Lebanese Foreign Ministry Issues 2nd Summons for Iranian Ambassador
Lebanon's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has set a new date for Iranian Ambassador Mojtaba Amani to appear after he declined an earlier summons over his controversial remarks criticizing discussions about disarming Hezbollah.
The ambassador had been scheduled to visit the ministry on Wednesday but apologized for not attending.
Foreign Minister Youssef Raji had initially summoned Amani to the ministry on Tuesday in protest over his recent statements. In Raji's absence abroad, the ambassador was expected to receive Lebanon's official position from the ministry's secretary general. However, Amani did not show up, later telling Lebanon's Al Jadeed TV that while he had received the summons, he had excused himself from attending and had yet to be informed of a new date.
He stressed that Iran 'respects whatever agreement the Lebanese people reach' regarding Hezbollah's weapons, asserting that Tehran does not impose its views on Lebanese domestic affairs.
Later in the day, Markaziah News Agency reported that the Foreign Ministry had indeed set a new appointment for Amani, although it did not disclose the date.
The controversy stems from a post Amani made last Friday on X, in which he wrote: 'The disarmament project is a clear conspiracy against nations.'
He added: 'We in the Islamic Republic of Iran are fully aware of the dangers of this conspiracy and the threat it poses to the security of the peoples in the region. We warn others not to fall into the trap laid by the enemies.'
Amani also stressed that maintaining deterrence capability is 'the first line of defense for sovereignty and independence, and it must not be compromised.'
On Wednesday, Raji reiterated that the new Lebanese government 'adheres to a clear policy aimed at asserting the state's sovereignty over all its territory, ensuring that arms are solely in the hands of the state, and that it alone holds the authority to decide on matters of war and peace.'
He also underscored commitment to the National Pact, the Taif Agreement, and genuine power-sharing between Lebanon's communities, saying these principles are essential for national unity and effective participation.
Speaking at the meeting of Arab foreign ministers in Cairo, Raji addressed what he called Israel's continued aggression against Lebanon.
According to a statement from the Foreign Ministry, Raji said: 'The world has witnessed Lebanon's full commitment to the ceasefire declaration. However, Israel insists on undermining the agreement and continues to violate Lebanon's sovereignty on a daily basis.'
He reaffirmed Lebanon's commitment to peaceful and diplomatic solutions, including full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, and stressed that Lebanon's legitimate security institutions, particularly the Lebanese Army, are determined to carry out their national duties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
5 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Will Lebanon Learn from al-Sharaa's Government?
It's been about 150 days since Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam took office. On one hand, Lebanon is experiencing its best chapter in two decades. On the other hand, there are concerns about the slow pace of progress – and that another war is on the verge of erupting. Regardless of whether the fighters on both sides of the Litani River are preparing for a decisive battle – which is unlikely or not—the road is long before Lebanon can fully reclaim its sovereignty from both Israel and Hezbollah. Israeli forces still occupy Lebanese land, and Hezbollah has handed over only a fraction of its weapons – barely the tip of the iceberg. The repeated rhetoric in both presidents' speeches about the 'Israeli enemy' carries no real weight today, nor is it necessary in modern political discourse. The bitter truth, for some, is this: it is Israel – not the Lebanese authorities – that will determine the shape of Hezbollah's future. Israel will define its size, the limits of its capabilities, and its influence. Neighboring Syria is facing a similar situation, but has chosen a different approach. Bashar al-Assad's regime has collapsed, just like Hezbollah's grip has weakened, leaving behind a complex legacy to navigate with the region's 'superpower' neighbor. Israeli forces are also present on Syrian soil and continue to target Syrian sites frequently. Amid this complex situation, President Ahmed al-Sharaa's government has managed to turn crisis into opportunity – and has earned global praise not only for what it has done, but for what it has deliberately chosen not to do. It quickly abandoned the ostrich-head-in-the-sand approach of previous regimes, which had failed to address internal and external politics with realism. Al-Sharaa did not attack Israel in his speeches. He did not mobilize his forces or instruct his militias to clash or even respond to Israeli fire. Nor did he inflate government statements with false claims of confrontations and victories. In fact, he never even referred to Israel as 'the enemy,' nor did he reject mediation or negotiations with the 'evil' neighbor. He made it clear: his goal is to stabilize war-torn Syria – not destabilize those around it. Lebanon's president and prime minister come from elite circles – military and civilian alike. Salam is a graduate of the Sorbonne in France and Harvard in the US – arguably the most internationally qualified leader in Lebanese political history. In contrast, President al-Sharaa is a product of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and had seen nothing of the world before assuming power except what lay between Iraq's Anbar and Syria's Idlib. You don't need a magnifying glass to see that al-Sharaa has advanced Syria's recovery, securing deals with both friendly and hostile powers. He has neutralized threats from Israel, Iran, Iraqi factions, and US sanctions – through dialogue – and has lured foreign investors with contracts to build and operate airports, ports, energy facilities, and industrial projects. We recognize that the challenges in Beirut differ from those in Damascus. Nevertheless, Lebanon today has a rare opportunity – perhaps once in forty years – to end decades of foreign domination, from the Palestinians to the Syrians and now the Iranians. This moment demands flexibility and a new approach, unlike the rigid policies of the past. Looking at the two warring sides – Hezbollah and Israel – Hezbollah has only three possible futures. First: It could return as a cross-border regional force, threatening Israel, managing Yemen's Houthis, and operating in Syria and Iraq. But that now seems impossible given Israel's insistence on a policy of preempting any force that poses a border threat. Note that Egypt, Jordan, and Syria – under their treaties with Israel –agreed to regulate weapons types and distances from the border, something Hezbollah used to reject. Yet under the ceasefire agreement, it accepted withdrawal