logo
Marjorie Taylor Greene Threatens Funds For 'Communist' NPR And PBS At Hearing

Marjorie Taylor Greene Threatens Funds For 'Communist' NPR And PBS At Hearing

Yahoo26-03-2025

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) accused the executives of NPR and PBS of pushing 'some of the most radical left positions,' and 'brainwashing and trans-ing children' while using federal funds to pursue 'their progressive, or Communist, agenda' during a Wednesday hearing on Capitol Hill.
'NPR and PBS have increasingly become radical leftwing echo chambers,' she said, going on to suggest the federal funds granted to both outlets be cut back.
Greene serves as the chairwoman of the House Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency, which was created this year to support billionaire Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Her hearing comes at a time when President Donald Trump, a longtime critic of press freedoms, has ramped up his attacks.
NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger listened with neutral expressions throughout.
At the hearing, Greene and her Republican colleagues argued that the radio network and public broadcaster were no longer relevant due to the popularity of podcasts and YouTube. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) pushed back, saying that platforms like YouTube were filled with ads that can be inappropriate for children, whereas PBS is not.
Garcia also used his 5-minute time allotment to have some fun.
'The American people want to know: Is Elmo now, or has he ever been, a member of the Communist Party of the United States?' he asked Kerger of the 'Sesame Street' character. She said no.
'Are you sure, Ms. Kerger? Because he is red,' Garcia replied.
He went on to grill the PBS executive on Bert and Ernie, two other puppets accused of being part of an 'extreme homosexual agenda.'
'They're friends. They're supportive of each other. Now, that might be triggering to our chairwoman and some on this committee, [and] perhaps that's also why we're here today,' Garcia said.
Garcia and other Democrats argued that Musk's activities should be scrutinized, not those of public broadcasters.
Much of the funding for NPR and PBS comes from individual donors and corporate sponsors, but both receive additional funds from the federal government. The outlets were formed under the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a publicly funded nonprofit that receives an approximately $500 million appropriation from Congress each year.
Maher said specifically that NPR received around $11 million from the federal government last year, which was primarily spent to maintain the broadcast systems used by public radio stations nationwide.
She fielded the most accusations of bias from Republicans on the panel. She said that she regretted posting fiery political tweets about conservatives in America before taking her job at NPR last year, and agreed when Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) suggested NPR's editors should include more Republicans.
Kerger highlighted the broad public support for PBS, known primarily for its children's programming.
'For over two decades, the American public has consistently ranked public television as one of the best investments the government makes,' she said in her opening statement.
At one point, Greene accused PBS of featuring a drag queen — a 'monster,' as the congresswoman put it — in an educational video, but Kerger quickly corrected her. The video was never aired on PBS, but rather briefly uploaded by a New York member station by mistake. It was created in partnership with PBS for the New York City Department of Education.
Other notable moments included Green's mispronunciation of the national motto, 'E Pluribus Unum;' Rep. James Comer's (R-Ky.) incredulous reaction to the idea NPR would have 'editorial standards' because he thought the term referred to political opinions; and Comer's acknowledgment that HuffPost has the right to exist.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans Flee Questions About the Cost of Trump's $45M Birthday Tank Parade
Republicans Flee Questions About the Cost of Trump's $45M Birthday Tank Parade

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans Flee Questions About the Cost of Trump's $45M Birthday Tank Parade

Republican lawmakers are using every trick in the book to avoid attending Trump's extravagant military parade—or commenting on its estimated $45 million price tag. The event in Washington, D.C., on Saturday is being billed as a celebration of the Army's 250th anniversary, which just so happens to coincide with the president's 79th birthday. Critics have derided the parade—which will feature thousands of soldiers and 28 tanks—as unnecessary and wasteful. Some Republican lawmakers, it seems, don't want to talk about the colossal expense to taxpayers of making Trump's long-standing dream for a big military parade come true. According to Huffington Post, almost a dozen GOP Senators tried to avoid answering simple questions—if they planned to attend, and if they're comfortable with the estimated $45 million cost—when asked on Wednesday. Utah Sen. Mike Lee told the publication he 'might be' attending, before saying of the parade's price tag: 'Uh, I have not looked into the price.' Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer said she is going to be out of town and then dodged the question about cost by getting into an elevator, according to Huffington Post. North Carolina Sen. Ted Budd, meanwhile, responded to a question about the price with eight seconds of silence before similarly escaping via an elevator. When asked about his comfort level with the costs of Trump's military parade, Indiana Sen. Todd Young spoke about unrelated legislation. When confronted over the fact he didn't answer the question, he reportedly snapped back: 'I answered the question I wanted to answer!' Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas told the publication simply: 'No comment.' It comes as just seven out of 50 congressional Republicans surveyed by Politico said they plan to stay in the capital for the parade. One of the few GOP senators willing to outright break ranks with the president was Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who compared the parade to similar displays in autocratic states such as North Korea and described it as beneath the United States. 'I've never been a big fan of goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' he said. 'So if you asked me, I wouldn't have done it. We were always different than the images you saw of the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that.' Speaking about the cost of the parade in a May 4 interview on Meet the Press, Trump said the price of putting it on was 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' 'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world,' Trump said at the time. 'We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it.'

