Flagship welfare reform plans to be introduced in Parliament
The Welfare Reform Bill will be introduced in the House of Commons, and its text will be published so MPs can begin scrutiny of the proposals.
The major reforms are set to include the tightening of criteria for the main disability benefit in England, personal independence payment (Pip).
I'll vote against these awful welfare reforms.
A Labour government should lift people out of poverty, not put people into it.
If you agree, then please write to your MP and tell them that. pic.twitter.com/9hvZfe9Cpf
— Brian Leishman (@BrianLeishmanMP) June 17, 2025
Ministers also want to cut the sickness related element of universal credit (UC), and delay access to it, so only those aged 22 and over can claim it.
The package of reforms is aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work, and the Government hopes it can save up to £5 billion a year by doing so.
But ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'.
The Bill is set to be introduced as the latest benefits data has shown that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion.
The latest data, published by the Department for Work and Pensions on Tuesday, showed there were a record 3.74 million people in England and Wales claiming Pip as of April this year.
The figure is up from 3.69 million in January and a jump of 200,000 from 3.54 million a year earlier.
Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million.
Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition.
Teenagers and young adults account for a growing proportion of those getting Pip.
Some 16.5% of claimants in April this year were aged 16-19, up from 14.6% in April 2019.
The 30-44 age group has similarly grown, while the number of 45-59 year-olds has fallen.
The figure for 60-74 year-olds has risen slightly over this period, from 29.3% to 30.8%.
It was reported in recent days that Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has agreed to include 'non-negotiable' protections in the Bill, including a guarantee that those who no longer qualify for Pip will still receive the payments for 13 weeks, rather than just four weeks.
The concession is seen as a move to avert a rebellion by Labour MPs opposed to the overall reforms, but have been described as 'not very much really' by one such parliamentarian.
Downing Street insisted it was 'crucial to say we are committed to the reforms that we've set out'.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'You've heard that from the Prime Minister, the Chancellor, the Work and Pensions Secretary, on the principles behind this and the urgent need for this.
'You have the statistics, they show we have the highest level of working age inactivity due to ill health in Western Europe.
'We're the only major economy whose employment rate hasn't recovered since the pandemic.'
Pip will remain 'an important non-means-tested benefit for disabled people and people with long-term health conditions, regardless of whether they are in or out of work', he said, but added the Government would build a 'system that is fairer' through its reforms.
It is thought the restrictions on Pip would slash benefits for about 800,000 people.
Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Starmer to delay HS2 after ‘litany of failure' under Tories
Sir Keir Starmer will delay the opening of HS2 as costs soar and a damning report exposes the 'litany of failure' behind the rail line. The prime minister's transport secretary will announce on Wednesday that the remaining London to Birmingham stretch of the high speed rail project will be delayed beyond its target opening date of 2033. A source told The Independent 'the original target can't be hit'. Heidi Alexander will lay out how the Tories saw the cost of HS2 soar by £37bn between its approval in 2012 and last year's general election. And she will vow that those who may have taken advantage of taxpayers by charging inflated prices will face consequences for doing so. Ms Alexander will tell the Commons she is drawing a 'line in the sand' over the beleaguered rail project, as the government attempts to reset how major infrastructure is delivered. Ministers plan to learn from the mistakes of HS2 so that they do a better job when it comes to projects like Northern Powerhouse Rail and the Lower Thames Crossing, it is understood. 'HS2 has made Britain a laughing stock in terms of its ability to deliver big infrastructure projects, and it has to end. This will set out the way we will do that,' a government source said. The result of two reviews into HS2 are expected to be announced alongside the Transport Secretary's statement. The first of these is an interim report by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2, who was appointed late last year. He will assess the construction of the project's first phase from London to Birmingham. A second, wider review into the governance and accountability of HS2, led by James Stewart, will also report back. This is expected to set out what has gone wrong with the project, and what ministers can learn for future infrastructure projects. Tony Berkeley branded HS2 "chaos" as he insisted it should be stopped. The Labour peer, who served as deputy chairman of a government review into HS2, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "It's chaos, and we haven't been told anything about it. "Rishi Sunak, after all, cancelled it 18 months ago. That was the previous government but everybody in HS2 seems to have ignored it and the government's ignored it by continuing to pour money down it when they should have stopped 18 months ago and they should still stop today. "They've wasted billions already. "I think that the first thing to do is to stop digging when you don't know what you're doing and where it's going to end up, and I would put HS2 into administration. Let the administrators sort it out and then take a clear, simple look at what they want to achieve and get it done in a much more cost effective way." Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is set to tell the Commons on Wednesday that she is drawing a "line in the sand" over the beleaguered rail project. As she addresses MPs, the transport secretary is expected to address allegations of fraud by contractors to HS2 which have emerged recently. Earlier this week, it emerged HS2 Ltd reported a sub-contractor working on the rail line to HMRC following an internal probe. During the statement, Ms Alexander is also set to announce a new chair of HS2. The current chair, Sir Jon Thompson, previously announced he would stand down in the spring of this year. His replacement will be Mike Brown, according to The Daily Telegraph newspaper. Mr Brown is the former commissioner for Transport for London, who helped to oversee the deliver of Crossrail, the transport project which became London's Elizabeth Line. HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then onto Manchester and Leeds, but the second phase of project was scrapped by Rishi Sunak's Conservatives due to spiralling costs, a decision first revealed by The Independent in September 2023. Concerns about the costs of the stunted project have persisted, with £100 million spent on a bat tunnel aimed at mitigating the railway's environmental impact singled out by Sir Keir for criticism.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
