Advocates fear Texas lawmakers are about to worsen the state's homelessness crisis
DALLAS — As thousands of Texans sleep on the streets, Republicans in the Texas Legislature have pushed proposals that advocates worry will only worsen the state's homelessness crisis.
GOP lawmakers have advanced bills to force cities to beef up their enforcement of a statewide ban on homeless encampments and prevent organizations that provide services to the homeless from setting up shop near schools. They've also pushed legislation that housing advocates fear will accelerate evictions, potentially driving up homelessness as a result.
As the state's housing costs rose in recent years, so did the number of people experiencing homelessness. Nearly 28,000 Texans did not have a permanent roof over their heads last year, according to federal estimates — about an 8% increase from the year before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of those, more than 12,000 were unsheltered — meaning they lived outside, in their cars or in other places not fit for human habitation.
Homeless advocates say proposals that have gained traction in the Legislature so far do little if anything to address the root causes of the state's homelessness crisis — chiefly its shortage of affordable homes — and would make it harder for unhoused people to get out of homelessness.
'A lot of legislators feel like the cities aren't doing their job,' said Eric Samuels, who heads the Texas Homeless Network. 'The presumption is they're not already working to prevent and end homelessness, which is far from the case.'
Chief among those proposals is a stiffening of the state's ban on homeless encampments. Gov. Greg Abbott signed the ban into law four years ago — and the U.S. Supreme Court effectively upheld it last year. But homeless encampments remain visible, driving frustration among lawmakers.
[The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a ban on homeless encampments. Here's what it means for Texas.]
Senate Bill 241 — authored by state Sen. Pete Flores, a Pleasanton Republican — aims to compel localities to show stricter enforcement of the ban. Under the bill, cities and counties would have to set up a process to allow residents to file formal complaints if they suspect a violation of the camping ban. If a city or county doesn't resolve that complaint within 90 days, the state attorney general could declare it a 'violating local entity.' The state would then step in to resolve the complaint and recoup the costs of clearing encampments from that city or county's sales taxes.
'It's already against the law,' Flores said during a March committee hearing. 'They're just not enforcing it.'
The bill cleared the Senate earlier this month by a 22-8 vote, largely along partisan lines, and awaits a committee hearing in the House.
Much of lawmakers' ire has been directed at Austin. City leaders there relaxed restrictions on public encampments in 2019 — and an uptick in the number of people experiencing street homelessness prompted Austin voters to reinstate the city's camping ban. State lawmakers quickly followed enacting a statewide ban, which makes sleeping outside or camping on public property a misdemeanor punishable by up to a $500 fine.
Since 2021, Austin has issued nearly 1,300 citations for violations of the camping ban and related violations, city data show.
As encampments remain visible and the city fields hundreds of complaints a month related to homelessness, there's frustration and hunger for greater enforcement of the ban.
'The simple fact is that (the camping ban) is not being enforced in the city of Austin,' said Matt Mackowiak, who co-founded the group Save Austin Now, which put the city's camping ban on the ballot in 2021. 'Anyone that spends more than 30 minutes in Austin knows that and sees that.'
Ticketing people experiencing homelessness for camping violations is counterproductive, homeless service providers and advocates have long argued. If someone can't afford to pay for housing, they likely can't afford a $500 fine. Fining them can make it more difficult to escape homelessness — especially if they don't show up for their court hearing, prompting arrest warrants and creating criminal histories that can make housing and employment nearly unobtainable. In Austin, the ban effectively forced people experiencing homelessness out of the city center, where they could more easily access necessary services and into places like neighborhoods and parks.
Some major Texas cities have reduced the number of people experiencing unsheltered homelessness in recent years. Officials in Houston and Dallas have focused reduction efforts on quickly finding new housing for people living in encampments and other places that aren't suitable for living while connecting them with support services. Those cities saw street homelessness fall by more than 25% from 2019 to 2024, federal figures show.
Under that strategy, ticketing people experiencing homelessness is often unnecessary, said Sarah Kahn, CEO of Housing Forward, the lead agency in charge of tackling homelessness in Dallas and Collin counties. That's because they've either been connected to services or law enforcement authorities have made it clear that camping at those sites will no longer be tolerated, she said.
Homeless advocates also worry that a proposal billed as cracking down on squatters will result in more people experiencing homelessness. Senate Bill 38 would speed up the eviction process and reduce legal protections for the state's 4.2 million renter households, tenants' advocates have said. Those facing eviction face a higher risk of becoming homeless, researchers have found. Homeless service providers worry the bill would accelerate evictions and lead to higher levels of homelessness.
'The more people that we evict, the more people who are going to fall into homelessness,' Samuels said. 'It's that simple.'
