logo
Liverpool crash suspect's details and ethnicity were released unusually early

Liverpool crash suspect's details and ethnicity were released unusually early

Daily Mirror27-05-2025

More information was released about the man arrested in connection with a car ploughing into crowds at Liverpool FC's title winning celebrations than what's usually expected
Liverpool: Moment suspect is led away from the scene
Liverpool's victory parade was thrown into disarray yesterday when a driver ploughed into the crowds, leaving dozens of people injured. And following the incident at 6pm, Merseyside Police was quick to state that "a 53-year-old white British man from the Liverpool area" had been arrested.
Police forces normally confirm the age of the suspect, as well as the road where they live. But within two hours of this incident, the Liverpool force shared the man's nationality and ethnicity too. The reason? A previous high-profile incident which led to harmful online disinformation.

Last summer's devastating Southport attacks saw Axel Rudakubana, then 17, murder young schoolgirls Alice da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe as they attended a Taylor-Swift themed holiday club event. And as the news broke of the horror incident, online speculation and disinformation quickly grew out of control about the young suspect having a Muslim name and being a newly-arrived migrant.

Within 36 hours, the local mosque in Southport was attacked and rioting subsequently spread across England, mostly aimed at hotels housing recently-arrived asylum seekers. The online speculation had been false - Rudakubana was born in the UK and had no direct links to Islamism.
Following the latest high-profile incident, Merseyside Police was quick to dampen speculation on social media that the Ford Galaxy driving into Liverpool fans was part of an Islamist terrorist attack, nor was it linked to newly arrived migrants in the country. Liverpool mayor Steve Rotheram said the force had acted "very, very quickly" to stamp out any disinformation that could have caused "real consternation".
In a report into the Southport attacks released earlier this year, His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services said the police service should "fill the information void with the truth". "Forces must provide a true narrative online to reach people who may be searching for information", it read.
"The police service must communicate the facts," the report explained. "Repeatedly, continuously and effectively as circumstances change and develop.

"If not, others will take over the narrative with overwhelming amounts of online content.
"And some of this may be false or harmful to the police response and the communities the police are there to protect."

But as the BBC wrote today, while Merseyside Police's communications team were quick to gain control of the narrative this time around, different circumstances could prove more complex to manage.
"What will a force do for example if the information about the suspect they are holding is unclear?," its report said.
"Even more problematically, what will a force do if they arrest someone in similar circumstances who is a recently arrived migrant or who has a clearly Muslim name?"
"There will be times when police can confirm quickly," said Helen King, former assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. "There are other times when it is unclear. These will always be complex and sensitive decisions."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

April Jones' family join calls for a new criminal offence
April Jones' family join calls for a new criminal offence

Powys County Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

April Jones' family join calls for a new criminal offence

The Prime Minister has been invited to meet with the family of murdered Machynlleth girl April Jones to discuss the creation of a new criminal offence for desecrating a body. April was only five years old when she went missing on the evening of October 1, 2012, after playing on her bike with friends near her home on the Bryn-y-Gog estate. Her disappearance shocked the nation and became the biggest search in British police history with specialist teams scouring around 40 square miles over six months. Paedophile and former slaughterman Mark Bridger, 47, was given a whole life sentence for April's abduction and murder, as well as being convicted for perverting the course of justice of disposing, concealing or destroying the girl's body. There had been strong evidence of a burnt human skull found in the fireplace of Bridger's cottage in Ceinws, which was a 10-minute drive from April's home. Mark Bridger was convicted of April's abduction and murder. The families of people who have been murdered, including Michael O'Leary and Sarah Everard, have called on the Prime Minister to create a new criminal offence of desecrating a body. At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday (June 11), Sir Keir Starmer was asked to meet with the families of people who have been murdered and hear their plea to make it a crime to desecrate a body. Plaid Cymru MP Ann Davies, who represents Caerfyrddin, said: 'My constituent Mr Michael O'Leary was brutally murdered five years ago, and his body was desecrated. 'I've made a number of requests to discuss his and other victims' cases with ministers and to explore introducing legislation making the desecration of a body a criminal offence. 'Would the Prime Minister meet with Mr O'Leary's family, along with other victims' families, including April Jones of Machynlleth, Sarah Everard and Helen McCourt, to hear why they are calling for a new criminal offence of desecrating a body to be introduced?' Responding, Sir Keir said: 'Can I thank her for raising this horrific case and the other similar cases and my thoughts, and I'm sure the thoughts of the whole House, are with Michael's family and all those affected by such vile crimes. 'I think we all need to listen to what they have to say… 'I'm sure the justice minister will be in touch at the first opportunity to take this forward.' Mr O'Leary, a 55-year-old father of three, was shot dead by his friend Andrew Jones in 2020, after Jones found out the victim was having an affair with his wife. He then burned Mr O'Leary's body on a funeral pyre made of wood pallets, and tried to make it look like he killed himself. Sarah Everard, 33, was kidnapped and murdered by off-duty police officer Wayne Couzens in 2021, who then burned her body in the woods. Helen McCourt was 22 years old when she was killed while walking home in Merseyside, and her murderer never revealed the location of her body. Her mother, Marie McCourt, has campaigned for Helen's Law, which would make it a criminal offence to conceal a body, and Helen's Law 2, which would make a new offence of desecrating a body.

