Putin authorises creation of state messaging app to combat WhatsApp and Telegram
MOSCOW, June 24 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday signed a law authorising the development of a state-backed messaging app integrated with government services, as Moscow strives to reduce its dependence on platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram.
Russia has long sought to establish what it calls digital sovereignty by promoting home-grown services. Its push to replace foreign tech platforms became more urgent as some Western companies pulled out of the Russian market following Moscow's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Russian lawmakers say the state app will have functionality that the likes of Telegram and Meta Platforms' (META.O), opens new tab WhatsApp do not. Critics say the fact that Russia will exercise state control over it poses risks to privacy and personal freedoms.
Mikhail Klimarev, director of the Internet Protection Society, a Russian digital rights group, said earlier this month he expected Russia to slow the speeds of WhatsApp and Telegram to encourage people to switch over to the new app.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
29 minutes ago
- The Sun
Dark forces are exploiting our soft-touch borders – it's time to take back control before it's too late
Putin boat in NATO leaders met yesterday to discuss global threats, including from Russia and China. Yet there's one massive security disaster that the British Government has been sleep-walking into. 1 Suspected terrorists, sex offenders and drug gang leaders have all arrived here illegally on small boats. And now security chiefs fear hostile states are taking advantage of Britain's inability to protect its own borders to sow division. The Left likes to dismiss the seriousness of illegal migrant crossings. Yet there is now mounting evidence that dark forces abroad want to weaponise the epic failure of our soft touch system to unpick the fabric of our society. Some illegal migrants are now effectively state-sponsored by rogue regimes like Russia and Iran, whose agents have provided support and false papers. The Home Office insists it is aware of the problem. Project beer ON the day he entered Number 10, Sir Keir Starmer promised to 'tread more lightly' on the lives of voters. How does he square that with the idea of draconian restrictions on booze ads? You'd think Labour's fun police would have learned their lesson after the ban on smoking in pub gardens went up in a flame of public outrage. Sun probe uncovers asylum seekers in hotels linked to string of rape cases Instead, the constant desire to interfere suggests we will never be free of the Nanny-knows-best attitude which infects our public health bodies. Labour now finds itself in the bizarre position of wanting to give the vote to 16-year-olds — yet barring anyone over 18 from watching an advert for lager online, or before 9pm on TV. What on earth will they consider next? A ban on eating sausages? A crackdown on cake? Life in Britain should be about freedom and choice. This latest crazy plan is enough to drive anyone to drink. Steely resolve IT'S a current madness that in the dash to Net Zero, Britain bans new drilling for fossil fuels while China burns billions of tons of coal to make cheap steel for wind turbines — which it then sells to us. But welcome changes now mean the Chinese can be cut out of Government contracts in critical areas of national security. That's not only a major boost for British steel and other UK firms. It's also a vital step towards keeping one of our biggest security threats at arm's length.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Change in Nato mindset was brought on by Vladimir Putin as much as Trump
The price was high, but for now, at least, a crisis in Nato has been averted. Donald Trump may like to take the credit for almost all of the 32 allies agreeing to a sharp increase in defence spending, but the reality is that the dramatic change in the Nato mindset was as much brought on by Vladimir Putin. The Russian president's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 was the first jolt, but there is a second uncomfortable reality. If there is a sustainable ceasefire in Ukraine, it will mean the deployment of a European-led peacekeeping force in the country – and after a while, Russia's military might will inevitably recover. Mark Rutte's sycophantic, but effective, handling of Trump, certainly helped bring about a positive summit in The Hague, though even the Nato chief had to concede that describing Trump as 'daddy' – a father figure who had to tell Iran and Israel to stop fighting – was perhaps 'a question of taste'. The manoeuvres were not subtle, but they were nevertheless effective. A late schedule change gave Trump a night in King Willem-Alexander's palace, complete with breakfast, leaving Trump to remark on how well he had slept, though what particularly seems to have hit home was hearing each of the alliance's other 31 leaders give a three-minute speech, something that might be assumed to have bored him. 'I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing, but I left here a little bit different,' he said as he reflected on the morning meeting in an upbeat press conference. Even Trump's complaints that US media had been reporting that Iran's nuclear sites may not have been destroyed, according to initial Pentagon assessments, did nothing to puncture his tone of warmth to his Nato allies. Make no mistake, after Trump's re-election and particularly in February, the alarm across Nato was real. That month, Trump started talking to Putin about Ukraine, and rowed with Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in the Oval Office – while his defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, made a speech that was interpreted as a warning that in the not too distant future Europe might have to defend itself. But what helped persuade Nato's other leaders to spend more was a worry about Trump's commitment. Nato planners believe that if Russia were to agree to a ceasefire, it could quickly, within perhaps three, five or seven years, pose a serious threat to the alliance's eastern flank. The Kremlin could maintain an army of some 600,000 and by spending 6.5% of GDP on defence begin to restore its stock of munitions and equipment. Rutte told the Guardian on the eve of the summit that, faced with this threat, it was clear that Nato had a series of 'capability gaps' – for example, the alliance needed a fivefold increase in air defence to protect its cities from the kind of bombing that Ukraine is currently suffering daily. It was easy, he argued, to persuade other leaders to sign up to increasing spending because the purpose was clear. The remiltarisation to come is substantial. Calculations from the Royal United Services Institute thinktank estimate that Nato defence spending in Europe and Canada will increase from $500m today to $1.1tn in 2035, when the combined defence budget of the other 31 allies will essentially equal the Pentagon's. Already there are signs of what this will look like in practice, though it is uncertain how much will be spent appropriately. Britain will spend at least £1bn on restoring an air-launched tactical nuclear weapon capability to complement Trident, which is intended to deter a full-scale Russian land invasion of Europe, the kind not envisaged since the 1980s – and which remains highly unlikely. If there was a moment when the post-cold war dividend was reversed, the Hague summit was certainly it.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
All NATO, including US, 'totally committed' to keeping Ukraine in fight, Rutte says
BRUSSELS, June 25 (Reuters) - The whole of NATO, including the United States, is "totally committed" to keeping Ukraine in the fight against Russia's invasion, alliance Secretary General Mark Rutte told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday. Speaking at the end of a summit of NATO leaders in The Hague, Rutte also said nobody in NATO was naive about Russia and all alliance members "have more or less the same assessment" of Moscow. U.S. President Donald Trump's more conciliatory stance towards Russia in his efforts to bring an end to the war in Ukraine has prompted questions about U.S. commitments to Kyiv. "The whole of NATO, including the United States, is totally committed to keep Ukraine in the fight, to make sure that if there is a peace deal, that peace deal - or the ceasefire - will be lasting, will be durable," Rutte said. He said the clear direction of travel was that Europeans would be responsible for more of the military aid to Ukraine. But he said the United States would still be "very much involved with intelligence-sharing, with also practical military support" including potentially air defence systems. "I think there will still be a huge, big American involvement," Rutte said. The Trump administration has also told Europeans that they must take over primary responsibility for their own security, rather than relying on the United States through NATO. Rutte said this process would be possible as Europeans had committed to spending more on defence, and it would be "well-organised" to avoid any gaps that Russia could exploit. "I've had these discussions in Washington over the last couple of months," he said. "For years, the U.S. has said 'we have to pivot more towards Asia'. Now that the Europeans are stepping up, that also makes it possible," he said. "You will see that what the U.S. is delivering to NATO in terms of capabilities will gradually come down. But there's also total clarity from the U.S. that they don't want any capability gaps to emerge in Europe," Rutte said.
