
Story of a sacred Jharkhand hill at the centre of old friction between Jains & Santals
The Jharkhand High Court on May 3 directed the state government to enforce a pre-existing ban on the consumption and sale of meat, alcohol, and other intoxicants on a hill considered to be sacred by both the Santal Adivasi and Jain communities.
Referred to as Marang Buru by Santals and Parasnath by Jains, the hill in Jharkhand's Giridih district has been the site of a century-old inter-community conflict. Here's the story.
A sacred hill
Jains believe that 20 of the 24 Jain tirthankaras (divine teachers) attained nirvana (liberation) on Parasnath Hill. The name 'Parasnath' is derived from Parshvanatha, the 23rd tirthankara. Today, there are more than 40 Jain temples and dhams on the hill.
'The Jains, being followers of one of the oldest religions, have held this hill sacred since the time of the tirthankaras [in the BCEs],' Amit Jain, a community leader in Parasnath, told The Indian Express.
'[Jains and Adivasis] have co-existed at Parasnath Hill from the very beginning. When the tirthankaras came here to attain nirvana here, it was the Adivasis who carried them to the top of the hill. That tradition continues today,' he said.
Marang Buru (literally 'the Great Mountain') is the supreme animist deity in the Santal tradition. The Jug Jaher Than (sacred grove) on the hill is the most sacred dhorom garh (religious site) of the Santals, akin to what Mecca means for Muslims. Also significant is the Dishom Manjhi Than on the hill, the symbolic seat of the dishom manjhi (the traditional Santal leader) where customary rituals are performed.
Its religious significance aside, Marang Buru is the supreme seat of justice for Santals. The Lo Bir Baisi, a tribal council that resolves disputes which cannot be handled at the village level, convenes at Boda Darha in Sohraiya village, on the eastern part of the sacred mountain.
It was with a resolution of this council that the historic Santal Hul was launched in 1855. Led by Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu, the rebellion targeted the oppressive dikus, literally 'outsiders', including zamindars, mahajans, and British officials.
An old conflict
Jains believe that an ancient king donated the Parasnath Hill to the community. But revenue department official P C Roy Choudhury in the 1957 Hazaribagh District Gazetteer wrote that 'the oldest of the [Jain] temples appears to date only from AD 1765.'
It was in 1911 that the conflict between Adivasis and Jains over Marang Buru/Parasnath officially entered state records.
'Parasnath is the Marang Buru or hill deity of the Santals… Each year they assemble during the full moon of Baisakh… and celebrate a religious hunt for three days; after which a great tribal session is held… The entry of this custom in the record-of-rights which was prepared in 1911… was followed by the institution of a suit by the Swetamber Jains who have declared that no such custom exists,' Roy Choudhury wrote.
This account describes the Sendra festival which has been a frequent flash point in the Santal-Jain conflict over the hill. During the three-day long Sendra, all male members of the Santal community head into the forest to hunt. 'It's a rebirth for Santal men. Either die or hunt to survive,' Arjun Marandi, a community elder, told The Indian Express.
For Jains, who follow a rigorous spiritually-motivated vegetarian diet, Sendra has long caused consternation. But initial attempts to ban hunting on the hill were unsuccessful.
The aforementioned suit was dismissed by the district court, and upon appeal, rejected by the Patna High Court in 1917. '[The plaintiffs'] grievance, if any, is hyper sentimental,' the court observed.
The Privy Council, the highest court of appeal in British India, later held that Santals have a customary right to hunt on Parasnath Hill, Roy Choudhury wrote in the 1957 Gazetteer.
After Independence
Continuing pressure from dikus and concerns regarding India's depleting forests gradually eroded Adivasi rights over the hill post-Independence.
In 1972, the year in which the Indira Gandhi government passed the Wildlife Protection Act, Adivasi villages around Marang Buru lost their status under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution.
Areas included in the Fifth Schedule give Scheduled Tribes certain special rights with regards to administration and control of resources. The forested area on and around the hill was designated as a wildlife sanctuary in 1978, which further reduced Adivasi rights over it.
As a result, rituals at the Jug Jaher Than in Marang Buru were halted from the 1970s to 2000, the year Jharkhand attained statehood. Ajay Tudu, a prominent Santali activist who led the movement for the resumption of Adivasi rituals at Marang Buru, was shot dead by unknown assailants in 2008.
But even in a state created with the ostensible purpose of politically empowering Adivasis, there have been continuing impediments on Santal customary practices in Parasnath.
