Strikes didn't destroy Iran nuclear programme: intel report
A preliminary US intelligence assessment has determined that US strikes over the weekend on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back Tehran's programme by only a matter of months, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.
The initial report was prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's main intelligence arm and one of 18 US intelligence agencies, said two of the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss classified matters.
The classified assessment is at odds with the statements of President Donald Trump and high-ranking US officials - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They have said the weekend strikes, which used a combination of bunker-busting bombs and more conventional weapons, essentially eliminated Iran's nuclear programme.
Trump's administration on Tuesday told the UN Security Council that its weekend strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities had "degraded" Iran's nuclear programme, short of Trump's earlier assertion that the facilities had been "obliterated."
Asked for comment, the White House pointed to a statement by spokesperson Karoline Leavitt to CNN, which first reported the assessment, that the "alleged" conclusion was "flat-out wrong."
"Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration," she said.
A US official who read the assessment noted that it contained a number of caveats and 'ifs' and said a more refined report was expected in the coming days and weeks.
Analysts said that, if the assessment was based on satellite imagery, the extent of damage to the deeply buried Fordow uranium enrichment facility would not necessarily be revealed.
Trump has said the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies it is seeking such a weapon and says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.
Hegseth on Sunday said that the strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear ambitions, while Trump said Iran's crucial nuclear sites had been "completely and fully obliterated".
Assessing the damage at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites is expected to be a difficult task, and the DIA is not the only agency tasked with the job. One source said the assessment was not universally accepted and had generated significant disagreement.
A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the US did not know the extent of the damage yet.
Still, the initial assessment indicated the strikes may not have been nearly as successful as the Trump administration has claimed.
HEGSETH REITERATES STANCE
One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and in fact the country's nuclear programme may have been set back only a month or two.
The Pentagon disputed the notion that the damage to Iran's nuclear programme was minor, though it did not dispute that the DIA assessment exists.
"Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons," Hegseth said in a statement provided to Reuters.
"Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target—and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission."
Initial military assessments can change as more information comes to light and it is not uncommon for opinions to vary across different US intelligence agencies.
Democrats have previously said Trump's claims that the weekend strikes eliminated or seriously set back Iran's nuclear program were not yet backed by evidence.
"There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear programme was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed," House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Monday.
Classified briefings on the matter for members of the House of Representatives and Senate were cancelled on Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says Trump 'exaggerated' impact of US strikes on nuclear sites
This image grab taken from footage broadcast by Iran's IRIB news on 26 June shows the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic Ayatollah Ali Khamenei addressing the nation. Photo: AFP Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says US President Donald Trump "exaggerated" the impact of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites , in his first appearance since a ceasefire in the war with Israel took hold. In a statement and a televised speech carried by state media, he hailed his country's "victory" over Israel and vowed never to surrender to the United States, while claiming that Washington had been dealt a "slap" after striking Iranian nuclear sites. Khamenei's remarks come two days after a ceasefire ended a 12-day war between Iran and Israel, the foes' deadliest and most destructive confrontation in history. It also follows a stinging row in the United States over the actual extent of the damage inflicted by American strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites during the conflict. "The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration," Khamenei said. The United States "has gained nothing from this war," he said, adding that American strikes "did nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear facilities. "The Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America," he said, a reference to Iran's missile launch targeting the largest US base in the Middle East. "I want to congratulate the great Iranian nation... for its victory over the fallacious Zionist regime," he added, claiming that Israel had "almost collapsed" because of Iran's strikes. Both Iran and Israel had already claimed they won, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailing on Tuesday a "historic victory" for Israel. In the United States, leaked intelligence this week opened up a Pandora's box of accusations and counter-claims over the extent of the damage caused by the strikes. Later on Thursday (local time), US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is due to offer a fresh assessment of the attacks. After waves of Israeli attacks on nuclear and military sites and retaliatory missile fire from Iran since 13 June, the United States bombed three key Iranian atomic facilities. An initial classified assessment, first reported by CNN, was said to have concluded that the strikes did not destroy key components and that Iran's nuclear programme was set back only months at most. Another key question raised by experts is whether Iran, preparing for the strike, moved out some 400 kilograms of enriched uranium -- which could now be hidden elsewhere in the vast country. The US administration has hit back furiously, with Trump saying the attack "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities, including the key site of Fordo buried inside a mountain, and that it had set the programme back by "decades". Trump said that Hegseth, whom he dubbed "war" secretary, would hold a news conference at 8am (1200 GMT) on Thursday to "fight for the dignity of our great American pilots". CIA chief John Ratcliffe said in a statement on Wednesday that "several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years". The Israeli military said it had delivered a "significant" blow to Iran's nuclear sites but that it was "still early" to fully assess the damage. Netanyahu announced that "we have thwarted Iran's nuclear project". "And if anyone in Iran tries to rebuild it, we will act with the same determination, with the same intensity, to foil any attempt," he said. Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told Al Jazeera that "nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure". After the war derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope "for a comprehensive peace agreement". Trump told reporters that Israel and Iran were "both tired, exhausted", before going on to say that talks were planned with Iran next week. "We may sign an agreement. I don't know," he added. Iran has systematically denied seeking a nuclear weapon while defending its "legitimate rights" to the peaceful use of atomic energy. It has also said it was willing to return to nuclear negotiations with Washington. The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran's health ministry said. Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to official figures. A state funeral will be held on Saturday in Tehran for top commanders and nuclear scientists killed in the war. - AFP
