Opinion: The climate conundrum facing political leaders: The public wants to have it both ways
Human-induced climate change continues to worsen, and its impacts have been felt across the country. On the West Coast, the heat dome in the sweltering summer of 2021 caused an estimated 619 deaths. On the East Coast, Hurricane Fiona led to $3 billion in damages. Fires in Fort McMurray and Jasper led to mass evacuations and $5 billion in insured losses.
Article content
Article content
The natural environment looms large in Canadian identity, but we are not a climate leader. According to the 2025 Climate Performance Index, Canada currently ranks 62nd of 67 countries. We are the lowest-ranked of the G7, and one of the lowest of the G20. This mediocre climate performance is a long-term trend through both Conservative and Liberal governments.
Article content
Article content
Despite worsening climate change and lacklustre federal climate action, the issue has been on the back burner in current election debates. This is largely because of cost-of-living concerns, as well as fears of annexation by the U.S. Further, the governing Liberals have scrapped the consumer carbon tax. In the face of threats south of the border there is also renewed political talk about building new oil and gas pipelines.
Article content
Article content
In this tumultuous context we surveyed a demographically representative sample of 3,003 Canadians across the country about their opinion on climate-related issues. The survey was conducted in March 2025 on our behalf by Research Co., a Canadian polling firm.
Article content
• Most people believe that climate change is real. Only 21.2 per cent of Canadians completely or mostly agreed with the idea that 'human caused climate change is a myth — there is no compelling scientific evidence for it.'
Article content
• The public was split about whether 'the federal government is wrong to scrap the consumer carbon tax' — 33.8 per cent completely or mostly disagreed with the decision to end the consumer carbon tax, while 31.4 per cent completely or mostly agreed with this decision.
Article content
Article content
• More of the public are skeptical of carbon pricing than believe it is effective: 40.5 per cent completely or mostly agree, while 22.2 per cent completely or mostly disagree with the statement: 'Climate change policy measures like 'gas taxes' and 'cap and trade' are ineffective in reducing GHG emissions.'
Article content
• Even though people are skeptical of carbon pricing, they are supportive of placing more emphasis on alternative energy: 66 per cent of people completely or mostly agree that 'Canada should place more emphasis on alternative energy sources (such as wind power, solar energy, hydro and biofuels)' while only 11.4 per cent completely or mostly disagree.
Article content
• On the other hand, a majority of respondents (53.5 per cent) completely or mostly agree that 'Canada can continue to develop the oil sands in Alberta and still meet its climate commitments' compared to a minority who completely or mostly disagree (14.3 per cent).
Article content
• A substantial portion of the general public — 50.6 per cent — completely or mostly agree that 'in light of current political tensions with the United States, Canada should build new oil and gas pipelines (e.g., resurrecting previously abandoned projects such as the Northern Gateway Pipeline and/or the Energy East Pipeline). Only 15 per cent of the general public completely or mostly disagree.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
27 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
John Rustad faces 'messy' summer over B.C. Conservative leadership: political expert
VICTORIA — B.C.'s Conservative caucus members are meeting in Surrey today in what a political scientist says could be the start of a 'messy' summer for party Leader John Rustad. It comes as Rustad's leadership is under review and questions arise about his handling of allegations he made in a letter accusing some former Conservative members of the legislature of blackmail. University of B.C. political science lecturer Stewart Prest says there is no formal mechanism for Conservative legislators to push Rustad out at today's meeting, but it doesn't mean they couldn't do things in a 'messier way' by withdrawing confidence in his leadership. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. He says if they say they no longer have faith in Rustad, the leader's options 'are limited about what he can do,' regardless of what the party constitution says. The constitution approved at the party's most recent annual general meeting in Nanaimo says a leader can only be removed from office after voluntary resignation, death, incapacity or in a leadership review by the membership. Premier David Eby said during his weekly news conference that the Opposition faces 'significant challenges' regardless of who leads them, saying it has 'far-right politics' that are extreme. 'The Conservatives will continue to focus on what appears to be important to them, which is mostly the Conservatives,' Eby said. The Conservative leadership review is already underway and is expected to last through December, with party members voting on whether they support Rustad in the job. Prest said he expects MLAs to let that process play out for now. But Prest said the riding-by-riding vote also created the 'possibility of an additional drip, drip effect' where Rustad had to continually defend his record. 'There's not one particular way this rule may play out, but I would think, if I were Mr. Rustad, I would not be looking forward to the summer,' Prest said. He added it is not clear whether any future leadership challenger to Rustad would come from the 'populist' or moderate wings of the party. 'We are already hearing rumblings of challenges from both camps, so I don't know if it is an either-or situation,' Prest said. He said that the recent emergence of the One BC party, launched by former Conservative MLAs Dallas Brodie and Tara Armstrong, speaks to a growing unwillingness among populists to compromise. 'So I think that is likely to continue,' Prest said. As for the moderate camp, its members would focus on the question of whether Rustad can win government, Prest said. 'If there isn't a sense that Mr. Rustad can pull everyone together, they too will join the calls for him to step aside and let someone else try,' Prest said.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Veteran B.C. MLA barred from federal Conservative run says Tories must fix nominations
A longtime B.C. MLA who was barred from running for the Conservative party in the April federal election said the Tories need to do a deep dive into their nomination processes — but he has little faith that will happen. Michael de Jong said too much power has been centralized with the party's leadership in Ottawa and he's not alone in feeling frustrated with the way nominations were run. But he said the party's leadership has shown little willingness to acknowledge fault. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre told a podcast this week that the party's support in the April 28 election 'didn't actually come down that much' compared to January, when it was projected to sweep to a huge majority. 2:10 B.C ridings to watch: Abbotsford-South Langley MP race 'The capacity to drink the bathwater is limitless. 'We almost won, we should have won, we will win, it was circumstances beyond our control,'' de Jong said. Story continues below advertisement 'There's an element of denial there, of denial that perhaps some of this result was the product of your own behaviour and your own decisions.' De Jong, who was B.C.'s Liberal finance minister from 2012 to 2017, announced his intention to run for the Conservatives in the riding of Abbotsford—South Langley in April 2024. He said he agreed with Poilievre's focus on fiscal restraint and a team of volunteers worked toward the goal of launching his candidacy for more than a year. De Jong said the local riding association unanimously recommended him as the party's candidate. He said he was shocked when he got a one-line email from a party official saying he wasn't qualified to enter the nomination contest. De Jong said he wasn't given a reason for the rejection and his appeal was denied. The Conservative party held a nomination meeting in the riding on March 8. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Sukhman Gill, a 25-year-old political newcomer, won the nomination and was elected MP. 2:10 BC United MLA Mike de Jong not seeking reelection 'Someone decided that the … only living finance minister with five balanced budgets under his belt was not qualified to run for the Conservative party. I don't know who that is,' de Jong said, adding he's been told the decision was made by the national campaign manager Jenni Byrne. Story continues below advertisement The Globe and Mail reported during the campaign that Byrne was behind the candidate selection decisions in about 90 ridings, frustrating prospective candidates who spent time and money preparing to run. The Conservatives did not respond to questions about Byrne's involvement. The Conservatives had completed nominations in 275 of the 343 federal ridings by mid-March. The election was called on March 23. Since April 28, a number of would-be candidates have spoken publicly about their concerns. De Jong said he's heard directly from others who had a similar experience. 'That's an odd approach for a party that fancies itself as the grassroots party,' he said. He said 'this desire for completely centralized control of the candidate selection process' is part of a broader trend in Canadian politics involving parties of all stripes. Leaders need some control over candidate selection to ensure the party isn't represented by people who turn out to have 'odious views,' said Alex Marland, the Jarislowsky chair in trust and political leadership at Acadia University. 'It's the leader who is concerned about the representation of the party and its reputation,' he said. Marland said there is a question of trust in the matter of would-be Conservative candidates who acted in good faith. Story continues below advertisement 3:35 Major blow to BC United Party with loss of long-time MLA from Abbotsford 'So they were going around knocking on doors for weeks and months, thinking that they were going to be entering into a fair contest. Maybe sometimes they're taking time off work. Certainly it's a big effort to do all of this. And then only to have, at the last moment, something change,' he said. Marland said nomination processes are rife with problems and political parties are effectively gatekeepers with a great deal of power to decide who gets elected. 'Political parties are private clubs, and these are things that are not handled by Elections Canada at all. So there's just no regulation,' he said. He's calling for creating better opportunities for Independent candidates to run and have an actual voice in legislatures. De Jong ran as an Independent in Abbotsford—South Langley. Even with his name recognition after a long provincial career and the endorsement of former MP Ed Fast, he lost to Gill. Story continues below advertisement Conservative party spokesperson Sarah Fischer said in an email that the national council reviews the party's governance documents to ensure they 'meet the needs of the moment' after each election. 'Consequently, the Conservative Party of Canada's national council struck an ad hoc subcommittee to review our candidate nomination rules to make sure that these rules are relevant and timely to the work ahead,' she wrote. The national council has scheduled a party convention for the end of January in Calgary, where Poilievre will face a leadership review and will be expected to hold an accountability session with delegates. Poilievre told The Hub this week that the Conservatives just need to find a way to hold the new coalition of voters that helped them win 143 seats on April 28. 'Now our challenge is, how do we crystallize that? How do we keep these people inspired? How do actually deliver for them the best we can in opposition? And then add the two or three percentage points more of people who didn't come out for us this time,' he said. De Jong said he has not heard from Poilievre or his inner circle since the election, and will not be at the January convention to raise the nomination issue himself. 'I think people should be very concerned, but I don't know that a guy like me is the best spokesperson because at the end of the day it's too easy for others to say, 'Well, you just didn't get what you wanted,'' de Jong said. Story continues below advertisement Besides, he said, his Conservative party membership lapsed in the spring. He won't be renewing it.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