MSPs pass bill giving Gaelic and Scots official status in Scotland
MSPs have passed a Bill which gives the Gaelic and Scots languages official status in Scotland. The Scottish Parliament voted unanimously in favour of the Scottish Languages Bill, which also makes changes to the support of Gaelic and Scots education, on Tuesday. Ministers say they are 'confident' the Bill will accelerate the growth of both languages, but Labour say it will do 'nowhere near enough'. Provisions included in the Bill involve the establishment of areas of linguistic significance in Gaelic communities, allowing ministers to focus grant funding in areas where the language is most fragile. READ MORE: Scotland must 'go beyond mitigating Westminster' with minimum income guarantee Ahead of the Stage 3 debate, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'I am confident that this Bill will accelerate the growth of Gaelic and Scots by establishing both languages as official'. She said it would also 'strengthen the rights of parents to ask for a Gaelic school to be established in their area' as well as introduce targets for people speaking Gaelic and qualifications in the language. Forbes said: 'To support the growth of Scotland's indigenous languages, we are also providing an additional £5.7 million to promote Scots and Gaelic this year.' (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) Labour's finance spokesperson Michael Marra said: 'This bill does nowhere near enough to protect the Gaelic language. 'Scottish Labour amendments will strengthen the legislation, but still the best that can be said is that this bill will do no harm. 'Without economic development in the heartlands, we know that the prospects for Scotland's ancient language are bleak. 'In the face of a Gaelic crisis, the SNP chose to bring a bill of limited scope that will, at best, make modest improvements.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
How your MP voted in historic abortion amendment as law change backed
MPs voted by a majority of 379 to 137 to back a call by Labour backbencher Tonia Antoniazzi which ensures women will not be prosecuted for ending their own pregnancies MPs last night backed a historic amendment that will decriminalise women who end their own pregnancies. Politicians from all parties were given a free vote - meaning they were not bound to follow party lines. Legislation put forward by Labour backbencher Tonia Antoniazzi was backed by a majority by 379 votes to 137. Ms Antoniazzi said every prosecution of women is a "travesty". It is the biggest shake-up of women's reproductive rights in six decades. The result was hailed as a "landmark" by backers, but critics branded the change in the law "dangerous". Several Labour frontbenchers, including Ed Miliband, Liz Kendall, John Healey and Pat McFadden voted for the change. Conservative shadow eduction secretary Laura Trott also voted in favour, but the majority of her colleagues, including Kemi Badenoch, were against. See our tool below to find out how your MP voted. But critics including Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voiced their opposition to the change. At the moment abortion is allowed up to 24 weeks, although there are exceptions if a woman's life is in danger. Home medication is permitted up to 10 weeks. In the past three years, six women have appeared in court in England charged with ending or attempting to end their pregnancy illegally. Ms Antoniazzi told the Commons that women should never be prosecuted. She said her amendment to the Government's Crime and Policing Bill was a "once in a generation" chance to change the law. Under Ms Antoniazzi's amendment, a woman would not be prosecuted in relation to her own body, but others including medics and coercive partners could be. A separate amendment was put forward by fellow Labour backbencher Stella Creasy, which would offer legal protection to all involved. No vote was held on Ms Creasy's amendment. Ms Antoniazzi told the Commons: "This is urgent. We know multiple women are still in a system awaiting a decision, accused of breaking this law. They cannot afford to wait." Earlier this year Nicola Packer, 45, was acquitted after being tried for taking abortion medicine at home during the Covid pandemic when she was around 26 weeks pregnant. She told jurors she did not realise she was as far through her pregnancy as she was. Ms Antoniazzi said her amendment would result in "removing the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment" of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She added: "Originally passed by an all-male parliament elected by men alone, this Victorian law is increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls." Do you think abortion should be decriminalised? Take our poll below. If you can't see it, click here But Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, who said she believes safe and legal abortions are part of female healthcare, earlier branded the amendments "unnecessary" and "dangerous". Ms Mahmood, who will not be present for Tuesday's vote due to being away on Government business, said in a letter to constituents: "It is hard to see these measures as anything other than extreme." She continued: "I oppose extending abortions up until the point of birth beyond the exemptions that currently exist, as doing so would not only be unnecessary but dangerous. "I am deeply concerned to see these measures being progressed in the name of women's rights, when the potential physical and mental impacts on women would be so devastating." According to latest data, there were 252,122 abortions reported in England and Wales in 2022, the highest figure on record. MPs were given a free vote - meaning they were not required to vote along party lines. Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones told MPs the Government is neutral. She said: "If the will of Parliament is that the law in England and Wales should change, then the Government would not stand in the way of such change but would seek to ensure that the law is workable and enforced in the way that Parliament intended." The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) said the vote is a "landmark moment for women's rights". Chief executive Heidi Stewart said: "This is a landmark moment for women's rights in this country and the most significant change to our abortion law since the 1967 Abortion Act was passed. "There will be no more women investigated after enduring a miscarriage, no more women dragged from their hospital beds to the back of a police van, no more women separated from their children because of our archaic abortion law. "This is a hard won victory, and we thank all those who have campaigned alongside us, and in particular those women, like Nicola Packer, who have spoken out about their traumatic experiences in the hope of achieving the change parliament has delivered today."
