logo
How selfie seekers are contributing to the rise in shark attacks

How selfie seekers are contributing to the rise in shark attacks

Time of India27-04-2025

Image source: Alamy
The pursuit of the perfect selfie has evolved beyond a harmless hobby and is now a dangerous trend in the oceans. Scientists are warning that the rising number of
shark attacks
can be attributed to tourists and influencers eager to capture close-up moments with these powerful predators. These reckless encounters, often driven by the desire to photograph or film, are leading to risky situations. A growing number of shark attacks are actually defensive responses by sharks, triggered by human behavior such as poking, prodding, or trying to photograph them. As the
selfie craze
intensifies, scientists urge people to reconsider the risks and treat these apex predators with the caution they require.
How is the selfie craze leading to more shark attacks
A new study published in Frontiers in Conservation reveals that many shark bites previously labelled as "attacks" are actually defensive reactions. Sharks are typically non-aggressive toward humans. They respond instinctively when they feel threatened, often after being poked, prodded, or grabbed by individuals trying to take photos or videos.
Social media's role in fueling risky behaviour around sharks
"People are treating sharks without any caution, in ways they would never treat a strange dog," says Professor Eric Clua of Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) University, the study's lead author. "Many influencers encourage clinging to a shark's dorsal fin or stroking them under the false idea that they are harmless. But this behaviour provokes the animal's survival instincts."
Image source: Alamy
What does the study reveals
The study examined shark encounters in French Polynesia from 2009 to 2023. Out of 74 recorded bites, about 5% were found to be defensive, occurring immediately after humans behaved aggressively or intrusively toward the shark. Most incidents involved smaller species like grey reef sharks, lemon sharks, blacktip reef sharks, and nurse sharks.
What role are influencers playing in shark-human conflicts
This trend is fueled by viral social media content, where influencers and even celebrities showcase themselves swimming beside or touching sharks. Wildlife photographer Taylor Cunningham, for example, shared videos of herself touching tiger sharks, calling them "like family." Meanwhile, marine biologist Ocean Ramsey sparked controversy after being filmed swimming alongside and stroking a giant great white shark, Deep Blue.
Recent examples of shark bites
These seemingly awe-inspiring moments come with real consequences. Recently, a Canadian tourist lost both her hands and part of her thigh while trying to photograph a shark in the Turks and Caicos Islands. In another tragic case, Barak Tzach, a father of four, was killed by sharks while attempting to film them off the coast of Israel.
Misconceptions about sharks vs. the reality of their behaviour
Experts emphasise that shark bites are extremely rare compared to other risks — sharks are responsible for fewer than 10 deaths a year globally, while dogs cause over 10,000 fatalities annually. Yet sharks suffer from a strong negative public image, leading to fear and misunderstanding.
"Enjoy the beauty of sharks, but remember: they are wild predators," warns Professor Clua. "Look, don't touch."
What can be done to prevent future shark bites
The message is clear. As the obsession with capturing sensational content grows, so does the risk, not just to humans, but to the sharks themselves. Scientists hope that by highlighting the real causes behind many of these incidents, people will rethink their approach to interacting with wildlife.
In the end, the best selfie might be the one taken from a safe distance, respecting the majestic creatures we are so eager to capture.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scientists discover 34 million year old hidden river world buried under 2 km of Antarctic ice
Scientists discover 34 million year old hidden river world buried under 2 km of Antarctic ice

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

Scientists discover 34 million year old hidden river world buried under 2 km of Antarctic ice

