US National Guard Deployed In Los Angeles: What Threats Do They Counter
What started as simmering outrage over federal immigration raids turned into a full-blown standoff in Los Angeles on Sunday. On its third day, the protests spiralled into chaos, self-driving cars were set on fire, a major freeway was shut down, and over 120 people were arrested.
Police responded with tear gas and rubber bullets as tensions ran high. Then came the flashpoint: US President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the city despite the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom.
What Is The US National Guard?
The US National Guard is a part-time military force that serves both state and federal governments. Each state has its own Guard units, which can be activated by the governor for local emergencies, like wildfires, floods, or protests, or by the President for national missions, including overseas deployments or domestic unrest.
The Guard is made up of two branches: the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard, totalling over 430,000 personnel. It operates under two legal frameworks, Title 32, where the governor is in charge (often for disaster response), and Title 10, where the President takes command (for federal missions).
Why Are National Guard Troops In Los Angeles?
Trump deployed the National Guards in direct response to widespread protests following a series of controversial ICE raids across Los Angeles. Immigration enforcement officers targeted workplaces such as Home Depots, a doughnut shop, and a warehouse.
Trump justified the troop deployment as necessary to "address the lawlessness" in California. By federalising the National Guard under Title 10, he placed them under his command, bypassing Governor Newsom, who normally controls the state's Guard.
"We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden," Trump said Sunday.
What Threats Are They Responding To?
The National Guard is not directly engaging in law enforcement. Their said role is to protect ICE officers and guard federal facilities, including a downtown detention centre where some detained immigrants were taken.
Protesters reportedly hurled rocks and concrete at federal agents, damaged property, including setting self-driving cars on fire, and clashed with police, prompting officers to use tear gas, rubber bullets, and flash bangs to control the crowds. Authorities have warned of growing public safety threats, describing the protests as being driven by "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and even suggesting possible cartel involvement. To prevent further unrest, Guard troops are now stationed outside key federal buildings, especially ICE facilities, to protect them from damage and block protesters from breaching federal grounds.
"There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves," wrote Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck.
What Is The Legal Basis?
The Insurrection Act, an 18th-century law, allows US presidents to use military force during rebellion or unrest, but Trump hasn't invoked it.
Instead, he relied on another statute that allows the president to federalise National Guard troops in emergencies. This places them under federal command, though the law says such orders should go through the state's governor, a step Trump skipped.
"Purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," Gavin Newsom said of the deployment.
Past Precedents
In 1957, US President Dwight Eisenhower sent federal troops to enforce school desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas.
In 1992, President George W Bush invoked the Insurrection Act during the Los Angeles riots following the Rodney King verdict.
More recently, in 2020, Trump, in his first term, requested National Guard units from various states to respond to protests in Washington, DC, after the killing of George Floyd.
What sets the current situation in Los Angeles apart is the deployment of troops over the objection of the state's governor, a legally murky and highly unusual move.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
If It Happened There: Donald Trump sends central troops to quell protests in opposition-ruled California
Protesters confront police on the 101 Freeway near the Metropolitan Detention Center of downtown Los Angeles, Sunday, June 8, 2025, following last night's immigration raid protest. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong) Note: The following piece is inspired by Joshua Keating's If It Happened There which uses tropes and tones normally used by American media to describe events in other countries. The facts presented deal with as much exactitude and accuracy as an American media outlets' reporting about a foreign country. Los Angeles, Mexican for the city of angels, is home to Hollywood – America's answer to Bollywood – and a city where starstruck aspirants come with the dream of being immortalised on the silver screen. Yet, the city, which falls under America-administered California, an opposition state which overwhelmingly voted for Mr Donald Trump 's rival from the Democratic Party, Ms Kamala Harris, soon came to resemble a warzone. Mr Trump – known for strongman-like tendencies like Mr Putin and Mr Jinping – sent in over 2,000 National Guard troops, dressed like Stormtroopers, to quell a popular uprising sparked by workplace raids on labourers who Mr Trump's officials claim are 'illegals' working in America without papers. It was, as one expert put it, a prime example of authoritarian overreach that has become a feature of American autocracy since Mr Trump's white nationalist Republican Party came to power in the last election. The flashpoint began in LA's Fashion District, where federal immigration agents—known locally as ICE—raided a garment factory, with similar operations in numerous surrounding areas. The raid at a Home Depot – a retail franchise with numerous outlets across the country – saw violent clashes between protesters, including unionists and local residents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Among the arrested was Mr David Huerta, a unionist, who eyewitnesses say was zip-tied and dragged away near the Metropolitan Detention Centre – which has overnight come to resemble a heavily guarded fortress. The situation grew increasingly volatile, coming to resemble