'I wish Canada would live up to its reputation': Journalist Samira Mohyeddin shares views on belonging — and betrayal — in Canada
Yahoo News Canada presents 'My Canada," a series spotlighting Canadians — born-and-raised to brand new — sharing their views on the Canadian dream, national identity, and the triumphs and tribulations that come with life inside and outside these borders.
As Canada Day approaches, Toronto journalist and activist Samira Mohyeddin finds herself reflecting less on the customary pride and more on her painful relationship with the country she has called home since childhood. 'My idea of what Canada means to me as an immigrant has changed throughout the years and being Canadian has always been complicated,' she says. 'It's a love-hate relationship.'
This May marked the 46th anniversary of her family's arrival in Canada after leaving Iran in 1979 at the start of the Iran hostage crisis. It brought to mind her first memory of her new home, which is not one of welcome, but of violence.
She remembers being just five years old when a group of boys tied her, her sister and two cousins to trees in their apartment complex, yelling, 'You took them hostage, so we're taking you hostage.'
'We had just arrived,' Mohyeddin says. 'We were new to the school, and this was our introduction.'
Years later, during the 2010 G20 protests in Toronto, she was among those 'kettled' by police for hours without cause. She joined a class-action lawsuit and won — $9,000, a small sum that could never account for the damage to her sense of belonging.
'That was an awakening,' she says. 'To realize that the so-called liberal democracy I live in can turn on a dime and become a fascist state. We think that we have all these rights and freedoms here, but I realized how quickly they can be taken away.'
It's not surprising, then, why Mohyeddin is quick to reject the myth of the 'grateful immigrant.' She believes Canada is steeped in 'a two-tier form of citizenship' when it comes to who is afforded which rights. She explains, 'I'm very appreciative of Canada opening its doors to my family, but at the same time, I hate this idea that we have to constantly be bowing to the fact that we are allowed here. The West has benefited from the brain drain from our countries, too.'
We think that we have all these rights and freedoms here, but I realized how quickly they can be taken away.
This Canada Day, her disappointment runs especially deep. Mohyeddin has been vocal about her outrage over Canada's muted response to calls of genocide in Gaza, and her feeling that the government has abandoned its commitment to international human rights law.
'Canada has shown that it is quite hypocritical and willing to sacrifice its reputation in the international community,' she says, pointing to the genocide of the Rohingya by the Myanmar military. At that time, Canada 'didn't wait for the gavel to drop' and for the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to prosecute Myanmar. Instead, it immediately declared it a genocide. Bob Rae, Canada's former Special Envoy to Myanmar, even visited refugee camps.
So, with Prime Minister Mark Carney having stated he's going to wait for the ICJ to make a call on Gaza, Mohyeddin says, 'What we're seeing is the Israeli exception, because if this was any other country, Canada would be leading the charge to stop it.'
As political tensions continue to brew between Canada and the U.S. now, too, Mohyeddin's feelings have only become more complicated. Since U.S. President Donald Trump's election and ensuing travel bans, she's cancelled three trips to America, as she no longer feels comfortable — like so many immigrants — travelling there.
'It's a lot more than just 'elbows up,' it's about locking arms,' she says. 'The U.S. is trying to sow divisions. There are Iranian Canadians, with Canadian passports, being stopped from going into the U.S. right now. It begs the question: what does it mean to be a Canadian? In 2015, Trudeau came out and said, 'a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian,' but we haven't seen it actually be put into effect. You can't say one thing and then act another way.'
It's become a little debilitating to watch these institutions that we had pride in fall apart like a house of cards.
Still, she sees glimmers of progress. 'When I was growing up, we weren't taught anything about Indigenous people's plight in this country. We pledged allegiance to the queen. Now, in public schools, kids are learning about residential schools — that's a start.'
But that slow crawl toward justice is not enough. 'Canada needs to apply the same critical Indigenous lens on itself and to other countries,' she says. 'If we don't call [what's happening in Gaza] a genocide, if we don't put an arms embargo on Israel, we will forever tarnish our image in the international community. And for what?'Asked if there's anything she admires about Canada's national character, Mohyeddin doesn't hesitate: "I just wish Canada would live up to its reputation. There is such a deep sense of betrayal in my bones about what it means to be Canadian. People are hurt and it's become a little debilitating to watch these institutions that we had pride in fall apart like a house of cards."