Inspector's report into Chinese ‘mega-embassy' with ministers for final decision
Inspector's report into Chinese ‘mega-embassy' with ministers for final decision

Glasgow Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Inspector's report into Chinese ‘mega-embassy' with ministers for final decision

Communities minister Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said a Government determination on the application would be made on or before September 9. Until then, neither the inspector's report nor its recommendation would be made public. The plans by Beijing for a super-embassy on the historic former site of the Royal Mint near the capital's financial district have sparked security concerns. Worries stem from the close proximity of the extensive development to critical data centres and communication cables. The contentious scheme comes against the backdrop of ongoing disquiet over Chinese interference in the UK, with allegations of spies infiltrating the establishment and secret police stations being used to intimidate dissidents in Britain. Unease has also previously been raised over ministerial involvement in progressing the plans, after the Metropolitan Police dropped their opposition. The final decision on the application now rests with Communities Secretary Angela Rayner (PA/Gareth Fuller) The embassy development was 'called in', which means Communities Secretary Angela Rayner, who is also Deputy Prime Minister, will make the final decision taking into account the inspector's findings. Updating peers at Westminster, Lady Taylor said: 'The inspector's report was received on June 10 by the department. 'Parties have been notified that a decision will be made on or before September 9 2025. 'As the report has just been received, we have not yet begun to assess the case. 'The inspector's report will form part of the final decision and will be released alongside it. 'Until that point, neither the recommendation nor the report will be made public.' She added: 'Because we now have the report, we will be considering it, it wouldn't be helpful to comment on any specific security issue raised on the application while it's under active consideration by the department.' The minister said the inspector's evidence-based recommendation would take into account a wide variety of material planning matters, which 'may include safety and national security'. Pressed over previous warnings by the head of MI5 over the 'epic scale' of Chinese espionage in the UK, Lady Taylor said: 'National security is, of course, the first duty of government, more generally. 'With regards to the specifics of the case, the inspector's report will consider the application against all of the national issues, local issues and regional issues, according to planning policy, and safety and national security will be taken into consideration, to make sure that we have considered fully all of the issues that may relate to this planning application.' She added: 'It's difficult to answer general questions about the relationship with China and talk about that in the same space as a planning decision, which has to be taken according to a fixed process. 'But please be assured that national security is (something) we very strongly consider to be our first duty.' Independent crossbencher Lord Alton of Liverpool, who has been banned by Beijing over his criticism of its human rights record, including its treatment of the Uighur Muslim minority, said: 'It's hard to imagine that if in 1980 the former Soviet Union had asked for a prime site for a new mega-embassy that we in Parliament would have agreed at that time.' Responding, Lady Taylor said: 'The Government stands firm on human rights, including against China's repression of the people of Xinjiang and Tibet.' On the plans for the embassy, she added: 'All material planning considerations will be taken into account in determining the case.'

Inspector's report into Chinese ‘mega-embassy' with ministers for final decision
Inspector's report into Chinese ‘mega-embassy' with ministers for final decision

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Inspector's report into Chinese ‘mega-embassy' with ministers for final decision

Until then, neither the inspector's report nor its recommendation would be made public. The plans by Beijing for a super-embassy on the historic former site of the Royal Mint near the capital's financial district have sparked security concerns. Worries stem from the close proximity of the extensive development to critical data centres and communication cables. The contentious scheme comes against the backdrop of ongoing disquiet over Chinese interference in the UK, with allegations of spies infiltrating the establishment and secret police stations being used to intimidate dissidents in Britain. Unease has also previously been raised over ministerial involvement in progressing the plans, after the Metropolitan Police dropped their opposition. The final decision on the application now rests with Communities Secretary Angela Rayner (PA/Gareth Fuller) The embassy development was 'called in', which means Communities Secretary Angela Rayner, who is also Deputy Prime Minister, will make the final decision taking into account the inspector's findings. Updating peers at Westminster, Lady Taylor said: 'The inspector's report was received on June 10 by the department. 'Parties have been notified that a decision will be made on or before September 9 2025. 'As the report has just been received, we have not yet begun to assess the case. 'The inspector's report will form part of the final decision and will be released alongside it. 'Until that point, neither the recommendation nor the report will be made public.' She added: 'Because we now have the report, we will be considering it, it wouldn't be helpful to comment on any specific security issue raised on the application while it's under active consideration by the department.' The minister said the inspector's evidence-based recommendation would take into account a wide variety of material planning matters, which 'may include safety and national security'. Pressed over previous warnings by the head of MI5 over the 'epic scale' of Chinese espionage in the UK, Lady Taylor said: 'National security is, of course, the first duty of government, more generally. 'With regards to the specifics of the case, the inspector's report will consider the application against all of the national issues, local issues and regional issues, according to planning policy, and safety and national security will be taken into consideration, to make sure that we have considered fully all of the issues that may relate to this planning application.' She added: 'It's difficult to answer general questions about the relationship with China and talk about that in the same space as a planning decision, which has to be taken according to a fixed process. 'But please be assured that national security is (something) we very strongly consider to be our first duty.' Independent crossbencher Lord Alton of Liverpool, who has been banned by Beijing over his criticism of its human rights record, including its treatment of the Uighur Muslim minority, said: 'It's hard to imagine that if in 1980 the former Soviet Union had asked for a prime site for a new mega-embassy that we in Parliament would have agreed at that time.' Responding, Lady Taylor said: 'The Government stands firm on human rights, including against China's repression of the people of Xinjiang and Tibet.' On the plans for the embassy, she added: 'All material planning considerations will be taken into account in determining the case.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store