceasefire will happen, he said. This is our home. We should be there. Briar Stewart (new window) · CBC News ·
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
'Serious Omission' in G7 Wildfire Charter Leaves Climate Change Unnamed
Leaders of the G7 countries have agreed to cooperate on efforts to manage the impacts of devastating wildfires, in Canada and around the world, but held back from naming climate change as a primary cause of the problem. The leaders are calling it the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter-and they're pitching it as a groundbreaking commitment for G7 leaders, reports The Canadian Press. But a former Canadian diplomat said the G7 will have to be more explicit about the climate crisis if it hopes to stay relevant. "To maintain its status as a leading body, the G7 must return to its longstanding tradition of having climate change as an important item on its agenda, and find a way to do so even when there's not a consensus at the table," Patricia Fuller, president and CEO of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), told The Energy Mix. The charter, published on the final day of the summit Tuesday, includes a pledge to mitigate and respond to the impact of fires on human health-an apparent reference to volumes of wildfire smoke that have travelled oceans and crossed borders in recent summers. The countries say they will reduce the risk of extreme fires through sustainable forest management and Indigenous land management techniques, such as controlled burning. "The world has experienced record-breaking wildfires across every forested continent over the past decade, often overwhelming available national resources and requiring governments to request assistance from other countries," it states. "These increasingly extreme wildfires are endangering lives, affecting human health, destroying homes and ecosystems, and costing governments and taxpayers billions of dollars each year," the leaders wrote. The G7 resolved "to boost global cooperation to prevent, fight, and recover from wildfires by taking integrated action to reduce the incidence and negative impacts of wildfires and ensure our readiness to help each other, and partners, when needed." Leaders also committed to collecting and sharing data and finding better ways to provide timely access to basic firefighting equipment. The charter was endorsed by guest participants from Australia, India, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea in addition to the G7 countries. The declaration comes as Canada battles yet another devastating wildfire season and almost one year after flames ripped through Jasper, a town 250 kilometres north of Kananaskis, the Rocky Mountain tourist community that hosted the summit, CP writes. Going into the summit, there was no expectation that climate change would be named out loud in the final declaration-or that there would be any final declaration at all, with Donald Trump in the room to block substantive agreements. Prime Minister Mark Carney's published priorities ahead of the summit made scant direct reference to past G7 commitments in areas like power sector decarbonization, methane controls, forest and land degradation, and elimination of fossil fuel subsidies-a promise the countries made in 2016 and were supposed to deliver on by this year. The summit ultimately produced a chair's summary from Carney as G7 President, as well as statements on critical minerals, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies for computing, sensing, and communications, migrant smuggling, and transnational repression. The chair's summary says the G7 leaders and guest participants-including UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres and World Bank President Ajay Banga-"discussed just energy transitions as well as sustainable and innovative solutions to boost energy access and affordability, while mitigating the impact on climate and the environment." Fuller said it was noteworthy that the climate and energy references came in the section of the chair's summary that reported on the G7's interactions with guests. "That speaks to the point that if the G7 is to maintain leadership as a global institution, it needs to be addressing issues that are of concern to the wider world, and climate change is a concern to all countries," she told The Mix. "It's certainly a concern to these large developing nations, important players on the global stage, that are experiencing very extreme impacts of climate change." As Canada and other G7 countries build stronger relationships with the Global South, "part of doing so is showing leadership on addressing climate change and advancing the energy transition, as a means of increasing energy security, diversifying energy sources, and increasing affordability," she added. "On these questions of security and affordability, there's a very broad consensus. But what is not being brought into the space as much as it should be is the importance of renewable energies in achieving those goals." The G7 previously committed to triple renewable energy deployment and double the rate of energy efficiency improvements, and "these are goals the G7 needs to continue to work on," Fuller said. "It also needs to make good on its commitment to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies, which are an impediment to an energy transition that can achieve these goals of security and diversification." Before the summit, news analysis suggested the wildfire references in what ultimately became the Kananaskis Charter would serve as a proxy for explicit climate commitments. When Canadian officials first began planning the meeting last year and knew they had to deal with the possibility of a Trump presidency, they understood "that if they start with the standard stuff on climate change, Donald Trump and his people would get out their red pens and just say 'no way,'" John Kirton, founding director of the G7 Research Group, told Globe and Mail freelancer Arno Kopecky. "So then, what is your strategy? And wildfires was the answer." The difference, Kopecky wrote, was that while Trump refuses to listen to climate science, he's seen a rash of wildfires since he returned to the White House in January, and his country is now receiving smoke from the blazes in Canada. "So Donald Trump's got a reason to be seen to be doing something about it," Kirton said. The end result-a wildfire charter with no reference to climate change-drew sharp criticism from several expert observers. Caroline Brouillette, executive director of Climate Action Network Canada, said Canada "cratered to the lowest common denominator" to appease the U.S. president and failed the test of climate leadership, CP writes. "They're missing the whole point in that we're seeing more fires, a longer fire season, more intense fires, more severe fires, because the climate is changing due to human activities," said fire and climate professor Mike Flannigan of Thompson Rivers University. "It's a serious omission, and that's being very polite." The wildfire charter "misses the most important, and most controversial point, about wildfires around the globe: that increasingly they are made so much more frequent and dangerous to human life and infrastructure by climate change," agreed Stephen Legault, senior program manager, Alberta climate at Environmental Defence Canada. "To have a serious conversation about wildfire necessitates a discussion about climate change." Source: The Energy Mix
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
UN peacekeeper killed in attack by armed men in Central African Republic
DAKAR, Senegal (AP) — A United Nations peacekeeper was killed during an attack by armed men in Central African Republic, the UN said on Tuesday as the Security Council expressed concerns over growing attacks against peacekeepers in the country. A Zambian peacekeeper was killed Friday when suspected Sudanese armed groups attacked a U.N. peacekeeping patrol team close to the country's northern border with Sudan in the village of Am-Sissia 1, according to a statement from the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.
