
Russia jails head of independent election watchdog for five years
Grigory Melkonyants, the co-chair of Russia's election monitoring group Golos (Voice), who is accused of cooperating with an "undesirable organisation", reacts inside an enclosure for defendants during a court hearing in Moscow, Russia May 14, 2025. REUTERS/Evgenia Novozhenina
LONDON (Reuters) -The head of Russia's only independent election watchdog was sentenced on Wednesday to five years in a penal colony after being found guilty of working with an "undesirable organisation".
Grigory Melkonyants, co-chair of the Golos movement, was arrested in August 2023. He pleaded not guilty at his trial.
Human rights campaigners say the case against the 44-year-old is part of a wider crackdown on civil society that has intensified since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
News outlet Mediazona said Melkonyants called out to supporters in the courtroom and urged them not to be downhearted over the verdict.
Golos, which means both "voice" and "vote" in Russian, first angered the authorities by publicising evidence of what it said was fraud in a 2011 parliamentary election that led to opposition protests, and then in the presidential vote that returned Vladimir Putin to the Kremlin for a third term in 2012.
The charges against Melkonyants were based on his alleged involvement with the Montenegro-based European Network of Election Monitoring Organisations, which links watchdogs in former communist countries in Europe and Central Asia. ENEMO did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Golos says it has had no interaction with ENEMO since Russia banned the latter as "undesirable" in 2021.
"This absurd case (against Melkonyants) defies easy explanation, not only for foreigners but even for ourselves," Golos co-chair Stanislav Andreichuk told Reuters.
Despite being designated as a "foreign agent", Golos continues its work in Russia. "Even though things are getting tougher, we're still doing what we do," Andreichuk said.
Last year, Golos described the 2024 election that returned Putin for a fifth term with over 88% of the vote as the most fraudulent and corrupt in the country's history.
The Kremlin said the result showed that the Russian people had "consolidated" around Putin, and Western attempts to portray the election as illegitimate were absurd.
Andreichuk said the Melkonyants trial should matter to the outside world because Golos's work was part of a struggle for democracy.
"A real democracy in Russia wouldn't be a military threat. But an authoritarian government will keep threatening its neighbours," he said.
Rights group OVD-Info says more than 1,600 people are currently imprisoned in Russia on political grounds. The Kremlin says it does not comment on individual cases but that Russia needs to uphold its laws and protect itself against subversive activity.
(Reporting by Mark Trevelyan in London, Editing by Timothy Heritage)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
British girl who took life was radicalised by U.S. neo-Nazis, inquest says
LONDON (Reuters) -A British teenage girl, who had said she wanted to blow up a synagogue and became fixated with Adolf Hitler, had been sucked into far-right extremism by two American neo-Nazis, a British coroner said on Monday. Rhianan Rudd, who was 16, took her own life in May 2022 at a children's home having been investigated by police and Britain's domestic security service MI5 over extremist views. Two years earlier, Rudd's mother had referred her daughter to the counter-radicalisation scheme, Prevent. She is believed to be the youngest girl to be charged with terrorism offences in Britain after she was arrested when 14, though the case against her was later dropped. At an inquest into her death, the Chief Coroner of England and Wales Alexia Durran said she had been initially radicalised by her mother's former partner, a U.S. neo-Nazi who had convictions for violence. She was further drawn into extremism by U.S. white supremacist Chris Cook, who was jailed in 2023 for terrorism over plans to attack power grids, Durran also said. Rudd, who had autism, became obsessed with fascism, even carving a swastika into her forehead, and had downloaded material about making bombs and 3D guns, Durran said. Durran concluded that both Mallaburn and Cook were each "a significant radicalising influence on Rhianan" who had "played a material role in introducing and encouraging Rhianan's interest in extreme right-wing materials". LEARNING FROM PAIN Rudd's mother Emily Carter said she believed that the police and MI5's prolonged investigation had played a role in her daughter's death. "Whilst nothing can ever bring Rhianan back, I urge all the authorities that came into contact with her to learn from what happened so that no other family has to experience the pain we have endured," Carter said in a statement. The charges against Rudd were not dropped until August 2021, four months after social workers believed she might have been a victim of sexual exploitation. However, giving her ruling at Chesterfield Coroners' Court in central England, Durran rejected the argument that the state had played a role in her death, saying it had been appropriate to investigate and prosecute her. "I am satisfied that the missed opportunities that occurred in this case were not systemic," she said. British authorities have become very concerned about the online radicalisation of young people. MI5's Director General Ken McCallum said last year that 13% of all those they were investigating were under 18, a threefold increase in the last three years. Britain's Crown Prosecution Service offered condolences to Rudd's family. "This is a tragic case," added Nick Price, CPS director of legal services. We do not prosecute young or vulnerable people lightly. Terrorism offences are extremely serious, and these are decisions our specialist prosecutors take great care over." (Reporting by Michael Holden; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne)


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Explainer-What is the High Seas Treaty to protect world oceans?