For her, and so many others, Canada Day is not just a national holiday, but a painful reminder of promises made and broken.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Samira Mohyeddin هم (@smohyeddin)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Why The U.S. Needs To Privatize Air Traffic Control
L ast month, to rally support for a massive infusion of funding to fix the troubled U.S. air traffic control system, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy staged a public horror show of the Federal Aviation Administration's outdated technology. It included 1980s zombies like floppy discs, bulky monitors and a favorite prop for those who have been pushing for improvements for decades: paper flight strips. At most U.S. air traffic control towers, when a new plane is about to enter its airspace, they're handled exactly the same as in the 1970s in one key way: a printer spits out a strip of paper with the callsign of the flight and other information. Controllers arrange the flight strips on a board, scribbling notes and moving them around to help choreograph the complicated ballet of planes in the sky. News flash to America Firsters: Canada switched over completely to a computerized system 16 years ago with great success. Some say our neighbor to the north is a model for how the U.S. could better go about modernizing its hopelessly outdated air traffic control systems. The Trump administration's fix: more money. Duffy has called for Congress to give the FAA tens of billions more to accelerate its modernization programs, claiming upgrades can be accomplished in three years that had previously been budgeted to take as long as 15 years. Bob Poole, a transportation policy greybeard at the Reason Foundation, argued that more money is not the solution to the unremitting decay of the U.S. air traffic control system. The FAA's troubled procurement staff struggles to define how upgrade programs should be carried out and how the technology should be configured within three years, and amid the chaos in Washington, it's not clear if Congress will come up with the money.. 'This is just a pipe dream—it could not possibly happen,' Poole told Forbes . A better way, he said, would be to follow Canada's lead and privatize air traffic control. 'An air traffic controller shouldn't have to worry, 'are these tiles over my head going to fall down and is it going to pour water on me while I'm around all this electrical equipment today?' ' Nick Daniels, president of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association. In 1996, the Canadian government spun out its air traffic control department into an independent corporation, Nav Canada. That gave it the ability to raise its own funds, and freedom from the narrow interests of lawmakers, who would bridle at any attempts to move jobs out of their districts. 'It was immediately empowering,' Joel Morin, a former Canadian air traffic control manager and executive at the International Air Transport Association, told Forbes . 'We became masters of our own domain, and what we did was totally focused on the air traffic system, not on anybody else's priorities.' Over the next 20 years, Nav Canada carried out a sweeping makeover of air traffic control, upgrading technology and improving safety and efficiency. The rate of instances in which planes fail to maintain minimum required separation from others has fallen by over half since 2001. They are now at a level that appears to be six times lower than in the U.S., Forbes estimates using federal data, with costs roughly a third lower than those of the FAA. By bringing systems development in-house and reducing use of contractors, Nav Canada was able to cut its capital spending to half of that of its government days, said the organization's founding CEO John Crichton. Better yet, it delivered three times as much new technology twice as fast, he said. Privatization of air traffic control agencies has occurred in various forms in over 60 countries, starting with New Zealand in 1987. In the U.S., it's an idea that's been explored periodically since the 1970s. The last serious attempt – legislation introduced by former House Transportation committee Chairman Bud Shuster (R-Pa.) — failed in 2018. It faced fierce opposition from influential lobby groups for business jet owners and private pilots, who believed it would favor airlines and lead to higher fees. Meanwhile, America's air traffic control infrastructure has continued to crumble after decades of chronic underinvestment. More than a third of the FAA's 138 ATC systems can no longer be reliably maintained, due to shortages of spare parts and funding, and another 39% were at risk of deteriorating beyond repair, the Government Accountability Office reported last year. Leaking roofs, busted elevators that force controllers to climb 15 flights of stairs and ancient HVAC systems also threaten controllers with more prosaic failures that have taken facilities offline. For example, last week, the air conditioning failed at the Phoenix air traffic control tower in over 100 degree heat. The FAA was forced to evacuate staff and shift oversight to another already stressed nearby air traffic control facility. 