US National Guard Deployed In Los Angeles: What Threats Do They Counter
What started as simmering outrage over federal immigration raids turned into a full-blown standoff in Los Angeles on Sunday. On its third day, the protests spiralled into chaos, self-driving cars were set on fire, a major freeway was shut down, and over 120 people were arrested.
Police responded with tear gas and rubber bullets as tensions ran high. Then came the flashpoint: US President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the city despite the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom.
What Is The US National Guard?
The US National Guard is a part-time military force that serves both state and federal governments. Each state has its own Guard units, which can be activated by the governor for local emergencies, like wildfires, floods, or protests, or by the President for national missions, including overseas deployments or domestic unrest.
The Guard is made up of two branches: the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard, totalling over 430,000 personnel. It operates under two legal frameworks, Title 32, where the governor is in charge (often for disaster response), and Title 10, where the President takes command (for federal missions).
Why Are National Guard Troops In Los Angeles?
Trump deployed the National Guards in direct response to widespread protests following a series of controversial ICE raids across Los Angeles. Immigration enforcement officers targeted workplaces such as Home Depots, a doughnut shop, and a warehouse.
Trump justified the troop deployment as necessary to "address the lawlessness" in California. By federalising the National Guard under Title 10, he placed them under his command, bypassing Governor Newsom, who normally controls the state's Guard.
"We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden," Trump said Sunday.
What Threats Are They Responding To?
The National Guard is not directly engaging in law enforcement. Their said role is to protect ICE officers and guard federal facilities, including a downtown detention centre where some detained immigrants were taken.
Protesters reportedly hurled rocks and concrete at federal agents, damaged property, including setting self-driving cars on fire, and clashed with police, prompting officers to use tear gas, rubber bullets, and flash bangs to control the crowds. Authorities have warned of growing public safety threats, describing the protests as being driven by "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and even suggesting possible cartel involvement. To prevent further unrest, Guard troops are now stationed outside key federal buildings, especially ICE facilities, to protect them from damage and block protesters from breaching federal grounds.
"There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves," wrote Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck.
What Is The Legal Basis?
The Insurrection Act, an 18th-century law, allows US presidents to use military force during rebellion or unrest, but Trump hasn't invoked it.
Instead, he relied on another statute that allows the president to federalise National Guard troops in emergencies. This places them under federal command, though the law says such orders should go through the state's governor, a step Trump skipped.
"Purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," Gavin Newsom said of the deployment.
Past Precedents
In 1957, US President Dwight Eisenhower sent federal troops to enforce school desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas.
In 1992, President George W Bush invoked the Insurrection Act during the Los Angeles riots following the Rodney King verdict.
More recently, in 2020, Trump, in his first term, requested National Guard units from various states to respond to protests in Washington, DC, after the killing of George Floyd.
What sets the current situation in Los Angeles apart is the deployment of troops over the objection of the state's governor, a legally murky and highly unusual move.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
‘Deal With China Done': Donald Trump Says Beijing Will Supply Rare Earths To US
Last Updated: Trump announces Beijing will supply rare earths and magnets under new US-China deal, agreement includes Chinese students returning to US universities. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that a new trade agreement with China is finalised, awaiting final approval from Chinese President Xi Jinping. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the agreement includes the complete supply of rare earth materials and magnets from China. The export of rare earths was a central issue in negotiations in London, according to several news outlets. Trump added that the US would, in return, permit Chinese students access to American universities, a provision he said was he was 'always good with". He also claimed the US is levying a total of 55% tariffs while China receives only 10%, although no official documentation of the deal has been released. 'The relationship is excellent," Trump wrote in capitals, characterising the agreement as mutually beneficial. 'WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%. RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!" Ensuring access to the vital elements had become a top priority for US officials in talks with Chinese counterparts, when the two sides met last week in London. 'The rare earth issue has clearly… overpowered the other parts of the trade negotiations because of stoppages at plants in the United States," said Paul Triolo, a technology expert at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis, in an online seminar on Monday. Triolo told news agency AFP that the disruption, which forced US car giant Ford to temporarily halt production of its Explorer SUV, 'really got the attention of the White House". What Are Rare Earths and Where Are They Found? Rare earths are a group of 17 metals used in everything from smartphones and electric vehicles to military equipment and wind turbines. While not actually rare, they are hard to mine and refine. China dominates the global supply, producing most of the world's rare earths and controlling nearly all of the processing. Other sources include the US, Australia, Myanmar, and India, but most still depend on China for refining. 'The Middle East has oil. China has rare earths," Deng Xiaoping, the late Chinese leader whose pro-market reforms set the country on its path to becoming an economic powerhouse, said in 1992. Since then, Beijing's heavy investment in state-owned mining firms and lax environmental regulations compared to other industry players have turned China into the world's top supplier. The country now accounts for 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency. Why the Global Rush? Rare earths are essential to modern tech and defence systems. As demand grows, countries are racing to secure their own supplies. China's dominance has made rare earths a geopolitical tool, pushing the US and others to diversify and reduce dependence. The flow of rare earths from China to manufacturers around the world has slowed after Beijing in early April began requiring domestic exporters to apply for a licence, widely seen as a response to US tariffs. Under the new requirements — which industry groups have said are complex and slow-moving — seven key elements and related magnets require Beijing's approval to be shipped to foreign buyers. The slowdown in licence approvals has raised concerns that more carmakers could be forced to pause production as they wait for shipments. China's commerce ministry said over the weekend that it had approved some export requests, describing itself as a 'responsible major country". It added that it was open to more dialogue with 'relevant countries". But the export bottleneck has underscored how heavily Washington still depends on Chinese rare earths to build defence equipment, even as tensions rise on both trade and security fronts. top videos View all A recent analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies pointed out that a single F-35 fighter jet uses more than 400 kilograms of rare earth elements. (with additional inputs from AFP) tags : donald trump us china trade relations Xi Jinping Location : Washington D.C., United States of America (USA) First Published: June 11, 2025, 17:58 IST News business 'Deal With China Done': Donald Trump Says Beijing Will Supply Rare Earths To US