from south of the Litani River, surrendering heavy weapons, military production platforms, and dismantling its infrastructure. Second: Hezbollah could reposition itself as a purely local force. That would require acknowledging the shift in the balance of power and abandoning its role as a threat to Israel or as a bargaining chip for Iran. It may try to keep its weapons to maintain dominance in Lebanon. To counter that, Lebanese and Israeli authorities are cooperating – Israel provides Beirut with intelligence on hidden arms, and the Lebanese side carries out raids and seizures. But Hezbollah is skilled at the game of hiding – though the current environment is tougher than before. This time, there's no escape, even after sidelining US mediator Morgan Ortagus, whom Hezbollah and its allies portray as Netanyahu's puppet. The reality is: it's Israel – not the US – that now dictates Lebanon's course. This is underscored by the unprecedented scale of Israeli strikes on the southern suburbs – the first since the war's end. The Lebanese presidency has promised to restore full state sovereignty by disarming Hezbollah and ending Lebanon's role as a proxy warfront. So far, it hasn't succeeded. Without this, stability will remain fragile, and investment will stay limited. Lebanon's future over the next 10 or 20 years hinges on what happens in these very days, transforming the country from a militia playground into a sovereign state focused on its internal affairs and the needs of its citizens. This is exactly what al-Sharaa is doing in Syria – with courage and cunning – even though his circumstances are arguably far more difficult and dangerous than those faced by Lebanon's leadership. And it's false to claim that the world simply rushed to support al-Sharaa – not at all. He set his priorities clearly, forged his own alliances, and refused to be blackmailed by local or regional propaganda about 'jihad' or the 'enemy.' His task now is to fight remnants and separatists, repair the economy, and focus on building a state that's been collapsing since the end of the Cold War.
Saudi Gazette
9 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Iran says it obtained Israel's nuclear secrets without providing proof
TEHRAN — Iran claims it has obtained a large batch of information on Israel's nuclear program, its intelligence minister said on Sunday, without providing any evidence to support it. Speaking to Iranian state television after a cabinet meeting, Esmail Khatib said the Intelligence Ministry had acquired 'an important treasury of strategic, operational and scientific intelligence' from Israel, which he said had been 'transferred into the country with God's help.' Khatib alleged that thousands of documents had been seized, including information related to Europe, the US and other individual countries, though he did not explain how the intelligence was obtained. Khatib, a Shiite cleric who was sanctioned by the US Treasury in 2022 for his alleged involvement in cyber espionage, said the documents would be made public soon. He claimed they were retrieved through 'infiltration' and 'access to sources,' but offered no specifics or proof. The announcement, which came days before Tehran is expected to face renewed diplomatic pressure over its own atomic activities appears to be aimed at countering a high-profile Israeli intelligence operation in 2018. At the time, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his agents had smuggled out a 'half-tonne' of documents from Iran concerning its nuclear operation was cited by US President Donald Trump when he withdrew the US from the 2015 nuclear accord with latest Iranian claims come as the board of governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) prepares to meet this week, with Western nations reportedly planning to censure Iran over its failure to clarify long-standing questions about its nuclear a move could lead to the issue being referred to the UN Security Council and potentially trigger the reimposition of UN sanctions under the 'snapback' mechanism outlined in the 2015 has signaled it will reject a US-backed proposal after five rounds of nuclear talks, raising concerns of a renewed is currently enriching uranium up to 60% purity — just short of the 90% level needed for nuclear weapons — and has stockpiled enough material to build several an agreement, analysts warn that Iran's already struggling economy could worsen further, potentially fuelling domestic risk of Israeli or US military action against Iranian nuclear sites also remains, amid fears that Tehran could sever cooperation with the IAEA and dash toward developing a nuclear weapon. — Euronews
Leaders
12 hours ago
- Leaders
Iran Threatens to Unveil Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Data
Iran has threatened to reveal sensitive data regarding Israel's nuclear program after seizing what it called a 'treasure trove' of classified documents, reported Reuters. On Sunday, the Iranian Intelligence Minister, Esmail Khatib, said that Tehran would soon release sensitive Israeli documents that would bolster Iran's strategic position and strengthen its offensive capabilities. Sensitive Data Speaking to Iran's state TV, Khatib said that these documents contain data related to Israel's nuclear facilities and its defensive capabilities, as well as to its relations with the US, Europe and other countries. This followed reports by Iran's state media on Saturday that Iranian intelligence agencies had seized a large trove of sensitive material from Israel. 'The transfer of this treasure trove was time-consuming and required security measures. Naturally, the transfer methods will remain confidential but the documents should be unveiled soon,' Khatib said, adding that 'talking of thousands of documents would be an understatement.' So far, Israel has not acknowledged the operation. According to Reuters, the operation might have links to a reported hacking on an Israeli nuclear facility last year. Nuclear Talks The announcement came as Iran and the US are engaging in talks to reach a new agreement on Tehran's nuclear program. The US President, Donald Trump, has repeatedly threatened of military action if negotiations failed. However, he blocked a planned Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites in April, favoring a negotiated deal. On the other hand, the Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on Wednesday ruled out abandoning uranium enrichment, saying it was '100%' against Iran's interests. Restoring UN Sanctions Western nations accuse Iran of enriching uranium up to 60% purity – close to the 90% weapons-grade level. Later this week, Western countries will likely submit a proposal to the IAEA's Board of Governors to declare Iran noncompliant with the UN nuclear watchdog, according to the Associated Press (AP). This, in turn, could lead to triggering the so-called 'snapback' of UN sanctions on Tehran by one of the Western countries involved in the original 2015 nuclear deal. Short link : Post Views: 1