Trump Insists He's ‘Not a King' as Massive Protests Loom
Trump Insists He's ‘Not a King' as Massive Protests Loom

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Insists He's ‘Not a King' as Massive Protests Loom

President Donald Trump was forced onto the defensive when asked about the 'No Kings Day' protests planned for this weekend, saying he 'doesn't feel like a king at all.' The 'No Kings' movement is set to stage a series of high-profile demonstrations across the country this weekend, set to coincide with the lavish military parade Trump has thrown himself in Washington to celebrate his 79th birthday. 'No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance,' the group wrote on its website. 'From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism—and show the world what democracy really looks like.' When asked his thoughts on the protests during a press conference on Thursday, Trump responded: 'I don't feel like a king, I have to go through hell to get stuff approved. 'A king would say, 'I'm not going to get this.' A king would have never had the California mandate to even be talking, he wouldn't have to call up [Speaker] Mike Johnson and say, 'fellas you got to pull this off' and after years we get it done,' he added, eliciting laughter from Republican lawmakers and political allies in the room. 'No, no we're not a king. We're not a king at all, thank you very much,' he said, using the royal 'we' to emphasize his point. Trump has, of course, likened himself to a monarch on at least one occasion since his return to the White House, posting 'CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!' on Truth Social back in February. The official White House account emphasized his point shortly afterwards with an AI-generated fake magazine cover of the president wearing a crown, accompanied by the caption 'Long Live the King.' Following the death of Pope Francis, Trump also joked to reporters that 'I'd like to be pope,' following the remarks with another AI-generated picture of himself in papal attire, which drew the ire of Catholics worldwide. Saturday's military parade, typically associated with autocratic strongman states such as Russia and North Korea, coupled with the deployment of active-duty Marines and thousands of National Guardsmen to Los Angeles in defiance of the state's governor, has proved to be the tipping point for the No Kings movement, as well as a host of other protest groups who plan to demonstrate against it. Alongside the No Kings demonstrations will be a series of parallel protests by a group called 'Kick Out the Clowns,' who plan to wear clown costumes and hold street circuses to 'reflect the absurdity of the MAGA regime.' Earlier this week, Trump warned that anyone who planned to disrupt his military parade will be met with 'very heavy force.' 'We're in an existential crisis with respect to our democracy and our Constitution right now, in the face of a wannabe dictator in the White House,' said John Bonifaz, a constitutional lawyer and president of Free Speech for People, who is taking part in the Saturday's protest. 'That's why it's important that we all show up to these events to demonstrate that we will continue to stand up for our democracy and our constitution at this critical moment in history.'

Trump order allows Japan-based Nippon to invest in US Steel despite security concerns
Trump order allows Japan-based Nippon to invest in US Steel despite security concerns

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump order allows Japan-based Nippon to invest in US Steel despite security concerns

The Brief President Trump has reversed his own opposition to a "partnership" between U.S. Steel and Japan-based Nippon Steel. Nippon has been trying to purchase U.S. Steel, but both the Trump and Biden administrations opposed the deal over national security concerns. President Donald Trump has paved the way for Japan-based Nippon Steel to invest in U.S. steel, reversing his own opposition to the deal. Trump signed an executive order Friday allowing for a Nippon-U.S. Steel "partnership," as long as Nippon adheres to a "national security agreement" from the federal government. What we know U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a "golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement from both companies said. What we don't know Trump's order didn't outline the terms of the national security agreement, and the companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. What they're saying "We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again." Trump said Thursday that he would as president have "total control" of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. "We have a golden share, which I control," said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump said then that the deal would preserve "51% ownership by Americans." The backstory The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. Dig deeper The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided "credible evidence" that Nippon Steel "might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States," but such risks might be "adequately mitigated" by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. What's next Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. The Source This report includes information from The Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store