'An air traffic controller shouldn't have to worry, 'are these tiles over my head going to fall down and is it going to pour water on me while I'm around all this electrical equipment today?' ' said Nick Daniels, president of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association. Such quotidian problems only exacerbate one of the biggest challenges facing air traffic control: persistent understaffing. The FAA has about 10,800 fully certified controllers, roughly 3,800 short of its staffing target. In practice, that means about 40% of controllers are working six days a week, 10 hours a day. 'The stress is absolutely at an all-time high. 'Morale's at an all-time low,' said Daniels. There haven't been any accidents attributed to a systems failure, but beyond luck, that's largely because when there is a major problem, as recently occurred at the short-staffed center overseeing Newark airport, which has suffered brief radar and communications outages , controllers compensate by delaying and spacing out flights – to travelers' great frustration. In the worst case, like the 2023 collapse of a pilot safety notification service, the FAA can halt flights altogether. Air traffic controllers monitor airport traffic in the Nav Canada tower at Ottawa International Airport in 2016. © 2016 Bloomberg Finance LP Poole, who's credited with coining the term privatization, has stopped using 'the P word' given its negative connotations in some circles. Instead he talks about converting the FAA's air traffic control organization into a public utility, akin to power and water companies, a move that could expedite its modernization. 'Having this embedded in the federal budget, it starves the air traffic organization from the kind of capital investment that is needed.' Robert Poole Crucially, it would eliminate the financial uncertainties of an organization whose budget is controlled by lawmakers. Once converted into a corporation, funding typically comes from usage fees charged to airlines and private planes, a revenue stream that can be used to support the sale of bonds to raise money to carry out big projects quickly. The FAA, whose funding comes in annual drips and drabs, has had to stretch out modernization programs over 10-to-15-year periods it euphemistically calls 'waterfall schedules.' These baked-in delays often mean that by the time the last facility is 'updated' 15 years later, it may already be obsolete. 'It's a crazy way to do business,' said Poole. 'Having this embedded in the federal budget, it starves the air traffic organization from the kind of capital investment that is needed.' Most privatized air traffic control organizations are still owned by their government. At the extreme end of privatization, there are two for-profit, partially investor-owned companies. Great Britain's NATS includes airlines and pension funds among its shareholders, with the government holding a 49% stake; while Italy's ENAV has 49% of its shares up for trading on the Milan stock exchange. Then there's Nav Canada, which is a nonprofit governed by a board of directors appointed by airlines, private aviation, labor unions and the government. In most of these cases, operations have improved post-privatization. 'You get better value for money and you get more focus,' said Andrew Charlton, a Switzerland-based aviation consultant who formerly ran a think tank devoted to privatization of aviation services. 