Landlord groups like the Texas Apartment Association have pushed the bill to deal with what they've said is an uptick in encounters with squatters — and difficulty under existing law getting them to vacate their property. The bill's opponents argue that squatting cases are rare and don't necessitate relaxing tenant protections against eviction.
State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Houston Republican who authored the bill, dismissed concerns that the legislation could spur an increase in homelessness.
'The only way to get rid of [squatters] is to speed up the eviction process,' Bettencourt said in an interview.
Senators approved the bill, 21-8, in April, and it awaits a committee hearing in the House.
Meanwhile, bills that advocates say could help people escape homelessness have yet to hit the floor in either chamber — like a proposal to help people experiencing homelessness regain crucial personal identification documents such as birth certificates and driver's licenses.
A bill by state Sen. Tan Parker, R-Flower Mound, would require the state's six largest counties to set up crisis service centers to provide mental health services for people experiencing homelessness. About 22% of homeless Texans suffer from a severe mental illness, federal data shows. Parker's bill, which has been left pending in committee, would help address a population whose needs are often difficult — if not impossible — to meet, Kahn said.
'We all want the same thing,' Kahn said. 'We want to end street homelessness, and we want to really address public health and safety for all of our neighbors, and we have tools that can achieve that outcome.'
Disclosure: Texas Apartment Association has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Tickets are on sale now for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Get tickets before May 1 and save big! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
44 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Speaker Johnson Downplays Musk's Influence, Suggests Republicans Will Pass Budget Bill
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on June 8 downplayed tech billionaire Elon Musk's critical comments and said that House Republicans will pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act backed by President Donald Trump. Last week, Musk and Trump got into a heated back and forth after the Tesla CEO repeatedly bashed the spending bill on social media. Trump suggested that it was because of its cuts to electric vehicle mandates, and at one point floated cutting federal money to Musk's companies. Meanwhile, Musk took credit for Trump and the GOP winning the 2024 election and threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft.

USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
ICE is enforcing the law. Trump is right to send National Guard to protect them.
ICE is enforcing the law. Trump is right to send National Guard to protect them. | Opinion I've watched the violence in Los Angeles this weekend, aimed at law enforcement officers who are attempting to uphold our nation's immigration laws, with growing anger. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump orders troops to LA as agents, protesters clash over immigration President Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protesters opposed to immigration enforcement. The images of fires burning and smoking rising above the streets of Los Angeles make America's second-largest city look like a war zone. But it's not war. It's what happens when a Republican president enforces the law in a state as far left and as lost as California. President Donald Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to restore peace in Los Angeles after protesters set fires, defaced buildings, slashed vehicle tires and hurled pieces of concrete at local police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. A Department of Homeland Security news release on June 7 noted that ICE agents − and their families − have endured a surge in threats and harassment. I've watched this violence, aimed at law enforcement officers who are attempting to uphold our nation's immigration laws, with growing anger. If California is one version of America and the rest of the country is another version, I know which America I choose. It's the same one a majority of Americans also have chosen. Polls have consistently shown that voters side with Trump and other Republicans on immigration and border security, not the lawlessness and chaos that Democrats and their progressive allies promote. And to answer the question I'll inevitably get: Yes, I voted for this, and I'd vote for this again. Opinion: Guess who Americans want to run the economy? Hint: It's not Democrats. California Gov. Newsom denounces Trump's effort to restore order California Gov. Gavin Newsom denounced Trump's decision to send in the National Guard as "inflammatory." That's not a good look for a governor with national ambitions. Newsom's staff hasn't helped him either. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth posted on X a photo of demonstrators posing in front of a fire while one person waved a Mexican flag. Hegseth wrote: "Another 'mostly peaceful protest' brought to you by @GavinNewsom. DEPORT." Newsom's press office responded: "Are you going to send in the Marines the next time the Philadelphia Eagles win, too?" Comparing violent protests against federal officers enforcing the law to a Super Bowl celebration that went too far is tone death, even for the governor of California. Opinion: Texas woman's death would have been prevented if Biden had secured the border It's important to note that ICE agents aren't arresting just anyone. The Department of Homeland Security reported that the arrests in Los Angeles included people accused of drug trafficking, assault, cruelty to children, domestic violence, robbery and the smuggling of illegal immigrants. Our nation's immigration laws must be enforced The fact that the protests broke out because the demonstrators didn't want illegal immigrants with criminal records to be arrested or deported is sad and pathetic. America is a melting pot, and our arms should be open to people who want to come to this land to live a better life. But we must follow a legal process for immigrants to enter and stay in the United States. But progressive states like California and Democratic leaders like Newsom and former President Joe Biden have ignored our immigration laws. They sent a clear message to people all over the world that the border was open, and millions took advantage of that fact to enter our country illegally. Now, it is Trump who must enforce the law and restore order, whether Gavin Newsom and the violent protesters in the streets of Los Angeles like it or not. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans gather in Mackinaw City with message of unity ahead of 2026 battleground