The North and South poles remain hidden beneath the thick icy cover of snow year-round, and as a result, most parts of the poles remain largely unexplored by humankind, concealing numerous secrets underneath. Beneath the thick ice of East Antarctica lies a hidden world, untouched for over 34 million years. This frozen expanse, more than 10 million square kilometers wide, has long concealed a forgotten landscape. The way leading to the secrets of the hidden landscape A team led by Stewart Jamieson at Durham University made this discovery with help from RADARSAT, a Canadian satellite system. The technology allowed them to detect small changes in the ice surface, revealing the shape of the land buried below. What found something as extraordinary as an ancient river-carved terrain, that was about the size of Wales, locked under nearly two kilometers of ice. 'It's like uncovering a time capsule,' Jamieson said as reported by the Brighter Side news. The untouched condition of the landscape might be due to its extreme age. Preserved beneath the ice sheet's crushing weight, the land remained unchanged since long before glaciation began. This hidden world dates back to a period when Antarctica was not the icy desert we know today. Back then, the continent was part of Gondwana, a supercontinent shared with Africa, South America, and Australia. Instead of ice, Antarctica had flowing rivers, forests, and roaming dinosaurs. That changed about 20 million years ago when glaciers took over, freezing the region's history beneath a growing sheet of ice. How did Antarctica go from Gondwana to Glaciation? The East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) began forming during the Eocene-Oligocene transition around 34 million years ago, as global temperatures plummeted and CO2 levels dropped below a critical threshold. High-altitude regions such as the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains and Transantarctic Mountains became nuclei for the growing ice masses. Over millions of years, these glaciers expanded, eventually combining into the massive ice sheet that persists today. The EAIS has undergone significant fluctuations throughout its history. During the Miocene period, approximately 17 to 14 million years ago, the ice sheet expanded and retreated in response to climatic shifts. Evidence from marine sediments suggests periods of retreat during warmer intervals, such as the mid-Pliocene warm period and the interglacial periods of the Pleistocene. These fluctuations left persistent imprints on the subglacial area, giving it the features that are now detectable through modern geophysical surveys. Technology tells us more Using the RADARSAT satellite system, scientists observed subtle changes in the slope of the ice's surface. These tiny clues helped reveal a massive, hidden terrain carved by rivers millions of years ago, long before the ice sheet even existed. To dig deeper, scientists used radio-echo sounding (RES) and computer models to study the land below. Their discoveries showed a landscape that didn't match modern ice flow patterns, proving it had formed long before glaciation. They even used flexural modeling to test whether ancient highlands were once part of one continuous landform, later broken up by natural erosion. But why does this matter today? Understanding this ancient environment helps scientists predict how the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) could behave in our warming world. Jamieson's team, whose study appeared in Nature Communications, talked about the importance of this work for climate science. 'Understanding how this massive sheet might respond to human-driven climate change is a pressing concern,' he said. This discovery also tells a bigger message that the Earth's past, present, and future are deeply connected. As noted in Scientific American, these buried landscapes are like time machines. By unlocking their secrets, we can better prepare for tomorrow's climate challenges, and possibly help protect the fragile ecosystems still clinging to life today.

A common supplement can remove toxic 'forever chemicals' from your body
A common supplement can remove toxic 'forever chemicals' from your body

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

A common supplement can remove toxic 'forever chemicals' from your body

Image credits: Getty Images It has been said for years that nature has a remedy for every problem out there. While we keep on expanding the horizons of medicine and technology, the field of nature has taken a step back, much to the disappointment of people who know that Mother Earth is the biggest magician and creator of all. A new study is now suggesting that the 'forever chemicals' that enter our body with water and food containing them, can be removed with a common dietary supplement. Oats the solution to PFAS ? Eating a fibre supplement derived from oats prior to every meal could help flush out the toxic forever chemicals from the body, as per the study. Per and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS commonly known as forever chemicals are used to make a variety of everyday use products such as non-stick cookware, cosmetics, stain-resistant fabrics, firefighting foams, food packaging and waterproof clothing. Previous studies have shown that beta-glucan fibre molecules found in oats, barley and rye can bind to PFAS in the digestive system. Now, the latest study published in Environmental Health has found that a dietary supplement that has beta-glucan fibre could significantly reduce PFAS levels in the body. The focused study Image credits: Getty Images Researchers recruited 72 Canadian men aged 18 to 65 with detectable levels of PFAS in their blood and fed 42 of them a diet supplement of 1gm of oat beta-glucan, a type of soluble gel-fibre, before every mealtime, which is when the body produces most bile. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Wrinkle Cream Keeps Selling Out At Costco (Find Out Why) The Skincare Magazine Undo The remaining 30 participants were fed a placebo made of rice. 'Serum samples were collected from 72 participants in 2019-2020 at baseline and after four weeks of the intervention and were analysed for 17 PFASs,' stated the study. After 4 weeks, researchers found a nearly 10% drop in two of the most dangerous PFAS types in people who consumed the oat fibre supplement. These two PFAS, namely PFOA and PFOS are present in drinking water, food packaging and cosmetics and can build up in the body over time. These remain in the environment for hundreds of years and are linked to health conditions such as decreased fertility, higher risk of some cancers and developmental delays in children. Scientists and researchers have been looking for ways to remove these from the body and the environment to degrade them into harmless compounds. 'Despite the growing concerns about the toxicity of PFAS, specific interventions to reduce PFAS levels in the body are limited,' the study notes. 'Current clinical treatments to reduce PFAS body burden are minimal.' More research is required Although the results from this study are modest, scientists claim the findings offer a first step to forming a dietary intervention for removing PFAS from the body. 'Results from this pilot analysis suggest a potentially practical and feasible intervention that may reduce human body burdens for some PFASs,' they said. 'However, studies utilising a larger sample with a broader range of serum concentrations, longer intervention period and clinically relevant fibre intakes are needed to determine the efficacy of using gel-forming dietary fibres to increase PFAS excretion,' they added. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change

Premature babies given sucrose for pain relief - but new research shows it doesn't stop long-term impacts on development
Premature babies given sucrose for pain relief - but new research shows it doesn't stop long-term impacts on development

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

Premature babies given sucrose for pain relief - but new research shows it doesn't stop long-term impacts on development

Auckland: Infants born very preterm spend weeks or even months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) while their immature brains are still developing. During this time, they receive up to 16 painful procedures every day. The most common is a routine heel prick used to collect a blood sample. Suctioning of the infant's airways is also common. While many of these procedures provide critical care, we know they are acutely painful. Even tearing tape off the skin can be painful. We also know, from decades of research, that preterm babies' exposure to daily painful invasive procedures is related to altered brain development, stress functioning and poorer cognitive and behavioural outcomes. The commonest strategy to manage acute pain in preterm babies is to give them sucrose, a sugar solution. But my recent research with Canadian colleagues shows this doesn't stop these long-term impacts. In New Zealand, there is no requirement to document all procedures or pain treatments. But as the findings from our Canadian study show, we urgently need research to improve long-term health outcomes for children born prematurely. Long-term effects of pain in early life We collected data on the number of procedures, clinical exposures and sucrose doses from three NICUs across Canada. One of these sites does not use sucrose for acute pain management. This meant we were able to compare outcomes for children who received sucrose during their NICU stay and those who did not, without having to randomly assign infants to different care as you would in a randomised controlled trial - the gold standard approach. At 18 months of age, when children born preterm are typically seen for a follow-up, parents report on their child's behaviour. Our findings replicate earlier research: very preterm babies who were exposed to painful procedures early in life showed more anxiety and depressive symptoms by toddlerhood. Our findings are similar regarding a child's cognition and language, backing results from other studies. We found no link between preterm babies' later behaviour and how much sucrose they were given to manage pain. Sucrose is thought to activate centres of the brain that modulate pain and lead to the release of endorphins, but the exact mechanism remains unclear. It has become the worldwide standard of care for acute neonatal pain, but it doesn't seem to be helping in the long term. Improving pain treatment About 1 in 13 babies are born preterm each year in Aotearoa New Zealand. Some 1-2% are very preterm, two to four months early. Māori and other ethnic minorities are at higher risk. Studies in New Zealand show children born very preterm have up to a three-fold risk of emotional disorders in preschool and by school age. This remains evident through adulthood. Sucrose may stop preterm babies from showing signs of pain, but physiological and neurological pain responses nevertheless happen. As is the case internationally, sucrose is used widely in New Zealand, but there is considerable variation in protocols of use across hospitals. No national guidelines for best practice exist. Infant pain should be assessed, but international data suggest this isn't always the case. What's more, pain isn't always managed. Routine assessment of pain and parent education videos are useful initiatives to encourage pain management. Minimising the number of procedures is recommended by international bodies. Advances in clinical care, including the use of less invasive ventilation support and the inclusion of parents in the daily care of their infant, have seen the number of procedures decrease. Pain management guidelines also help, but whether these changes improve outcomes in the long term, we don't know yet. We do know there are other ways of treating neonatal pain and minimising long-term impacts. Placing a newborn on a parent's bare chest, skin-to-skin, effectively reduces short and long-term effects of neonatal pain. For times when whānau are not able to be in the NICU, we have limited evidence that other pain management strategies , such as expressed breast milk, are effective. Our recent research cements this: sucrose isn't helping as we thought. Understanding which pain management strategies should be used for short and long-term benefits of this vulnerable population could make a big difference in the lives of these babies. This requires additional research and a different approach, while considering what is culturally acceptable in Aotearoa New Zealand. If the strategies we are currently using aren't working, we need to think creatively about how to limit the impact of pain on children born prematurely. (The Conversation)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store