'And the staff get paid more over time because they're outside the government pay scales. So that makes it easier to attract talent.' That's certainly been the case for Nav Canada which in the 1990s faced a situation not unlike what the FAA faces now. Its technology was hopelessly dusty and in need of replacement and there was a significant shortage of air traffic controllers to manage a busy airspace second only to the United States. Freed from government control, CEO Crichton, a former airline executive and trade group head, moved to cut fat. He trimmed the workforce by 25% in the first three years, largely by getting rid of superfluous administrators and middle management. Crichton also ended Nav Canada's dependence on outside contractors who'd spiked development costs for new air traffic control systems. The organization had plenty of engineers and programmers on staff, but they'd largely been doing project management. Crichton put them to work developing new air traffic control systems in house calibrated for the people who would ultimately use them. 'We said from now on, if you're an engineer, you're going to do engineering. If you're a computer geek, you're going to do geeking,' Crichton told Forbes . 'And we're going to make sure the system is designed exactly for what we want and no more.' Success came quickly. In 2009, Nav Canada finished rolling out a system called XCDS, which replaced antiquated paper flight strips with touchscreen computers. The first of its kind, the organization went on to sell it to air navigation service providers in other countries, including the United Kingdom, Denmark, Australia and India. The computerized flight progress strip used by air traffic controllers is seen in the Nav Canada tower at Ottawa International Airport in 2016. © 2016 Bloomberg Finance LP Then in 2014, it began using text messages to communicate route and altitude changes to pilots on domestic flights, reducing the risk of misinterpreting crackly radio messages. The FAA only completed adopting the technology this year. As a private company, Nav Canada has made other canny moves to maximize profits and bring better service to its customers. It bought a major stake in Aireon, a company with a satellite-based airplane tracking service that monitors flights over oceans and other remote areas without radar coverage. Aerion's system has allowed Nav Canada and NATS to safely reduce spacing between planes on heavily traveled cross-Atlantic routes, letting them fly more efficient routes and reducing fuel burn. Consistent funding also allowed Nav Canada to overhaul foundational infrastructure like its buildings and communication and power systems, said Sid Koslow, Nav Canada's chief technology officer until his retirement in 2017. 'If you fall behind, you have a mountain of stuff that you have to do, and your budget gets eaten up by maintenance,' he said. The FAA has been struggling for years to replace its ancient copper-wire based telecom system. Nav Canada switched over to an internet protocol backbone in the early 2000s. Nav Canada's costs have been consistently lower than the FAA's. In 2022, its ATC operations cost $369.44 per flight hour for aircraft operating under instrument flight rules, 37% below FAA, according to a report from CANSO, an air navigation trade group. That's surprising, says Poole, given that there are significant economies of scale in air traffic control. 'As the world's largest by rights the U.S. ought to have the lowest unit costs, other things equal,' he said. 'Clearly we don't.' And Nav Canada has been able to hold down fees for its users. It raised customer service charges a steep 30% amid the pandemic as air traffic and revenue plunged. But it's still charging customers 57% less on an inflation-adjusted basis than in 1999. It's hard to compare safety across countries but by one measure – the rate of failures to maintain proper separation between planes — Nav Canada is outperforming the FAA. Nav Canada reported that its rate of loss of separation of planes under instrument flight rules was 0.53 per 100,000 movements in fiscal 2023. The FAA doesn't report those statistics, but combining numbers that it does suggests that its rate of loss of separation was 3.3 per 100,000 movements in the same year. But none of this seems to have registered with the U.S., where a broad coalition of airlines and other aviation groups has come together to support Duffy's decidedly questionable do-15-years-of-upgrades-in-3-years plan, calling for Congress to allocate at least $31 billion. And it's not clear if that's coming. Meanwhile, Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), a member of the transportation committee who supported Shuster's privatization legislation, told Forbes they'll have to take a 'hard look' at Duffy's plan to 'make sure that this isn't just another government kind of boondoggle.' A bipartisan group of lawmakers is beginning to look at a range of options to improve the air traffic control system, and privatization could be among them, Perry said. 