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Iran's Khamenei to address nation after ceasefire with Israel
Iranian state media said it will air on Thursday a video message from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has not delivered a public statement since a ceasefire ended Iran's 12-day war with Israel earlier this week. 'The third video message by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei addressed to the
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Luxon Departs NATO Summit After Meeting With Ukraine's Zelensky
The prime minister said his two days' attendance at the NATO summit was worthwhile for New Zealand, calling the alliance an important partner and praising commitments to defence spending and supporting Ukraine. At the summit in The Hague, the alliance's 32 European and North American countries agreed to increase their defence spending to 5 percent of GDP within a decade. Participants also agreed to an "ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty - that an attack on one is an attack on all", easing European fears that US President Donald Trump was wavering on that commitment. The final communique followed days of lavish praise from NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, in the hope Trump - who had been sceptical of the alliance - would not derail the summit. At a news conference on Wednesday morning (local time), Rutte went as far as saying "sometimes Daddy needs to use strong language," when asked about Trump's expletive-laden quip at Israel and Iran on Tuesday. But the deference seemed to work. After the summit, Trump confirmed his support for the alliance. "I left here differently," he told a news conference. "I left here saying that these people really love their countries, it's not a rip-off and we're here to help them protect their country." New Zealand is not a NATO member, so while the alliance's leaders were meeting in an auditorium in The Hague, Luxon was meeting with other partners including the EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and Australian deputy prime minister Richard Marles. He then held a bilateral meeting with Ukraine President Volodomyr Zelensky. "I think he's feeling incredibly supported," Luxon said after the meeting. "I think, you know, this is a big win for Ukraine as well. Because clearly there'll be a big investment here that's been committed to, and a significant amount of that money will go into Ukraine ultimately." There had been concern that support for Ukraine could be diluted compared to previous NATO summits, particularly with Trump's past antipathy towards Zelensky. But the final communique included a line promising further support to Ukraine, noting that its "security contributes to ours". However, it stopped short of directly condemning Russia. PM meets with IP4 allies After that meeting, Rutte met with Luxon, Marles and the foreign ministers of Japan and South Korea for a gathering of a grouping that's been dubbed the Indo-Pacific 4, or IP4. "We have that relationship and the Pacific countries … not because we want to extend NATO to the Indo-Pacific, but because we have friends in the Indo-Pacific," he said. "There is a lot of use and importance in making joint analysis of the security threats facing us here, and what is happening in the Indo-Pacific knowing that these two areas, these two theatres, are getting more interconnected." Luxon said that collaboration could ultimately make things more cost-effective for New Zealand. "As we go through our asset upgrades and our defence capability being built out, there's a real need for us to plug into some of those procurement exercises as well so we can get more value for the money that we're spending," he said. "I think there's huge opportunities in that." The prime minister has spent two days walking the corridors and halls of this venue which has taken over half the centre of The Hague, with helicopters circling above and snipers perched on rooftops. He held formal meetings with 11 leaders - including breakfast with the new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney - and had brief interactions with many more on the sidelines or at a state dinner at the Dutch King's palace on Tuesday. 'Historic' NATO meeting "It's been a pretty historic NATO in the regard of a commitment to spending, which has been really important," Luxon said." Throughout, Luxon has tried to stress that any pressure that had been placed upon NATO members to increase defence spending did not apply to New Zealand. The prime minister said the fact everyone had increased their spending underscored the "existential threat to democracy" posed by the war in Ukraine. "There's a crisis unifying this region very, very quickly. That has focused the minds and actually made all the countries come together to make this commitment, which is no mean feat." He described the countries as having mature MMP environments with multi-party coaltions, and being a coalition themselves as a NATO block. "To be able to pull all that together, to focus, to get to the outcome and the commitment in place, is really important." Luxon said the war in Ukraine came up in every conversation he had had. In his meeting with Indo-Pacific 4 grouping, representatives had reaffirmed support for Ukraine and committed to working together to make purchasing defence equipment more efficient. "As we all are increasing our defence spending, we don't want to see the price of defence assets going up and defense companies making increased margins." He said it was a "real opportunity" for countries to work together on procurement, and get efficiency, scale and interoperability into the purchases. In particular, he raised the concern that an increase in defence spending would result in huge amounts of money going toward the defence industry. "Because each country comes with its own bespoke asks and they want some customisation, some difference, you end up paying for that." Luxon said their conversations included a desire to work together to get a "maximum return" to "genuinely upgrade your capability." "You just don't want to pay more for delivering the same capability." He wouldn't charactise New Zealand as being at the "back of the queue" of the arms race, given a step up in the country's budget as well. He also indicated the developing defence industry in New Zealand that could benefit by contributing to European procurement. He said there was a connection between the Euro-Atlantic and Pacific region, and affirming that was also about differentiating themselves from the countries supporting Russian in the war against Ukraine. Luxon said that highlighted the separation in simple terms. He also said he'd raised with China the need to use any influence it has over North Korea and Russia to reduce harm in the war against Ukraine. Luxon spoke about a "coordinated" and "concerted" effort bilaterally by "those four powers" Iran, China, North Korea and Russia "against the West."