U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman (R-Watersmeet) speaks to Michigan Republican Party donors, elected officials and activists at the Straits Area Lincoln Day Dinner event in Mackinaw City on June 7, 2025 | Photo by Ben Solis MACKINAW CITY – Hopped up on a series of fresh wins and with their man in the White House, Michigan Republicans on Saturday said they need to hold it together over the next year if they want to achieve a full sweep of key offices in 2026. With momentum at their backs, it appeared that nothing less would satisfy the nearly 150 donors and elected officials who met to dine at Audie's Restaurant in Mackinaw City for the Straits Area Lincoln Day Dinner. The guest list included two members of the state's congressional delegation – one who may very well seek the open U.S. Senate seat – the Michigan Legislature and many more local officials. Two GOP candidates for governor – former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox and current Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R-Porter Township) – were also in attendance, who stumped before the crowd with speeches heavy on potential policy for the state. Michiganders in 2026 will not only select a replacement for retiring Democratic U.S. Sen. Gary Peters, but also a new governor, secretary of state and attorney general. Control of the Michigan Senate is also up for grabs, with Republicans hoping the wind in their sails from President Donald Trump's 2024 victory will help them win back control of the entire state Legislature after Democrats swept races in 2022. Sen. John Damoose (R-Harbor Springs) said that fight is starting early and that he hoped his colleagues understood the measure of the moment. Looking out on the packed banquet hall in the back of Audie's Restaurant, Damoose said the energy was palpable. 'It made me think back to the dark days after 2020, where we just felt kicked in the teeth and we broke up and went into different corners, and we fought amongst ourselves,' Damoose said. 'We were downtrodden and we didn't really have a clear path forward. We were worried that the election wasn't fair.' Damoose said he then thought of his son, who was in high school at the time, and that if he had come home with a poor test score, he likely would have all kinds of excuses about why he failed that test. 'Even if that were true, I would tell him that I didn't care about that. I want to know what you are going to do to do better next time,' Damoose said. That parable was also indicative of what the kind of soul searching Republicans need to do heading into 2026. 'It hurt us to sit and fight. We saw the results of that in 2022, but we did a little better last year,' Damoose said. 'We want the same good things, but the bottom line is, if anybody's out there wondering whether we're divided, look at this [room] and look at the list of people who are here today, ready to win in 2026.' A family sometimes gets into arguments, but the bottom line is that they love each other, Damoose added. He also spoke highly of Sen. Jim Runestad (R-White Lake), chair of the Michigan Republican Party, whom Damoose said was committed to bringing them back together. Sen. Ed McBroom (R-Vulcan) said there will be challenging races for the MIGOP in the Upper Peninsula and it would take a lot of support to get across the finish line. The big prize, however, would be the top three executive offices, all currently held by Democrats. In a jab at Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson – the latter of whom is running for governor in 2026 – McBroom said it wouldn't take much to have candidates better than what Michigan has. U.S. Rep. Jack Bergman (R-Watersmeet), who attended the event along with headlining speaker U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland), said Trump not being on the ballot means Republicans must focus on voter turnout. If they don't get the turnout equation right in 2026, Republicans could lose the U.S. House, and that would render the last years of Trump's presidency dead in the water. 'The Democrats will veto the Trump agenda, with all the impeachment and stuff that they will choose to do,' Bergman said before adding that he doesn't believe Democrats have a handle on their own platform. 'Who's your party leader? What's your party platform? What is your plan? When you don't have [all three], you're getting what you're getting.' Several protesters greeted Bergman with signs and chants as they walked along the sidewalk outside Audie's Restaurant. Undeterred, Bergman said that aside from holding the U.S. House, getting back control of Lansing in the Legislature and the executive branch should be donors and activists' main priority. The state House fell back into Republican control last year mostly due to Trump's resurgence and a plan executed by Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township). That has already had consequences for the Democrats who controlled both chambers last session as Republicans seek to roll back their legislative agenda and trim the budget with an ethos similar to that of DOGE, the Trump administration effort that has sought to slash, if not eliminate outright, the budgets of federal agencies and departments. Although the Democratic-controlled Michigan Senate has put forward its 2025 fiscal year budget, the state House has been slowwalking theirs, with members of the House Appropriations Committee noting how they're going through it with a fine-toothed comb every chance they can in statements or press conferences. Case in point: When speaking to the crowd on Saturday, Rep. John Roth (R-Interlochen) talked about his work thus far on appropriations, and said he had 10 items that he 'killed immediately' when he took over his budget. 'One was the water affordability bill that nobody could tell me why there was money in there for anything,' Roth said. 'So, $10 million, gone. We're having a lot of fun with that.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX