logo
Ukraine's troops dying over US aid cut-off, say soldiers on front line

Ukraine's troops dying over US aid cut-off, say soldiers on front line

Telegraph05-03-2025

Ukrainian soldiers are dying because of Donald Trump's decision to end military aid to Ukraine, front-line troops have told The Telegraph.
Soldiers revealed how they are feeling the pressure of dwindling American supplies and the looming summer months, when battles usually become more ferocious, and fear they have lost any remaining initiative.
But their view on the war has become even more pessimistic following President Trump's announcement on Wednesday that the US would cease to provide intelligence to Ukraine, and morale is dangerously low.
'We are not the ones advancing over the last few months,' said combat medic Slava, 27, speaking from a village on the border between Dnipropetrovsk and Donetsk regions.
'It's sad to say, but we don't have initiative on the battlefield any more.'
US support is a crucial component of Ukraine's ability to defend itself against Russian missiles and launch long-range strikes.
Intelligence from Washington, meanwhile, has proved vital not just for Ukraine's ability to attack deep-lying Russian positions or defend its own, but also in protecting civilians.
'I am going to say honestly how it is: everything is bad and it's going to be worse, but we need to keep working and pushing,' said Artem – not his real name – a 30-year-old medic who wished to remain anonymous for safety reasons.
Artem, who ferries injured soldiers to and from the front lines, said that he had noticed a '20 per cent' increase in casualties in recent weeks.
'I think that the number will rapidly grow even more,' he added. 'On top of this it is getting warmer. Better weather conditions means a higher intensity of fighting.'
The White House said on Wednesday that it would consider restoring military aid if President Zelensky returned to the negotiating table.
It was later reported that Mr Zelensky had agreed to further peace talks with the Trump administration after Washington ceased its sharing of battlefield intelligence.
But those serving on the front lines in Donetsk said even if the aid resumes, it could be too little, too late to hold off further Russian advances.
'The front line is not stable any more. It is not a line, but a zigzag, which makes it more difficult to defend,' said Slava.
' Drones are the main issue. It is impossible to drive to evacuation points often and impossible to stop driving to give a patient the full care they need.'
'I want the world to know that more people are dying because of it,' said Artem, referring to the dwindling US support.
Slava added that now is 'not the time' to suspend the sharing of intelligence, saying that the move was a 'gamble' with the fate of her country.
'It's not the time to appease the enemy. This step shows once again that the Republicans are for Russia.'
According to Artem, the intensity on the battlefield has become increasingly ferocious since the end of US aid.
'The workload is absolutely insane. I have been in touch with other medics and everyone is saying they are overwhelmed,' he said. 'We all have an empty look in our eyes because of everything.'
Aleksander, a 34-year-old soldier who has served on the front line for three years with no rotation, said morale was running low.
'Honestly, the morale situation is tough in the third year, but we are holding on. I did not go to fight for just anyone. I went for my family.'
On Wednesday, Mr Zelensky said he wants to see ' an end to the war once and for all ' and agreed to return to the negotiation table.
But Artem said that any deal with Russia that does not acknowledge the damage inflicted on Ukraine by Moscow's armies would be a mockery of those who died defending their country.
'In that case I would wonder what it was all for,' he said. 'Freedom is not free.'
Those serving on the front lines vowed to The Telegraph that they would keep fighting until a deal is agreed that they believe is fair to their country.
'There is no other way for us. It's either we keep fighting, or we cease existing,' said Slava.
Aleksander said that although Ukraine's prospects look bleak, its soldiers have managed to pull through before.
'I want to say that as long as this war continues, we have a single chance to win – because we may never get another one,' he said.
'The Russians thought they would take Kyiv in three days, but they failed, and now this has been going on for three years. We need to get through this period.'
Slava expressed fears that Ukraine is now 'the country that stops the overflow of Russian influence' and wondered what a deal that favours Russia could mean for Europe.
'Once our defence is destroyed, the rest of Europe is next. Russia will never stop.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's policies could have a major impact on your credit score. Here's how
Trump's policies could have a major impact on your credit score. Here's how

The Independent

time5 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's policies could have a major impact on your credit score. Here's how

Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more President Donald Trump returned to the White House this January with a flurry of sweeping orders – some of which may impact Americans' credit scores. Trump and his allies are set on enacting his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which would add trillions to the country's already sizable deficit and drive up interest rates, producing large-scale macroeconomic repercussions. Financial markets have already warned of the rising debt, with Moody's cutting its pristine 'Aaa' U.S. credit rating, which could take even further hits if the deficit continues to rise. To help pay for the bill, Republicans are looking to make cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs, without which, more Americans are likely to go into medical debt. Some 15 million Americans with medical debt may suffer even greater consequences of Trump's policies after his administration paused a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule that would ban the inclusion of medical debt on credit reports. As of now, medical debt can be included in credit scores and a significant amount of medical bills can drag down a credit score. A lower credit score means a person appears to be a bigger risk to a lender, such as a bank. That could lead to higher interest rates on loans, such as for a car or a home. open image in gallery President Donald Trump's spending bill will have far-reaching macroeconomic repercussions and likely impact Americans' credit scores. ( AP ) A Biden-era rule would have removed $49 million in medical debt from credit score records, but new leadership at CFPB appointed by Trump is attempting to reverse its course, NPR reported. In addition to the complete switch in its stance, the CFPB joined forces with plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit trying to stop the Biden ban. The rule has since been stuck in limbo, with Judge Sean Jordan from Texas' Eastern District federal court twice ordering a stay, delaying the rule's new start date until the end of July. The outcome of the lawsuit will have tremendous financial implications for millions of Americans whose medical debt has negatively impacted their credit scores. Meanwhile, consumer advocates have been speaking out on behalf of the medical debt rule, worried abandoning it would take away necessary consumer protections. "I'm disappointed for the 15 million Americans who have medical bills on their credit reports and have to suffer the consequences of poor credit scores because of it," Patricia Kelmar, senior director of health care campaigns at the U.S. PIRG Education Fund, told USA Today. open image in gallery Trump-appointed CFPB leaders is looking to reverse a Biden-era rule that would ban the inclusion of medical debt on credit reports. ( Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ) In the lawsuit filed in April, CFPB along with plaintiffs, the Consumer Data Industry Association and the Cornerstone Credit Union League, asked the judge to abandon the medical debt rule 'because it exceeds the bureau's statutory authority.' "We believe that Congress is the only one who can act on this and determine whether or not it can be on the credit report," Dan Smith, CEO and president of the Consumer Data Industry Association, told NPR. "Our intention here is to protect the credit reporting system. To ensure that it is as complete and accurate as possible," he said. In the lawsuit, the groups also note that the three largest credit bureaus - Experian, TransUnion and Equifax – no longer list paid medical debts, unpaid medical debts less than a year old and medical debts less than $500. Americans' credit scores may also see some changes thanks to a proposal from Trump that would cap credit card interest rates at 10 percent – a significant reduction from the current average interest rate of about 21 percent. Lower rates mean people would be able to pay back credit card bills quicker, and improve their credit scores by having less debt. The proposal was touted as a solution to the debt many Americans owe due to high credit card interest rates, Newsweek reported. open image in gallery Americans held $45 billion more in credit card debt in 2024 than in 2023. ( Getty Images/iStockphoto ) Americans held $1.21 trillion in credit card debt as of December 2024 – an increase of $45 billion from September 2024, per New York Fed data. Data also shows that 7.18 percent of U.S. credit card debt is in serious delinquency, likely causing many credit scores to take a serious downward spiral. Following Trump's campaign promise, Reps Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Ny) and Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla) introduced legislation to cap credit card interest rates at a maximum of 10 percent. The measure would take the financial burden away from consumers, especially those with high-interest debt. The cap would last until January 1, 2031, according to the bill.

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary

South Wales Guardian

time22 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary

Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Mr Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one back-and-forth, Mr Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer when Representative Adam Smith asked whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defence Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Mr Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. Representative Mike Turner asked: 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' As Mr Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Mr Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Mr Hegseth responded. Time and again, officials pressed Mr Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead,' Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a US ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the US, said on Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Mr Hegseth danced around the direct question from Mr Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Mr Smith said. Mr Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for US strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other US leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with representatives. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Mr Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed. That became a quick trap, as Mr Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Mr Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Mr Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Mr Moulton then asked Mr Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Mr Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store