New record for ‘blind box' toy: Human-sized Labubu figure sold for whooping $150,000 at Beijing auction — Check details
A human-sized Labubu figure was sold at an auction house in Beijing, China, on Tuesday, 10 June 2025, for $150,275.51 (1.08 million yuan), marking a new record for the 'blind box' toy, reported the news agency Reuters.
The deal was closed at the Yongle International Auction in Beijing, where more than 2,000 people placed their bids through Yongle's mobile application, and nearly 200 people attended the event in person, according to the report.
One of the auction bidders, Du, said that she planned to spend a maximum of 20,000 yuan on the toy. However, she had to walk out empty-handed after the price jumped to over $150,000.
'My child likes it so every time when Labubu released new products we will buy one or two items. It is hard to explain its popularity but it must have moved this generation,' Du told the news agency.
According to the agency report, the toy was a one-of-one 4.3 feet (131 cm) tall Labubu figure in 'mint green' colour, which was sold as the highest crossing item in the auction house on Tuesday.
The Labubu was made by a Hong Kong-based artist and illustrator named Kasing Lung nearly a decade ago. Later, in 2019, the artist agreed to let Pop Mart sell these figurines.
Pop Mart is a Chinese toymaker that markets collectable figurines. They started selling these items in blind boxes, which act as a surprise for the buyers, who do not know exactly what design they will receive until they open the packaging.
Labubu blind box toys sold in Pop Mart's stores are around 50 yuan, according to the agency report.
The Labubu figurine became popular after top social media celebrities like Korean pop music group Blackpink's Lisa and British football star David Beckham were spotted with the same.
Lisa reportedly praised the doll in interviews and online posts, while Beckham also shared a photo on Instagram of his Labubu figure attached to a bag. According to Mint's earlier report, Dua Lipa and Jahnvi Kapoor are among other celebrities who own the China-made Labubu figurine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement
Disney and Universal sued popular artificial intelligence image-generator Midjourney on Wednesday, marking the first time major Hollywood companies have taken legal action against a maker of generative AI technology that could upend the entertainment industry. The copyright lawsuit in a Los Angeles federal court claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorized copies' of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from 'Despicable Me.' 'Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing," the companies state in the complaint. The studios also say the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney didn't respond to a request for comment but its CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit in a weekly conference call with users Wednesday after someone asked if it would endanger the tiny startup's future. 'I can't really discuss any ongoing legal things because the world isn't cool like that, but I think Midjourney is going to be around for a very long time,' Holz said. "I think everybody wants us to be around.' In a 2022 interview with The Associated Press, Holz described his image-making service as 'kind of like a search engine' pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He compared copyright concerns about the technology with how such laws have adapted to human creativity. 'Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?' Holz said. 'Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine.' The lawsuit against Midjourney comes as a number other AI companies have sought to make inroads into Hollywood and the video game industry, providing AI tools that can aid filmmakers and game developers in generating new video, synthetic voices and editing help. A movie industry group, the Motion Picture Association, said in a statement Wednesday that 'strong copyright protection is the backbone of our industry' and it supports a 'balanced approach to AI that both protects intellectual property and embraces responsible, human-centered innovation.' Endorsing the lawsuit Wednesday as a 'critical stand for human creativity and responsible innovation' was the Recording Industry Association of America, a music publishing group fighting its own legal battles against companies that make AI-generated music. Major AI developers don't typically disclose their data sources but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. At the same time, many big tech companies are increasingly looking to make licensing deals to pay for the content their AI systems need. The studios' case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is underway in London, pitting Getty Images against Stability AI, maker of an image-generating tool that competes with Midjourney.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Disney and Universal sue AI firm Midjourney for copyright infringement
HighlightsDisney and Universal Pictures have filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Midjourney, marking a significant legal action from major Hollywood companies against generative artificial intelligence technology. The lawsuit alleges that Midjourney has created and distributed unauthorized copies of iconic characters, including Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from Despicable Me, by unlawfully using the studios' copyrighted libraries. Midjourney's CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit during a conference call, expressing confidence in the company's longevity despite the legal challenges and likening the image-generating service to a search engine that learns from various images on the internet. Disney and Universal sued popular artificial intelligence image-generator Midjourney on Wednesday, marking the first time major Hollywood companies have taken legal action against a maker of generative AI technology that could upend the entertainment industry. The copyright lawsuit in a Los Angeles federal court claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute "endless unauthorized copies" of their famed characters, such as Darth Vader from the Star Wars franchise and the Minions from "Despicable Me." "Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism. Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing," the companies state in the complaint. The studios also say the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to take technological measures to halt such image generation. Midjourney didn't respond to a request for comment but its CEO David Holz addressed the lawsuit in a weekly conference call with users Wednesday after someone asked if it would endanger the tiny startup's future. "I can't really discuss any ongoing legal things because the world isn't cool like that, but I think Midjourney is going to be around for a very long time," Holz said. "I think everybody wants us to be around." In a 2022 interview with The Associated Press, Holz described his image-making service as "kind of like a search engine" pulling in a wide swath of images from across the internet. He compared copyright concerns about the technology with how such laws have adapted to human creativity. "Can a person look at somebody else's picture and learn from it and make a similar picture?" Holz said. "Obviously, it's allowed for people and if it wasn't, then it would destroy the whole professional art industry, probably the nonprofessional industry too. To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it's sort of the same thing and if the images come out differently then it seems like it's fine." The lawsuit against Midjourney comes as a number other AI companies have sought to make inroads into Hollywood and the video game industry, providing AI tools that can aid filmmakers and game developers in generating new video, synthetic voices and editing help. A movie industry group, the Motion Picture Association, said in a statement Wednesday that "strong copyright protection is the backbone of our industry" and it supports a "balanced approach to AI that both protects intellectual property and embraces responsible, human-centered innovation." Endorsing the lawsuit Wednesday as a "critical stand for human creativity and responsible innovation" was the Recording Industry Association of America, a music publishing group fighting its own legal battles against companies that make AI-generated music. Major AI developers don't typically disclose their data sources but have argued that taking troves of publicly accessible online text, images and other media to train their AI systems is protected by the "fair use" doctrine of American copyright law. At the same time, many big tech companies are increasingly looking to make licensing deals to pay for the content their AI systems need. The studios' case joins a growing number of lawsuits filed against developers of AI platforms in San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry is underway in London, pitting Getty Images against Stability AI, maker of an image-generating tool that competes with Midjourney.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Fake Labubu Identity: How to identify if your Labubu is fake or real?