LONDON (Reuters) - While many countries have agreed to take steps to protect the vast, ungoverned swathes of the world's oceans, they have yet to see their High Seas Treaty go into effect. This week's U.N. Oceans Conference in the French city of Nice hopes to change that. WHAT IS THE HIGH SEAS TREATY? The treaty, signed in 2023, provides a legal framework for creating marine protected areas on the "high seas", or the ocean areas that lie beyond any national jurisdiction. Currently, less than 3% of the oceans are under some form of protection, although altogether the world's oceans cover two-thirds of the planet. The treaty contains 75 points covering areas such as protecting, caring for and ensuring responsible use of marine resources, and includes a provision for requiring environmental impact assessments of any economic activities in international waters. The treaty also aims to ensure that all countries have fair and equitable access to the ocean's resources. While it is widely referred to as the High Seas Treaty, officially it is called the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty. As of Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron said 50 countries had ratified the treaty, with 60 needed for it to go into effect. Separate to the High Seas Treaty, countries agreed under a 2022 U.N. biodiversity pact to put 30% of their territorial waters under conservation. WHY DO WE NEED AN OCEAN TREATY? Oceans support coastal economies and livelihoods through tourism, fishing, shipping, mining, offshore energy and more. Oceans also absorb about a third of the world's carbon dioxide, or CO2 - the primary gas driving climate change - while ocean-swimming phytoplankton provide about half of the world's oxygen. But marine life is now struggling, and human industry and development are almost entirely to blame. More than 1,500 ocean plants and animals are now at risk of extinction, and that number is expected to rise amid ongoing pollution, overfishing, ocean warming and acidification, according to scientists at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Additionally, new threats to ocean organisms and ecosystems could emerge in coming years in the form of deep-sea mining for rare-earth minerals. In Nice, Macron is expected to urge countries to support postponing sea-bed exploration while researchers work to understand deep sea ecosystems. Scientists are also concerned about the possibility that governments could look to modify ocean chemistry to boost its capacity for absorbing CO2 - a scenario that researchers say could help to limit global warming but could also have unintended consequences. WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR THE TREATY? Macron's news on Monday of 50 governments having ratified the treaty means it is still short by 10 signatures. The treaty will enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified it. Work then begins on setting up institutions and committees to implement the treaty, while its signatories expect to hold a first conference within a year. Despite its involvement in the original treaty negotiations, the United States under current President Donald Trump is not expected to ratify the treaty. WHAT ELSE IS HAPPENING AT THE U.N. OCEANS CONFERENCE? Macron is co-hosting this third U.N. Oceans conference with Costa Rica, and with at least 55 heads of state, business leaders and civil society groups expected to attend the five-day event. Aside from discussions to advance the treaty, delegates are also expected this week to discuss overfishing, water pollution and other threats to marine life. They'll also be looking for fresh ideas on how to pay for it all - with ocean-linked financing lagging far behind other sustainable investment areas. For the five years spanning 2015-2019, ocean-related spending totalled $10 billion. By comparison, the U.N. estimates that every year at least $175 billion is needed for marine protection. The last U.N. oceans summit was held in Lisbon and co-hosted by Kenya in 2022. The next, co-hosted by Chile and Korea, is set for 2028. (Reporting by Virginia Furness, Editing by Katy Daigle and Hugh Lawson)


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Defiance and resignation in Ukrainian town
Sitting on camping chairs with sunglasses and sodas in hand, Yevgen and his friends soaked up the searing Mezhova sun. Russia has said it is advancing into the surrounding eastern region of Dnipropetrovsk for the first time in its three-year invasion. Mezhova, a town just 13km from the flashpoint Donetsk region, now risks becoming a target for a Russian ground offensive. Few locals dare venture into the nearest village to the east, where drones reportedly strike nearly every vehicle. Yevgen Grinshenko, 26, and his friends fled Pokrovsk, a Donetsk mining town that has suffered intense Russian-Ukrainian clashes. "I'm no longer afraid of anything. We've been through it all," said the round-faced aid volunteer, wounded by Russian projectiles in Pokrovsk. "That fear has become a part of my life," he said. But the apparent calm in the town is deceptive. Most of its original residents had fled, said Yevgen. "Everyone who remains is displaced." Since an order to evacuate local children was issued last month by the authorities, the town is "panicking a bit", said an elderly passerby. In Mezhova, colourful Soviet-era cars have been replaced by khaki 4x4s, and eerily quiet streets are patrolled by soldiers. Olga Motuzenko, a 66-year-old teacher, fled fighting in Pokrovsk and reached Mezhova. Wearing a small white lace hat, she was selling onions from her garden by the side of the road. "They could be here in two days," she said. She and her husband had believed Mezhova would be safe, that the front would hold. "But it didn't work out," she said with a sigh. Her home in Pokrovsk "no longer exists", and she had to leave with her husband, taking barely half of their belongings. "I don't feel good here. We are thinking about moving elsewhere again," she murmured in a frail voice. For now, she stays so her ailing husband can still receive treatment. What would force her to leave? "If everything is bombed." But Russian explosive drones were already flying overhead, and some vehicles had been hit, she said. Lt-Col Oleksander came to a cafe to mark his 60th birthday with fellow soldiers — a celebration he once pictured sharing with his wife and grandchildren, not on the front lines. "It's unfortunately true, fighting is happening here and there," said the trim-moustached officer, warning that the Russians "are already very close" to the regional border. "They are advancing slowly, very slowly, but they are advancing." In fruitless talks with Ukraine, Russia demanded recognition of its annexation of Crimea and four other regions where its forces are deployed — including Donetsk — as a condition for any negotiations. Asked whether he feared Moscow might lay claim to a sixth Ukrainian region, Oleksander brushed off the idea. "They could claim all of Ukraine belongs to them. It won't matter. Our resistance won't change," he declared. For his birthday, Oleksander had just one wish — for the war to end quickly. He was weary of seeing young people "die every day". "It's hard," he said. "Impossible to accept."