a modern-day version of A Song of Ice and Fire – a popular series of books – which inspired the incest-drama Game of Thrones. Driverless Waymo cars – a company owned by Google, often accused of monopolising the internet to further America's imperial power – were set ablaze in a powerful demonstration of the working-class revolution against Silicon Valley's technocratic regime. While California's duly elected leaders – progressive Democrat Governor Mr Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Ms Karen Bass – objected, 2,000 National Guard troops hit hotspots near downtown Los Angeles. Local protest organisers – many embedded with immigrant rights groups – were illegally dragged away. Teenagers and older women with placards were violently attacked as federal officials justified the harsh measures, claiming they were 'suspected participants.' A Distraction? Some commentators even wondered if Mr Trump's heavy-handed action might be a ruse to distract from his recent feud with Mr Elon Musk, a technocrat and the world's richest man who funded Mr Trump's return to the White House with both his personal wealth and by buying the social media platform named X – formerly known as Twitter – to help spread canards that could return Mr Trump to the White House. Mr Trump, also a former avid user of Twitter who was banned from the platform earlier and opened his own rival Truth Social, had a spat with Mr Musk over a finance bill that the American President likes to call the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' and which Mr Musk called fiscal suicide. The fallout included a physical altercation with Mr Trump's tariff honcho, Mr Scott Bessent, whose attempt at a parliamentary rebuttal ostensibly left Mr Musk with a black eye. Mr Musk – known for using powerful drugs like ketamine – retaliated by calling Mr Trump some unprintable names and even claiming that the American President's name was present in the Epstein Files. The Epstein Files, incidentally, refer to a litany of famous celebrities – from both sides of the political aisle, including Republicans and Democrats – who visited Mr Epstein's island where they allegedly participated in peccadilloes involving underage individuals without their consent. Protesters take cover behind chairs near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles, Sunday, June 8, 2025, following last night's immigration raid protest. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer) Mr Musk – who until recently ran a government department that looked at cutting fiscal waste – is the first member of Mr Trump's new team to have a public falling out. Unlike the last administration, where many members including the then Vice President Mr Mike Pence stood up to Mr Trump, the new cabinet is full of individuals whose first claim to fame is complete fealty to Mr Trump. This includes Ms Kristi Noem, the head of Homeland Security, Ms Linda McMahon, the Secretary of Education, former Fox News host Mr Pete Hegseth who is now the Secretary of Defence, and the current Vice President, Mr JD Vance, who once called Mr Trump 'cultural heroin' and compared him to Adolf Hitler. In his second term, Mr Trump has eschewed any pretence of adhering to the US Constitution, whether its quelling dissent in institutes of higher education, illegally deporting American citizens, or accepting expensive gifts from foreign nations. Mr Trump's actions might not just affect residents of America-administered California or even just Americans, given the country's overstated power over the rest of the world. The new regime under Mr Trump has taken sweeping decisions to target its own population, deport legal citizens, silence dissent, and punish anyone perceived to be disloyal, while the courts – once heralded as the guardians of the Constitution – mutely watch on. Questions must be raised as to whether a country like the United States of America is a fit choice for global events, like the next football World Cup – set to be held in 2026 – when it can't even adhere to the basic norms that citizens of democracies take for granted.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk vs Donald Trump: Tesla CEO's father reveals reason behind public feud, predicts how it would end
Donald Trump versus Elon Musk feud has hogged all the limelight. The US President and Tesla chief have at loggerheads since the last week. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs The dispute between Donald Trump and Elon Musk was triggered by months of intense stress on both sides, and the public battle between the U.S. president and the billionaire donor needs to stop, Tesla boss' father Errol Musk said on Monday. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination", as per a whether he thought his son had made a mistake by engaging in a public clash with the president, Errol Musk said people were sometimes unable to think as clearly as they should "in the heat of the moment", Reuters reported."They've had five months of intense stress," Musk told Reuters at a conference in Moscow organised by conservative Russian tycoons."With all the opposition cleared and two people left in the arena, all they have ever done is get rid of everything and now they are trying to get rid of each other - well that has to stop."Asked how it would end, he said: "Oh, it will end on a good note - very soon."Neither the White House nor Musk could be reached for comment outside normal U.S. business hours. Trump said on Saturday his relationship with Musk was over and that there would be "serious consequences" if the world's richest man decided to fund U.S. Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash father told reporters he was standing by his son."Elon is sticking to his principles but you cannot always stick to your principles in the real world," Musk's father said. "Sometimes you have to give and take."Speaking beside sanctioned Russian businessman Konstantin Malofeyev, Musk's father praised President Vladimir Putin as a "very stable and pleasant man." He accused "fake media" in the West of projecting "complete nonsense" about Russia and for casting it as an enemy.A1. President of Russia is Vladimir Putin.A2. Elon Musk's father is Errol Musk.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's ICE war spills onto streets: Where's the US headed?