Most recently, a 2023 memorandum by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change ordered that no alcohol or meat be served within a 25 km radius of the hill — an area encompassing 99, mostly Adivasi, villages — out of respect for the sentiments of the Jain community.
The memo also banned serving eggs or meat in Anganwadi centres and primary schools in the area, Naman Priyesh Lakra, the Deputy Commissioner of Giridih district, told The Indian Express. The recent HC order pertained to the enforcement of this MoEFCC directive.
DC Lakra said that following the HC order the number of home guards in the area has been increased to prevent illegal activities by villagers or outsiders.
Nonetheless, earlier this week, Santals celebrated the Sendra festival in the jungles of Marang Buru. The Marang Buru Sanvta Susaar Baisi (MBSSB), a local Santal association led by Sikandar Hembrom, has also filed a counter-petition asserting Santals' traditional rights over the hill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Today in Politics: All eyes on INDIA bloc as it looks to fill gap with NCP(SP) over special session demand
Cracks seem to be appearing between one main constituent of the Opposition INDIA bloc and the others over the demand for a special session of Parliament to discuss Operation Sindoor. Interesting to see would be how the Opposition alliance mends the differences. On Friday, NCP(SP) Baramati MP Supriya Sule, who was a apart of one of the all-party delegations who went abroad to put forward India's stand in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, told The Indian Express that the Congress had approached her to join the bandwagon in demanding a special session of Parliament over the issue but she had refused saying that it was a time to be united and not play 'petty politics'. 'While I was abroad as a part of the delegation, the Congress contacted me. I said I cannot join them as I am away and told them to wait till all the delegations return. I told them, let's have a meeting and decide after I return, but it happened before I returned. That is why I could not sign the letter to the Prime Minister,' Sule told The Indian Express. Sule's remarks come close on the heels of 16 Opposition parties writing to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanding a special session, saying 'there are serious questions facing the nation about the terror attack, killing of civilians in Poonch, Uri and Rajouri, the ceasefire announcements, and the implications on our national security and foreign policy'. The NCP(SP) was not a signatory. They also come amid the rising 'closeness' between NCP patriarch Sharad Pawar and his estranged nephew and NCP chief Ajit Pawar. In the recent past, the two leaders have been seen sharing the stage at multiple events. Earlier, the senior Pawar, who has served as the Union Defence Minister, had categorically said that his party would not demand a special session of Parliament over Operation Sindoor as 'some things were not meant to be discussed in public'. On the other hand, Sule said the country comes first and India must send a message to the world that we are united against any terror attack. 'Pawar sahab had made it very clear. We were expecting that when the July session comes, hopefully everything will be settled by then, then we can definitely debate it. Because in a vibrant democracy, every issue must be debated, but there has to be a right time for it.' Sule said her party would 'definitely ask' the government questions during the Monsoon session. 'Of course, I think India will ask questions, not just the NCP (SP). India will ask questions. India wants to know a lot of answers. It is not just about the NCP (SP), India wants to know.' UK foreign secretary to visit India Aiming to further strengthen UK-India ties, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy will be on a two-day India visit starting Friday. During his visit, he is scheduled to hold talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister. He will also hold talks with Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal. – With PTI inputs


Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Haryana govt puts Nagina-Tijara road project on hold, irks locals in Nuh
The Nagina-Tijara road project meant to connect the Sarheta village in Nuh to Rajasthan, has been suspended until December 31, 2026, an official from the Gurugram Public Works Department (PWD), said on Thursday. The road, once touted as a symbol of inter-state connectivity, now lies abandoned and the project has been put on hold triggering anger among locals. The Haryana government official, cited above, was responding to a public complaint filed in October 2023. Originally launched in March 2018, following its announcement by then chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar during a rally in Punhana in December 2015, the project was expected to connect Haryana, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh. The proposed 13-km-long road would have reduced the current 45-km detour between Nagina and Tijara, helping people to travel across these states. The official statement announcing the suspension has turned viral on social media platforms and has triggered anger among the locals living in Nagina, Punhana and Pinangwan, with multiple delegations now planning to meet CM Nayab Singh Saini and raise the issue. Convenor of the Mewat RTI Manch, Rajuddin Meo, who filed the original complaint on October 8, 2023, expressed his disappointment. 