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
US-Russia ties: Kremlin says 'quick results' to improve relations unlikely; talks set to continue
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin (AP) The Kremlin on Wednesday said that efforts to improve Russia-US relations are unlikely to yield 'quick results', despite a series of calls between presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin . Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters, "There are many obstacles in bilateral relations, and it is unlikely that we can hope for any quick results." Apart from phone calls, Putin has met with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff several times in Moscow, and top diplomats have held talks in Saudi Arabia. Lower-level delegations have also held talks in Istanbul to discuss enhancing the operations of their respective embassies. Talks are set to continue in Moscow and Washington, said Russia's ambassador to the US, as reported by the news agency TASS. Trump has unsettled Europe by seeking closer ties with Moscow, a sharp shift from Washington's effort to isolate Putin for the past three years. Meanwhile, US secretary of defence Pete Hegseth has stated before a congressional subcommittee that the US is set to reduce its military aid to Ukraine. Trump has voiced his inclination to bring an end to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and has urged the warring countries to strike a peace deal. In the latest offensive, Russian strikes have killed three people and wounded 60 others in Ukraine's northeastern city of Kharkiv. Russia has rejected calls for an unconditional ceasefire and has insisted that Ukraine surrender large areas of territory and forego its efforts to join Nato.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why for-profit colleges are poised to flourish under Trump's education policies
How new federal rules could boost for-profit colleges despite quality concerns. (AI Image) President Donald Trump's recent proposal to redirect federal funding from elite universities like Harvard to trade schools signals a significant shift in the US higher education landscape. While Trump lacks the direct authority to reroute the $3 billion in research grants appropriated by Congress, his push aligns with a broader Republican agenda aimed at boosting for-profit colleges and career training programs. These institutions, which have faced controversy and regulatory scrutiny in the past, now appear set for a resurgence under Trump's policies and a supportive Republican Congress. Trump's administration is advancing legislation and regulatory changes that benefit for-profit colleges, particularly through new workforce Pell grants and relaxed accreditation standards. These shifts could open federal aid to a wider range of short-term training programs, many operated by for-profit entities, despite ongoing concerns about educational quality and student outcomes. Federal policies open doors for for-profit education The House-passed tax and budget bill, formally known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, introduces new workforce Pell grants available to students enrolled in eight to fifteen-week workforce training programs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2 BHKs starts at ₹ 72.6 Lakh | No Floor rise | Zero PLC Mahindra Happinest Tathawade Get Quote Undo While programs must be state-approved, they do not need to be accredited, a major departure from previous requirements. As reported by the Forbes, this change lowers the regulatory barrier for many for-profit institutions to access federal funds. Michelle Dimino, director of the education program at Third Way, told Forbes that the bill's quality assurance measures are weak. Eligible programs must meet a 70% completion rate and a 70% job placement rate, thresholds she describes as easily manipulated by predatory schools. "Sometimes colleges might look for students who are already employed right as a target audience because they know that they'll do good on a job placement measure," she said. Furthermore, Trump plans to overhaul the accreditation process, making it easier for for-profit schools to qualify for federal aid. Nicholas Kent, Trump's nominee for undersecretary of education and a former lobbyist for Career Education Colleges and Universities (CECU), reflects the administration's sympathetic stance toward the industry. His nomination, as reported by the Forbes, awaits a Senate floor vote after passing the committee on a party-line vote. Investors rally behind for-profit colleges The financial markets have responded positively to the Trump administration's pro-for-profit stance. According to Jeffrey Silber, a senior analyst at BMO Capital Markets Equity Research, stocks in the sector surged after Trump's election. Adtalem Global Education's shares rose 61%, while Perdoceo Education Corporation saw a 46% increase, with notable jumps occurring immediately after the election, as quoted by the Forbes. CECU praised Trump's focus on career education and his suggestion to divert Harvard's funding to trade schools. "The best way to support trade schools is to reduce the regulatory burden facing private career schools while increasing funding that allows students interested in the trades to choose the highest quality school," the association stated, according to the Forbes. Concerns over quality and student outcomes Despite these policy shifts, experts warn about the risks of expanding federal aid to for-profit colleges without sufficient oversight. Michael Itzkowitz, founder of The HEA Group, highlighted troubling data showing 59% of certificate-granting institutions leave graduates earning less than $32,000 annually—roughly the income of a typical high school graduate—even ten years after enrollment, as reported by the Forbes. The rollback of key regulations, including the gainful employment rule and the 90/10 rule, both designed to protect students from poor-performing programs, further exacerbates these concerns. The House bill would also limit borrower defense protections that allow students defrauded by schools to cancel loans, a safeguard introduced during the Obama administration after the collapse of Corinthian Colleges. Dimino warned Forbes that expanding access without proper safeguards could invite abuses seen in the past. "Every time for-profit colleges have been given access to more federal aid, abuses have followed," she said. As the US faces economic uncertainty, Silber noted that for-profit colleges may be seen as a "defensive" investment, potentially attracting more students seeking quick retraining, even as the broader economy fluctuates. In summary, the combination of relaxed regulations, new funding streams, and a politically favorable environment positions for-profit colleges to expand rapidly under President Trump's education policies. However, this growth comes amid persistent concerns about educational quality and financial risks for students. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