The Los Angeles riots might remind some people of the movie 'Civil War', released last year, which portrayed a near-future America descending into chaos as political divisions erupt into violent conflict. In both the film and the current real-world unrest, Los Angeles becomes a central battleground, symbolizing the breakdown of national unity and the erosion of institutional authority, albeit the current LA riots are more public disorder than a civil war. Just as the movie imagined journalists navigating a fractured, war-torn country with clashing factions and crumbling norms, today's scenes of ICE raids, violent protests and open defiance by state leaders of federal authority evoke the possibility that America's divisions may no longer be merely political but becoming existential. On Sunday, California National Guard troops were deployed in LA to help contain a third consecutive day of protests. These demonstrations, sparked by the Trump administration's intensification of immigration enforcement actions, have turned violent in parts of the city. As federal agents with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducted high-profile raids, protesters, many of them illegal immigrants, took to the streets in resistance. What began as demonstrations quickly escalated into confrontations with law enforcement, property damage and street blockades. In response, President Donald Trump defended the federal crackdown and warned he might invoke the Insurrection Act , a rarely used 1807 statute that permits the president to deploy active-duty military forces within US borders in times of rebellion or unrest. Meanwhile, California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom called the National Guard deployment 'unlawful,' highlighting the widening rift between state and federal authority, particularly in Democratic-led states. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The 15 Most Beautiful Beaches On Earth Kingdom Of Men Learn More Undo A nation divided over illegal immigrants At the heart of this confrontation lies a deep and enduring ideological divide over immigration. For Trump and his supporters, enforcing immigration law, particularly through aggressive ICE raids, represents a non-negotiable commitment to national sovereignty and public safety. The Trump administration has long argued that failure to enforce immigration laws undermines the rule of law, burdens public resources and jeopardizes national security . The recent crackdown, Trump claims, is a necessary escalation to restore order and signal the administration's seriousness about deporting those in the country illegally. Yet to Trump's critics, chiefly Democratic leaders and immigrant rights groups, the tactics are viewed as not just heavy-handed but morally wrong. Many argue that these policies target vulnerable families, disrupt communities, and fan the flames of xenophobia. Cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco have declared themselves " sanctuary cities ", where local officials refuse to fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities, setting up legal and ethical clashes over jurisdiction and responsibility. Live Events The protests, though initially peaceful, have increasingly featured militant rhetoric and violent outbursts, which Republican leaders cite as evidence of lawlessness and the failure of progressive leadership. Democratic leaders, in contrast, view the federal response as an authoritarian overreach. A crisis in the making What makes the current situation particularly volatile is that it sits at the intersection of legal, political and social turmoil. The use of the Insurrection Act is exceedingly rare, historically reserved for exceptional breakdowns in civil order (such as the 1992 Los Angeles riots). If invoked now, it would mark one of the most dramatic assertions of federal power in modern American history. This raises profound questions: Can the president override the will of state governors under the pretext of enforcing immigration law? What are the limits of state resistance in a federalist system? And how far are protesters, and their political defenders, willing to go to oppose ICE operations? Already, there are indications that this conflict could spread to other cities. Sanctuary cities across the US, from Chicago to New York to Seattle, may become flashpoints if ICE expands its efforts. Mass protests, street violence and counter-protests could spiral into wider unrest. If National Guard deployments become more common and federal troops are introduced under the Insurrection Act, America could face a level of domestic militarization not seen since the civil rights era. Immigration is no longer a policy issue. It has become an existential question about what kind of country the US wants to be. For those on the right, this is a battle for national security and integrity of the country. For those on the left, it is a fight for human rights and a more inclusive society. The perception that one party is enabling lawlessness while the other is enabling authoritarianism leaves little room for compromise. In the given situation, America might be heading into a future where lines could blur between legal protest, civil disobedience and outright rebellion The Trump administration's doubling down on immigration enforcement is one of the key promises Trump had made to his base, but violent resistance to federal agencies can light a fuse in several cities. Democratic leaders' refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities may earn praise from progressives, but it also challenges federal supremacy in matters of immigration and law enforcement. If neither side backs down, the result could be a season of violent protest, federal-state standoffs, and courtroom battles that test the limits of the constitution. The consequences of such a showdown will shape the upcoming midterm election.