'This is not just any road—it was meant to honour the memory of Raja Hasan Khan Mewati. His statue was installed at Barkali Chowk in Nagina by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government in March last year. A budget was allocated, but suspending such a significant project for two years raises serious questions about the government's intention,' he said. To be sure, the project has already faced numerous administrative and legal setbacks. It was awarded twice by the Haryana PWD to different companies. The first contractor, SKR Company, abandoned the work mid-way. A second firm was assigned the remaining stretch, but later approached the Punjab and Haryana high court in 2018, citing land and technical issues, leading to the construction being stalled. Although the matter was later withdrawn from the high court in 2019, work was not resumed. Beyond historical importance, the road holds religious significance for many in the region. Jain devotees from Mewat often struggle to reach the renowned Digambar Jain temple in Tijara, currently having to travel over 45 km via Ferozepur Jhirka. The Gram Panchayat of Notki and former Tijara MLA Ayub Khan have been advocating for this direct route. Earlier, in June 2011, then CM Bhupinder Singh Hooda had announced a four-lane road from Nagina to the Tijara border in the presence of UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi. A budget of ₹19.81 crore had also been earmarked with the promise being reiterated during the 2014 Haryana assembly polls. Now, with Sarheta's direct connection in limbo, residents of Sarheta and Kotla are deeply annoyed with the government's decision to suspend the project. A recent delegation led by Mewat RTI Manch and the Mouji Foundation raised the matter with sub-divisional officers in Tijara, Khairthal-Alwar DC, and the chief minister's office. Yet, with the PWD's latest confirmation of the project's suspension, many in Mewat feel betrayed and side-lined—fearing that the region's historical legacy and infrastructural needs will continue to be ignored. Superintending engineer, PWD B&R, (Gurugram circle) Praveen Chaudhary said, 'The demand regarding widening of the road from Nagina to Tijara, which consists of two different roads, has seen progress, with the Nagina to Notki Road (ID 1187) of 3.5 km approved in-principle for ₹1.5 crore. For the Notki to Tijara Road, while an agreement was terminated, new proposals for a 4km-long road in Haryana and a 2km-long road in Rajasthan are being considered, despite previous geotechnical investigation issues.'


Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi: ACB quizzes Jain; may be summoned again
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Delhi minister Satyendar Jain was on Friday interrogated for nearly six hours by the Delhi government's Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) in connection with alleged irregularities in the construction of classrooms during the previous government's tenure. Jain, who earlier held key portfolios of Public Works Department (PWD) and health, appeared 'evasive' during the questioning and is likely to be summoned again to join the investigation, according to three ACB officials familiar with the proceedings. 'We asked him 28 key questions about procedural lapses, cost escalations, and possible financial misconduct in the classroom construction drive. He gave valid responses to barely six,' said one senior officer, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'Initially, he blamed the education department. When countered, he then appeared to shift responsibility to the cabinet. His responses weren't cooperative from an investigative standpoint,' the officer added. ACB is investigating alleged violations in a project involving the construction of 12,748 semi-permanent classrooms in schools run by the then AAP government. Initially valued at ₹860 crore, the project cost ballooned to over ₹2,800 crore, allegedly without new tenders or adherence to standard procurement protocols. 'When questioned about the awarding of contracts at inflated rates and violations in procurement processes—reportedly to benefit contractors with AAP links—Jain largely deflected, repeatedly citing cabinet decisions,' said a second ACB official. Investigators pointed out that while the classrooms were meant to be semi-permanent structures (SPS), with a lifespan of about 30 years, the cost per unit averaged ₹24.86 lakh—nearly five times the estimated market cost of ₹5 lakh per classroom. 'When we asked him to explain the inflated costs, Jain claimed the pricing was determined by the education department. He argued that SPS classrooms were constructed to near-RCC standards based on cabinet decisions,' the official said. A further point of contention was the alleged suppression of a report by the Chief Technical Examiner (CTE) of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), which flagged serious procurement violations. The report was not disclosed between 2017 and 2020. When questioned about it, Jain claimed ignorance. 'He did admit to some form of favouritism in selecting contractors and architects, but again deflected blame—saying it was a collective decision by the cabinet and the education department,' said the third investigator cited above. ACB has also summoned former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, who was education minister during the period under scrutiny. Sisodia is expected to appear before the agency on Monday. An FIR was registered on April 30, naming both Sisodia and Jain. The charges include Section 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy). The FIR was filed after receiving clearance under Section 17-A of the POC Act. The summons served to Jain and Sisodia cite their roles in key policy decisions, and request written responses along with supporting documents. Both leaders have previously denied any wrongdoing in the matter. Jain refused comment on the matter when approached by HT.