From railways to minerals: seven takeaways from Canada's new NATO spending pledge
THE HAGUE – Canada and its NATO allies agreed Wednesday to substantially hike their defence spending target to five per cent of annual GDP by 2035. Prime Minister Mark Carney endorsed the plan to invest 3.5 per cent of national GDP in core defence needs, plus another 1.5 per cent in related areas, such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. Here are some key aspects of this week's NATO leaders' summit. 1) A post-Trump review NATO members will review their spending pledge in 2029. The U.S. Constitution says President Donald Trump ends his term in the first few days of that year. Carney would not say whether that's why NATO members set the review for 2029. He instead suggested it was a reasonable amount of time, given the need to 'ensure that the commitments align with the global security landscape.' A senior Canadian government official who spoke to reporters on background on Wednesday said the review could examine the ratio between core defence spending and funding for related areas. 2) Trump calls the shots NATO leaders boosted defence spending in part due to the threat of conventional and cyber attacks by Russia. But they were also driven to act by Trump's repeated suggestion that the U.S. might not defend a NATO ally under attack if it hasn't met the spending target — a violation of the core NATO commitment to collective defence, known as Article 5. The president generated even more uncertainty Tuesday when he said his commitment to mutual defence 'depends on your definition' of the NATO treaty's guarantee. On Wednesday, however, after the agreement on five per cent was reached, Trump was asked to clarify his stance on Article 5. 'I stand with it. That's why I'm here,' Trump said. 'If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here.' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said he had no doubt about the U.S. commitment to NATO's collective defence. The Canadian official who briefed reporters on background said Trump said nothing to contradict the principle of collective defence during the leaders' meeting. 3) We don't know what counts Carney said he can't list at this point the weapons and other military equipment Canada will purchase to reach the 3.5 per cent benchmark by 2035. He said that's because technology keeps evolving and it's not clear how quantum tech will affect future cyber threats. Carney pointed to the huge role drones have played in Ukraine's defence — weapons that have become more sophisticated even as their costs have dropped. 'The world is changing quite rapidly — we all know that — in terms of the threats, the nature of warfare. And defence is also changing quite rapidly,' he said. 4) Build, baby, build When asked about the 1.5 per cent target for military-adjacent spending, the government official who briefed reporters said it could include projects that have dual commercial and military functions, such as roads. It could cover major projects such as the Arctic ports Carney wants to build using the fast-track powers in Bill C-5 — legislation that has come in for criticism over its wide scope and the speed at which it passed through the House of Commons. The official said Ottawa will try to make the case that projects like upgrades to rail infrastructure support national or economic security. Carney has said work to access critical minerals for allies could count toward the 1.5 per cent target — and so could a lot of other things on which Canada is already spending money. 'We're going to do a more proper accounting of that,' he said. 'We have to show that, and we have to be deliberate and strategic about it.' 5) Canada not the only laggard Canada isn't the only country under pressure to meet the new NATO spending target. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez claimed on Sunday that Spain had reached a deal with NATO excluding it from the updated spending target. Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico suggested Tuesday that his country might be better off embracing neutrality, saying the new target would amount to an 'absolutely absurd' share of his government's spending. Yet both countries approved the new target, as did Italy, which also had expressed reservations about the new goal. France, the U.K., the Netherlands and Germany all had committed to the five per cent goal before the meeting, as had NATO members closer to Russia. Rutte warned Monday that no country can opt out of the target. He said progress made toward the new target will be reviewed in four years. 6) Sacrifices? Not yet Earlier this month, as he announced Canada would meet NATO's previous spending target of two per cent, Carney said hitting the target 'will require ambition, collaboration and yes, on occasion, sacrifice.' But he changed his message Wednesday. When asked what sacrifices Canada will make, Carney insisted that higher defence spending will spur economic growth. 'We're not at a trade-off, we're not at sacrifices in order to do those — these will be net-additive,' he said. 'Those trade-offs happen towards the end of the decade, into the next decade.' 7) Back to the future Canada's defence spending hasn't reached five per cent of GDP since the 1950s. It hasn't even been above two per cent since 1990, despite the fact that the two per cent target has been the NATO standard since 2014. NATO estimates that Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. In 2014, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence. Carney has said that five per cent of GDP would mean a $150 billion defence budget for Canada. Not everyone loves the focus on the spending target. 'The metric is stupid,' Canada's former ambassador to NATO Kerry Buck told a panel on June 4, calling it 'a club to bash you over the head.' She said the target 'carries a lot of political weight' but shouldn't distract from the need to invest in Canada's defence by spending on both the military and diplomacy. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