'We have a secretary and a president that are interested in making fundamental, foundational changes,' he said. 'While that circumstance exists, we ought to explore the possibility of making the improvements that, quite honestly, the American people demand, have paid for and certainly deserve.' That would mean overcoming opposition from naysayers who say the successful record of privatization in other countries doesn't necessarily apply in the U.S., which has 10 times the air traffic as includes the controllers union head Daniels. 'No one runs as much traffic that's as diverse and dynamic as what we do,' he said. Crichton begs to differ. 'It doesn't matter whether you're in Canada or you're in Ireland or in Italy or in Australia, it's the same business,' he said. 'If you have the right formula that produces efficiency and productivity, there's no reason it shouldn't work regardless of the size of the enterprise.' More from Forbes Forbes Elon Musk Wants SpaceX To Fix Air Traffic Control. Here's Why It Won't Work. By Jeremy Bogaisky Forbes For The Army, The D.C. Crash Is The Latest In A Wave Of Troubling Accidents By Jeremy Bogaisky Forbes Starlink's Numbers Could Bring SpaceX's Valuation Crashing Down By Jeremy Bogaisky
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Power play in the Senate
Presented by Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Canada Playbook | Follow Politico Canada Thanks for reading Canada Playbook. Let's get into it. → Bill C-5 gets a Red Chamber sequel. → Does Canada's 5 percent pledge add up? → RFK Jr. vs. global vaccine funding. Trade war SENATE SPOTLIGHT ON BILL C-5 — The Red Chamber gets its chance to change MARK CARNEY's 'nation-building bill' today — even though the Liberal government has politely signaled senators should leave it alone. The House passed Bill C-5 last week despite attempts to slow it down. Critics argue it will give Cabinet new powers to override health and environmental laws, while failing to properly consult First Nations. — Ahead today: Several senators will attempt to amend the bill, though it remains unclear if they'll have enough support to change it. Indigenous and environmental groups want senators to delay the bill that would grant the PM and Cabinet broad authority to fast-track major infrastructure projects, ranging from pipelines to ports. All eyes on Sen. PAUL PROSPER, who has said he plans to do just that. — Timely reading: Former Canadian Sen. ANDRÉ PRATTE, who was appointed by JUSTIN TRUDEAU, has urged senators to reject 'Carney's C-5 power grab.' Pratte wrote in the National Post: 'If senators are serious, and I know them to be, they should protest when the government allows them only a few days to analyze a major piece of legislation.' — Thinking about it: Senators debated the bill for about four hours on Wednesday. — No hesitation: Supporting the bill was a no-brainer for Sen. HASSAN YUSSUFF, who sits on the prime minister's Council on Canada-U.S. Relations. He sponsored the bill in the Senate, arguing C-5 is necessary to reverse the economic harm President DONALD TRUMP has inflicted on Canada through tariffs. 'While we cannot control the action of the president of the United States, we can control how we, at home, respond,' he said Wednesday. 'We must take urgent action now to strengthen our negotiating hand, protect Canadian workers and our economy.' — Spotted: A majority of senators, on their phones scrolling through news sites, X, emails and even watching videos during debates — some juggling several screens at once. — Noted: Sen. MARILOU MCPHEDRAN asked the Senate to split C-5 … Senate Speaker RAYMONDE GAGNÉ ruled there's no provision to allow for that, unlike in the House of Commons. — Also noted: Sen. DANIÈLE HENKEL received an ovation from colleagues after expressing hope that C-5 become a 'springboard for our [small and medium-sized enterprises] and our communities.' → Always be closing: On Wednesday, Energy Minister TIM HODGSON was selling the bill at the Toronto Regional Board of Trade. 'It turns ambition into action,' he said in a keynote address. 'It gives industry, investors and trading partners confidence that Canadian projects will get built and Canadian goods will get to market. It creates the prosperity we need to pay for our way of life.' — Stamp of approval: Premiers have been patiently waiting since they first discussed 'nation-building projects' with the PM in Saskatoon earlier this month. Ontario Premier DOUG FORD sent a three-page letter to the Senate this week, urging them to pass the bill. 'Workers, families and businesses are navigating the economic uncertainty caused by President Trump's tariffs and they are counting on all levels of government to work together to protect Canada,' he wrote. Alberta Premier DANIELLE SMITH told Bloomberg News she expects a pipeline to British Columbia will be near the top of Ottawa's list. Enbridge looks like it could be interested. → Hold your horses: The federal government has yet to identify what projects will be approved for fast-tracking. — Medical emergency: Sen. PATRICK BRAZEAU collapsed in the chamber on Wednesday while defending First Nation rights-holders. 'Oh shit,' he said before falling to the floor. Senators jumped up to attend to Brazeau. He was assessed by paramedics, and CBC reported Brazeau was taken away in an ambulance. Ottawa Paramedic Service later advised us the incident 'was not life threatening.' 'We are told that he appears to be recovering,' a spokesperson for the Senate told Playbook. Sen. LEO HOUSAKAS praised Sen. MOHAMED-IQBAL RAVALIA, a former family doctor, for his quick response to the emergency. 'Thank you for always being there for all of us,' he said. → Now it's crunch time: Senators have until 5:15 p.m. Friday — or the Speaker will force a vote The Senate Conservative caucus has said it will support the bill — but it only has 14 votes. Want more POLITICO? Download our mobile app to save stories, get notifications on U.S.-Canada relations, and more. In iOS or Android . THE ROOMS THAT MATTER — Prime Minister MARK CARNEY is back in Ottawa and will spend the day in private meetings. DRIVING THE DAY GETTING TO 5 — The PM says Canada is all-in on reaching NATO's new 5 percent spending target by 2035. — Reality check: Canada has yet to formally reach the military alliance's 2 percent target, though Carney has said that would be achieved by the end of this fiscal year. — Next question: How does Canada get to 5? — Installment plan: As Carney explained before departing The Hague, the new NATO target calls for an additional 1.5 percent in actual defense spending. The other 1.5 percent can be spent on non-military projects that support defense — roads, airports, ports and mining, for example. — Like, say: Arctic roads and ports that serve both communities and the military. Or Canada's stalled but potentially lucrative critical minerals industry. — Halfway there: Carney suggested Canada already spends enough on projects of that kind to cash in on that portion of the commitment. 'Canadian workers, in shipyards, in labs, shop floors right across our country — we'll make the drones, the icebreakers, the aerospace technologies and much more that's needed to build a more secure world,' Carney said Wednesday. 'Much of this we are already doing.' — It all adds up: Carney said Canada can reach 3.5 percent by 2035 by buying and upgrading ageing military equipment — a move that will help to build domestic industries, 'as well as to diversify our defense partnerships.' Part of that includes the EU-Canada security agreement Canada signed this week in Brussels. 'These investments serve our defense as well as protecting the readiness and resilience to protect Canadians,' the PM said. — Trade-offs: The major impediment to Canada achieving the 2 percent target was concern about 'robbing Peter to pay Paul.' Would it mean cuts to Canada's social safety net, the federal transfers to the provinces to pay for health care and education? — Carney's answer: Canadian Forces personnel are underpaid and using rusted-out equipment, so pay raises and new hardware are justified. — And: 'These will be net additive,' he said. 'More of it will help build our economy at the same time as it improves our defense.' — In related reading: From NICHOLAS VINOCUR, LAURA KAYALI, PAUL MCLEARY and VICTOR JACK: Europe managed to keep Trump in NATO. Now what? — And in case you missed it: NATO chief calls Trump 'Daddy.' MORNING MUST-CLICKS — 'I don't just respect the things Canadians have created; I like them. I read ROBERT J. SAWYER and MARGARET ATWOOD. I'm a fan of WILLIAM SHATNER. I'm actually a huge Trekkie,' Bloc Québécois Leader YVES-FRANÇOIS BLANCHET said during a Q&A with Maclean's. — From the Globe's MARIE WOOLF: Minister steering federal border bill consults Ethics Commissioner to rule out conflict of interest. — Sen. LEO HOUSAKOS tells LAURA RYCKEWAERT of The Hill Times that Conservative ranks in the Senate could continue to grow. — STEPHANIE TAYLOR of the Post reports that there is pressure building on Liberals to rethink its electric vehicle mandate. — 'It's not conspicuously incorrect; it's just an odd thing to say,' CHRIS SELLEY writes of the PM's 'bizarre fixation' with calling Canada the 'most European of non-European countries.' — And JESSICA MUNDIE of CBC News reports from the PM's presser: Canada isn't looking to join the EU, Carney says, but still wants closer ties. For your radar VACCINE HESITANCY — The NATO summit in The Hague ended successfully Wednesday, given TRUMP left happy, things went according to plan, and everyone mostly stuck to the script. — Bonus for us: Defense watchers mostly stopped referring to Canadians as deadbeats. — Meanwhile in Brussels: Different summit, different story, different laggards. — RFK in the china shop: On Wednesday, U.S. Health Secretary ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. lobbed a veritable grenade into a pledging conference held every five years to replenish the budget of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. — Spending laggards: He advised via video that the U.S. plans to withhold a $1.58 billion U.S. pledge to Gavi made under former President JOE BIDEN until the global health organization has 're-earned the public trust.' POLITICO's Claudia Chiappa reports, In the video, RFK Jr. denounced — without evidence — the international organization that has helped protect 1.1 billion children from contracting preventable diseases — measles, malaria, polio, human papillomavirus. — Canada commits: On Wednesday from Brussels, Secretary of State of International Development RANDEEP SARAI released a statement to note that Canada has renewed its commitment with a C$675 million pledge over the next five years. 'The health challenges facing our world are not getting simpler,' he said. 'No child, anywhere, should die from a disease that immunization can prevent.' PROZONE In news for Pro subscribers: — Trump: Deal with Iran not necessary following US strikes. — Kennedy's vaccine panel to review childhood immunization schedule. — Senate GOP scrambles to rewrite Trump's megabill. — Hassett says trade deals coming after megabill passes. — Kilmar Abrego Garcia is back in US custody after being illegally deported and will now face criminal charges. PLAYBOOKERS Birthdays: HBD to former Quebec Premier PHILIPPE COUILLARD and journalist and author VICTOR MALAREK. HBD + 1 to TASHA KHEIRRIDIN. Spotted: Britain's PRINCESS ANNE, wearing an autumn-hued maple leaf brooch … AI Minister EVAN SOLOMON, attending an AIDS vigil in Toronto. Movers and shakers: Here's how Senate committee chair assignments are shaking out: HASSAN YUSSUFF (national security, defense and veterans affairs) … MARTY KLYNE (audit and oversight) … DAVID ARNOT (legal and constitutional affairs) … LARRY SMITH (transport) … MICHÈLE AUDETTE (Indigenous Peoples) … CLÉMENT GIGNAC (banking and economy) … PAT DUNCAN (energy). Lobby watch: Blackbird Strategies' LISA KIRBIE, TOM POTTER and ANNALISA HARRIS registered to lobby on behalf of Nunatsiavut Government … ISABEL METCALFE registered for Giller Prize/The Giller Foundation … JOHN FOX registered for the Yukon Development Corporation … CODY MALLETTE registered for Malahat Battery Technologies Corp. … MICHELLE BAILEY registered for Snap ULC. The Stratford Festival reported a June 19 meeting with DAVID MYLES, parliamentary secretary to Canadian Identity Minister STEVEN GUILBEAULT. Media mentions: Anchor STEVE PAIKIN and colleagues ended a 19-year run on TVO's 'The Agenda.' Farewell: GERALD BEAULIEU's creation, 'When the Rubber Meets the Road,' is leaving the LeBreton Flats pathway. Got a document to share? A birthday coming up? Send it all our way. TRIVIA Wednesday's answer: It was KIM CAMBELL who said: 'The biggest challenge was the Ottawa Press Gallery. The people who cover politics all the time were the worst.' Campbell was sworn in as prime minister on June 25, 1993. Bonus props to readers who landed both questions: ALYSON FAIR, MARCEL MARCOTTE, GARY ALLEN, BLAIR ARMITAGE, DARRYL DAMUDE, BILL WATSON, LIAM MITCHELL, JOHN DILLON, GREG MACEACHERN, MELISSA FELD, ROBERT MCDOUGALL, BOB GORDON, JOHN PEPPER and CHARLES DILLON. And props to JOHN ECKER, JOHN DILLON, ELIZABETH BURN, MELISSA FELD and MALCOLM MCKAY. Props +1 to DARRYL DAMUDE. Today's question: Who was the first Black man appointed to the Senate? Send your answer to canadaplaybook@ Writing tomorrow's Playbook: MICKEY DJURIC and MIKE BLANCHFIELD. Canada Playbook would not happen without: Canada Editor Sue Allan, editor Willa Plank and POLITICO's Grace Maalouf.
News24
4 hours ago
- News24
G20 leaders have a role to play in the media's fight against deepfakes
There is a troubling scourge of deepfakes, which impact on the media and need the attention of the G20 writes Sbu Ngalwa. Not much happens in Polokwane – save for that odd day when the Peter Mokaba Stadium plays host to a Premier Soccer League home game, and then suddenly, the town comes alive. The last time Polokwane likely welcomed international visitors from diverse nationalities was in June 2010, during the Soccer World Cup. But I digress. In the Limpopo capital earlier this month, senior government officials, international organisations, civil society and technocrats from G20 countries gathered for the third meeting of the Digital Economy Working Group (DEWG). The DEWG is one of 15 working groups participating in a series of meetings focused on topics relevant to the G20. Inputs from these meetings contribute to the G20 summit agenda and may be incorporated into the final G20 Leaders' Declaration after the South African-hosted summit in November 2025. Troubling scourge of deepfakes Therefore, working group discussions have the potential to make it onto the agenda of the leaders of countries that hold over 85% of the global GDP. This is by far the most powerful bloc of global nations, and South Africa holds the G20 presidency this year and will hand over the baton to the United States for 2026. The G20 needs to be inclusive in its deliberations, considerations, and ultimately, decisions. Fortunately, civil society is involved in some of the Sherpa streams. The DEWG invited me to provide input on behalf of the SA National Editors' Forum (Sanef) and, by extension, the African Editors Forum (TAEF) on the troubling scourge of deepfakes and their impact on the media. Deepfakes involve the digital manipulation of videos/images to appear to show the targeted person's face, body or voice. The intention is to mislead and spread false information. SABC Morning Live presenter Leanne Manas is among the victims. Her image was used to promote an online trading platform. As a result, she needed security to escort her to work, where victims of scams travelled to the SABC to 'confront' her. The Polokwane meeting provided an opportunity to highlight the media's role in fighting misinformation and disinformation and also to appeal to the G20 nations to involve the media in their collective response against deepfakes and other efforts to promote information integrity. The mainstream media has been at the forefront of exposing deepfakes and informing the public about this dangerous assault on the truth. In May, News24 exposed the hijacking of local websites for the nefarious purposes of spreading fake stories about the country. Through its fact-checking desk, News24 revealed how a digital marketing agency based in India was buying expired domains of South African websites and using them to publish fake AI-generated stories. This included a report about plans by the City of Cape Town to introduce a traffic congestion tax. In a country burdened by growing inequality, an increase in the fuel levy and the recent political uproar over the government's failed attempt to increase VAT, such a story would not only gain traction online, but also offend many people. That's how convincing some of these stories are. Thankfully, it was quickly debunked, as the City also issued a statement denying that such a tax was in the pipeline. Danger of the new weapons Another fake story presented bogus documents about new load shedding scenarios and yet another purported change in social security grants. Besides impersonating journalists in deepfake scams, sexually humiliating imagery of our colleagues, designed to intimidate and discredit, is also concocted. Importantly, though, the News24 report demonstrates how journalism serves as an antidote, bringing to light the immense dangers of these new weapons. The media is already besieged by powerful political and economic interests for whom certain truths are inconvenient. On top of this, we now face the onslaught of deepfakes, which also causes harm to political and business leaders, celebrities, and indeed ordinary people (especially women and girls, and people investing their personal savings). While we appreciate G20 countries addressing the issue, we caution against the use of overly broad laws and regulations that, under the guise of criminalising deepfakes, may effectively suppress public interest journalism. As media organisations, Sanef and Media Monitoring Africa are discussing these issues in a parallel process to the G20, dubbed the M20. Building on the pioneering decisions on information integrity made during Brazil's G20 Presidency last year, this independent initiative aims to sustain momentum and ensure continued engagement throughout 2025 - and beyond. Support for media freedom To play our part in the common fight against deepfakes, we need the G20 to show genuine support for media freedom and editorial independence. Back in Polokwane, Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies Solly Matlatsi's comments were therefore welcomed when he assured that government was looking at evolving capabilities of generative AI and risks posed by deepfakes, and that it was 'an issue of growing concern for information integrity and public trust'. - Sbu Ngalwa is acting secretary-general of The African Editors' Forum (TAEF, treasurer-general of the SA National Editors' Forum (Sanef) and a member of the local M20 organising committee. For more information about the M20 initiative, visit the website, or contact the M20 secretariat. *Want to respond to the columnist? Send your letter or article to opinions@ with your name and town or province. You are welcome to also send a profile picture. We encourage a diversity of voices and views in our readers' submissions and reserve the right not to publish any and all submissions received. Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.