So, you finally got your hands on one of those little gremlins everyone on social media is obsessed with? You own a Labubu. Congrats! But wait, is it the real deal or did you accidentally adopt a knockoff cousin called Lafufu? Yes, the Popmart viral sensation has officially hit collector chaos levels. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now And like all good things that blow up online, the fakes have come flooding in faster than you can say 'limited edition.' If you're staring at your new plush monster wondering whether it's a fashion-forward icon or a sneaky imposter - don't worry, we have got you. Let's break it down. What even is a Labubu? Labubu isn't just a weird little elf-beast thing. She (yes, she - according to the OG children's books by Kasing Lung) is the star of The Monsters series and has become a fashion-forward freaky-cute collectible thanks to a collab with Chinese retail giant Popmart. Think big buggy eyes, crocodile teeth, and a dash of chaotic energy. Throw in a blind-box unboxing experience and a rare-chase factor (1 in 72 boxes has an ultra-rare piece!) and you've got a recipe for instant Instagram clout. Even celebs like Dua Lipa and Rihanna are toting Labubus around like they're the new Birkins. So of course… chaos ensued. Enter: The Lafufu Because the internet can't have nice things without bootleg versions popping up, we now have Lafufus. These are fake Labubus. Kinda cute, kinda wonky, and definitely causing confusion. They're being sold all over online marketplaces often for dirt cheap. But here's the thing: not all knockoffs are evil. Some people actually prefer their Lafufus. More on that in a sec. How to spot a fake (aka Lafufu vs Labubu) If your Labubu came with side-eye and an iffy-looking foot, don't panic just yet. Here's how to suss out whether your monster baby is legit or living a lie: Packaging Real Labubus come in Popmart-branded box with a scannable QR code. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Lafufus are often sold in a plastic bag that looks like it once held leftover noodles. Red flag. Details Authentic Labubus have pretty little touches - tiny blush, UV-reactive foot markings, tiny hands. Lafufus? Blobs with hair. Look out for weird fur, missing limbs, or one eye higher than the other. Build quality Labubus might have slight imperfections (hey, they're handmade), but Lafufus can be wild. We're talking floppy legs, weird fur textures, and paint jobs that scream 'art class at age 5.' Price check Found one for under £10? It's almost definitely a Lafufu. Legit Labubus are usually £25 and up, especially if they're rare or part of a collector's set. Okay but, should you even buy a Lafufu? Here's the hot take: Maybe? We're not gonna shame you for choosing the budget-friendly option, especially when Labubu resale prices are reaching iPhone levels (INR 2,89,000). If you don't care about QR codes or collectible street cred, Lafufus are actually (kinda) great. Creative playground Some collectors buy Lafufus just to customize them. They repaint, fluff, shave, stitch outfits—you name it. It's like Build-a-Bear meets chaotic art therapy. Affordable entry into the fandom If you're Labubu-curious but don't want to drop half your paycheck on a doll with a snarl, Lafufu lets you join the monster party without financial regret. Just be honest about what you're getting. Don't fall for listings pretending to be real Popmart goods when they're clearly not. If it says 'Labubu' but shows up looking like it had a rough night in the washing machine - you've got yourself a Lafufu. Real or fake, love your weird little monster At the end of the day, whether your toy is a certified collectible or a rogue Lafufu with a slightly lopsided grin, it's still a part of the culture. What matters is that you love it. Labubu or Lafufu, real or remix, just make sure you're buying from legit sellers, managing your expectations, and maybe not spending your rent money on a monster in a box. (Unless you really want to. No judgment.) And hey, if Rihanna can rock one, so can you. Even if yours cost £9.99 (INR 1,100) and came with a mystery odor. Want more tips on spotting fakes or customizing your Lafufu into a punk-rock icon? Just holler, Labubu world is wild, and we are here for the chaos.
